Search again
Publications
Mapping High-Impact Practices to Advising Research Briefs
Kinzie, J., Keup, J., Holmes, B. Hilliard, K.
National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 2024.
Mapping High-Impact Practices to Advising is a research brief series published by the National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition in collaboration with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) with grant funding from the Advising Success Network. This four-issue series explores a range of novel connections between advising and HIPs, elaborating on the multiple ways advising can be transformative in undergraduate education.
Full version
Can Shorter Surveys Motivate Nonrespondents to Respond? A Randomized Controlled Experiment with College Students
Sarraf, Shimon
Atlanta, GA: , 2024.
During the spring 2023, NSSE conducted a randomized controlled experiment with nonrespondents to assess the impact of administering shorter surveys on response rates and question completion. This poster documents the experiment's major findings and concusions.
Full version
Expanding our knowledge of LGBQ+ faculty
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., Merckle, R., & Chamis, E.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, , , 2023.
Most research about queerness at colleges and universities has been aimed at examining the student experience. Research on queer faculty often has quantitative limitations, has grown outdated, or is qualitative in nature, but from this work, we know that the experiences of queer faculty are often difficult. Through a large-scale, multi-institution, multiyear investigation of LGBQ+ faculty, this study gives an overview of the academic lives of these understudied academics. We investigate who they are, what institutions employ them, and different ways they contribute to undergraduate education. With this story, we hope to strengthen the voices of qualitative studies and encourage higher education to think more broadly about notions of diversity and identity.
Full version
How do university faculty feel about grading? Insights from a control-value theory perspective
Schwab, C., Frenzel, A. C., BrckaLorenz, A., Jaeger, J., & Stupnisky, R.
Studies in Higher Education, , , 2023.
Research on faculty emotions is scarce, despite their evident relevance for faculty well-being, higher education quality, and student outcomes. The present studies aimed to investigate six discrete emotions (enjoyment, pride, boredom, anxiety, anger, frustration) faculty may experience during grading. Study 1 compared faculty emotions for grading with emotions for research and teaching (US sample, N??=??1226). Mean comparisons showed that grading generally elicited less positive and more negative emotions than research and teaching. Study 2 further examined faculty emotions for grading through the lens of control-value theory, by identifying emotion-specific appraisal patterns in two countries (US, n??=??244 and Germany, n??=??201). Multiple linear regressions revealed that the most consistent predictor for grading emotions across both samples was cost, in terms of the extent to which faculty perceived grading as a thankless task that kept them away from more meaningful tasks. Our findings further point to the important role of faculty??student relationships and faculty members?? confidence in their grading ability for eliciting grading emotions. This study extends existing research on emotions in higher education by considering grading as a relevant emotion-inducing task, and by applying control-value theory to a new context in two countries, thereby contributing to the question of this theory??s generalizability. Practical implications of our findings entail that universities should aim to improve the circumstances of grading and equip their faculty with the means to handle their grading duties well, to optimize their somewhat worrisome emotional experiences in this context.
Full version
International students?? career preparation
Oktafiga, D., Zhu, Y. & BrckaLorenz, A.
In M. Mohamad & J. Boyd International Student Support and Engagement in Higher Education: Exploring Innovative Practices in Campus, Academic and Professional Support Services Routledge, 2023.
International students (ISs) are a significant and growing student group with unique needs. We use 2015??2019 National Survey of Student Engagement data that includes over 4,000 ISs, senior undergraduate college students in the United States from other countries studying at more than 450 colleges and universities. We describe these ISs?? future career plans, how prepared they are in terms of career-related skills and abilities, and how internships and other career preparation experiences relate to these skills and abilities. Findings indicate that ISs?? country of origin, major, and participation in internships play an important role in understanding students?? confidence in the use of selected skills and abilities. We will provide detailed information about the IS landscape and the benefits that career services would bring to them, with implications for practice and future research that include finding effective ways to balance ISs?? academic and social lives.
Full version
Teaching development opportunities & faculty teaching practice at four-year institutions
Fassett, K., Hiller, S. C., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
College Teaching, 71(3), 165-175, 2023.
To contextualize the myriad of teaching development efforts available to faculty, this large-scale study of nearly 4,500 faculty at four-year institutions broadens our understandings of who participates in teaching development practices, how their participation relates to their institutional environments, and how their participation connects to their use of effective teaching practices. Results show some notable patterns by academic field, social identity, the type of courses taught, and institutional characteristics. The overview of educational development participation in this study gives strength to positive findings from smaller-scale research studies and provides a solid base for more specific studies of these practices.
Full version
Understanding international student experiences and career preparation challenges through COVID-19
Zhu, Y., Gopal, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
In A.W. Wiseman, C. Matherly, & M. Crumley-Effinger Internationalization and Imprints of the Pandemic on Higher Education Worldwide Emerald Publishing, 2023.
College support and career development are two significant challenges international students encountered during the pandemic, and these two factors have an enormous impact on the internationalization of higher education. The data for this study came from the 2020 to 2021 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that includes over 500 international students enrolled at over 120 four-year colleges and universities in the United States. These students specifically responded to an open-ended item asking them what they think institutions should do better to assist their academic achievement and career goals. This study takes an in-depth look at international students?? qualitative responses about ways that institutions could better support their preparation for future careers. Using theories of cultural wealth and ecological systems to understand the unique experiences of international students during the pandemic offers an opportunity to help students not just in times of crisis but more holistically as they continue to pursue their higher education experiences in the United States. Ultimately, the authors provide recommendations for higher education professionals working with international students to better support their students?? career development and overall college experience.
Full version
Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices: Research and Models for Achieving Equity, Fidelity, Impact, and Scale
Zilvinskis, J., Kinzie, J., Daday, J., O??Donnell, K & Vande Zande C.
Stylus, 2022.
Research shows that enriching learning experiences such as learning communities, service-learning, undergraduate research, internships, and senior culminating experiences ?? collectively known as High-Impact Practices (HIPs) ?? are positively associated with student engagement; deep, and integrated learning; and personal and educational gains for all students ?? particularly for historically underserved students, including first-generation students and racially minoritized populations. Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices is to provide examples from around the country of the ways educators are advancing equity, promoting fidelity, achieving scale, and strengthening assessment of their own local high-impact practices. Its chapters bring together the best current scholarship, methodologies, and evidence-based practices within the HIPs field, illustrating new approaches to faculty professional development, culture and coalition building, research and assessment, and continuous improvement that help institutions understand and extend practices with a demonstrated high impact.
Full version
Exploring the Influence of Course-Based Career Experiences and Faculty on Students?? Career Preparation
Kinzie, J. & Akuyz, F.
NACE JournalNACE Journal, 83(4), 23-31, 2022.
The effective preparation of college students for careers is an important college outcome. Yet, employers and the public increasingly feel that universities are not doing enough to prepare students for the workforce. This article features NSSE data to focus on courses, exploring the extent to which students are exposed to course-based career experiences using new evidence of college students?? career and workforce preparation. We explore facets of course-based career experiences, along with students?? perceptions of their career preparation outcomes, and the influence of interactions with faculty and advisers on their career plans.
Full version
Centering Black women faculty: Magnifying powerful voices
Priddie, C., Palmer, D., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
To Improve the Academy, 41(2), 96-127, 2022.
While much of the quantitative research on Black women faculty has taken a comparative approach to understanding their experiences, this study provides a counternarrative, centering their experiences as faculty. This large-scale, multi-institution glance at Black women faculty helps to give us an overview of these women across the country, looking at who they are, where they are, how they spend their time, and what they value in undergraduate education. This study allows us to strengthen various arguments made in qualitative studies of Black women faculty and amplify their perspectives and experiences. Furthermore, it reaffirms and reinvigorates the need for educational developers to practice intentional assessment of Black women faculty??s teaching, support the current teaching efforts of Black women faculty on their campus, and advocate for policy change centering the work of Black women faculty.
Full version
Delivering on the Promise of High-Impact Practices: A New Resource for Assessment
Zilvinskis, J., Kinzie, J., Daday, J., O??Donnell, K & Vande Zande C.
Assessment Update, 34(4), 1-2, 16, 2022.
Is a HIP Always a HIP? The Case of Learning Communities
Fosnacht, Kevin; Graham, Polly
Journal of Student Affairs Research and PracticeJournal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, , , 2021.
With the increasing adoption of learning communities, it is imperative to document their effectiveness. Using a large, longitudinal, multi-institutional dataset, we found that linked-learning communities positively impact students?? engagement and perceived gains. We also found that the estimated effect of learning communities varies widely across institutions on various measures. Some learning communities are very beneficial, while others have a negligible impact on students.
Full version
Elevating Student Voice in Assessment: Approaches to Using NSSE's Student Comments
Kinzie, Jillian; Silberstein, Samantha; Palmer, Dajanae
Assessment Update, 33(2), , 2021.
Full version
Linking Faculty Involvement in High-Impact Practices to First-Year Student Participation
Fassett, Kyle T. and BrckaLorenz, Allison
National Resource Center Research Brief, 2021(2), 1-4, 2021.
Tasked with developing, encouraging, and participating in highly impactful educational experiences, faculty serve in roles vital to first-year student success. Known for benefiting many students, high-impact practices assist institutions in promoting a variety of outcomes ranging from retention to civic engagement. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), we investigated the relationship between faculty emphasis and participation in high-impact practices with first-year student participation at over 80 diverse four year institutions. We found that faculty values for participation are positively related to student participation, but faculty involvement in more high-impact practices could decrease student participation. Administrators should consider ways to support their faculty in providing these experiences and to assess potential barriers for providing equitable quality high impact practices.
Full version
An Examination of Inclusivity and Support for Diversity in STEM Fields
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Haeger, Heather; Priddie, Christen
Journal for STEM Education Research, , , 2021.
The lack of diversity in STEM professions is an ongoing concern for the US both in terms of social justice and in having a globally competitive workforce. This study provides information for campus leaders to be proactive in considering a wide array of identities to meet the needs of students beyond attending to structural forms of diversity. Data from a large-scale, multi-institution study of students?? perceptions of inclusive coursework and institutional commitment to diversity in STEM fields furthers what we know about diversity in these majors. Results encourage campus leaders to additionally consider sexual orientation and disability status in conversations about diversity and to think about how culturally engaging and inclusive courses go beyond the content of the course.
Full version
Assessing intersectional experiences: Where to begin?
BrckaLorenz, A., & Kirnbauer, T.
Assessment in Practice, , , 2021.
Full version
Campus climate (college & university)
BrckaLorenz, A.
In K. K. Strunk & S. A. Shelton Encyclopedia of Queer Studies in Education Brill, 2021.
Expectations for and quality experiences in undergraduate research over time: Perspectives of students and faculty
Kinzie, J. & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Special Issue on Undergraduate Research, 21(1), 35-56, 2021.
Attention to undergraduate research (UGR) is not surprising given its widespread appeal and evidence of educational benefit. Tracking participation and identifying equity gaps in UGR are important markers of access to and equity in educationally beneficial experiences. Information about students?? exposure to elements of quality in UGR and how this corresponds to faculty perspectives and instructional practice can help inform efforts to advance and improve UGR. In this article, we use 7 years of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to explore the national landscape of UGR by examining the responses of 972,088 1st-year students who reported that they planned to participate in UGR before they graduated and the responses of 1,248,854 senior students who reported that they had done or were currently involved in a UGR experience. To complement our student perspectives, we present perspectives on faculty importance of and instructional practice in UGR with data from NSSE??s companion survey, the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, by examining the experiences of 106,000 faculty respondents. Our presentation of descriptive statistics provides a national overview of UGR participation by a variety of salient institutional and student characteristics, a broad summary of faculty involvement in UGR, and baseline data about students?? exposure to elements of high-impact UGR.
Full version
Honors college faculty support for high-impact practice participation
Miller, A., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), , 2021.
Much of the existing research on honors colleges or programs is focused on the student experience, with less information offered concerning the faculty perspective. This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing support for high-impact practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two experimental items about teaching honors courses. A series of ordinary least squares and binary logistic regression analyses suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more likely to supervise undergraduates on research and internships and to think that it is important for students to participate in learning communities, study abroad, and research with faculty. These findings are interpreted within the context of previous research and current theory, bridging knowledge from the fields of higher education and gifted education.
Full version
Teaching honors courses: Perceptions of engagement from the faculty perspective.
Miller, A., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(1), 3-27, 2021.
Research suggests that honors students are more likely to be engaged in some, but not all, aspects of the college experience, although there is less information available from the faculty perspective. This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing various engagement-related practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two items about teaching honors courses. A series of ordinary least squares regression analyses suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more likely to encourage engagement in the areas of student??faculty interaction, learning strategies, and collaborative learning, even after controlling for other demographic and institutional variables. These findings are considered within the context of existing research and theory, connecting knowledge from higher education and gifted education.
Full version
The COVID Pivot and Quality of the Undergraduate Experience: NSSE Pulse Project Report
National Survey of Student Engagement, , 2021.
The coronavirus upended all aspects of education. The 2020?21 academic year required rapid adaptation to unprecedented and unpredictable circumstances. Amidst these circumstances, it was especially important to understand students' experiences and support educators working to implement effective educational practices. In response to these challenges, NSSE offered a special fall 2020 survey at no charge (NSSE 2021 registration not required). The short online survey—NSSE Pulse—included selected questions from NSSE critical to persistence to help colleges and universities take the pulse of the undergraduate student experience and use results to diagnose shortcomings and strengths and to inform campus action.
Approximately 1.2 million bachelor's degree–seeking students attend the colleges and universities that participated in NSSE Pulse. These institutions reflect the diversity of U.S. bachelor's–granting colleges and universities with respect to institution type, public or private control, size, region, and locale. Eight headline findings are discussed in the NSSE Pulse Report, along with implications and recommendations for colleges and universities.
Full version
An Overlooked Factor? How Religion and Spirituality Influence Students' Perception of the Campus Environment
Fosnacht, K. & Broderick, C.
Journal of College and CharacterJournal of College and Character, 21(3), 186-203, 2020.
Postsecondary institutions are frequently forced to respond to discriminatory acts, including those against religious minorities. Such actions can create the perception of a hostile campus for students, which impinges on their learning and development. Research on the campus environment has traditionally focused on race and sex but has largely neglected other important aspects of students? identities like religion and spirituality. This study investigates how the religious/spiritual aspects of the campus environment influenced students? perceptions of the overall campus environment using data from a multi-institutional sample of first-year and senior undergraduates. The multivariate results show that the religious/spiritual dimensions of the campus environment account for a significant proportion of the variance in students? campus environmental perceptions.
Full version
How to reorient assessment and accreditation in the time of COVID-19 disruption
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Update, 32(4), 4-5, 2020.
Among the many issues facing higher education during COVID-19 is uncertainty about the status of student learning outcomes assessment and accreditation. Will necessary shifts in course assignments and assessments affect completion, particularly for those scheduled to graduate this year? Will a suspension (or slowdown) of program-level assessment put the institution out of compliance with state regulations or accreditation requirements? If accreditation visits are postponed, will the institution find its federal funding in jeopardy? All of these concerns are understandable, and it is good to have them aired and discussed. However, the disruptions caused by COVID-19 may also provide an occasion for some useful rethinking of assessment. What those disruptions underscore is that decisions about assessment and accreditation must, above all, be sensitive to current realities and do what is best for students and faculty. Rather than aiming for compliance, or sticking with the plan to ?just give students the exam and asterisk the results,? now is the time to prioritize what people need and embrace compassion-driven assessment, and reassess the fundamental goals of assessment. To help think about the issues at hand, I offer some practical suggestions for course- and program-level assessment and accreditation demands. Then I suggest we take advantage of this moment to make some meaningful improvements to assessment and accreditation.
Full version
Pick and Choose
Gonyea, Robert; Fosnacht, Kevin; Graham, Polly
Talking Stick, 37(5), , 2020.
Getting a roommate is one of the first milestones of a student?s campus experience. Is there a best way to manage this process and support students of color?
Full version
Information Literacy's Influence on Undergraduates' Learning and Development: Results from a Large Multi-institutional Study
Fosnacht, Kevin
College & Research Libraries, 81(2), 272-287, 2020.
This paper investigated the reliability and validity of the National Survey of Student Engagement's Experiences with Information Literacy module, an assessment instrument developed in collaboration with a group of instructional librarians. After identifying three information literacy?related factors in the module, it assessed the relationship between the factors and students' engagement in Higher-Order Learning and Reflective and Integrative Learning activities and students' perceived gains. The results from these analyses indicated that information literacy activities were positively and significantly correlated with student engagement and students' perceived gains.
Full version
NSSE's Quest for Quality: Seven Lessons in Designing a Better Survey
Gonyea, Robert M. and Sarraf, Shimon
Assessment UpdateAssessment Update, 32(2), 6-14, 2020.
In 20 years NSSE has learned much about how to manage a successful survey administration, and how to continuously improve the questionnaire, data collection tools, and reporting. This article includes seven lessons that may help assessment professionals improve their own surveys.
Full version
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) at Twenty
Ewell, P. and McCormick, A.C.
Assessment UpdateAssessment Update, 32(2), 1-16, 2020.
Full version
Twenty Years of NSSE Data Use: Assessment Lessons for the Collective Good
Kinzie, J. and Franklin, K.
Assessment UpdateAssessment Update, 32(2), 4-15, 2020.
Full version
Expectations for Engagement: What 1st-year Students and Transfers Say
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Washington, DC: , 2020.
Understanding entering student expectations is critical to assure that staff can align appropriate institutional resources for each student. This session will include how the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) provides comprehensive information about your entering first-year and transfer student?s prior academic experiences, as well as their expectations and beliefs regarding the upcoming academic year. Participants will learn how other institutions use BCSSE for academic advising, retention efforts, faculty and staff development, and other activities. Participants will be encouraged to share their campuses current practices and how BCSSE could facilitate best practices on their campus.
Full version
Examining the Meaning of Vague Quantifiers in Higher Education: How Often is "Often"?
Rocconi, L.M., Dumford, A.D., & Butler, B.
Research in Higher Education, 61, 229-247, 2020.
Researchers, assessment professionals, and faculty in higher education increasingly depend on survey data from students to make pivotal curricular and programmatic decisions. The surveys collecting these data often require students to judge frequency (e.g., how often), quantity (e.g., how much), or intensity (e.g., how strongly). The response options given for these questions are usually vague and include responses such as "never," "sometimes," and "often." However, the meaning that respondents give to these vague responses may vary. This study aims to determine the efficacy of using vague quantifiers in survey research. More specifically, the purpose of this study is to explore the meaning that respondents ascribe to vague response options and whether or not those meanings vary by student characteristics. Results from this study indicate a high degree of correspondence between vague and numeric response and suggest that students seem to adapt the meaning of "sometimes," "often," and "very often" based on the appropriate reference for the question. Overall, findings provide evidence of the utility and appropriateness of using vague response options. Some differences by student characteristics and the implications of these differences are discussed.
Full version
The Relationship of First-Year Residence Hall Roommate Assignment Policy with Interactional Diversity and Perceptions of the Campus Environment
Fosnacht, K., Gonyea, R. M., & Graham, P.
The Journal of Higher Education, , , 2020.
A heterogeneous student body is valued in part because diverse interactions among students help create educated and competent citizens and promote learning and development. Campus housing is a primary setting for diverse interactions as students navigate living with individuals who differ from themselves. This study investigated how the roommate assignment process influences interactional diversity and perceptions of the campus environment for first-year students living on campus, and if these relationships differ by race/ethnicity and national origin. On average, students whose roommates were assigned by the institution (as opposed to choosing their own roommates) did not interact with diverse others more often. At the same time, however, Asian, Black and multiracial students who were assigned roommates by the institution perceived a substantially less welcoming campus environment than their same-race peers who chose their roommates. This difference was not observed for White students.
Full version
Graduate Student Instructors, the Courses They Teach, and the Support They Value
Allison BrckaLorenz, Rong Wang, Thomas F. Nelson Laird
New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2020(163), 25-34, 2020.
This chapter presents a study exploring the diverse characteristics of Graduate Student Instructors (GSIs) employed at eight research universities in the United States and investigates the ways in which these characteristics impact the value GSIs place on types of professional development and support in teaching.
Full version
Teaching honors courses: Perceptions of engagement from the faculty perspective
Miller, A., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal of Advanced Academics, , , 2020.
Research suggests that honors students are more likely to be engaged in some, but not all, aspects of the college experience, although there is less information available from the faculty perspective. This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing various engagement-related practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two items about teaching honors courses. A series of ordinary least squares regression analyses suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more likely to encourage engagement in the areas of student?faculty interaction, learning strategies, and collaborative learning, even after controlling for other demographic and institutional variables. These findings are considered within the context of existing research and theory, connecting knowledge from higher education and gifted education.
Full version
The relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement
Hurtado, S. S., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Fosnacht, K.
Learning Communities Research and Practice, 8(1), 5, 2020.
Residential learning communities (RLCs) are residence hall environments designed to deliver academic and social benefits. For decades, many have argued RLCs are an effective means for increasing student success. Yet substantial changes in the defining characteristics of campus housing and student diversity have led to new questions about the impact of living on campus and the benefits of RLCs in particular. Consequently, we investigated the continued efficacy of RLCs as an effective educational practice. Using data from a diverse, multi-institution sample of first-year and sophomore students, this study provides insight into the relationships between RLC participation, student engagement, and perceived gains in learning.
Full version
The relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement
Hurtado, S.S., Gonyea, R.M., Graham, P. A., & Fosnacht, K.
Learning Communities Research and PracticeLearning Communities Research and Practice, 8(1), , 2020.
Residential learning communities (RLCs) are residence hall environments designed to deliver academic and social benefits. For decades, many have argued RLCs are an effective means for increasing student success. Yet substantial changes in the defining characteristics of campus housing and student diversity have led to new questions about the impact of living on campus and the benefits of RLCs in particular. Consequently, we investigated the continued efficacy of RLCs as an effective educational practice. Using data from a diverse, multi-institution sample of first-year and sophomore students, this study provides insight into the relationships between RLC participation, student engagement, and perceived gains in learning.
Full version
Reassessing disparities in online learner student engagement in higher education
Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A. C.
Educational Researcher, 49(1 January-February), 20–29, 2020.
Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the
literature on its connection with student engagement is sparse. Student engagement measures identify key aspects of the
learning process that can improve learning and outcomes like retention and achievement. The few studies investigating
the link between online learning and student engagement found positive benefits for online learners compared to face-to-face
learners in terms of perceived academic challenge, learning gains, satisfaction, and better study habits. On the other
hand, face-to-face learners reported higher levels of environment support, collaborative learning, and faculty interaction.
However, these studies did not effectively account for the differences in background characteristics like age, time spent
working or caring for dependents, and enrollment status. Further, they did not consider the increasingly large population
of students who enroll in both online and face-to-face courses. In our study, we used propensity score matching on the
2015 National Survey of Student Engagement data to account for the disparities in these groups? demographics variables.
After matching, we found that some of the previous literature?s differences diminish or disappear entirely. This suggests
differences in supportive environments and learning strategies have more to do with online student characteristics than
learning mode. However, online learning still falls well below other modes in terms of collaborative learning and interaction
with faculty.
Supporting LGBQ+ students with disabilities: Exploring the experiences of students living on campus
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K. T., & Hurtado, S. S
The Journal of College and University Student Housing, 46(3), 78–90, 2020.
Students with multiple oppressed identities, such as LGBQ+ students with disabilities, face a multitude of barriers on college campuses due to heterosexism and ableism, sometimes even from those in-group. This large-scale, multi-institution comparative quantitative study of LGBQ+ students with disabilities living on campus examines these students? experiences with belonging and discrimination. Guided by the Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity, we compare the experiences of students in the intersections of sexual and ability identities to guide housing and residence life practitioners in supporting students with complex identities. A series of chi-square (?2) analyses and adjusted standardized residuals allowed us to explore the experiences of students who identify as LGBQ+ and without a disability, as well as students who identify as straight with or without a disability, in order to highlight the experiences of LGBQ+ students with disabilities. Findings indicate that LGBQ+ students most frequently report a mental health disorder or multiple disabilities or impairments and that these students feel less physically safe, comfortable being themselves, like part of the campus community, and valued by their institution than their peers. Most troubling is the large proportion of LGBQ+ students with a disability who have personally experienced offensive behavior, discrimination, or harassment at their institution based on their sexual orientation. Implications focus on creating partnerships with mental health, disability services, and LGBTQ/Pride Center professionals; evaluating roommate matching policies; the proactive creation of support systems; and applying concepts of Universal Design.
Full version
How valid is grit in the postsecondary context? A construct and concurrent validity analysis
Fosnacht, K., Copridge, K., & Sarraf, S.
Research in Higher Education, 60(6), 803–822, 2019.
College admissions leaders increasingly desire to incorporate non-cognitive factors like grit into admissions decisions. Consequently, we examined the validity of the short grit scale (Grit-S) using data collected on undergraduates attending 38 colleges. Using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), we found that Grit-S does not possess adequate model fit; however, a modified version of the scale does possess this property. Using multi-group CFA, we also found that Grit-S is relatively invariant across multiple demographic groups. Next, we examined the concurrent validity of grit with students‘ engagement, perceived gains, time spent studying, and grades. These results confirmed previous research that most of the predictive power of grit is contained in its perseverance of effort, not consistency of interest, dimension.
Full version
Behavior-based student typology: A view from student transition from high school to college
Mu, L., & Cole, J.
Research in Higher Education, , , 2019.
Several recent studies have successfully identified college student typologies based on individuals‘ behaviors. One limitation of past studies has been their reliance on one-time cross-sectional assessments. As a result, we are left to ponder the stability of students‘ behavioral types as their academic years move forward. This study used longitudinal student data from high school to college, to investigate the stability of a behavior-based student typology. Guided by findings in behavioral consistency from personality psychology, this study explored the associations of higher education institution‘s structure, and supportive elements of the environment and the transition of students‘ behavior-based types. The results showed that, in high school and higher education settings, students‘ behaviors in a variety of activities classified students into four types. In the higher education setting, about half of the students were of the same behavioral type while the remaining students engaged in changes as compared with their behavior-based types in high school. Students‘ background characteristics and institutional environment demonstrated an association related to these shifts.
Full version
Better Together: How Faculty Development and Assessment Can Join Forces to Improve Student Learning
Kinzie, J., Landy, K., Sorcinelli, M. & Hutchings, P.
Change magazine, 51(5), 46-54, 2019.
Full version
Effective advising: How academic advising influences student learning outcomes in different institutional contexts
Mu, L., & Fosnacht, K.
The Review of Higher Education, 42(4), 1283–1307, 2019.
Using survey data from 156 bachelor‘s-granting institutions, this study explored the relationship between academic advising services and seniors‘ grades and self-perceived gains. We found advising experiences has a positive relationship with students‘ grades and self-perceived gains. In addition, our results indicate that the institutional advising climate is positively correlated with perceived gains, but not grades. The results also showed that the relationships between advising and students‘ learning and development varied across institutions. Implications for policy and practice were discussed.
Full version
How does faculty research motivation type relate to success? A test of self-determination theory
Stupnisky, R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 25-35, 2019.
Studies show institutional, demographic, and social-environmental factors to be incomplete predictors of professor research productivity; meanwhile, the effects of motivation on faculty research are relatively understudied. The current study tested the extent to which self-determined motivation served as a predictor of faculty research success. Analysis of 1,846 U.S. faculty from 19 institutions using structural equation modeling found autonomous motivation (enjoyment, value) positively related to self-reported research productivity and number of publications, beyond demographics and position details. The basic needs of autonomy and competence predicted autonomous motivation, and indirectly predicted achievement. External motivation (rewards) had relatively smaller positive relationships with research productivity, while introjected motivation (guilt) had no relationships. The results contribute to both the faculty development and motivation research literatures.
Full version
Opening the activism and postsecondary education black box: Relating high-impact practices and student identity with activist behaviors
Morgan, D. L., Zilvinskis, J., & Dugan, B.
Journal of Political Science Education, , , 2019.
Faculty and administrators at postsecondary institutions continue to grapple with understanding the dynamic nature of student activism. In response, the National Survey of Student Engagement administered a supplemental item set following the 2016 presidential election, in which more than 3,000 respondents were asked about their involvement in activism. Leveraging these data, this study employed multilevel modeling to measure the relationship between activist behaviors and student backgrounds, high-impact practice (HIP) participation, involvement in student activities, and institutional characteristics. The present study adds nuance to and models the connection among HIPs, student identities (e.g., queer, black or African American), and student activism. Implications for practice and research are shared that outline a renewed understanding of student activism as a pillar of civic learning and democratic engagement work in higher education.
Full version
Predicting the quality of Black women collegians' relationships with faculty at a public historically Black university
Williams, M. S., & Johnson, J. M.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(2), 115-125, 2019.
Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the impact of effective teaching practices and student?faculty interactions on perceptions of faculty relationship quality for Black women collegians at a public historically Black university. Using a conceptual framework that integrates Tinto‘s (1993) interactionalist theory of college student departure, Astin‘s (1993) student involvement theory, and Weidman‘s (1989) undergraduate socialization model, the final regression model explained 56% of the variance in faculty relationship quality. Significant predictors included faculty feedback, course-related conversations outside of class, and discussions around academic performance. We close with implications for policy, praxis, and future investigations.
Full version
The within-group differences in LGBQ+ college students? belongingness, institutional commitment, and outness
BrckaLorenz, A., Duran, A., Fassett, K. & Palmer, D.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, Advance online publication, , 2019.
Although scholars have examined how lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ +) students perceive their collegiate environments, few quantitative studies disaggregate data to see how populations within the LGBQ + community experience certain outcomes. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate how student subgroups within the LGBQ + community differed in their perceptions of belongingness, institutional commitment, and outness. Using large-scale, multi-institution data from thousands of first-year and senior undergraduates, we examined how these important affective outcomes differ by sexuality groups (e.g., gay/lesbian, bisexual, or queer) and when the intersections of sexual and racial/ethnic identities are considered. Findings suggest that within-group differences exist in LGBQ + student populations that are not necessarily visible when understanding these communities in monolithic ways. We then offer implications for research and student affairs practitioners.
Full version
Thwarting the temptation to leave college: An examination of engagement's impact on college sense of belonging among Black and LatinX students
Kitchen, J. A., & Williams, M. S.
Journal for the Study of Postsecondary and Tertiary Education, 4, 67-84, 2019.
Persistence rates among Black and LatinX students continue to fall behind those of their White peers. One way to address this issue is to promote a stronger college sense of belonging. While student involvement has been linked to sense of belonging, postsecondary institutions need to seriously reflect on, and re-commit to, their own role in engaging Black and LatinX students to promote their sense of belonging, a strong correlate of persistence and college completion. A sense of belonging has been linked to college success, including student persistence. One potential way to promote a sense of belonging among Black and LatinX students is through student engagement. This paper examines the relationship between student engagement and college sense of belonging among a national sample of 10,475 Black and LatinX students. Guided by student engagement theory, we parse out the role of student involvement and institutional engagement to examine the unique and net impact of each facet of engagement as it relates to college sense of belonging among Black and LatinX students. This study employs hierarchical linear regression modeling to examine the unique and net impact of two facts of student engagement: a) student involvement, and b)institutional engagement, as each relates to college sense of belonging among a national sample of 10, 475 Black and LatinX students.
Full version
Time well spent: Flipped classrooms and effective teaching practices.
Fassett, K., BrckaLorenz, A., Strickland, J., & Ribera, A.
In E. Alqurashi Fostering Student Engagement with Instructional Technology in Higher Education ICI Global, 2019.
Good teaching practices are the crux of student education and require constant evaluation to meet current generations' learning needs. Flipped classrooms have sought a foothold in higher education to provide opportunities for deep learning through the delivery of content online prior to attending class while having activities related to processing and applying the information during class. Using a large-scale, multi-institution study of faculty teaching flipped courses, this study empirically links flipped procedures to other forms of effective educational practice and additionally focuses on the motivations and impacts on the faculty side of this pedagogical practice. Findings indicate numerous learning and development benefits for students with implications for supporting and motivating faculty across disciplines, faculty identities, and course types.
Full version
Do working students buy into HIPs? Working for pay and participation in high-impact practices
Zilvinskis, J., & McCormick, A. C.
Journal of College Student Development, 60(5 September-October), 543–562, 2019.
High-impact practices (HIPs), a set of distinctive educational experiences associated with a range of educational benefits, have garnered the attention of educators, policy makers, and researchers alike. Concerns exist regarding who has access to HIPs, and one possible impediment is paid employment. We investigated the relationship between student employment and participation in two HIPs: service-learning and undergraduate research. Using data from 207,925 respondents to the 2015 and 2016 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement, we examined patterns of HIPs participation when considering the differing circumstances of part-time and full-time senior undergraduates with regard to paid employment on campus, off campus, and both. The findings can guide institutional practice, such as the design of campus employment opportunities as well as academic advising to promote HIPs participation.
Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education--Annual results 2018
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2018.
This year‘s Annual Results examines how colleges and universities are preparing students for work and careers. Our analyses investigated the importance of educational context?with special attention to major?in shaping students‘ development of workplace-relevant skills such
as working with others and solving real-world problems, as well as basic skills valued by employers such as critical thinking and effective
writing and speaking. We also asked a subset of respondents a set of targeted questions about their career goals and their use of career
planning resources and related activities. Finally, we used results from NSSE‘s Topical Module on First-Year Experiences and Senior Transitions to study seniors planning to take less-traveled paths after college.
Full version
The benefits of living on campus: Do residence halls provide distinctive environments of engagement?
Graham, P. A., Hurtado, S. S., & Gonyea, R. M.
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 55(3), 255–269, 2018.
The changing landscape of on- and off-campus undergraduate residential options underline the need to reexamine the impact of on-campus living. Using multi-institutional survey data from first-year students, this study investigates the relationship of residential status with engagement and perceived gains in learning and development. Results indicate, after controlling for student and institution characteristics, that on-campus residence has small positive effects on some outcomes but not on others where effects might be expected.
Full version
Engaging in the margins: Exploring differences in biracial students' engagement by racial heritage
Harris, J. C., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 55(2), 137–154, 2018.
The research presented in this article utilizes data from four years of the National Survey of Student Engagement to shed light on the biracial student population and their engagement practices in postsecondary contexts. Specifically, this study explored the ways in which biracial students with different racial heritages engage differently from one another and from their monoracial peers on campus. Study findings complicate the ideology that biracial individuals are a monolithic group, fostering a conversation concerning multiraciality in higher education and providing critical implications for future research and practice.
Full version
Faculty members' motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types
Stupnisky, R., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Guay, F.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 15-26, 2018.
This study tested a conceptual model based on self-determination theory to examine how university faculty members‘ motivation for teaching predicts their utilization of teaching best practices, and explored if faculty at various higher education institution types are differentially motivated for teaching. Data from a national online survey of 1,671 faculty from 19 universities was analyzed using structural equation modeling. Support for the overall model showed faculty autonomy, competence, and relatedness positively predicted autonomous motivation (intrinsic, identified), but not controlled motivation (introjected, external). Autonomous motivation, in turn, predicted greater incorporation of effective teaching strategies, namely instructional clarity, higher-order learning, reflective and integrative learning, and collaborative learning. There were no differences found across faculty at doctoral, master‘s, and bachelor‘s institutions in terms of autonomous motivation mean levels, nor for the predictive effects of autonomous motivation on teaching best practices. The findings have implications for the faculty motivation and teaching research literatures, as well as for faculty development initiatives aimed at improving teaching effectiveness.
Full version
The role of religion and institution type in seniors' perceptions of the religious and spiritual campus climate
Fosnacht, K., & Broderick, C.
Journal of College and Character, 19(1), 18-31, 2018.
This study investigated the correlates of two measures that capture students‘ perception of the religious and spiritual campus climate. It focuses on how the factors, religious identity and attending a religiously affiliated institution, influence students‘ perception of the respect for their beliefs and comfort in expressing their views on campus. The results indicate few differences by religious identity in students‘ perception of the respect for their beliefs, but significant differences by religion in their comfort in expressing their views. Additionally, attending a religiously affiliated institution was positively associated with students‘ comfort in expressing their beliefs.
Full version
A meta-analysis of queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum student experiences at U.S. research universities
Greathouse, M., BrckaLorenz, A., Hoban, M., Huesman, R., Rankin, S., & Stolzenberg, E.
In Krista M. Soria Evaluating Campus Climate at U.S. Research Universities: Opportunities for Diversity and Inclusion Palgrave MacMillan, 2018.
Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students remain a significantly underserved population within higher education, despite the presence of significant disparities related to campus climate, academic engagement, and health outcomes. In this chapter, the authors explore the climate for queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum undergraduate students attending US Public Research Universities within higher education through a meta-analysis of 2016 and 2017 national datasets assessing campus climate, academic outcomes, and health outcomes?each of which has incorporated sexual identity and gender identity demographics within their respective survey instruments.
Full version
Activists, non-activists, and allies: Civic engagement and student types at MSIs
Fassett, K. T., Priddie, C., BrckaLorenz, A., & Kinzie, J.
Frontiers in Education, 3(103), , 2018.
Although civic engagement has been examined across various student groups, there is limited research on the impact of civic engagement at minority-serving institutions (MSIs). This study uses a large-scale, cross-sectional approach to analyze college students' participation in civic engagement activities at 24 MSIs from 2013 to 2017 using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Aspects of civic engagement examined include students' participation in events that address social or political issues, frequency of interactions with diverse others, participation in leadership and service-learning activities, and perceptions of their institution's contribution to their growth in areas such as becoming an informed and active citizen. Additionally, researchers explored students' ability to resolve conflicts that involve bias and prejudice and contribute to the well-being of their community; how frequently students inform themselves of state, national, or global issues; and how they may organize others around a common cause.
Full version
Contextualizing effect sizes in the National Survey of Student Engagement: An empirical analysis
Rocconi, L. M., & Gonyea, R. M.
Research and Practice in Assessment, 13(Summer/Fall), 22-38, 2018.
The concept of effect size plays a crucial role in assessment, institutional research, and scholarly inquiry, where it is common with large sample sizes to find small relationships that are statistically significant. This study examines the distribution of effect sizes from institutions that participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and empirically derives recommendations for their interpretation. The aim is to provide guidelines for researchers, policymakers, and assessment professionals to judge the importance of an effect from student engagement results. The authors argue for the adoption of the recommendations for interpreting effect sizes from statistical comparisons of NSSE data.
Full version
Do high achieving students benefit from honors college participation? A look at student engagement for first-year students and seniors
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 217–241, 2018.
This study investigates findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), comparing various aspects of student engagement between honors college and general education students. Responses from 1,339 honors college students and 7,191 general education students across 15 different universities suggest a positive impact for honors college participation on reflective and integrative learning, use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, diverse discussions, student-faculty interaction, and quality of interactions for first-year students, even when controlling for student and institutional characteristics. For senior students, honors college participation was related to more frequent student-faculty interaction. Potential experiential and curricular reasons for these differences are discussed, along with implications for educators, researchers, parents, and students.
First-year students' time use in college: A latent profile analysis
Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A. C., & Lerma, R.
Research in Higher Education, 59(7), 958–978, 2018.
Students‘ time expenditures influence their learning and development. This study used latent profile analysis to identify a taxonomy of how first-year students spend their time using a large multi-institution sample. We identified four time usage patterns by first-year students titled Balanced, Involved, Partiers, and Parents. Sex, expected major field, on-campus residency, age, Greek-life membership, and standardized test scores were predictive of students‘ time use patterns. Holding a range of student and institutional factors constant, members of the involved group, on average, reported higher levels of engagement than the Balanced group, while Partiers reported lower levels of engagement. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Full version
Focus on the finish line: Does high-impact practice participation influence career plans and early job attainment?
Miller, A. L., Rocconi, L. M., & Dumford, A. D.
Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 75(3), 489–506, 2018.
High-impact practices (HIPs) are important co-curricular educational experiences in postsecondary education, as they promote learning, development, and persistence among students. The goal of this study was to extend the research on HIPs to explore potential connections with HIP participation and career outcomes. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study explores whether HIP participation influences college seniors‘ post-graduation plans for career and further education, and whether HIP participation has a positive impact on early job attainment for these students. Results suggest that even after controlling for a variety of demographic and institutional factors, HIP participation is a statistically significant predictor of future career plans and early job attainment. HIP participation can give students a career-related advantage through transferable skill development, engaging in learning opportunities, and generating ?stories? for potential employers.
High-impact practices and student-faculty interactions across sexual orientations
Garvey, J. C., BrckaLorenz, A., Latopolski, K., & Hurtado, S. S.
Journal of College Student Development, 59(2), 211-226, 2018.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between high-impact practices and student?faculty interactions for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning (LGBQ) students. Results yield few differences in participation of high-impact practices for LGBQ students compared to heterosexual students. Results also demonstrate the significant influences of student and institutional characteristics on high-impact practice participation for LGBQ students, and in particular student?faculty interactions.
Full version
International student engagement: An exploration of student and faculty perceptions
Wang, R. & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal of International Students, 8(2), 1002-1033, 2018.
An increasing number of faculty have brought up questions and concerns about supporting international students? academic engagement and success. However, little is known about faculty?s approaches to international student engagement and how they may differ from international students? self-reported engagement at four-year institutions. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement and Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, both large-scale and multi-institutional datasets, this study explores international student engagement in learning strategies, collaborative learning, and student-faculty interaction as well as international student engagement from the perspectives of faculty and students. Recommendations on supporting international student engagement from an individual faculty level, department level, and institutional level are discussed.
Full version
Looking across high-impact practices: First-year student democratic awareness and democratic participation
Weiss, H. A., & Fosnacht, K.
Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 30(2), 45–64, 2018.
Creating educated and informed citizens for our diverse democracy has long been one of the objectives of the U.S. educational system. Traditionally, service-learning has been the primary tool for colleges and universities to promote civic outcomes; however, other practices, particularly those requiring substantial student investments of time and energy, also hold the potential to improve civic outcomes. Using data from nearly 13,000 first-year students who responded to the National Survey of Student Engagement's Civic Engagement module, we found that service-learning, learning communities, and research with faculty were positively and significantly correlated to two measures of democratic engagement. The results have important implications for how postsecondary institutions promote civic outcomes.
Full version
Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum student experiences in American higher education: The analysis of national survey findings
Greathouse, M., BrckaLorenz, A., Hoban, M., Huesman, R., Rankin, S., & Stolzenberg, E.
New Brunswick, NJ: , 2018.
Full version
Reimagining student engagement: How nontraditional adult learners engage in traditional postsecondary environments
Rabourn, K., BrckaLorenz, A., & Shoup, R.
Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(1), 22-33, 2018.
Adult learners are a growing population in U.S. postsecondary education who experience distinct barriers to academic success. However, higher education institutions continue to create and adhere to policies that favor traditional college students. Thus, adult learner experiences must be better understood to ensure this population is supported. This study used data from the 2013 and 2014 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement to identify characteristics of adult learners and compare their engagement with traditional-aged students. Our regression analysis revealed that adult learners were more likely to take their classes online, begin their education at another institution, and enroll part-time. Adult learners also were more engaged academically and had positive perceptions of teaching practices and interactions with others, despite reporting fewer interactions with faculty and peers and less supportive campuses. These findings challenge institutions to continue to seek a deeper understanding of how adult learners engage with postsecondary education.
Full version
The dependability of the updated NSSE: A generalizability study
Fosnacht, K., & Gonyea, R. M.
Research and Practice in Assessment, 13(Summer/Fall), 62–74, 2018.
This study utilized generalizability theory to assess the context where the National Survey of Student Engagement‘s (NSSE) summary measures, the Engagement Indicators, produce dependable group-level means. The dependability of NSSE group means is an important topic for the higher education assessment community given its wide utilization and usage in institutional assessment and accreditation. We found that the Engagement Indicators produced dependable group means for an institution derived from samples as small as 25 to 50 students. Furthermore, we discuss how the assessment community should use NSSE data.
Full version
The role of creative coursework in skill development for university seniors
Miller, A. L.
Global Education Review, 5(Creativity & Education Special Issue 1), 88–107, 2018.
Previous research suggests that creativity training can be effective in academic settings and that teachers in particular can have an impact on creativity. Furthermore, creativity is one of many transferable skills in higher education that will benefit students when they enter the workforce. This study extends research on creativity training and transferable skills in higher education, using data from the Senior Transitions topical module of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Responses from over 48,000 seniors at 227 different U.S colleges and universities were used to explore curricular differences across disciplinary fields as well as how exposure to creative coursework can predict confidence in numerous skills and abilities. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a measure of exposure to creative coursework, and an ANOVA suggested significant differences by major fields, with arts majors showing a distinct advantage. Results from ordinary least squares regression models found that even after controlling for several demographic and institutional characteristics, creative coursework is a significant positive predictor of confidence in several different skills and abilities that are important for adapting to traditional and non-traditional work settings, including creative thinking, critical thinking, entrepreneurial skills, and networking abilities. Potential reasons for these patterns of results are discussed. These findings can help to inform curricular and programming enhancements for college students across all major fields, helping to better prepare them for their futures in various workplace settings.
Full version
With retention, the key is "act locally"
Cole, J. S., Gonyea, R. G., & Rocconi, L.
In R. Feldman (Ed.) The first year of college: Research, theory, and practice on improving the student experience and increasing retention Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
The authors build on retention theory to show how data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) can be used to understand and potentially affect retention. Emphasizing the fact that solutions must be local and taking into account the unique characteristics of an institution, they highlight the ways in which retention outcomes can be improved by considering multiple variables that impact performance.
Full version
Refining an Approach to Assessment for Learning Improvement
Stitt-Bergh, M., Kinzie, J., & Fulcher, K.
Research and Practice in Assessment, , , 2018.
Full version
Promoting democratic engagement during college: Looking beyond service-learning
Howe, E. C., & Fosnacht, K.
Journal of College and Character, 18(3), , 2017.
Preparing students to be engaged participants in our democratic society has long been an important college outcome. Over the past few decades, postsecondary institutions have primarily attempted to improve civic outcomes by integrating service activities into their curricula. While research on the effects of service-learning are plentiful, research on how other educationally beneficial activities influence democratic outcomes is scarce. In this study, we find that service-learning may not be the only means for promoting democratic outcomes because other high impact practices, most prominently learning communities, have greater or equivalent relationship to two dimensions of democratic engagement.
Full version
Black, White, and biracial students’ engagement at differing institutional types
Harris, J. C., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 783-789, 2017.
The purpose of this research is to fill a large gap in the literature on college student engagement by exploring differences in engagement for White students, Black students, and Black/White biracial students within and between institutional types. To achieve this purpose, this study explores how engagement compares for Black, White, and biracial students with Black and White heritage within HBCUs and non-HBCUs and how engagement compares for these same biracial students between HBCUs and non-HBCUs.
Full version
Undergraduate financial stress, financial self-efficacy, and major choice: A multi-institutional study
Fosnacht, K., & Calderone, S. M.
Journal of Financial Therapy, 8(1), Article 7, 2017.
Over time, undergraduates students been increasingly forced to assume a greater portion of college costs. For most students, this means borrowing larger sums and cutting back on expenses to fulfill their college dreams, which often leads to financial stress. Using financial self-efficacy theory, we sought to better understand how a lack of financial confidence and a diminished sense of financial well-being may serve to undermine students‘ intended short and long-term goals. To this end, we examined the predictors of financial stress based upon a multi-institutional sample of senior undergraduates and focus on the role of the earnings potential of different majors.
Full version
Information literacy's influence on undergraduates' learning and development: Results from a large multi-institutional study
Fosnacht, K.
In D. M. Mueller, (Ed.) At the helm: Leading transformation: The proceedings of the ACRL 2017 conference, March 22?25, 2017, Baltimore, Maryland Chicago, IL: Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2017.
This paper investigated the reliability and validity of the National Survey of Student Engagement‘s Experiences with Information Literacy Topical Module, an assessment instrument developed in collaboration with a group of instructional librarians. After identifying three information literacy related constructs in the module, it assessed the relationship between the constructs and students‘ engagement in Higher-Order Learning and Reflective and Integrative Learning activities and students' perceived gains. The results from these analyses indicated that information literacy activities are positively and significantly correlated with student engagement and students‘ perceived gains.
Full version
A glimpse of global learning: Assessing student experiences and institutional commitments
Kinzie, J., Helms, R. M., & Cole, J.
Liberal Education, 103(2), , 2017.
What do we know about the extent to which institutions are designing international activities, providing students with direct experience of different cultures and courses on global topics, and ensuring that graduates acquire global learning outcomes? To provide this information, the American Council on Education (ACE) and the Center for Postsecondary Research at the Indiana University School of Education collaborated on a study that takes advantage of national surveys administered by each organization. In this article, we discuss preliminary findings from a study of combined results from the 2016 administration of the ACE Mapping Internationalization on U.S. Campuses survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Global Learning Topical Module.
Full version
Concluding comments about student transition to higher education
Cole, J. S.
Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 73, 539–551, 2017.
This special issue of Transition to Higher Education contained studies from nine countries across the globe. The following provides a brief review of all nine studies, identifying common themes. These common themes include the importance of student expectations regarding their first-year experiences, as well as the importance of student academic and social integration. Another common theme was first-year stagnation, where some students experience little to no growth regarding motivation or deep approaches to learning. This section concludes by stressing the need for campuses to utilize their local data to better understand the factors that facilitate or undermine successful student transition on their campus.
Exceeding statements: How students and faculty experience institutional missions
Graham, P. A., Ribera, A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Broderick, C.
Journal of College and Character, 18(4), 246-263, 2017.
While the importance of institutional mission is acknowledged within the higher education community, there is a lack of empirical evidence investigating how missions are experienced. Using survey data from students and faculty, this study investigates perceptions of mission engagement at religiously affiliated and independent institutions. Implications for practice are discussed.
Full version
Frequency of first-year student interactions with advisors
Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A. C., Nailos, J. N., & Ribera, A. K.
NACADA Journal, 37(1), 74-86, 2017.
Although acknowledged that academic advising helps students adjust to and deal with the challenges of college, little is known about students' frequency of interactions with advisors. Using data from 52,546 full-time, first-year students at 209 diverse institutions, we examined the frequency with which students met with academic advisors and the way these interactions vary by student and institutional characteristics. We found that the typical first-year student met with an advisor 1 to 3 times during his or her first college year; however, the number of meetings varied across student subpopulations and institutional types.
Full version
High-impact practices and student-faculty interactions for gender-variant students
BrckaLorenz, A., Garvey, J. C., Hurtado, S. S., & Latopolski, K.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, , Advance online publication, 2017.
The vast amount of research on student success and engagement in college focuses on a narrative for majority student populations that does not account for unique experiences across social identities. This article examines the experiences of gender-variant students (i.e., students who do not identify as either cisgender men or women) regarding engagement in high-impact practices and student?faculty interactions using a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative data set collected from the 2014 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement. Although high-impact practice participation was similar for gender-variant and cisgender students, positive student-faculty interaction was found to be a significant predictor for increased high-impact practice participation for gender-variant students. Results from this study may also point to chillier climates of certain major fields for gender-variant students. Implications for these findings focus on investigating major choice as a mediating factor for high-impact practice participation and advocating for the inclusion of different gender identities in surveys, institutional data, and higher-education research.
Full version
How important are high response rates for college surveys?
Fosnacht, K., Sarraf, S., Howe, E., & Peck, L. K.
The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 245–265, 2017.
Surveys play an important role in understanding the higher education landscape. However, declining survey participation rates threaten this source of vital information and its perceived utility. Although survey researchers have long assumed that the best way to obtain unbiased estimates is to achieve a high response rate, many survey researchers have begun to question the widely held assumption that low response rates provide biased results. Due to the prevalence of survey data in higher education research and assessment efforts, it is imperative to better understand the relationship between response rates and data quality. This study investigates this assumption with college student assessment data. It utilizes data from hundreds of samples of first-year and senior students with relatively high response rates using a common assessment instrument with a standardized administration protocol. It investigates how population estimates would have changed if researchers put forth less effort when collecting data and achieved lower response rates and respondent counts.
Full version
How writing contributes to learning: New findings from a national study and their local application
Anderson, P., Anson, C. M., Fish, T., Gonyea, R. M., Marshall, M., Menefee-Libey, W., Paine, C., Palucki Blake, L., & Weaver, S.
Peer Review, 19(Winter, 1), , 2017.
This article summarizes findings from NSSE Consortium for the Study of Writing in College by which three writing constructs were derived ? Interactive Writing Processes, Meaning-Making Writing Tasks, and Clear Writing Expectations. Authors describe how to use the constructs to create better writing assignments, and provide examples from three institutions in their application.
Full version
Indirect assessments in higher education
Nelson Laird, T. F. & BrckaLorenz, A.
In T. Cumming & M. D. Miller Enhancing Assessment in Higher Education: Putting Psychometrics to Work Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2017.
Assessment and accountability are now inescapable features of the landscape of higher education, and ensuring that these assessments are psychometrically sound has become a high priority for accrediting agencies and therefore also for higher education institutions. Bringing together the higher education assessment literature with the psychometric literature, this book focuses on how to practice sound assessment.
This volume provides comprehensive and detailed descriptions of tools for and approaches to assessing student learning outcomes in higher education. The book is guided by the core purpose of assessment, which is to enable faculty, administrators, and student affairs professionals with the information they need to increase student learning by making changes in policies, curricula, and other programs.
The book is divided into three sections: overview, assessment in higher education, and case studies. The central section looks at direct and indirect measures of student learning, and how to assure the validity, reliability, and fairness of both types. The first six chapters (the first two sections) alternate chapters written by experts in assessment in higher education and experts in psychometrics. The remaining three chapters are applications of assessment practices in three higher education institutions. Finally, the book includes a glossary of key terms in the field.
Full version
Sense of peer belonging and institutional acceptance in the first year: The role of high-impact practices
Ribera, A. K., Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 58(4), 545–563, 2017.
This study examines the role that high-impact practices play in shaping first-year students‘ sense of belonging as it relates to peers and institutional acceptance. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (n=9,371), results reveal troublesome gaps for historically underrepresented populations in their sense of belonging among their peers and affiliation with the institution. Yet, when students participated in certain high-impact practices (learning communities, service learning, research with faculty, and campus leadership), positive associations were found, even after controlling for other institutional and student-level characteristics. Implications for first-year programming are discussed.
The journey or the destination: Exploring engagement patterns of disabled student veterans
Kraus, A., Nicholls, R. C., & Cole, J. S.
In D. DiRamio (Ed.) What?s next for student veterans? Moving from transition to academic success Herndon, VA: Stylus, 2017.
Higher education has worked in recent years to create more inclusive campus practices for student veterans, and disability is an important aspect of this community. An estimated 25% of student veterans have a disability, and student veterans are twice as likely as their non-veteran peers to have at least one disability. To address the unique characteristics of student veterans, including those with disabilities, college and university professionals have developed vet-friendly campuses across the country with services such as dedicated spaces for student veterans to gather and seek refuge from the hectic nature of campus, Veterans Affairs work-study positions, and participation in the Yellow Ribbon program to more seamlessly facilitate the approval of transfer credit. Also, to respond to the concerns of military-connected students, campuses are identifying points of contact across important student services such as counseling and psychological services, financial aid, and disability services. However, little research has been conducted to help us understand the impact of these programs and services on student engagement. While we understand general trends and characteristics of student veterans, we do not have a clear sense with respect to involvement or engagement of what makes these students successful in higher education. Even less descriptive information is available to help us understand the behaviors and experiences of disabled student veterans. This chapter uses findings from the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement as well as individual interviews to explore the engagement patterns of disabled student veterans in their final year of university to better understand how and why these students persist to graduation.
Full version
The use of student engagement findings as a case of evidence-based practice
Kinzie, J.
New Directions for Higher Education, 2017(178), 47–56, 2017.
The chapter considers student engagement to discuss the use of assessment evidence to advance evidence-based practice and to illustrate a scholarship of practice.
Full version
Creative cognitive processes in higher education
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), pp. 282–293, 2016.
This paper explores whether or not students in higher education settings are using creative cognitive processes, how these processes are related to deep approaches to learning, and in what types of settings and students these processes are most prevalent. Data collected from 8,724 students at 17 institutions participating in the 2010 National Survey of Student Engagement suggests that first-year and senior students employ several different creative cognitive processes in their everyday activities. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggest two distinct types of processes: deliberate creative processes and intuitive cognitive processes. Additional analyses indicate significant positive relationships between both types of creative processes and deep approaches to learning, as well as statistically significant differences in the use of creative processes based on gender, enrollment type, and type of institution. Potential reasons for and implications of these findings are discussed.
To be or not to be (an arts major): Career aspirations and perceived skills of graduating seniors across multiple disciplines
Miller, A. L., Dumford, A. D., Gaskill, S., Houghton, R., & Tepper, S. J.
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2016.
Full version
A lottery improves performance on a low-stakes test for males but not females
Cole, J. S., Bergin, D. A., & Summers, J.
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, , 1–16, 2016.
The purpose of this study was to address the effectiveness of autonomy support and a lottery-based reward in enhancing test performance and test-taking motivation on a low-stakes test. Two hundred and forty-six university students were randomly assigned to three groups ? lottery, autonomy support and control ? and took a mathematics test. Students in the autonomy support and lottery group reported putting forth more test-taking effort than students in the control group. Males who were offered a chance at winning the financial reward scored almost 10 points higher on the exam compared to females. Results showed no significant difference in test scores for female students among groups, suggesting that neither intervention had an impact on females.
Impact of the environment: How does attending a Hispanic-Serving Institution influence the engagement of baccalaureate-seeking Latina/o students?
Fosnacht, K., & Nailos, J. N.
Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(3), 191–297, 2016.
Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) enroll the majority of Latina/o students in higher education; however, it is unclear how HSIs influence Latina/os‘ postsecondary experiences. In this study, we examined how the Latina/o student experience differed between students who did and did not attend 4-year HSIs. The results suggest that HSIs generally have positive, but modest, effects on Latina/o‘s student engagement and self-perceived gains. The differences were more pronounced for first-year students than seniors.
Full version
Engaging Latino students for transfer and completion
Waiwaiole, E., Kinzie, J., & Brown, S.
Diverse Issues in Higher Education, , , 2016.
Both community colleges and bachelor‘s degree-granting institutions across the country are responding to a chorus of calls for dramatic improvements in student success and college completion, while maintaining and improving the quality of students‘ educational experiences. A companion challenge is to close persistent and troubling attainment gaps across a diverse population of students. Because Latinos are the largest under-served population and the numbers will continue to increase, achieving these goals requires consideration of how these students experience higher education and what institutions can do to better serve them.
An alternative approach: Using panels to survey college students
Sarraf, S. A., Hurtado, S., Houlemarde, M., & Wang, X.
AIR Professional File, (Fall), Article 138, 2016.
Eight short surveys based on select items from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) were administered to approximately five hundred students over a nine-week period at five diverse colleges and universities. The goal of the experiment was to investigate what impact a survey panel data collection approach would have on recruitment, survey data quality indicators, and scale properties. Results indicated higher response rates, shorter survey duration, and minimal impact on scale factor structures. However, both cost of incentives and panel member attrition make this alternative survey method less attractive than it would be otherwise.
Assessment in student affairs (2nd ed.)
Schuh, J. H., Biddix, P., Dean, L. A., & Kinzie, J.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
A practical, comprehensive manual for assessment design and implementation,
Assessment in Student Affairs (Second Edition) offers a contemporary look at the foundational elements and practical application of assessment in student affairs. Higher education administration is increasingly called upon to demonstrate organizational effectiveness and engage in continuous improvement based on information generated through systematic inquiry. This book provides a thorough primer on all stages of the assessment process. From planning to reporting and beyond, you'll find valuable assessment strategies to help you produce meaningful information and improve your program. Combining and updating the thoroughness and practicality of Assessment in Student Affairs and Assessment Practice in Student Affairs, this new edition covers design of assessment projects, ethical practice, student learning outcomes, data collection and analysis methods, report writing, and strategies to implement change based on assessment results. Case studies demonstrate real-world application to help you clearly see how these ideas are used effectively every day, and end-of-chapter discussion questions stimulate deeper investigation and further thinking about the ideas discussed. The instructor resources will help you seamlessly integrate this new resource into existing graduate-level courses.
Student affairs administrators understand the importance of assessment, but many can benefit from additional direction when it comes to designing and implementing evaluations that produce truly useful information. This book provides field-tested approaches to assessment, giving you a comprehensive how-to manual for demonstrating?and improving?the work you do every day.
?Build your own assessment to demonstrate organizational effectiveness.
?Utilize quantitative and qualitative techniques and data.
?Identify metrics and methods for measuring student learning.
?Report and implement assessment findings effectively.
Accountability and effectiveness are the hallmarks of higher education administration today, and they are becoming the metrics by which programs and services are evaluated. Strong assessment skills have never been more important. Assessment in Student Affairs gives you the knowledge base and skill set you need to shine a spotlight on what you and your organization are able to achieve.
Do later wake times and increased sleep duration of 12th graders result in more studying, higher grades, and improved SAT/ACT test scores?
Cole, J. S.
Sleep and Breathing, 20, 1053–1057, 2016.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between sleep duration, wake time, and hours studying on high school grades and performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT)/ American College Testing (ACT) college entrance exams.
Method: Data were collected from 13,071 recently graduated high school seniors who were entering college in the fall of 2014. A column proportions z test with a Bonferroni adjustment was used to analyze proportional differences. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine mean group differences.
Results: Students who woke up prior to 6 a.m. and got less than 8 h of sleep (27 %) were significantly more likely to report studying 11 or more hours per week (30 %), almost double the rate compared to students who got more than 8 h of sleep and woke up the latest (16 %). Post hoc results revealed students who woke up at 7 a.m. or later reported significantly higher high school grades than all other groups (p < 0.001), with the exception of those students who woke up between 6:01 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. and got eight or more hours of sleep. The highest reported SAT/ACT scores were from the group that woke up after 7 a.m. but got less than 8 h sleep (M = 1099.5). Their scores were significantly higher than all other groups.
Conclusion: This study provides additional evidence that increased sleep and later wake time are associated with increased high school grades. However, this study also found that students who sleep the longest also reported less studying and lower SAT/ACT scores.
The who, what, and where of learning strategies
Dumford, A. D., Cogswell, C. A., & Miller, A. L.
The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 72-88, 2016.
Learning strategies have been shown to be an important part of success in the classroom, but little research exists that examines differences across major fields concerning the use and faculty emphasis of learning strategies. This study uses data from the National Survey of Student Engagement and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement to explore whether there is congruence for academic disciplines between the student use and faculty encouragement of learning strategies. Patterns in the results suggest that are certain fields, including health professions, biology, agriculture, natural resources, and social service professions most frequently emphasizing and using learning strategies, while others, including engineering, physical sciences, mathematics, and computer science are less likely to do so. OLS regression models also suggest demographic and environmental predictors of student use of learning strategies, such as gender, enrollment status, cumulative college grades, Greek affiliation, and participation in a learning community. Potential reasons for and implications of these findings are discussed.
Using student engagement results to oversee educational quality
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., & Gonyea, R. M.
Trusteeship, 24(1), , 2016.
Since the advent of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in 2000, more than 1,600 bachelor‘s degree-granting colleges and universities have had access to reliable evidence about their students‘ engagement in effective educational practices that can inform discussions about educational quality. Yet too few institutions and boards take full advantage of this information to document and improve quality. Board members must come to understand the importance of student engagement and how institutions under their leadership can use it to improve educational quality.
Full version
What is NSSE?
Paine, C., Gonyea, R. M., Anson, C. M., & Anderson, P. V.
In R. Malenczyk (Ed.) A rhetoric for writing program administrators Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, 2016.
The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study
Anderson, P., Anson, C. M., Gonyea, R. M., & Paine, C.
Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199-235, 2015.
Conducted through a collaboration between the Council of Writing Program Administrators(CWPA) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this study identified and tested new variables for examining writing‘s relationship to learning and development. Eighty CWPA members helped to establish a consensus model of 27 effective writing practices. Eighty US baccalaureate institutions appended questions to the NSSE instrument based on these 27 practices, yielding responses from 29,634 first-year students and 41,802 seniors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) identified three constructs: Interactive Writing Processes, Meaning-Making Writing Tasks, and Clear Writing Expectations. Regression analyses indicated that the constructs were positively associated with two sets of established constructs in the regular NSSE instrument--Deep Approaches to Learning (Higher-Order Learning, Integrative Learning, and Reflective Learning)and Perceived Gains in Learning and Development as defined by the institution‘s contributions to growth in Practical Competence, Personal and Social Development, and General Education Learning--with effect sizes that were consistently greater than those for the number of pages written. These were net results after controlling for institutional and student characteristics, as well as other factors that might contribute to enhanced learning. The study adds three empirically established constructs to research on writing and learning. It extends the positive impact of writing beyond learning course material to include Personal and Social Development. Although correlational, it can provide guidance to instructors, institutions, accreditors, and other stakeholders because of the nature of the questions associated with the effective writing constructs.
Full version
Independent colleges and student engagement: Descriptive analysis by institutional type
Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J.
Washington, DC: Council of Independent Colleges, 2015.
Critics of traditional, residential, liberal arts colleges and universities contend that this form of higher education is outmoded, too costly, and no longer educationally relevant for 21st century students. Economies of scale, large classes taught by contingent faculty members and graduate students, and increasing reliance on technology and online learning, so the argument goes, are the only cost-effective means of meeting the educational challenges of the future. This report, prepared for the Council of Independent Colleges (CIC), draws on the most current NSSE data, from 2013 and 2014, that include more than 540,000 first-year and senior students enrolled at more than 900 four-year colleges and universities. Findings are presented with comparisons across four institutional types: (1) baccalaureate and master‘s level private institutions (CIC‘s predominant membership profile), (2) baccalaureate and master‘s level public institutions, (3) doctoral private institutions, and (4) doctoral public institutions. Included in the analysis are measures from the updated NSSE that includes ten new Engagement Indicators, six High-Impact Practices, the Perceived Gains scale, and a Satisfaction scale. Findings from this study affirm the effectiveness of independent colleges and universities for undergraduate student learning. Students at private institutions are more likely to be engaged in educationally effective experiences than their peers at public institutions. Areas of distinction in the private institution undergraduate experience include a more academically challenging education, better relations with faculty members, more substantial interactions with others on campus, and the consistent perception that students have learned and grown more, in comparison with public institutions.
Full version
College seniors' plans for graduate school: Do deep approaches learning and Holland academic environments matter?
Rocconi, L. M., Ribera, A. K., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Research in Higher Education, 56(2, Special Forum Issue), 178–201, 2015.
This study examines the extent to which college seniors‘ plans for graduate school are related to their tendency to engage in deep approaches to learning (DAL) and their academic environments (majors) as classified by Holland type. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, we analyzed responses from over 116,000 seniors attending 499 four-year institutions. Findings revealed a significant positive relationship between seniors‘ uses of DAL and plans for earning a graduate degree. Further, seniors majoring in Investigative and Social environments were more likely to hold higher degree expectations. Significant interaction effects by DAL and Holland academic environment were also found. The impact of DAL on graduate degree expectations was greater for seniors majoring in Artistic environments than otherwise similar students in Investigative, Enterprising, or Social environments. In addition, the impact of DAL on degree expectations was greater for seniors in Enterprising environments than otherwise similar students in Social environments.
Full version
Living with smartphones: Does completion device affect survey responses?
Lambert, A. D., & Miller, A. L.
Research in Higher Education, 56(2, Special Forum Issue), 166–177, 2015.
With the growing reliance on tablets and smartphones for internet access, understanding the effects of completion device on online survey responses becomes increasing important. This study uses data from the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project, a multi-institution online alumni survey designed to obtain knowledge of arts education, to explore the effects of what type of device (PC, Mac, tablet, or smartphone) a respondent uses has on his/her responses. Differences by device type in the characteristics of survey respondents, survey completion, time spent responding, willingness to answer complex and open-ended questions, and lengths of open-ended responses are discussed.
Full version
Reflections on the state of student engagement data use and strategies for action
Kinzie, J., Cogswell, C. A., & Wheatle, K. I. E.
Assessment Update, 27(2), 1–2, 14–15, 2015.
Although the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects responses from hundreds of participating colleges and universities every year, its ultimate goal is not to collect data but to catalyze improvement in undergraduate education. Launched in 2000 by the Pew Charitable Trusts in response to growing national and local pressures for higher education to focus on measures of education quality and for colleges and universities to engage in meaningful improvement, the NSSE has become a leader in a campaign to focus attention on a number of relatively clear characteristics of effective environments for teaching and learning. The NSSE‘s process indicators related to good practices in undergraduate education provide diagnostic information about concrete activities that can guide interventions to promote improvement. By 2014, more than 1,500 institutions had participated in the NSSE, and over 4.5 million students had completed the questionnaire. In addition, the launch of two complementary instruments, the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), have furthered efforts to encourage the use of data for improvement by equipping institutions with information about faculty perceptions and entering students‘ expectations for engagement. Given these noble goals and all the student engagement data, what impact has the NSSE had on the use of data for improvement on campuses? And what lessons does this work suggest for the improvement agenda in higher education?
Full version
Development of the quantitative reasoning items on the National Survey of Student Engagement
Dumford, A. D., & Rocconi, L. M.
Numeracy, 8(1), Article 5, 2015.
As society‘s needs for quantitative skills become more prevalent, college graduates require quantitative skills regardless of their career choices. Therefore, it is important that institutions assess students‘ engagement in quantitative activities during college. This study chronicles the process taken by the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to develop items that measure students‘ participation in quantitative reasoning (QR) activities. On the whole, findings across the quantitative and qualitative analyses suggest good overall properties for the developed QR items. The items show great promise to explore and evaluate the frequency with which college students participate in QR-related activities. Each year, hundreds of institutions across the United States and Canada participate in NSSE, and, with the addition of these new items on the core survey, every participating institution will have information on this topic. Our hope is that these items will spur conversations on campuses about students‘ use of quantitative reasoning activities.
Full version
Are those rose-colored glasses you are wearing? Student and alumni survey responses
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L.
Research and Practice in Assessment, 10, 5-14, 2015.
Lessons from the field—Volume 3: Using data to catalyze change on campus
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University School of Education, 2015.
Volume 3 of Lessons from the Field builds on insights from the earlier volumes illustrating the benefits of using NSSE results. Specifically, the highlighted institutional examples predominately feature the use of NSSE‘s updated measures and redesigned reports introduced with the survey‘s 14th administration in 2013. After more than three years of collaborative analysis, evidence-based item refinement, pilot testing, and student interviews, NSSE was revised to
incorporate content enhancements and customization
options that sustain the survey‘s relevance and value to participating institutions. The 25 institutional accounts featured in this volume illustrate how institutions are using results from the updated NSSE in assessment and improvement activities and in a variety of efforts
to address important campus needs and priorities.
Indeed, enlisting campus constituencies in the use
of assessment results is essential during a time of heightened demands for accountability and pressures to increase student persistence and completion, support diversity, and ensure high-quality learning for all students. Even more, improvement efforts at colleges and universities are more likely to succeed when they emerge from a shared understanding of the evidence and of the priorities for action.
Full version
Participation in undergraduate research at minority-serving institutions
Haeger, H., BrckaLorenz, A., & Webber, K.
Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring, 4(1), 1-22, 2015.
This research used a national dataset to examine factors associated with participation for underrepresented minority (URM) students, benefits of participation at minority-serving institutions, and examples of programs that work to decrease barriers for URM participation in UR. Findings showed that Latino and first-generation students participated in UR less than White peers, but students at Minority Serving Institutions who participated in research with a faculty member reported using more learning strategies, increased collaboration, and having more experience with quantitative reasoning than students not participating in an UR experience.
Full version
Using National Survey of Student Engagement data and methods to assess teaching in first-year composition and writing across the curriculum
Paine, C., Anson, C., Gonyea, R. M., & Anderson, P.
In A. E. Dayton (Ed.) Assessing the teaching of writing: Twenty-first century trends and technologies Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado, 2015.
In this chapter, we describe the origins, aims, and general structure of the NSSE (student engagement) and the Consortium for the Study of Writing in College (CSWC) (writing instruction) surveys. We describe how the CSWC was developed and offered and provide a brief overview of major findings of the national study. We describe how WPAs can adopt and adapt both the CSWC questions and the general approach to local needs. Finally, we describe some best practices (what to do and what to avoid) for using this approach, and we provide a few ideas for sharing results and making improvements.
Creative cognitive processes in higher education
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), pp. 282–293, 2014.
This paper explores whether or not students in higher education settings are using creative cognitive processes, how these processes are related to deep approaches to learning, and in what types of settings and students these processes are most prevalent. Data collected from 8,724 students at 17 institutions participating in the 2010 National Survey of Student Engagement suggests that first-year and senior students employ several different creative cognitive processes in their everyday activities. Results from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggest two distinct types of processes: deliberate creative processes and intuitive cognitive processes. Additional analyses indicate significant positive relationships between both types of creative processes and deep approaches to learning, as well as statistically significant differences in the use of creative processes based on gender, enrollment type, and type of institution. Potential reasons for and implications of these findings are discussed.
A survey of college-bound high school graduates regarding circadian preference, caffeine use, and academic performance
Cole, J. S.
Sleep and Breathing, 19, 123–127, 2014.
Background: This study examines the relationships between circadian preference and caffeine use with academic performance and hours spent studying for recent high school graduates entering their first year of college.
Method: Entering first-year college students enrolled at 90 baccalaureate-level institutions across the USA were invited to complete the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM) as well as answer questions regarding caffeine consumption. Surveys were administered on each campus during the summer months of 2013. Only those that graduated from a US high school in the spring of 2013 were included in this study. The final sample for this study included 25,200 students that completed the BCSSE, CSM, and questions regarding caffeine consumption.
Results: Evening types (E-types) were significantly less likely to report earning A/A?‘s in high school and less likely to study 16 or more hours per week compared to intermediate or morning types (M-types) (p<0.05). Overall, entering first year students reported an average of 1.1 servings of caffeine per day, with 39 % reporting no caffeine consumption. M-types were more likely to consume no caffeine (54 %) compared to E-types that also indicated no daily caffeine (31 %) (p<0.05). However, E-types were approximately 2.5 times more likely to consume three or more daily servings of caffeine (18 %) compared to M-types that consume the same amount (7 %) (p<0.05). M-types that consumed no caffeine reported the highest grades with nearly 64 % reporting they earned mostly A‘s or A-‘s in high school. However, the apparent advantage that morning types had over evening types regarding high school grades was completely ameliorated once three or more servings of caffeine were consumed per day.
Conclusions: This study provides additional information to educators and health professionals to create programs and provide resource to help adolescents better understand the
impact of their sleep behaviors and use of caffeine on their academic performance.
Do good assessment practices measure up to the principles of assessment?
Kinzie, J., Jankowski, N., & Provezis, S.
Assessment Update, 26(3), 1–2, 14–16, 2014.
The American Association for Higher Education's Nine Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning (AAHE 1992) have appeared to stand the test of time, as evidenced by the fact that they are often referred to within the pages of Assessment Update and appear on various assessment websites and in texts (see Banta, Jones, and Black 2009). In fact, Hutchings, Ewell, and Banta (n.d.) reviewed the principles in 2010, declaring that they had ?aged nicely.? Looking back to 1992, the principles were conceived as a way to codify the responsible and effective conduct of assessment, advance assessment for educational improvement, and assist campuses to develop approaches that make a difference for students and their learning. The principles serve as a foundation for assessment practice. Guidelines for assessment continue to be promulgated, such as the New Leadership Alliance‘s Committing to Quality: Guidelines for Assessment and Accountability in Higher Education (2012), which intended to help institutions evaluate their assessment practices and to establish shared commitments among sectors of higher education; and the Principles for Effective Assessment of Student Achievement (Western Association for Schools and Colleges 2013), endorsed in July 2013 by six higher education associations and all regional accreditors, which succinctly expressed the value of assessment. The newer statements share tenets of the AAHE principles and also reflect specific organizational commitments. Similar to the AAHE Assessment Forum, the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) has sought to move the needle on assessment efforts by surveying the landscape of assessment in higher education and by assisting institutions and others in discovering and adopting promising practices in the assessment of undergraduate student learning outcomes. Toward these ends, this article considers the most widely cited guidelines for effective assessment, namely, the AAHE Principles against the backdrop of NILOA‘s collection of accounts of good assessment practice. Simply put, how well do institutions‘ assessment activities align with stated principles for effectiveness?
High-impact practices and the first-year student
Tukibayeva, M., & Gonyea, R. M.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(160, Special Issue), 19–35, 2014.
High-impact practices?programs and activities in which students commit considerable time and effort in different settings?can help to define the first-year college experience and are likely to increase success in areas like persistence, deep learning, and self-reported gains.
One size does not fit all: Traditional and innovative models of student affairs practice
Manning, K. M., Kinzie, J., & Schuh, J. H.
New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.
In the day-to-day work of higher education administration, student affairs professionals know that different institutional types, whether a small liberal arts college, a doctoral intensive institution, or a large private university, require different practical approaches. Despite this, most student affairs literature emphasizes a "one size fits all" approach to practice, giving little attention to the differing models of student affairs practice and their diversity across institutions. In the second edition of this influential book, leading scholars Kathleen Manning, Jillian Kinzie, and John H. Schuh advocate an original approach by presenting 11 models of student affairs practice, including both traditional and innovative programs. Based on a qualitative, multi-institutional research project, One Size Does Not Fit All explores a variety of policies, practices, and programs that contribute to increased student engagement, success, and learning.
New to this revised edition:
Refinement of models in light of recent NSSE data and current developments in higher education, including budget cuts and the economic crisis;
updated information throughout about model assessment and techniques to renew divisions of student affairs;
a deeper analysis of how models of student affairs practice relate to institutional mission and purposes;
end-of-chapter discussion questions to guide thinking about ways to incorporate models in one‘s own context;
an entirely new Part IV, including chapters on "Catalysts and Tools for Change" and "Redesigning Your Student Affairs Division."
Reconsidering the inclusion of diversity in the curriculum
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Diversity & Democracy, 17(4), 12–14, 2014.
As institutions seek to improve all students' success, the inclusion of people with diverse backgrounds, ideas, and methods of teaching and learning is an educational imperative. Such inclusion simultaneously (1) creates more equitable opportunities for students from marginalized groups to participate in higher education and (2) promotes the kinds of outcomes for all students that employers and society need, such as complex thinking skills, the ability to work across difference, increased civic participation, and decreased prejudice (see, for example, National Leadership Council 2007).
Faculty members often recognize that inclusion is a key to learning. Even among students who have access to an educational experience, those who feel excluded from the full experience struggle to learn as well as those who feel included (Hurtado et al. 1999). To create an inclusive learning environment throughout the curriculum and in all fields, all faculty members should consider how they are incorporating diversity into their courses and how they can be more inclusive in their teaching. Incorporating diversity into one's teaching takes time and depends on the specifics of the situation (who is teaching which students, and in what context). Faculty members do not need simple solutions that may not work for their circumstances. Therefore, I offer the framework described below not as a prescription, but as a guide for faculty seeking their own ways of including diversity in their courses.
Refocusing the quality discourse: The United States National Survey of Student Engagement
McCormick, A. C., & Kinzie, J.
In H. B. Coates & A. C. McCormick (Eds.) Engaging university students: International insights from system-wide studies Singapore: Springer, 2014.
This chapter reports on work conducted with nearly 1,500 bachelor's degree-granting colleges and universities in the USA to assess the extent to which their undergraduates are exposed to and participate in empirically proven effective educational activities. The chapter begins with a discussion of the prevailing quality discourse in the USA. It then explores the conceptual and empirical foundations of student engagement and the origins of NSSE as both a response to the quality problem and as a diagnostic tool to facilitate improvement. The chapter also discusses tensions between internal improvement and external accountability efforts, and NSSE‘s role in the assessment and accountability movements. It concludes with a discussion of challenges that confront the project going forward.
Research on successful learning practices
Kinzie, J.
In B. Tobolowsky (Ed.) Paths to learning: Teaching for engagement in college Columbia, SC: National Resource Center, 2014.
Survey page length and progress indicators: What are their relationships to item nonresponse?
Sarraf, S., & Tukibayeva, M.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2014(161, Special Issue), 83–97, 2014.
The popularity of online student surveys has been associated with greater item nonresponse. This chapter presents research aimed at exploring what factors might help minimize item nonresponse, such
as altering online survey page length and using progress indicators.
Using NSSE to understand student success: A multi-year analysis
Fiorini, S., Shepard, L, Liu, T., & Ouimet, J.
Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma, 2014.
This research focuses on using NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement) responses to predict student academic success. The analysis is based on 16,630 Indiana University Bloomington first-year beginner students and seniors who completed the NSSE survey administered from 2006 to 2012. Logistic regression and linear regression on student background and pre-college information, financial aid, previous college academic performance, NSSE Benchmarks and individual NSSE items were conducted to predict academic success defined as: 1) first-year
students‘ fall-to-fall retention and end-of-first-year cumulative GPA, 2) seniors number of terms taken to degree completion and 4-year graduation. Results show that certain student characteristics and earlier achievement are indicative of college success with higher levels of student engagement marginally contributing to the models. Analyses also highlighted elements of engagement that go counter to their expected effect on retention and performance.
Full version
Assessing learning spaces: Purpose, possibilities, approaches
Kinzie, J.
In J. L. Narum (Ed.) A guide: Planning for assessing 21st century spaces for 21st century learners Washington, DC: Learning Spaces Collaboratory, 2013.
The deep interest in knowing what would improve the quality of learning is driving assessment into every nook and cranny of colleges and universities. Colleges and universities are more accountable for educational effectiveness and for the performance of their students and graduates. Thus, concern about improving educational quality, coupled with the need for individual
campuses to demonstrate learning outcomes, has made assessment an unavoidable activity on campuses since the 1980s. Renewed efforts to enhance quality and increase persistence and success for all students?particularly under-represented minorities?has made it essential to collect evidence on a regular basis of the extent to which effectiveness has been achieved, evidence intended to mobilize attention to improving educational conditions in light of the findings. Assessment has always been a critical component in teaching and learning. Educators regularly assess at the individual student level, evaluating student work and giving grades, and some aggregate this information to guide improvements efforts at the level of an individual
course. Assessment also moves beyond the course when faculty consider strengths and weaknesses of students‘ work in relation to departmental learning goals. The department can then use these findings and other data, such as a graduating senior survey, to inform decisions about curriculum, pedagogy, and perhaps to prepare
for a specialized accreditation review or an institutional review. The demand for information from assessment has broadened its definition and purpose, now embracing the collection and analysis of student learning outcomes and other institutional outcomes, including cost-effectiveness, satisfaction, and the achievement of standards?all to determine the impact of educational programs, practices, and policies.
Good information in the right hands can be a vitally important lever for change. When done well, assessment can provide a foundation for wise planning, budgeting, improvements to the curriculum, pedagogy, staffing, programming, and ensuring that resources are dedicated to what is most effective.
NSSE benchmarks and institutional outcomes: A note on the importance of considering the intended uses of a measure in validity studies
Pike, G.
Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 149–170, 2013.
Surveys play a prominent role in assessment and institutional research, and the NSSE College Student Report is one of the most popular surveys of enrolled undergraduates. Recent studies have raised questions about the validity of the NSSE survey. Although these studies have themselves been criticized, documenting the validity of an instrument requires an affirmative finding regarding the adequacy and appropriateness of score interpretation and use. Using national data from NSSE 2008, the present study found that the NSSE benchmarks provided dependable means for 50 or more students and were significantly related to important institutional outcomes such as retention and graduation rates.
Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research
Webber, K., Nelson Laird, T. F., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 227–249, 2013.
Undergraduate research (UR) is a valued co-curricular activity that has involved an increasing number of students and faculty members in recent years. While there is a growing body of research on student participation in UR, there is less research available examining faculty perceptions of, participation in UR, and how those factors influence student participation in UR. This study examined approximately 110,000 responses to the National Survey of Student Engagement and 40,000 responses to the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement at over 450 four-year institutions. Findings revealed that individual and institutional characteristics predicted student and faculty member involvement and that the majority of faculty members perceived UR to be of importance. Implications for fostering faculty involvement, student success, and viewing UR as an institutional asset are discussed.
Advancing the study of a movement: The status of methods and measures in first-year experience and student transition research
Kinzie, J.
The Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 25(2), 39–52, 2013.
The essay examines the variety of research methods and measures used in the first-year experience and students-in-transition field over the past 25 years. Interrogating the extant research, Kinzie explores whether the methods and analytic processes most commonly employed are adequate to advance our understanding of complex issues in the field. The author concludes with four recommendations for broadening understanding of the conditions that contribute to student learning and success: (a) adopting more varied and sophisticated research methods; (b) identifying more refined outcomes, especially outcomes focused on student learning; (c) expanding the populations of interest and selecting relevant methods and measures for examining their unique experiences; and (d) designing studies that help us understand more about the characteristics and structures of proven educational initiatives that contribute to positive student outcomes.
Estimating college student behavior frequencies: Do vague and enumerated estimation strategies yield similar results?
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 58–71, 2013.
Purpose. Surveys that collect data regarding behavior estimates are found in many fields including, but not limited to, those that conduct consumer research, health studies, sexual behavior, drug use, political polls, and many types of education studies. These studies typically use either vague behavioral quantifiers as the response set, or enumerated response sets where the respondent needs to select or tally the target behavior, or a combination of both types. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these two methods of estimating educationally related behaviors.
Design/methodology/approach. Data for this study was taken from the 2010 administration of Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), which is administered to incoming first?year students. Respondents included 30,964 first?year entering students from 81 higher education institutions in the USA. Data analysis was then carried out.
Findings. This study found that the more frequent the behavior, the shorter the time frame the respondent uses when estimating the behavior using enumerated strategies. In addition, this study showed that for many educationally relevant behaviors vague quantifiers are associated with increasing enumerated responses for the same behavior showing that two behavioral estimates are providing consistent estimations of the same behavior. Another equally important finding is that there were few meaningful group differences regarding these estimates.
Originality/value. Overall, the results from this study shed new light on interpreting behavior estimations using vague and enumerated responses.
First-year students’ psychological well-being and need for cognition: Are they important predictors of academic engagement?
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
Journal of College Student Development, 54, 557–569, 2013.
This study focused on the dispositions of entering
first-year students, their perceptions of classroom and institutional environments, and their subsequent academic engagement. Total variance explained by variables included in the path model for academic engagement was 30%. The
results of this study found evidence to support
the theoretical model that environment does
mediate the relationship between two personality
constructs (Need for Cognition and Psychological
Well-Being) and academic engagement. Results
of this study provide additional evidence that the
environment matters and that institutions should
continue to focus on creating supportive, positive
environments that foster engagement.
Linking the assessment of student engagement to student success
Gonyea, R. M., BrckaLorenz, A., & Ribera, T.
In G. McLaughlin, R. Howard, J. McLaughlin, & W. E. Knight (Eds.) Building bridges for student success: A sourcebook for colleges and universities Norman, OK: Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange, 2013.
In this chapter, we explore the conceptual foundations and measurement of student engagement and share studies that link student engagement to student success. We also provide examples from several institutions that use student engagement measures in formative assessment to improve their students‘ learning experiences. Finally, we look at the researcher‘s role in effectively using engagement data to create a culture of evidence that documents student success.
Making college count: An examination of quantitative reasoning activities in higher education
Rocconi, L. M., Lambert, A. D., McCormick, A. C., & Sarraf, S. A.
Numeracy, 6(2), Article 10, 2013.
Findings from national studies along with more frequent calls from those who employ college graduates suggest an urgent need for colleges and universities to increase opportunities for students to develop quantitative reasoning (QR) skills. To address this issue, the current study examines the relationship between the frequency of QR activities during college and student and institutional characteristics, as well as whether students at institutions with an emphasis on QR (at least one QR course requirement for all students) report more QR activity. Results show that gender, race-ethnicity, major, full-time status, first-generation status, age, institutional enrollment size, and institutional control are related to the frequency of QR activities. Findings also suggest that such activities are indeed more common among institutions that emphasize QR.
Full version
Refreshing engagement: NSSE at 13
McCormick, A. C., Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(3), 6–15, 2013.
Thirteen years ago, 276 bachelor's-granting colleges and universities inaugurated a new approach to assessing college quality by participating in the first national administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). The timing was right. Policymakers were growing increasingly impatient with an ongoing yet unsustainable pattern of cost escalation, skepticism was building about how much students were learning in college, and regional accreditors were ratcheting up their demands on colleges and universities to adopt assessment for purposes of improvement.
Meanwhile, higher education's leaders were frustrated by the crude metrics dominating the discourse about college quality. It's been said that a dean at one of those early-adopting institutions enthusiastically proclaimed: ?Finally, a test I actually want to teach to!?NSSE introduced a simple yet effective reframing of the quality question: ask undergraduates about their educationally purposeful experiences. It incorporated several important design principles: emphasize behaviors that prior research found to be positively related to desired learning outcomes; emphasize actionable information?behaviors and experiences that institutions can influence; standardize survey sampling and administration to ensure comparability between institutions; provide participating institutions with comprehensive reports detailing their own students' responses relative to those at comparison institutions, plus an identified student data file to permit further analysis by the institution. NSSE was administered to first-year students and seniors, opening a window on quality at these ?bookends? of the undergraduate experience. In addition to reporting item-by-item results, the project created summary measures in the form of five ?Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice? that focused attention on key dimensions of quality in undergraduate education: level of academic challenge, active and collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, enriching educational experiences, and supportive campus environment. The new survey caught on fast. Annual participation now numbers 600?700 institutions, for a cumulative total of more than 1,500 colleges and universities in the US and Canada. What started as a bold experiment in changing the discourse about quality and improvement in undergraduate education?and providing metrics to inform that discourse?is now a trusted fixture in higher education's assessment landscape. High rates of repeat participation offer compelling testimony of the project's value. Of the first group of 276, 93 percent administered the survey in NSSE's tenth year or later. The Web-based survey is now offered as a census of first-year students and seniors, permitting disaggregated analyses by academic unit or demographic subgroup. In 2013, some 1.6 million undergraduates were invited to complete the survey, providing both valuable information for more than 620 participating campuses and a comprehensive look at student engagement across a wide variety of institutions. The 2013 administration marks the first major update of the survey since its inception. In the following pages, we summarize what we've learned over NSSE's first 13 years, why we're updating the survey, and new insights and diagnostic possibilities represented by these changes. Although NSSE's companion surveys, the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), are incorporating parallel changes, here we focus on the changes to NSSE.
Full version
Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M.
In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 28 Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2013.
This chapter traces the development of student engagement as a research-informed intervention to shift the discourse on quality in higher education to emphasize matters of teaching and learning while providing colleges and universities with diagnostic, actionable information that can inform improvement efforts. The conceptual lineage of student engagement blends a set of related theoretical propositions (quality of effort, involvement, and integration) with practice-focused prescriptions for good practice in undergraduate education. The development of survey-based approaches to measuring student engagement is reviewed, including a treatment of recent criticisms of these approaches. Next, we summarize important empirical findings, including validation research, typological research, and research on institutional improvement. Because student engagement emerged as an intervention to inform educational improvement, we also present examples of how engagement data are being used at colleges and universities. The chapter concludes with a discussion of challenges and opportunities going forward.
Full version
The Degree Qualifications Profile: What it is and why we need it now
Jankowski, N., Hutchings, P., Ewell, P. T., Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(6), 6–14, 2013.
There is no shortage of challenges facing postsecondary institutions in the US. One that cuts to the core of the enterprise is whether they are preparing their graduates to live productive, civically responsible lives in a dynamic global marketplace mapped onto diverse, yet increasingly interdependent, social and cultural systems. Much of the evidence presented in recent Change articles suggests that what undergraduate students know and are able to do falls well short of what employers, policymakers, and educational leaders say is needed.
Whether one accepts the available evidence as sufficient to draw such a sweeping conclusion ultimately rests on resolving two non-trivial issues. First, key stakeholders?those mentioned above and others, including students?must agree on the constellation of knowledge, skills, competencies, and dispositions that need to be signaled by postsecondary degrees and credentials if they are to be attuned to the demands of the times.
Various individuals and groups representing business and education have issued sets of preferred outcomes. Perhaps best known are the Essential Learning Outcomes promulgated by the Association of American Colleges and Universities' (AAC&U) Liberal Education and America's Promise (LEAP) campaign. But while there is considerable overlap in the attributes that various groups deem desirable, there is less agreement as to the expected level of proficiency associated with a given credential or degree (associate's, baccalaureate, and post-baccalaureate). Second, what evidence do we have that students have achieved the desired levels of proficiency in the respective outcome areas? Countries throughout the world?in Europe, Australasia, and Central and South America?have made considerable progress in addressing these challenges by developing degree qualifications frameworks that articulate what outcomes graduates of their colleges and universities should have, along with behaviorally anchored indicators and other measures that mark the extent to which students have acquired them. A handful of institutions in the US?such as Alverno College, the military academies, and Western Governor's University?have done something akin to this. But it is only recently that concerted efforts have been mounted to bring greater clarity and more widespread agreement about what credentials and degrees should represent by more precisely defining what college students in this country need to know and be able to do and at what level of proficiency. This paper is about the status and aspirations of one such effort, Lumina Foundation's Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP).Over the past 18 months, the staff of the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) and their colleagues at Public Agenda and Lumina Foundation have collected information from faculty and staff at scores of colleges and universities across the country, as well as from participants at various conferences and convenings, about how the DQP is being used. The DQP authors will take this information into account as they prepare a revised iteration of the document, which should be available in 2014. Drawing from our work as members of the NILOA team and on the perspective of Peter Ewell as one of the DQP authors, what follows is a brief overview of the DQP's defining features, a summary of general trends in its use, brief descriptions of several projects, and an analysis of the DQP's implications for assessment. We conclude with some comments about the promise of the DQP for both individual institutions and for higher education writ large.
Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Ribera, T., Kinzie, J., & Cole, E. R.
To Improve the Academy, 31, 149–160, 2012.
As colleges and universities shift to a learning-
centered paradigm, a growing emphasis is being placed on understanding which teaching practices are effective in promoting student learning (Barr & Tagg, 1995). Reviewing the literature, there are varying ideas on what constitutes effective teaching; however, one that is often referenced when discussing the characteristics of effective teaching is teaching clarity (Feldman, 1989; Hativa, Barak, & Simhi, 2001; Sherman et al., 1987). Teaching clarity can be thought of as a teaching method where faculty demonstrate a level of transparency in their approach to instruction and goal setting in an effort to help students better understand expectations and comprehend subject matter (Ginsberg, 2007b). This includes providing examples and summarizing key points of lectures (Chesebro & McCroskey, 2001; Myers & Knox, 2001). Teaching clarity has been shown to have a positive effect on key outcomes of an undergraduate education (see Chesebro & McCroskey, 2001; Myers & Knox, 2001; Pascarella, Edison, Nora, Hagedorn, & Braxton, 1996). Unfortunately, little is known about the extent to which students are exposed to specific teaching clarity behaviors and the relationship to other important elements of an undergraduate education, such as student engagement, deep learning, and self-reported gains.
An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes
Hu, S., & McCormick, A. C.
Research in Higher Education, 53, 738–754, 2012.
Using data from the 2006 cohort of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, we developed a student typology based on student responses to survey items on the National Survey of Student Engagement. We then examined the utility of this typology in understanding direct-assessment learning outcomes, self-reported gains, grade-point average, and persistence from the first to second year of college. Results from linear and logistic regression models indicated there were relationships between student types and the various outcomes, and that an engagement-based student typology could help deepen our understanding of the college student experience and college outcomes.
Examining the relationship between student learning and persistence
Hu, S., McCormick, A. C., & Gonyea, R. M.
Innovative Higher Education, 37, 387–395, 2012.
Using data from the 2006 cohort of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, we developed a student typology based on student responses to survey items on the National Survey of Student Engagement. We then examined the utility of this typology in understanding direct-assessment learning outcomes, self-reported gains, grade-point average, and persistence from the first to second year of college. Results from linear and logistic regression models indicated there were relationships between student types and the various outcomes, and that an engagement-based student typology could help deepen our understanding of the college student experience and college outcomes.
Financial stress affects academics for college students, survey finds
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2012.
Findings illuminate how financial challenges affect college students. A majority of students surveyed worry about paying for college, and as many as one in three frequently opt not to purchase required academic materials due to cost. Full-time students working more than 20 hours per week face the greatest financial stress: three in five said that their job interfered with their academic performance, yet just as many had considered working more hours.
Full version
Going deep into mechanisms for moral reasoning growth: How deep learning approaches affect moral reasoning development for first-year students
Mayhew, M. J., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Blaich, C. F.
Research in Higher Education, 53, 26–46, 2012.
The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of deep approaches to learning on the moral reasoning development of 1,457 first-year students across 19 institutions. Results showed a modest positive relationship between our measures of deep approaches to learning and moral reasoning at the end of the first year of college even after controlling for precollege moral reasoning. After accounting for a host of demographic and relevant student characteristics and for the natural clustering of students, we found that the integrative learning subscale, which captures students' participation in activities designed to integrate information from varied sources and diverse perspectives, positively affected moral reasoning among first-year students. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.
High-impact practices: Promoting participation for all students
Kinzie, J.
Diversity & Democracy, 15(3), 13–14, 2012.
Certain educational activities, such as learning communities, undergraduate research, study abroad, and service learning, have been identified as high-impact practices (HIPs) because they engage students in active learning that elevates their performance on desired outcomes (NSSE 2007; Kuh 2008). When done well, these practices require students to make their own discoveries and connections, grapple with challenging real-world questions, and address complex problems?all necessary skills if students are to become engaged and effective members of their communities. The strong positive effects of several HIPs are well-documented in extant research about programs that support student learning. Brownell and Swaner conclude that high-impact practices ?live up to their name,? noting a wide range of benefits for participants (2009, 30). Participation in HIPs, including those that emphasize civic engagement, has powerful educational benefits for all students. These kinds of educational experiences are especially powerful for students who may be the first in their family to attend college, and those who are historically underserved in postsecondary education. This article briefly introduces the benefits of HIPs, examines participation in them, and suggests approaches to making these valuable practices more widespread to advance educational equity and social justice goals.
Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys
Miller, A. L.
Educational Research Quarterly, 36(1), 30-47, 2012.
The frequent use of student self-report surveys in higher education calls into question the possibility of social desirability having an unwanted influence on responses. This research explores the potential presence of social desirability bias with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), a widely used assessment of student behaviors. Correlations between a short social desirability scale and NSSE benchmarks, subscales, and selected items suggest that the majority of scores have no significant relationship with a measure of social desirability. A series of regression models controlling for demographic variables produce similar results. Effect sizes and estimates of explained variance are also discussed.
Lessons from the field—Volume 2: Moving from data to action
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University School of Education, 2012.
In this publication we highlight approaches different types of institutions have taken to improve the undergraduate experience. Because NSSE focuses on student behavior and effective educational practice, colleges and universities have found many productive ways to use survey results: accreditation self-studies, benchmarking, curricular reform, faculty and staff development, grant writing, institutional research, retention, and state system comparisons.
The stories about data use illustrate various ways that assessment can be a worthwhile undertaking when meaningful data are generated and discussed with a wide campus audience, and results are used to inform efforts to improve educational effectiveness. Understanding how colleges and universities use results and achieve
improvements in undergraduate education is important.
to advancing systemic improvement in higher
education. The examples in this volume provide ample
inspiration for encouraging institutions to move from
collecting data to taking action.
Full version
Optimizing high-impact educational practices in the senior year
Kinzie, J.
In M. S. Hunter, J. R. Keup, J. Kinzie, & H. Maietta (Eds.) The senior year: Culminating experiences and transitions Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience Students in Transition, 2012.
This chapter addresses how high-impact practices can be used to improve institutional efforts in supporting seniors.
Understanding undergraduate students’ experience: A content analysis using NSSE open-ended comments as an example
Chambers, T., & Chiang, C.-H.
Quality & Quantity, 46, 1113–1123, 2012.
This study demonstrates how a qualitative content analysis method may be used to help understand undergraduate students‘ experience. We examine and rationalize the methodological concerns regarding content analysis of open-ended comments in the qualitative study. We describe a data analysis technique, using qualitative responses from National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) as an example, and highlight the findings in a thematic way to convey how undergraduate students perceive issues that challenge them to develop skills, awareness, and confidence, as well as the potential factors that influence student engagement and future success. Finally, we provide potentials of how these findings can be utilized to improve student experience, limitations of this study as well as suggestions for future research.
Full version
Will these trees ever bear fruit? A response to the special issue on student engagement
McCormick, A. C., & McClenney, K.
The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 307–333, 2012.
There is broad consensus that U.S. higher education needs to do better. Researchers, policymakers, and practitioners have called attention to a range of challenges: too many students enter college unprepared for college-level work, yet many developmental programs are little more than revolving doors; too many students who begin college never graduate, often accumulating considerable debt; the most rapid enrollment growth is among the groups that higher education has historically served least well?so institutions have to do more to ensure their students‘ success; students‘ development of generalized critical-thinking and problem-solving skills falls short of what we want and need; we are not producing enough graduates in science, technology, engineering, and math; cost escalation is unsustainable, with most of the growth occurring outside of core educational functions; and the United States is losing ground to other countries with regard to postsecondary degree attainment. And as we confront these challenges, the national understanding of college quality is dominated by beauty contests that privilege reputation and resources over teaching and learning. The higher education research community has the capacity to contribute to our understanding of and response to these challenges. Indeed, scholars have engaged with many of them. Any could justifiably serve as the organizing theme for a special issue of one of the field‘s leading scholarly journals. Given the range of important topics where systematic, focused scholarly treatment could advance both research and practice, we find it curious that student engagement trumps these subjects as meriting a special issue of the Association for the Study of Higher Education‘s signature scholarly journal. We might be flattered that our work is seen as deserving such attention, but we are instead dismayed that the ?special issue on student engagement? was in fact devoted to critiques focused exclusively on the two university-based research and service projects that we direct; that it included no contributions from scholars with a record of inquiry on student engagement; and that we had no opportunity to respond to the critique in the special issue itself so as to better advance scholarly discourse and professional practice. While our projects have always welcomed reasoned critique (continuous improvement based on feedback is a hallmark of both projects), we find these precedents worrisome. We are nevertheless grateful for the opportunity to submit this response after the fact. In the following pages, we situate our response relative to the long-decried disconnect between higher education research and practice, a gap that our respective projects attempt to bridge. We offer brief comments about the Olivas preface, mostly to correct factual errors and omissions, and then provide more detailed responses to the substantive critiques in the articles by Porter; Dowd, Sawatzky, and Korn; Campbell and Cabrera; and Nora, Crisp, and Matthews (all 2011).
Full version
An investigation of the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C.
Research in Higher Education, 52, 300–322, 2011.
This study examined the contingent relationships between learning community participation and student engagement in educational activities inside and outside the classroom using data from the 2004 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Results indicated that learning community participation was positively and significantly related to student engagement, both for first-year students and seniors. For some types of engagement, relationships were significantly stronger for seniors than for first-year students. Analyses also revealed there was substantial variability across institutions in the magnitude of the relationships between learning community participation and first-year students' levels of engagement. Although institutional characteristics accounted for some of the variability across institutions, a substantial amount of the variability in engagement-learning community relationships remained unexplained.
Career and technical education students who transition to four-year institutions: An exploratory study
Qi, W., & Cole, J. S.
The Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 23, 75–92, 2011.
Each year more students with career and technical education (CTE) backgrounds are transitioning to four-year institutions. This exploratory study investigated differences between CTE, community college transfers and native (nontransfer) students at four-year institutions in regard to how they balance their time and their academic engagement patterns. An important finding of this study was that CTE students, when compared to traditional nontransfer students and community college transfers, spent equal amounts of time studying and demonstrated equal or significantly greater levels of academic engagement. The findings also provide the higher education community much needed information regarding the CTE students‘ transition to college.
Full version
Clearing the air about the use of self-reported gains in institutional research
Gonyea, R. M., & Miller, A.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(150), 99–111, 2011.
Correlations between self-reported learning gains and direct, longitudinal measures that ostensibly correspond in content area are generally inadequate. This chapter clarifies that self-reported measures of learning are more properly used and interpreted as evidence of students' perceived learning and affective outcomes. In this context, the authors supply evidence that social desirability bias in such self-assessments does not constitute a significant concern. Recommendations for use of self-reported gains in research and institutional assessment are discussed.
Establishing differences between diversity requirements and other courses with varying degrees of diversity inclusivity
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Engberg, M. E.
The Journal of General Education, 60, 117–137, 2011.
This study examines how diversity requirements differ from courses that are highly inclusive or less inclusive of diversity. Results suggest that instructor characteristics are statistically different and that highly inclusive and less inclusive diversity courses score highest and lowest, respectively, on measures of effective teaching compared with required diversity courses.
Gender gaps in collegiate teaching style: Variations by course characteristics
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., & Niskod-Dossett, A.S.
Research in Higher Education, 52, 261–277, 2011.
Using data from over 9,000 faculty members that participated in the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this study examined the moderating role a range of course characteristics played on the effects of gender on the percentage of class time spent on various activities, a measure of teaching style. Results revealed gender differences, but that the gaps between men and women in lecturing and active classroom practices varied by disciplinary area, course level, and the number of times a course had been taught by the same instructor. The results confirm that gender effects depend on context, which implies that efforts to improve teaching and learning must also adapt to the instructional context.
If and when money matters: The relationships among educational expenditures, student engagement, and students’ learning outcomes
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., Ethington, C. A., & Smart, J. C.
Research in Higher Education, 52, 81–106, 2011.
Calls for accountability in higher education are prompted in part by questions concerning whether colleges and universities use their resources effectively to promote student learning. Unfortunately, too little is known about whether money matters to desired outcomes of college. Using students‘ responses to the 2004 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in concert with institutional data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and the College Board, this study examined the relationships between educational expenditures, student engagement and selected student self-reported learning outcomes, controlling for student and institutional characteristics. Results indicated that expenditures were modestly related to student engagement and learning outcomes. However, the nature of these relationships differed, depending on the engagement/outcome measure and student year in school.
Institutional encouragement of and faculty engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Ribera, T.
To Improve the Academy, 30, 112–125, 2011.
Nelson Laird and Ribera examine institutional encouragement of and faculty engagement in SoTL across forty-nine U.S. colleges and universities. Their results suggest that institutional encouragement of and faculty engagement in the public dissemination of teaching investigations lag behind encouragement and engagement in other aspects of SoTL.
It’s about time: What to make of reported declines in how much college students study
McCormick, A. C.
Liberal Education, 97(1), 30–39, 2011.
A substantial body of research affirms the commonsense notion that involvement in academic work and quality of effort pay off: the more students engage in educationally purposeful activities, the more they learn. An important element is how much time students invest in studying. Yet while time is important, it is increasingly clear that how students spend their study time also matters. Spending many hours memorizing facts in order to perform well on an exam may earn a good grade, but it is not likely to result in long-term retention or the ability to apply what was learned in novel situations. A recent longitudinal analysis of student performance on the open-ended performance task of the Collegiate Learning Assessment, administered to the same students at the beginning of the first year and at the end of the sophomore year, found that hours spent studying alone corresponded to improved performance, but hours spent studying with peers did not. While we should not ignore the importance of how study time is used, this article focuses on the simple question of how much full-time college students study, whether study time has declined, and if so, what may account for the decline.
Full version
Measuring the diversity inclusivity of college courses
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Research in Higher Education, 52, 572–588, 2011.
Most studies of curricular diversity have focused on the effects of participation in diversity courses on student outcomes. Though the results have been positive, these studies have used limited measures of curricular diversity and there is a great need for a complimentary body of research demonstrating what faculty and what types of courses are more likely to include diversity. This study relies on 12 diversity inclusivity items derived from a comprehensive model of how diversity is included into a course to investigate how much diversity is being included in collegiate courses and what predicts diversity inclusivity, as measured by two scales: diverse grounding and inclusive learning. The results, based on 7,101 responses from faculty participating in the 2007 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, suggest that most faculty are including diversity in their courses in some way, but that women and faculty of color tend to include diversity to a greater extent than their colleagues. Also, courses taught in the soft fields are more likely to be inclusive of diversity.
STEM/non-STEM differences in engagement at U.S. institutions
Nelson Laird, T. F., McCormick, A. C., Sullivan, D. F., & Zimmerman, C. K.
Peer Review, 13(3), 23–26, 2011.
A recent paper by one of us (Nelson Laird) and some colleagues brought some sobering news of differences between STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and non-STEM undergraduates with regard to approaches to learning that promote more complex, deeper understanding. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), Nelson Laird and colleagues examined disciplinary differences in the extent to which students are exposed to educational environments that promote deep approaches to learning. These approaches to learning are important because ?[s]tudents who use deep approaches to learning tend to perform better as well as retain, integrate, and transfer information at higher rates than students using surface approaches to student learning? (Nelson Laird, Shoup, Kuh, and Schwarz 2008, 470). Nelson Laird and colleagues found?using models with extensive statistical controls?that, nationally, STEM faculty generally use pedagogies that encourage higher-order, integrative, and reflective learning significantly less than faculty in non-STEM fields and, not coincidently, STEM seniors experience ?deep approaches to learning? less than seniors in non-STEM fields (for descriptions of the three measures, see Nelson Laird et al. 2008). The differences were small for Higher-Order Learning, the scale that is concerned with analysis, synthesis, and judgment regarding evidence?relatively good news?but quite large for the Integrative and Reflective Learning scales. The study by Nelson Laird and colleagues is a part of a larger body of work about students engaging in educationally purposeful activities?those educational practices known to positively influence valued educational outcomes, activities such as active and collaborative learning and those that involve much student?faculty interaction, as noted in many of the articles in this issue of Peer Review. We know of the positive impact of pedagogies of engagement not only on general student learning, but also on STEM learning, from years of research. It is discouraging that, nationally, faculty in STEM fields tend to have lower expectations for integrative and reflective learning relative to other faculty, and that results from seniors reflect those differences. The Integrative Learning scale assesses how often students use ideas from various sources and courses, include diverse perspectives in class discussions or writing assignments, and discuss ideas from readings or classes with faculty members and others outside of class. The Reflective Learning scale is a combination of responses to questions about trying out different perspectives and thinking about one‘s own beliefs. The kinds of intellectual self-reflection skills these questions are about are surely as important in the STEM disciplines as they are in other disciplines, but we see that STEM majors have far fewer opportunities to develop these skills than students in other majors. Indeed, one might argue that it is especially in STEM that students should acquire these skills, given the way empirical evidence tends to be seen as harder in science than in other disciplines. Discovering a bad premise or assumption and being open to other interpretations are just as important in STEM disciplines as elsewhere. These results caused us to want to look more closely at STEM/non-STEM differences and to determine whether there are circumstances where STEM seniors buck the general trends and are as engaged or more engaged than their non-STEM peers.
Student learning in fraternities and sororities: Using NSSE data to describe members’ participation in educationally meaningful activities in college
Bureau, D., Ryan, H. G., Ahren, C., Shoup, R., & Torres, V.
Oracle, 6(1), 1–22, 2011.
The benefits and challenges for college students involved in social fraternities and sororities have long been sources of heated discussion among higher education constituents. A liberal education is meant to incorporate elements of critical thinking, diverse experiences, and challenging and enriching interactions with peers and educators. Past research indicates that involvement in a fraternity or sorority has had some positive effect in these areas, especially as students persist at their chosen institutions. This study uses data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to explore indicators of student learning among senior members of social fraternities and sororities. Regression analyses controlling for conditional variables indicated that students in these groups report higher involvement in critical developmental practices and larger gains in important educational areas than their unaffiliated counterparts. Limitations and implications of the
study are discussed.
Full version
In their own words: Understanding the undergraduate student experience at the University of Toronto
Office of the Vice Provost, Students, & First-Entry Divisions, University of Toronto.
Toronto, ON, Canada: , 2010.
Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research
Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M.
Research in Higher Education, 51(4), 305–319, 2010.
Because it is often impractical or impossible to obtain school transcripts or records on subjects, many researchers rely on college students to accurately self-report their academic record as part of their data collection procedures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of student self-reported academic performance. As expected the study finds overall validity of self-reported test scores to be high. However, correlations between self-reported and actual SAT scores are significantly lower than correlations for self-reported and actual ACT Composite scores. This study also confirms prior research which found that when students are inaccurate in reporting their scores, a disproportionate number of them over-report their scores. Also consistent with other studies, this study finds that lower achieving students for both tests are much less accurate when reporting their scores.
Full version
Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J.
New York, NY: Wiley, 2010.
Student Success in College describes policies, programs, and practices that a diverse set of institutions have used to enhance student achievement. This book clearly shows the benefits to student learning and educational effectiveness that can be realized when these conditions are present. Based on the Documenting Effective Educational Practice (DEEP) project from the Center for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University, this book provides concrete examples from 20 institutions that other colleges and universities can learn from and adapt to help create a success-oriented campus culture and learning environment.
Full version
How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes?
Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Education, 42(1), 16–22, 2010.
Pursuant to a subcontract from the Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College, the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa analyzed institution-level data from the first year of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education to estimate the validity of the NSSE benchmarks in predicting seven traits and skills thought to be the outcomes of a general liberal arts education. Our study measured those outcomes directly; it also addressed the limitations of past research on the NSSE by using a longitudinal pre-test-post-test approach. No other investigation of which we are aware provides such a comprehensive validation of the NSSE benchmark scales.
Full version
A comparison of student and faculty academic technology use across disciplines
Guidry, K. R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(3), , 2010.
Our study extends the research into faculty and student use of contemporary academic technologies by asking five questions: How often do students report using academic technologies? How often do faculty report using academic technologies? Do students in different disciplines use these technologies more or less than their peers? Do faculty in different disciplines use these technologies more or less than their peers? Are there noticeable differences between how often students and faculty use these technologies? Our study examined responses to a pair of surveys ? the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) ? administered in the spring of 2009.
Assessment for advancement
McCormick, A. C.
CASE Currents, 36(3), 11–12, 2010.
Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic
Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J.
Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 305–317, 2010.
This paper examines the experiences of students in undergraduate engineering compared to students in other fields, using responses on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). NSSE is a cross-sectional survey that is widely used by four-year undergraduate institutions in the United States and Canada, with adaptations for use in Australia, China, New Zealand, and South Africa. The data analyzed in this paper reflect responses from a longitudinal sample of nearly 12,000 U.S. students, representing a wide range of majors, who took the NSSE survey as first-year students and then again as seniors. Using NSSE variables, we explored the extent to which the collegiate experiences of engineering majors compared to the collegiate experiences of non-engineering majors with respect to student engagement. We also compared the experiences of those who persisted in engineering, those who left engineering to pursue another major, and those who migrated into engineering from another major. Finally, we developed a predictive model for engineering persistence based on students‘ reported educational experiences and demographic characteristics. We found that, in most ways, the undergraduate experiences of engineering majors are similar to the experiences of students who major in other disciplines. However, in some key areas, the experiences of engineering students are very different.
Foreword
Kinzie, J.
In J. Melius (Ed.) Student engagement as a factor in academic achievement: The case study of undergraduates at Norfolk State University, Virginia New York, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2010.
Here's looking at you: Transparency, institutional self-presentation, and the public interest
McCormick, A. C.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(6), 35–43, 2010.
Accountability figures prominently in the higher education policy discourse these days. Critics of higher education (for instance, members of the Spellings Commission) argue that colleges and universities need to be more ?transparent? to justify support by taxpayers, payers of tuition, and other funders. To better inform prospective students and other stakeholders, we are being asked to go public about our programs, educational processes, and results. But transparency can be about more than consumer information. It can provide an opportunity for a college or university to proclaim its successes while acknowledging that it needs to improve in some areas. Information about results can also document progress toward important goals. For internal audiences, this kind of information focuses attention and signals priorities for improvement, while for external observers it offers evidence that the academy takes its educational mission seriously and practices what it preaches regarding the use of evidence to support assertions, interpretations, conclusions, and prescriptions for action. Such openness is risky for several reasons, though. Revealing shortcomings invites negative consequences, whether from a legislature that may be seeking ways to cut budgets or to demonstrate a hard-nosed commitment to quality, from competitors seeking to exploit vulnerabilities, from alumni or other constituents on the lookout for evidence of a decline in standards, and so on. As a result, ?transparency? is sometimes a euphemism for what might be more accurately described as strategic communication or image management, in which information is carefully selected and presented so as to portray a successful and effective institution. This should come as no surprise. A persistent, paradoxical, and problematic characteristic of accountability systems in general is that they create a powerful incentive for those being held accountable ?to look as good as possible, regardless of the underlying performance? (Ewell, 2009, p. 7). In this article, I examine various forms of public reporting of student engagement information. Some are controlled by third parties and others by the institutions themselves. I look at four third-party efforts: the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE), the Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA), Transparency by Design (TbD), and the institutionally authorized online publication of results from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) by the daily newspaper USA TODAY (USAT). (See Resources for links to these Web sites.) The Center for Community College Student Engagement (which houses CCSSE) recently introduced a new survey focused on the early experience of entering community college students; while this review focuses on CCSSE, it applies equally to the Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE), which uses a comparable reporting framework.
Full version
How gender and race moderate the effect of interactions across difference on student perceptions of the campus environment
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Niskod-Dossett, A. S.
The Review of Higher Education, 33(3), 333–356, 2010.
Relying on data from 37,122 first-year students and 42,285 seniors who participated in the 2006 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study illustrates how student interactions across difference positively affect student perceptions of the campus environment. The magnitude of the effect of these interactions varies meaningfully by racial/ethnic group, but not by gender.
Perspectives from campus leaders on the current state of student learning outcomes assessment.
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Update, 22(5), 1–2, 14–15, 2010.
The assessment of student learning outcomes is of keen interest to the federal government, accrediting bodies, and education associations and policymakers. Colleges and universities have been under increased pressured to demonstrate accountability for student learning and be more transparent about dimensions of educational quality. Although institutions are responding to these demands, it is not altogether clear where learning outcomes assessment ranks in importance on institutions‘ action agenda, or the extent to which colleges and universities are using assessment results to make real improvements in the quality of student learning. The National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) is a multiyear effort to understand and further the student learning outcomes agenda nationally. One of NILOA‘s primary activities is tracking the journey of higher education institutions responding to the challenge of outcomes assessment. To this end, NILOA conducts surveys, focus groups, and case studies to learn more about what colleges and universities are doing to assess student learning and how they are using the results. This paper highlights lessons from four focus group sessions with campus leaders ? presidents, provosts, academic deans and directors of institutional research from a variety of two- and four-year institutions ? regarding their perspectives on the state of learning assessment practices on their campuses. The perceptions are considered in relation to findings from the 2009 NILOA survey report, More Than You Think, Less than We Need: Learning Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education. The perspectives of campus leaders provide first-hand accounts of a range of student learning outcomes activities on campus and help contextualize results from the 2009 NILOA survey. Focus group findings illustrate the extent to which assessment has taken hold on campus, explicate the role of accreditation and the responsibility of faculty in student learning outcomes assessment, and showcase how assessment has been furthered on campuses. The institutional examples of innovative assessment practices, particularly those that involve faculty in meaningful ways and lead to institutional improvements, and the promising ways that assessment has been woven into administrative structures and processes, are instructive for advancing understanding of what is happening on the ground at colleges and universities. The paper concludes by articulating questions and challenges raised by campus leaders including reservations about identifying and using assessment measures, issues of transparency and communicating results, and concerns about financing assessment. As the demand for greater emphasis on student learning outcomes assessment intensifies, it is important to document both the successes and challenges associated with campus efforts to respond. Campus leaders provide an important perspective on what is most likely to help assessment efforts grow and deepen in institutions.
Research and discovery across the curriculum
Elrod, S., Kinzie, J., & Husic, D.
Peer Review, 12(2), 4–8, 2010.
The national conversation on undergraduate research is gaining momentum, in part because of its identification as one of the ten high-impact educational practices identified in an analysis of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), published by the Association of American Colleges and Universities (Kuh 2008). However, the trend is not new; the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) has been a leading proponent of undergraduate research for the past thirty years. According to CUR, undergraduate research is ?an inquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an original intellectual or creative contribution to the discipline.? Ramirez and Hoagland (2003) state that faculty and students should be encouraged to ??collaborate as partners in their explorations of uncharted intellectual terrain. The symbiosis established between the faculty member and undergraduate collaborator energizes and informs the faculty member‘s teaching and research while simultaneously introducing the student to the joys of discovery as well as to lessons in persistence, problem-solving and critical thinking.? Thus, it is as much a matter of effective teaching and learning as it is a matter of research and scholarship. In STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines, Project Kaleidoscope, working over the past twenty years to advance effective STEM education, has also played a role. The National Science Foundation‘s Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) and Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) programs and various scientific societies have also helped to promote, support, and highlight the work of undergraduate researchers. Many funding agencies, philanthropic foundations and other organizations have also touted and supported the educational benefits of undergraduate research across all disciplines for decades, including the National Humanities Alliance, which holds an annual Humanities Advocacy Day. Undergraduate research experiences are also held in high regard by faculty members: more than 50 percent of faculty members reported on the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) that participation in a research project with a faculty member is important for students (National Survey of Student Engagement 2008). Students in all disciplines are also increasingly calling for such experiences (Society of Physics Students 2008). In this article, we provide an analysis of the value of undergraduate research and suggest that its essence be used to infuse a pedagogy of research and discovery into courses across the curriculum for a more relevant, real-world, research-rich educational experience.
Student engagement and a culture of assessment
Kinzie, J.
In G. Kramer & R. Swing (Eds.) Higher education assessments: Leadership matters Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield, 2010.
The author asserts that many campuses have made significant advances in assessment practices that drive improvements in student learning and success. This chapter introduces a framework for assessment based on student engagement and success, then highlights nine characteristics of campus assessment activities associated with improvements to student learning. For convenience, characteristics are grouped according to their focus on 1. strong leadership, 2. inclusive involvement, or 3. outcomes-based program function. Most institutions still find it hard to use evidence for systematic improvement, and few report having well-developed assessment plans to sustain a culture of assessment. Fortunately, effective and inspirational models have been developed by many institutions that have adopted an effective student engagement framework for assessing and improving the conditions for students' success leading to improvements in their learning. In this chapter, the lessons learned from 20 educationally effective institutions are reexamined in light of information from additional institutions that have advanced a framework for student engagement and success.
Student engagement and learning: Experiences that matter
Kinzie, J.
In J. C. Hughes & J. Mighty (Eds.) Taking stock: Research on teaching and learning in higher education Montreal, Quebec/Kingston, ON, Canada: McGill-Queen?s University Press, 2010.
The author presents an overview of the current research on student engagement and learning. Taking into account decades of work on the subject, she concludes that ?engagement is . . . a robust proxy? for learning. More specifically, in a ?host of studies,? measures of student engagement correlate positively with measures of student learning. More plainly, when students are engaged, they are usually learning?and vice versa. The obvious pedagogical takeaway: We are encouraged to engage students more and to engage them more deeply. In other words, ?Engaging pedagogies matter . . .? (p. 151). In addition to this broad affirmation of efforts to engage students in the learning process, Kinzie proposes four specific propositions for how we should apply the research on student engagement and learning: 1. Expectations matter to student learning and success, particularly in the first year of university; 2. Stimulating educational experiences and certain ?high-impact? practices raise student learning and impart greater benefit to all students; 3. What faculty emphasize and think is important to learning and influences what students do; and 4. Educators must be concerned with the total learning environment, inside and outside the classroom.
The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Garver, A. K.
Research in Higher Education, 51, 248–265, 2010.
Building on work examining differences in the emphasis faculty place on effective educational practices, this study uses data from nearly 8,000 faculty members from the 2007 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement to explore how disciplinary area moderates the effect of teaching a general education course (GEC) on the emphasis faculty place on deep approaches to learning. Results showed that the GEC effect was strongest in hard-applied-life fields and weakest in hard-pure-life and soft-applied-life fields, suggesting that proponents of general education reform need to temper their efforts by a clearer understanding of disciplinary differences.
Using longitudinal data to improve the experiences and engagement of first-year students
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(Assessment Supplement), 43–52, 2010.
This chapter describes how campuses can use longitudinal data to investigate and improve the experiences and engagement patterns of their first-year students. The chapter has two goals. The first is to briefly describe the relationship between precollege student characteristics such as students‘ high school engagement and their engagement expectations for the first year of college with students‘ subsequent first-year engagement and experiences. The second is to present concrete examples of how campuses can use longitudinal data to better understand the experiences and engagement patterns of their first-year students.
Full version
What I hear you saying is... : Analysis of student comments from the NSSE
Chambers, T.
College Student Journal, 44(1), 3–24, 2010.
A major challenge of assessing students' experiences in postsecondary education is collecting an array of information that inform institutions about what students do and how they make meaning of their experiences during their time in particular educational environments. While the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is highly respected and broadly administered throughout higher education, most, if not all, of the analyses of NSSE data have been conducted on the quantitative responses to its survey items. Very little attention is given to students' responses to the open-ended question at the end of the NSSE survey, "Do you have any other comments?" This study explored the open-ended responses undergraduate students provided on the NSSE regarding their engagement with educationally purposeful activities at a large urban research institution. Content analyses were conducted on 739 coded responses from students, yielding 10 thematic categories organized into 4 experience domains. Additionally the study explored the distinctions among the categorical and domain responses across and among the nine colleges/faculties within the study institution. Potential implications, limitations and opportunities related to the study findings are discussed as well. (Contains 2 tables.)
Work during college: Its relationship to student engagement and education outcomes
McCormick, A. C., Moore, J. V. III, & Kuh, G. D.
In In L. W. Perna (Ed.) Understanding the working college student: New research and its implications for policy and practice Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2010.
Research discussed in this chapter found that working either on campus or off campus is positively connected to several proportions of student engagement, particularly for full-time students. Specifically, students working more than 20 hours per week had the biggest gains on student engagement. First-year students were more likely to work longer hours and to work off campus more frequently than other students. Compared to students who had a parent with a bachelor‘s degree, a significant share of first-generation students worked more than 20 hours per week (e.g., among freshmen, 20% of first-generation students versus 10% second- or older-generation students worked and among seniors, 39% of first-generation students versus 25%second- or older-generation). Furthermore, first-generation seniors were twice as likely as their peers with college-educated parents to work at least 30 hours per week (20% versus 10%). Thus, with so many college students working, it is imperative that faculty and staff become more informed about the relationship between employment and both student engagement and educational outcomes.
Analyzing and interpreting NSSE data
Chen, P.-S. D., Gonyea, R. M., Sarraf, S. A., BrckaLorenz, A., Korkmaz, A., Lambert, A. D., Shoup, R., & Williams, J. M.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), 35–54, 2009.
Colleges and universities in the United States are being challenged to assess student outcomes and the quality of programs and services (McPherson & Shulenburger, 2006; Commission on the Future of Higher Education, 2006). One of the more widely used sources of evidence is student engagement as measured by a cluster of student engagement surveys administered by the Center for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University. They include the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and its companion projects: the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement, Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, and Law School Survey of Student Engagement. The University of Texas?Austin hosts the two-year variation of the NSSE, the Community College Survey of Student Engagement. With more than 1,300 colleges and universities using NSSE, many institutional researchers may benefit from guidance about how to understand and use these data. This chapter shares practical tips and recommendations for the analysis and interpretation of NSSE data. We divided the chapter into three parts. The first offers six overarching tips and recommendations for working with student engagement data. We then discuss considerations for the analysis of multiple years of student engagement data. Finally, we describe how effect sizes can be used and interpreted to make student engagement results more meaningful. Although we use NSSE data and examples throughout the chapter, institutional researchers can almost always extrapolate the suggestions we provide to other student experience surveys. Instead of technical discussions of such topics as scale construction and factor analysis, we focus on practical, concrete data manipulations and applications for the analytical work of the institutional research professional.
Comparing the utility of the 2000 and 2005 Carnegie classification systems in research on students’ college experiences and outcomes.
McCormick, A. C., Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Chen, P. D.
Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 144–167, 2009.
Full version
Converting engagement results into action
Kinzie, J., & Pennipede, B. S.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 83–96, 2009.
Editor's notes
Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), 1–4, 2009.
Effectively involving faculty in the assessment of student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Smallwood, R., Niskod-Dossett, A. S., & Garver, A. K.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 71–81, 2009.
Independent colleges and student engagement: Descriptive analysis by institutional type
BrckaLorenz, A., Ribera, T., & Gonyea, R. M.
(A 2009 NSSE special analysis update for the Council of Independent Colleges). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2009.
Individual and environmental effects of part-time enrollment status on student-faculty interaction and self-reported gains
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Cruce, T. M.
The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 290–314, 2009.
Lessons from the field—Volume 1: Using NSSE to assess and improve undergraduate education
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University School of Education, 2009.
Assessment is a worthwhile undertaking when
meaningful data are generated, evidence-based
improvement initiatives are thoroughly considered and discussed, and results are ultimately used to improve educational effectiveness. NSSE results are oriented toward such practical use. Each year, more campuses use their NSSE results in innovative ways to improve the undergraduate experience. In this publication we highlight the approaches different types of institutions
have taken to move from data to action.
Full version
NSSE, organizational intelligence, and the institutional researcher
Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), 107–113, 2009.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations
Kuh, G. D.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20, 2009.
The role of precollege data in assessing and understanding student engagement in college
Cole, J. S., Kennedy, M., & Ben-Avie, M.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), 55–70, 2009.
Full version
The use of engagement data in accreditation, planning, and assessment
Banta, T. W., Pike, G. R., & Hansen, M. J.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), 21–34, 2009.
Toward reflective accountability: Using NSSE for accountability and transparency
McCormick, A. C.
New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(141), 97–106, 2009.
Using NSSE in institutional research
Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D. (Eds.)
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141, Special Issue), , 2009.
Full version
What general education courses contribute to essential learning outcomes
Nelson Laird, T. F., Niskod-Dossett, A. S., & Kuh, G. D.
The Journal of General Education, 58, 65–84, 2009.
Collecting survey data for assessment: A practice brief based on BEAMS project outcomes
Kinzie, J.
Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy, 2008.
Full version
Classroom practices at institutions with higher-than-expected persistence rates: What student engagement data tells us
Nelson Laird, T. F., Chen, D., & Kuh, G. D.
In J. Braxton (Ed.), The role of the classroom in college student persistence , 2008.
Learning at a distance: Engaged or not?
Chen, P. D., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3), , 2008.
Full version
Predicting collegiate philanthropy: Student engagement as a correlate of young alumni giving
Moore III, J. V.
Journal of the Indiana University Student Personnel Association, 2008 Edition, , 39–55, 2008.
Full version
Promoting persistence and success of underrepresented students: Lessons for teaching and learning
Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(115), 21–38, 2008.
Student engagement and student success at Historically Black and Hispanic-Serving Institutions
Bridges, B. K., Kinzie, J., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D.
In In M. Gasman, B. Baez, & C. Turner (Eds.) Understanding minority-serving institutions San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J.
Research in Higher Education, 49, 469–494, 2008.
Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M.
The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563, 2008.
Methodological challenges in multi-investigator multi-institutional research in higher education
Kinzie, J., Magolda, P., Kezar, A., Kuh, G. D., Hinkle, S., & Whitt, E
Higher Education, 54(3), 469–482, 2007.
Full version
Student learning and faculty research: Connecting teaching and scholarship
American Council of Learned Societies
Washington, DC: The Teagle Foundation, 2007.
Full version
Comparative review of British, American, and Australian national surveys of undergraduate students
Higher Education Academy
National survey comparative review York, UK: Author, 2007.
Full version
Connecting the dots: Multi-faceted analyses of the relationships between student engagement results from the NSSE, and the institutional practices and conditions that foster student success
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., & Gonyea, R. M.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2007.
Full version
Student engagement in law school: Knowing our students
Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2007.
African American and Hispanic student engagement at minority-serving and predominantly White institutions
Nelson Laird, T. F., Bridges, B. K., Morelon-Quainoo, C. L., Williams, J. M., & Salinas Holmes, M.
Journal of College Student Development, 48(1), 1–18, 2007.
Built to engage: Liberal arts colleges and effective educational practice
Kuh, G. D.
In F. Oakely (Ed.) Liberal arts colleges in American higher education New York, NY: American Council of Learned Societies, 2007.
Full version
Contextualizing NSSE effect sizes: Empirical analysis and interpretation of benchmark comparisons
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2007.
Full version
Engaging students in the first college year: Why librarians matter
Kuh, G. D., Boruff-Jones, P. D., & Mark, A. E.
In L. Hardesty (Ed.) The role of the library in the first college year Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 2007.
Engaging undergraduate students in research activities: Are research universities doing a better job?
Hu, S., Kuh, G.D., & Gaston Gayles, J.
Innovative Higher Education, , , 2007.
Full version
Evaluating the rationale for affirmative action in college admissions: Direct and indirect relationships between campus diversity and gains in understanding diverse groups
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Journal of College Student Development, 48(2), 1–17, 2007.
Full version
Risky business
Kuh, G. D
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(5), 31–35, 2007.
Full version
Student engagement in the first year of college
Kuh, G. D
In M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, & B. O. Barefoot (Eds.) Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
What student engagement data tell us about college readiness
Kuh, G. D.
Peer Review, 9(1), 4–8, 2007.
Full version
Who flourishes in college? Using positive psychology and student involvement theory to explore mental health among traditionally aged undergraduates
Ambler, G.
Williamsburg, VA: The College of William and Mary, 2007.
Why teacher-scholars matter: Some insights from FSSE and NSSE
Kuh, G. D., Chen, D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Liberal Education, 93(4), 40–45, 2007.
Women students at co-educational and women's colleges: How do their experiences compare?
Kinzie, J., Thomas, A. D., Palmer, M. M., Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 48(2), 145–165, 2007.
Full version
What matters to student success: A review of the literature
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J.A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2006.
Full version
Are students ready for college? What student engagement data say
McCarthy, M. M., & Kuh, G. D.
Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 664–669, 2006.
Assessing what matters in law school: The Law School Survey of Student Engagement
O'Day, P. A., & Kuh, G. D.
Indiana Law Journal, 81(1), 401–409, 2006.
Full version
DEEP lessons: Enhanced roles for SSAOs
Schuh, J. H., Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., & Manning, K.
Leadership Exchange, 4(1), 5–9, 2006.
Engaging legal education: Moving beyond the status quo
Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2006.
Full version
Expectations and engagement: How liberal arts college students compare with counterparts elsewhere
Gonyea, R. M., Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2006.
To learn more about the relationships between students‘ pre-college educational experiences and
their expectations for and experiences in the first college year, we turned to data collected via the newly developed Beginning College Survey of Engagement (BCSSE) and the National Survey of
Student Engagement (NSSE). The BCSSE, a companion instrument to the NSSE, measures entering
students‘ expectations for college (with a focus on participating in educationally purposeful activities). It also collects information about selected high school experiences. The NSSE assesses the extent to which first-year students in college engage in empirically-derived good educational practices and what they gain from their college experience. Thus, we can match entering students‘ responses to the BCSS with their responses to the NSSE at the end of the first year of college to obtain a more accurate picture of what students are like when they start college and what they expect of themselves and their college or university, and compare these responses to what students actually do during their first year of college. A better understanding of these phenomena will be instructive for revising pre-college socialization, orientation, and first-year experience initiatives as well as other efforts designed to enhance student learning and improve persistence and graduation rates. Because the Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College is committed to exploring various facets of and promoting liberal arts educational practices and ensuring that the nature of liberal arts education is better understood, we
concentrate on the expectations and experiences of students at baccalaureate liberal arts colleges
compared to students at other types of colleges and universities.
Three central questions guided this analysis:
(1) What do liberal arts college students expect to do during their first year of study in terms
of academic, social and other activities?
(2) How do the expectations of liberal arts college students compare with their experiences
during the first year?
(3) How do the expectations and experiences of liberal arts college students compare with
those of their peers at other types of institutions?
Full version
Increasing student participation in NSSE: Two success stories
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Update, 18(2), 4–6, 2006.
Full version
Independent colleges and student engagement: Do religious affiliation and institutional type matter?
Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2006.
This study extends previous work on the relationships between student engagement in spirituality-enhancing activities during college and selected student and institutional variables. Using the same data set and many of the same dependent variables as an analysis performed for the Teagle Foundation, this study for CIC examined more extensively the influence of
institutional variables including multiple categories of religious affiliation, Carnegie classification, and control (public/private). Block hierarchical regression models were used to estimate the relationships between institutional type characteristics and nine dependent variables. Religious affiliation explained the most variance on three dependent variables ? participating in spiritual activities (worship), gains in spiritual development (gnspirit), and gains in ethical development (gnethics). Students at faith-based institutions scored the highest on these dimensions, followed by Roman Catholic and Other Protestant-affiliated institutions. At the same time, students attending non-affiliated, private institutions did not differ in any appreciable way from their public school peers, with both groups generally engaging least often in spiritual activities. Although the effects were not as strong as with religious affiliation, students attending private institutions scored higher than their public school counterparts in certain areas such as participating in spiritual activities, engaging in deep learning, and in self-reported growth in spirituality, ethical development, personal and social development, and intellectual skills. The findings indicate religiously affiliated colleges and universities are not all alike and that there is more to learn about how institutional mission and environments influence student engagement and learning.
Full version
Intercollegiate athletes and effective educational practices: Winning combinations or losing effort?
Umbach, P. D., Palmer, M. M., Kuh, G. D., & Hannah, S. J.
Research in Higher Education, 47, 709–733, 2006.
Make the most of your NSSE data
Kinzie, J.
Leadership Exchange, 5(2), 31–35, 2006.
Making students matter
Kuh, G. D.
In J. C. Burke (Ed.) Fixing the fragmented university: Decentralization with direction Boston, MA: Jossey-Bass, 2006.
Full version
Nonresponse bias in student assessment surveys: A comparison of respondents and non-respondents of the National Survey of Student Engagement at an independent comprehensive Catholic university
McInnis, E. D.
, 2006.
Relationship among structural diversity, informal peer interactions and the perceptions of the campus environment
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D.
The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 425–450, 2006.
Full version
Spirituality, liberal learning, and college student engagement
Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Liberal Education, Winter, 40–47, 2006.
Full version
Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P
Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32, 2006.
Full version
Student success in college: Why it matters and what institutions can do about it
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J.
, , 2006.
Full version
Taking student expectations seriously: A guide for campus applications
Miller, T., Kuh, G. D., Paine, D., & Associates
Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 2006.
The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores
Pike, G. R.
Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 551–564, 2006.
Full version
Student engagement: A missing link in improving high schools
McCarthy, M. M., & Kuh, G. D
Teachers College Record, , , 2005.
A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D.
Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 185–209, 2005.
Full version
Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T.
Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 5–20, 2005.
Full version
“Never let it rest”: Lessons about student success from high performing colleges and universities
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(4), 42–53, 2005.
A time-honored approach to improving effectiveness is to learn what high-performing organizations within a given industry do and then to determine which of their practices are replicable in other settings. A team of 24 researchers coordinated by the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Institute for Effective Educational Practice at the Indiana University
Center for Postsecondary Research set out to do just that. The Documenting Effective Educational Practices (DEEP) project was a two-year study of 20 four-year colleges and universities that had both higher-than-predicted graduation rates and higher-than-predicted scores on the NSSE. Graduation is increasingly used in accountability and performance systems as an indicator of institutional effectiveness, and student engagement is important because research shows that it's linked to a host of desirable outcomes of college.
Full version
7 steps for taking student learning seriously
Kuh, G. D
Trusteeship, 13(3), 20–24, 2005.
Full version
A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices
Zhao, C. M., Kuh, G. D., & Carini, R. M
The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 209–231, 2005.
Full version
An approach to measuring cognitive outcomes across higher-education institutions
Klein, S. P., Kuh, G. D., Chun, M., Shavelson, R., & Benjamin, R
Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 251–276, 2005.
Full version
Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
Experiencing diversity: What can we learn from liberal arts colleges?
Kuh, G. D., & Umbach, P. D
Liberal Education, 91(1), 14–21, 2005.
Full version
Exploring the relationships between spirituality, liberal learning, and college student
Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Full version
First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D.
The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 276–300, 2005.
Full version
Imagine asking the client: Using student and alumni surveys in accountability in higher education
Kuh, G. D.
In In J. Burke (Ed.) Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
Institutional selectivity and good practices in undergraduate education: How strong is the link?
Pascarella, E. T., Cruce, T., Wolniak, G. C., Kuh, G. D., Umbach, P. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Gonyea, R. M., & Zhao, C. M.
The Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 251–285, 2005.
Full version
Promoting student success: Creating conditions so every student can learn
Chickering, A. W., & Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Accommodating diverse learning styles of students has long been espoused as a principle of good practice in undergraduate education. Much progress has been made during the past
two decades in using active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, learning communities,
student-faculty research, service learning, internships, and other pedagogical innovations to enrich student learning. Variable time
blocks are more common--from three hours, to all day, to weekends, to six or eight weeks--to fit the desired outcomes, content, and
processes. Peers tutor other students, deepening their own learning in the process. Increasingly
sophisticated communication and information technologies provide students access to a broad range of print and visual resources and to an
expanded range of human expertise. A wider range of assessment tools document what and how well students are learning. Despite all this activity, at too many schools these and other effective educational practices are underutilized. The suggestions offered here are drawn in large part from a study of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, through the National Survey of Student Engagement, demonstrated that they have effective practices for fostering success among students of differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions clearly communicate that they value high quality undergraduate teaching and learning. They have developed instructional approaches tailored to a wide range of student learning styles, ensuring that students engage with course content and interact in meaningful ways with faculty and peers, inside and outside the classroom.
Full version
Promoting student success: Making place matter to student success
Manning, K., & Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Some campuses have a ?special? feel
about them. Students are quick to mention that they cannot imagine a better place for them personally or--for that matter--any better setting for a college or university. The college has become their home away
from home, the place they‘d rather be than any other. Generations of graduates return for reunion weekends, passing through familiar buildings and pausing at favorite
spots that evoke fond recollections of what was a very meaningful time in their lives. Built structures and memories are inextricably intertwined to form deep emotional ties to the institution and to those with whom they shared this place. Colleges and universities with such a palpable sense of place also have salutary
effects on student success. In a uniquely human way, this powerful connection to something larger than oneself encourages students to engage with faculty, staff, and peers in meaningful ways and compels
graduates to give back to alma mater by contributing their time, talents, and resources. Administrators at other colleges long to understand and create the conditions that bond people so tightly to the institution and to one another during and after graduation.
Full version
Promoting student success: Small steps senior administrators can take
El Khawas, E.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Colleges and universities can increase the number of students who graduate by making a number of small, strategic changes in institutional policies and practices. Some schools have done this by focusing on effective educational practices and empowering faculty, staff and students to work together in new,
productive ways. Others have improved the campus climate for learning by carefully assessing what students are experiencing or by realigning resources to induce students to
participate in activities associated with persistence and other desired outcomes of college. Senior administrators play a key role in such efforts when they speak plainly and consistently about the importance of student success and make decisions congruent with this priority. The suggestions offered here are drawn from a study of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, through the National
Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE),
demonstrated that they have effective practices for fostering success among students of differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions--called DEEP schools here because
they were studied for the project on
Documenting Effective Educational Practices--clearly communicate that they value high quality undergraduate teaching and learning, and provide effective, well-linked academic
and support services. Despite constraints, they have found ways to create supportive learning
environments, ensuring that students engage with course content, faculty and peers, inside and outside the classroom.
Full version
Promoting student success: The importance of shared leadership and collaboration
Kezar, A.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Collaborative, shared leadership among administrators, students,
faculty, and staff is a key component to creating campus environments that foster student success. Collaborative work groups can be powerful vehicles for launching and institutionalizing
student-friendly policies and practices and for developing complementary programs such as
first-year initiatives, fresh approaches to general education curricular offerings, service-
learning, and student leadership development programs among others. Such initiatives almost always result in richer learning opportunities for students when done collaboratively than when an individual unit
develops them. But collaborative approaches to leadership and
program development do not come naturally within higher education institutions that reward
individualistic endeavors over collaboration. The guiding principles offered here for promoting shared leadership and collaboration are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, as demonstrated through the National
Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE),
effective policies and practices for engaging their students.
Full version
Promoting student success: Using financial and other resources to enhance student success
Jacobs, B. A., & Schuh, J. H.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Howard Bowen (1996) wryly observed decades ago that colleges and universities raise all the money they can, and then they spend it. His point was that institutions have more good ideas than they can fully fund. As a consequence, they are constantly making choices as to how to best use their finite resources. Where and
how resources are allocated reflect
institutional priorities ideally guided by a deliberate planning process that values and supports student success. The principles that follow for using financial and other resources to enhance student learning are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, as
demonstrated through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), effective policies and practices for engaging their students. These institutions illustrate that it
is not necessarily the amount
of resources an institution allocates that is important to student success but how financial
resources, faculty and staff time, and facilities are linked to create powerful, affirming learning environments.
Full version
Promoting student success: What accreditation teams can do
Griego, E.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
The process of accreditation review in the U.S. serves two primary functions: quality assurance and continual improvement. The
experienced educators who voluntarily serve on accreditation teams apply common standards of quality that serve students and meet public
accountability expectations and offer
suggestions and recommendations for
institutional consideration and improvement. In the last decade, regional accreditation
commissions and national professional and specialized accreditation agencies have increasingly focused on student learning results and institutional improvement. There has been a corresponding shift in focus from institutional resources, structures, and inputs as the primary
indicators of institutional quality, toward increased emphasis on student learning results, appropriate to the degree level and mission of the institution. Accreditation review team reports are rich sources for examples of institutional practices that engage student learning. What have not been readily available
to accreditation teams, however, are
compilations of examples of good institutional practice. The suggestions offered here are drawn in large part from a study of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, through the
National Survey of Student Engagement, demonstrated that they have effective practices for fostering success among students of
differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions?called DEEP schools here because they were studied for the project on Documenting Effective Educational
Practices?clearly communicate that they value high quality undergraduate teaching and learning.
Full version
Promoting student success: What advisors can do
De Sousa, D. J.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Students who are well prepared academically and highly motivated tend to do well in college and persist to graduation. But for various reasons?some of which are beyond their control?many students lack the requisite academic background for college-level work. As a result, most colleges and universities enroll students with a wide range of abilities. Some of these institutions are more effective than others in helping their students succeed in college. These schools recognize that in terms of learning and personal development, what students bring to college is less important than what they do when they get to college. Academic advisors can play an integral role in promoting student success by assisting students in ways that encourage them to engage in the right kinds of activities, inside and outside the classroom. Advisors are especially important because they are among the first people new students encounter and
should see regularly during their first year. The guiding principles offered here are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and demonstrated through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that they have effective policies and practices for working with students of differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions are referred to below as either educationally effective schools or high-performing institutions.
Full version
Promoting student success: What business leaders can do
Lovett, C. M.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
More than any other group of
stakeholders, business leaders are
aware that this country‘s ability to
remain competitive in a global,
technology-based economy is ever
more closely tied to its ability to
produce more and better prepared
college graduates. Graduating more
students from various backgrounds who
are well prepared to meet the social,
civic and economic challenges of the
future is a national priority. Every college and university can improve its graduation rates and enhance the quality of its undergraduate programs by creating the conditions that matter to student success. Decades of research studies show that student engagement--the time and effort that students devote to their studies and related activities--is a key factor in student success. The
Documenting Effective Educational
Practice (DEEP) project gathered data
from 20 very different institutions of higher learning whose student scores on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) were higher than what was predicted on the basis of their student and institutional profile, history, and other factors.
Full version
Promoting student success: What campus leaders can do
Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Graduating more students and increasing the quality of their learning are national priorities. Every college and university can
improve in these areas by focusing on the educational conditions that matter to student success. Decades of research studies show that a key factor is student engagement--the time
and effort students devote to their studies and related activities and how institutions organize learning opportunities and provide services to
induce students to take part in and benefit from such activities. The guiding principles offered here are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and
demonstrated through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that they have effective policies and practices for working with students of differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions value high quality undergraduate teaching, diversity and support for all students. They clearly communicate and hold students to high standards, provide timely feedback, and encourage students to actively engage with course content and faculty and peers, inside and outside the classroom. When they complement the institution‘s mission and values, these conditions can create powerful learning environments that lead to desirable learning outcomes that are generally independent of institutional resources or students‘ background.
Full version
Promoting student success: What department chairs can do
Schuh, J. H., & Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Department chairs are in a position to help shape a culture where student learning is the central focus of faculty, staff, and students (Gmelch & Schuh, 2004). They hire, socialize, and evaluate faculty members‘ performance, guide curriculum development, and maintain the quality of academic programs. At the same time, department chairs typically assume the role without any specific preparation for the position; many have little or no experience as academic administrators. Yet, they are expected to lead their peers in establishing and implementing departmental goals and objectives. If improving educational effectiveness and enhancing student learning are priorities, what should the department chair emphasize? The suggestions offered here are based on
an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and higher-than-predicted scores on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Taken together, these measures suggest that their policies, programs, practices, and campus climates challenge and support students of differing abilities
and aspirations. How might these ideas be applied to your department?
Full version
Promoting student success: What faculty members can do
Kinzie, J.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
What students do in college matters as much as anything else in terms of their educational success. Educationally effective colleges and universities--those that add value
to the student experience--intentionally craft policies and practices that channel students‘
energy to the activities that matter to student learning. Students who participate in collaborative learning activities such as service-learning, coherent first-year programs, peer
tutoring and senior capstone projects are more likely to persist and succeed--especially when these programs and practices are well
conceived and delivered in an effective, coordinated manner. An essential ingredient is an unwavering, widespread commitment to
enhancing student learning on the part of faculty members. The suggestions offered here are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and demonstrated
through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that they have effective policies and practices for working with students of differing abilities and aspirations. These institutions value high quality undergraduate teaching, diversity, and support for all students. They clearly communicate and hold students to high standards, provide timely feedback, and encourage students to actively engage with course content, faculty and peers, inside and outside the classroom. When they complement
the institution‘s mission and values, these conditions can create powerful learning environments that lead to desirable learning outcomes that are generally independent of institutional resources or students‘ background.
Full version
Promoting student success: What new faculty need to know
Cambridge, B. L.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Starting a new position is exhilarating. The key challenge is to make the strange familiar as soon as possible. There are new policies to learn, new colleagues to get to
know, and new surroundings to adapt to. All these aspects and more need to be understood and managed well in order to focus on the primary task at hand--teaching and learning. Of all that is new, to what should you attend first if you are committed to creating the conditions under which students learn best? How can you use your institution‘s resources to help
your students take advantage of opportunities to deepen their learning? The suggestions offered here are based on an in-depth examination of 20 diverse four-year colleges and universities that have
higher-than-predicted graduation rates and demonstrated through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that they have effective policies and practices for working with students of differing abilities
and aspirations. Consider adapting some of their approaches to assist new faculty at your institution.
Full version
Promoting student success: What SHEEOs and system heads can do
Ewell, P. T.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
States benefit considerably when their stocks of ?educational capital? grow. From a workforce and tax revenue standpoint, state rates of return on baccalaureate education are
far higher than those associated with any other educational step. Additional benefits attributable to higher education?ranging from
enhancements in citizen participation to improved health and avoidance of public support?are equally easy to document. It is, thus, in every state‘s interest to increase the numbers of its citizens who attain a
baccalaureate degree. And it is equally in every state‘s interest to ensure that those who do earn a degree have experienced the kind of
high quality learning environments that yield levels of knowledge and skills that are nationally and internationally competitive. Every college and university can improve its graduation rates and enhance the quality of its undergraduate programs by creating the conditions that matter to student success. Decades of research studies show that one key
factor is student engagement?the time and effort that students devote to their studies and related activities. Institutions can organize their classes and other learning opportunities so that students put more effort in and benefit more from such activities. SHEEOs and
System Heads can do their part by ensuring that matters of undergraduate quality and student
success remain central to the state‘s approaches to planning, resource allocation, and accountability. And while their direct responsibility remains largely confined to public institutions, they can increasingly
establish policies that affect independent institutions as well.
Full version
Promoting student success: What student affairs can do
Whitt, E. J.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Interest in creating the conditions that enhance student learning and support students in achieving their educational goals is at an all-time high. Four-fifths of high school graduates need some form of postsecondary education to acquire the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to address increasingly complex social, economic, and political issues. Student engagement--what students
do during college--generally matters more to what they learn and whether they persist to graduation than who they are or even where they go to college. The contribution of out-of-class experiences to student engagement cannot be overstated. Any institution that wishes to make student achievement, satisfaction,
persistence, and learning a priority must have competent student affairs
professionals whose contributions
complement the academic mission of the institution in ways that help students and the institution realize their goals. The ?lessons‘ for student affairs practice offered here are based on an in-depth
examination of 20 four-year colleges and universities that have higher-than-predicted graduation rates and, as demonstrated through the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), effective policies and practices for engaging their students.
Full version
Promoting student success: What student leaders can do
Magolda, P.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Student leaders reap many benefits and rewards as a result of their involvements with campus organizations. In addition to enjoying
the respect of their peers, they have
opportunities to meet a variety of faculty, staff and students, exposing them to a range of different personalities and cultures. They
typically grow in self confidence and practical competence as they learn how to manage their time, energy, and their group‘s financial resources. In addition, the challenges they
encounter in the course of these and other activities draw them out of their comfortable patterns of thinking and responding to situations, helping them to become more flexible, responsive, and reflective (Kuh, 1995; Kuh & Lund, 1994). In addition to these personal benefits, student leaders can contribute much to the quality of the learning environment, the experiences of their peers, and the larger campus community. Unfortunately, too often these potentially positive effects are not fully realized. Student
governments get sidetracked on trivial issues. Social organizations inadvertently discourage participation by students from diverse backgrounds. Service clubs touch in relevant ways only a small fraction of those who need assistance. Established campus governance structures ignore or limit active, meaningful involvement by students.
Full version
Promoting student success: What the media and the general public need to know
Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
After several years of intense public focus on the need to improve K-12 education, more attention has turned recently to what happens when high school graduates move on to college.
Students, parents, and lawmakers are asking whether undergraduates are getting adequate value for their investments of time and money,
particularly as college and university tuition keeps rising. Employers are expressing concern
about whether some graduates are adequately prepared for the world of work. Demographic pressures in some states also mean that institutions have to find places for more students, even though state appropriations to many
public institutions have been cut or are barely increasing. In addition, legislators and policy experts are pressing institutions to make it possible for students to complete degree
requirements in a reasonable period of time and worry that significant dropout rates at some colleges and universities may reflect a waste of
public resources spent on those students.
Full version
Putting student engagement results to use: Lessons from the field
Kuh, G. D
Assessment Update, 17(1), 12–13, 2005.
Full version
Searching for the Peach Blossom Shangri-La: Student engagement of men and women STEM majors
Zhao, C.-M., Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
The Review of Higher Education, 28, 503–525, 2005.
Full version
Self-reported data in institutional research: Review and recommendations
Gonyea, R. M.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2005(127), 73–90, 2005.
Seven steps for taking student learning seriously
Kuh, G. D.
Trusteeship, May/June, 20–24, 2005.
Full version
Student engagement at minority-serving institutions: Emerging lessons from the BEAMS project
Bridges, B. K., Cambridge, B., Kuh, G. D., & Leegwater, L. H
In G. H. Gaither (Ed.), What works: Achieving success in minority retention , 2005.
Full version
Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D
Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 211–233, 2005.
Full version
Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
The law school years: Probing questions, actionable data
Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2005.
Full version
What students expect from college and what they get
Kuh, G. D., Gonyea, R. M., & Williams, J. M.
In In T. E. Miller, B. E. Bender, J. H. Schuh Associates (Eds.) Promoting reasonable expectations: Aligning student and institutional views of the college experience San Francisco, CA: , 2005.
A study of resource expenditures and allocation at DEEP colleges and universities: Is spending related to student engagement?
Gansemer-Topf, A., Saunders, K., Schuh, J., & Shelley, M
, , 2004.
Full version
Disengaged jocks: Myth or reality?
Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D.
LiberalArtsOnline, 4(4), , 2004.
Full version
"Surfin" with a purpose: Examining how spending time online is related to student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Students Affairs Online, 5(3), , 2004.
Full version
Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement
Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D.
Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138, 2004.
Full version
Aligning faculty and student behavior: Realizing the promise of greater expectations
Kuh, G. D., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Umbach, P. D.
Liberal Education, 90(4), 24–31, 2004.
Full version
College and character: Insights from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D., & Umbach, P.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(122), 37–54, 2004.
Full version
Do DEEP institutions spend more or differently than their peers?
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems [NCHEMS]
, , 2004.
Full version
Forging a new direction: How UTEP created its own brand of excellence
Kuh, G. D., & Natalicio, D. S.
About Campus, 9(5), 9–15, 2004.
Full version
Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at Historically Black Colleges and Universities
Harper, S. R., Carini, R. M., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J.
Journal of College Student Development, 45(3), 271–284, 2004.
Full version
Going DEEP: Learning from campuses that share responsibility for student success
Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D.
About Campus, 9(5), 2–8, 2004.
Full version
Principles for assessing student engagement in the first year of college
Hayek, J. C., & Kuh, G. D.
Assessment Update, 16(2), 11–13, 2004.
Full version
Quality time: An in-depth look at the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C
Currents, 30(9), 11–12, 2004.
Student engagement in law schools: A first look
Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2004.
Full version
Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success
National Survey of Student Engagement
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.Bloomington, IN: , 2004.
The contributions of the research university to assessment and innovation in undergraduate education
Kuh, G. D.
W. E. Becker & M. L. Andrews (Eds.)The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: The contributions of research universities Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004.
Using focus groups to establish the validity and reliability of a college student survey
Ouimet, J. A., Bunnage, J. B., Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Kennedy, J.
Research in Higher Education, 45, 233–250, 2004.
Full version
What does institutional selectivity tell us about educational quality?
Kuh, G. D., & Pascarella, E. T
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(5), 52–58, 2004.
Full version
Nontraditional college students and the role of collaborative learning as a tool for science mastery
Lundberg, C. A.
School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 8–17, 2003.
Active learning in and out of the classroom: Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Belcheir, M. J.
(Report No. BSU-RR-2003-02), , 2003.
Full version
College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter?
Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. H., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M., & Ouimet, J. A.
Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1–19, 2003.
Full version
Cooperative college examinations: More gain, less pain when students share information and grades
Zimbardo, P. G., Butler, L.D., & Wolfe, V. A.
The Journal of Experimental Education, 71 (2) 101-125, , 2003.
Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 320–332, 2003.
How are we doing at engaging students? Charles Schroeder talks to George Kuh
Schroeder, C. C., & Kuh, G. D.
About Campus, 8(2), 9–16, 2003.
Full version
Student academic and personal growth while at Boise State: A summary of 2002 National Survey of Student Engagement findings
Belcheir, M. J.
(Report No. BSU-RR-2003-03)., , 2003.
Full version
The campus environment as viewed through the lens of the National Survey of Student Engagement
Belcheir, M. J.
(Report No. BSU-RR-203-01)Boise, ID: Office of Institutional Advancement, 2003.
Full version
The campus visit
Kuh, G. D.
New York, NY: Kaplan, 2003.
The relationship between institutional mission and students’ involvement and educational outcomes
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M
Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 241–261, 2003.
Full version
The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning
Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M
College and Research Libraries, 64, 256–282, 2003.
Full version
Tomorrow's teachers: Do they engage in the "right things" during college?
Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 391–398, 2003.
Utilizing the classroom peer group to address children's social needs: An evaluation of the circle of friends intervention approach
Fredrickson, N. & Turner, J.
Journal of Special Education, 36 (4), 234-245, , 2003.
Warts and all: Exposing history to high school students
Stanley, G.
Educational Horizons, 81 (2) 86-91., , 2003.
What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE
Kuh, G. D
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32, 2003.
For years, judgments about the quality of the undergraduate experience have turned on evidence about an institution‘s reputation and resources?students‘ SAT scores, faculty credentials, library holdings, and so on. But students can be surrounded by impressive resources and not routinely encounter classes or take part in activities that engage them in authentic learning. A more meaningful approach to evaluating an institution is to determine how well it fosters student learning. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) was launched upon the premise that to assess the quality of the undergraduate education at an institution, we need good information about student engagement. This article outlines NSSE‘s evolution, summarizes some of what has been learned so far about engagement patterns of different groups of students, and discusses some of the questions and challenges the NSSE results raise.
Full version
Working and learning: The role of involvement for employed students
Lundberg, C. A.
Ashe National Conference, Sacramento, , 2002.
A profile of Boise State first year and senior students with comparisons to other urban universities
Belcheir, M. J.
Research Report 2002-07. (ERIC ED480930), 2002.
Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior
Whitmire, E.
Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (8) 631-638, , 2002.
Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: The Diversity Education & Exchange Program, 2002.
Kuh, G. D.
Wabash College Colloquium Address, Crawfordsville, IN, 2002.
Academic advising and student success: Lessons from NSSE
Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 2002.
Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2002.
Kuh, G. D.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2002.
Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influence of student and institutional characteristics
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D
Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–576, 2002.
Full version
Comparing the academic engagement of American Indian and White college students
Cole, J. S., & Denzine, G. M.
Journal of American Indiana Education, 41(1), 19–34, 2002.
Higher education's self-reflexive turn: Toward an intercultural theory of student development
Tanaka, G.
The Journal of Higher Education, 73 (2) 263-296, , 2002.
Insights into effective educational practice
Hayek, J. C., & Kuh, G. D.
EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 25(1), 60–61, 2002.
Full version
The impact of college racial composition on African American students' academic and social gains: Additional evidence
Flowers, L. A.
Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 403–410, 2002.
Triumph or tragedy: Comparing student engagement levels of members of Greek-letter organizations and other students
Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., O?Day, P. T., & Kuh, G. D
Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 643–663, 2002.
Full version
The National Survey of Student Engagement
Bridges, B. K., Kuh, G. D., & O'Day, P.
NetResults, , , 2001.
Full version
The College Student Expectations Questionnaire: Assessing student expectations of their college education [14 paragraphs in online-series]
Gonyea, R. M.
FYA-List Series, , , 2001.
Undergraduate education at the turn of the century: Lessons from NSSE 2000
Kuh, G. D.
College of William & Mary Higher Education Lecture, Williamsburg, VA, 2001.
A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education
Kojaltic, M., & Kuh, G. D.
Higher Education, 42, 351–371, 2001.
A report on the National Survey of Student Engagement
Whitfield, C. E.
, , 2001.
Full version
Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D.
Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(3), 10–17, 66, 2001.
This article describes the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), one of the scores of efforts underway to assess student learning and improve the quality of undergraduate education, after the release of the project‘s first national report NSSE 2000: National Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice and while the second round of data collection was nearing an end.
Full version
Computing experience and good practices in undergraduate education: Does the degree of campus "wiredness" matter?
Shouping, H. & Kuh, G.D.
Education Policy Analysis Archives v9 n49, , 2001.
Influences of student goals for college for freshman-year quality of effort and growth
Kaufman, M. A., & Creamer, D. G.
Journal of College Student Development, 32(3), 197–206, 2001.
Is it more than about getting along? The broader educational relevance of reducing students' racial biases
Chang, M.J.
Journal of College Student Development, 42 (2), 93-105, , 2001.
Learning productivity at research universities
Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S.
The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 1–28, 2001.
NSSE technical and norms report
Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J.A., Gonyea, R. M., & Kennedy, J.
, , 2001.
Full version
The disengaged commuter student: Fact or fiction?
Kuh, G. D., Gonyea, R. M., & Palmer, M
Commuter Perspectives, 27(1), 2–5, 2001.
Full version
The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s
Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S.
The Review of Higher Education, 24, 309–332, 2001.
The fulfillment of expectations for college and student departure decisions
Helland, P. A., Stallings, H. J., et al.
Journal of College Student Retention, 3(4), 381–396, 2001.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties
Kuh, G. D
, , 2001.
Full version
The relationship between undergraduate students' perceived past academic success and perceived academic self-concept
Schlosser, L. Z., & Sedlacek, W. E.
The Journal of the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 13(2), 95–105, 2001.
The relationship between undergrads’' background characteristics an college experiences and their academic library use
Whitmite, E.
College & Research Libraries, 62 (6) 528-540, , 2001.
The relationships between computer and information technology use, student learning, and other college experiences
Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S.
Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 217–232, 2001.
Tools for assessing the first-year student experience
Kuh, G. D.
In R. Swing (Ed.) Proving and improving: Strategies for assessing the first college year Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 2001.
What predicts perceived gains in learning and in satisfaction?
Belcheir, M. J.
(Report No. BSU-RR-2001-02), , 2001.
Full version
"They shall be known by what they do": An activities-based typology of college students
Kuh, G. D., Hu, S., & Vesper, N.
Journal of College Student Development, 41(2), 228–244, 2000.
Faculty-student affairs collaboration on assessment: Lessons from the field
Kuh, G. D., & Banta, T. W.
About Campus, 4(6), 4-11, 2000.
Improving classroom instruction through "best-of-class" techniques
Blackbourn, J.M., Payne, J.S., Burnham, S., Elrod, F., & Thomas, C.
Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27, , 2000.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: Results from Boise State freshmen and seniors (Report No. BSU-RR-2000-04)
Belcheir, M. J.
Boise, ID: Office of Institutional Advancement: Office of Institutional Advancement, 2000.
Full version
The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice
National Survey of Student Engagement
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, 2000.
Where are the liberal arts?
Pace, C. R., & Connolly, M.
Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 53–65, 2000.
Impact of the number of response categories on frequency scales: An examination of information obtained, reliability, and factor structure
Weems, G.H.
Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Point Clear, Alabama, , 1999.
Another look at the fourth edition of the CSEQ
Kuh, G. D.
Assessment Update, 11(2), 13, 16, 1999.
Cognitive effects of college racial composition on African American students after 3 years of college
Flowers, L. & Pascarella, E.T.
Journal of College Student Development, 40 (6), 669-677, , 1999.
Gender, race, and performance expectations of college students
Mayo, M. W., & Christenfeld, N.
Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 27(2), 93–104, 1999.
Increasing expectations for student effort
Schilling, K. M., & Schilling, K. L.
About Campus, 4(2), 4–10, 1999.
Interactions with peers and objective and self-reported cognitive outcomes across 3 years of college
Whitt, E. J., Edison, M., Pascarella, E.T., Nora, A. & Terenzini, P.T.
Journal of College Student Development, 40 (1) 61-78, , 1999.
Racial differences in the academic library experiences of undergraduates
Whitmire, E.
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 33-37, 1999.
Setting the bar high to promote student learning
Kuh, G. D.
In G. S. Blimling, E. J. Whitt, & Associates (Eds.) Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
Solving for the x: Aspirations and expectations of college students
Eskilson, A., & Wiley, M. G.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(1), 51–70, 1999.
The effects of entering characteristics and instructional experiences on student satisfaction and degree completion: An application of the input-environment-outcome assessment model
House, J.
International Journal of Instructional Media 26 no4 423-34, , 1999.
Unraveling the complexity of the increase in college grades from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s
Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(3), 1–24, 1999.
Will higher education make a difference? African Americans’ economic expectations and college choice
Freeman, K.
College and University, 75(2), 7–12, 1999.
Women's perceptions of a "chilly climate" and cognitive outcomes in college: Additional evidence
Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., Nora, A., & Terenzini, P. T.
Journal of College Student Development, 40(2), 163–177, 1999.
The constant error of the halo in educational outcomes research
Pike, G. R.
Associtaion for Institional Research, Minneapolis, MN, , 1998.
Student expectations of, and satisfaction with, the university library
Harwood, N. & Bydder, J.
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24 (2) 161-171, , 1998.
Development of critical thinking skills: An analysis of academic library experiences and other measures
Whitmire, E.
College & Research Libraries, 59(3), 266–273, 1998.
Does work inhibit cognitive development during college?
Pascarella, E. T., Edison, M. I., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L, S., & Terenzini, P. T.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 75–93, 1998.
Gender-based differences in perception of experiences in higher education: Gaining a broader perspective
Drew, T. L., & Work, G. G.
The Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 542–555, 1998.
Shaping student character
Kuh, G. D.
Liberal Education, 84(3), 18–25, 1998.
A comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994
Kuh, G. D., & Vesper, N.
The Review of Higher Education, 21(1), 43–61, 1997.
A factor analytic model of college student development
Lavelle, E., & Rickord, B.
NASPA Journal, 36(4), 301–315, 1997.
African American men on college campuses: Their needs and their perceptions
Cuyjet, M. J.
New Directions for Student Services, 80, 5–16, 1997.
Engaging students in active learning
Warren, R.
About Campus, 2(1), 16–20, 1997.
Identifying indicators of curricular quality
Ewell, P. T.
Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
Organizing for learning - a new imperative
Ewell, P.T.
AAHE Bulletin, , 1997.
Strengthening assessment for academic quality improvement
Ewell, P. T.
In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, L. A. Mets, & Associates Planning and management for a changing environment San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
The "chilly climate" for women and cognitive outcomes in the first year of college
Pascarella, E. T., Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Hagedorn, L. S. Nora, A., Yeager, P., & Terenzini, P. T.
Journal of College Student Development, 38(2), 109-124, 1997.
The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education
Kuh, G. D., Pace, C. R., & Vesper, N.
Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 435-454, 1997.
The relations of Holland-typed majors to students' freshman and senior work values
Huang, Y. R., & Healy, C. C.
Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 455-477, 1997.
Using process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education
Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., & Pace, C. R.
Research in Higher Education, 38, 435–454, 1997.
Additional evidence on the cognitive effects of college racial composition: A research note
Pascarella, E., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., & Terenzini, P.
Journal of College Student Development, 37 (5) 494-501., , 1996.
Assessing student involvement in learning
Froh, R. C.
Using scholarships to improve practice San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses
Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., & Oblander, F. W. (Eds.).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
Collaboration between general education and the major
Saint Joseph College
Assessment Update, 8(2), , 1996.
Differential impacts of academic and social experiences of college-related outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions
Nora, A., Cabrerra, A., Hagedorn, L., & Pascarella, E.
Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 427-451, 1996.
Does institutional racial composition make a difference in what Black students gain from college?
DeSousa, D. J., & Kuh, G. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 37(3), 257–267, 1996.
Editor's notes: Bob Pace tells us what students do while in college
Banta, T. W.
Assessment Update, 8(1), 3, 13, 1996.
First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences and cognitive development
Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Yeager, P., Pascarella, E., & Nora, L.
Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1-22, 1996.
Gender differences among incoming African American freshmen on academic and social expectations
Kim, S. H., & Sedlacek, W. E.
Journal of the Freshman Year Experience and Students in Transition, 8(1), 25-37, 1996.
How standards-based high school assessment can affect admission to colleges and universities
Griffith, F. A.
Progress, Trends, and Practices in Higher Education, 8 (1), 1-15, , 1996.
Influences on students' internal locus of attribution for academic success in the first year of college
Pascarella, E., & Edison, M.
Research in Higher Education, 37(6), 731–756, 1996.
Influences on students' openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college
Pascarella, E., & Edison, M.
The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 174–195, 1996.
Limitation of using students' self-reports of academic development as proxies for traditional achievement measures
Pike, G. R.
Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 89-113, 1996.
Participation in a racial or cultural awareness workshop and attitudes toward diversity on campus
Springer, L., Palmer, B., Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A.
The Review of Higher Education, 20(1), 53–68, 1996.
Relationship between learner attitudes, prior achievement, and performance in a general education course: A multi-institutional study
House, J.D., Keely, E.J., & Hurst, R.S.
International Journal of Institutional Media, 23 (3), 257-271, , 1996.
Resetting expectations
Marchese, T.
Change, pg. 4, , 1996.
Residence hall social climates and student learning
Kerr, K. G.
, , 1996.
The influence of dominant race environment on students' involvement, perceptions, and educational gains: A look at Historically Black and Predominantly White liberal arts institutions
Watson, L. W., & Kuh, G. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 37(4), 415–424, 1996.
What have we learned from the first year of the national study of student learning?
Pascarella, E. T., Whitt, E., Nora, A., Edison, M., Hagedorn, & Terenzini, P. T.
Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 182-192, 1996.
Academic and out-of-class influences affecting the development of students' intellectual orientations
Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A.
The Review of Higher Education, 19, 28-44, 1995.
Assessing the immediate and residual effects of the residence hall experience: Validating Pace's 1990 analysis of on-campus and off-campus students
Ballou, R. A., Reavill, L. K., & Schultz, B. L.
Journal of College and University Housing, 25(1), 16-21, 1995.
Expectations for college and student persistence
Braxton, J. M., Vesper, N., et al.
Research in Higher Education, 36(5), 595–612, 1995.
Freshman to senior year gains reported on the college student experiences questionnaire
Bauer, K. W.
NASPA Journal, 32(2), 130-137, 1995.
From teaching to learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education
Barr, R.B. & Tagg, J.
Change, , 1995.
High expectations or high hopes?: Using high expectations as an indicator for learning
Lund, J.
Unpublished manuscript. Bloomington: Indiana University., , 1995.
Individual and environmental predictors of adjustment during the first year of college
Brooks II, J.H. & DuBois, D.L.
Journal of College Student Development, 36 (4), 347-360, , 1995.
Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills
Terenzini, P., Springer, L., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A.
Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 23-39, 1995.
Influences on college students' orientations toward learning for self-understanding
Springer, L., Terenzini, P., Pascarella, E., & Nora, A.
Journal of College Student Development, 36(1), 5-18, 1995.
Reasonable expectations
Kuh, G. D., Miller, T., Lyons, J., & Trow, J.
Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 1995.
The relationships between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores
Pike, G. R.
, , 1995.
A comparison of student effort and educational gains of White and African-American students at predominantly White colleges and universities
MacKay, K. A., & Kuh, G. D.
Journal of College Student Development, 35(3), 217-223, 1994.
A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for national policy of instructional "good practice" indicators in undergraduate education
National Center for Higher Education
, , 1994.
Student learning at metropolitan universities
Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., & Krehbiel, L.
Handbook of theory and research New York, NY: Agathon, 1994.
A structural model of perceived academic, personal, and vocational gains related to college student responsibility
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H.
Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 267-289, 1993.
An empirical typology of college students
Astin, A. W.
Journal of College Student Development, 34, (36-45, , 1993.
Cognitive impacts of living on campus versus commuting to college
Pascarella, E. T., Bohr, L., Nora, A, Zusman, B., Inman, P., & Desler, M.
Journal of College Student Development, 34(3), 216-220, 1993.
Making a difference: Outcomes of a decade of assessment in higher education
Banta, T. W., & Associates
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
Staying ahead of the curve
Dehne, G. C.
Trusteeship, 1(1), 18-23, 1993.
Student age and enrollment status as determinants of learning and personal development at metropolitan institutions
Arnold, J. A., Kuh, G. D., Vesper, N., & Schuh, J. H.
Journal of College Student Development, 34(1), 11-16, 1993.
The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An alternative view
Pike, G. R.
Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 23-40, 1993.
Turning teaching into learning: The role of student responsibility in the collegiate experience (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8)
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H.
Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1993.
Test-retest and other repeated use of the college experiences questionnaire
Fidler, P.P.
ASHE Presentation, , 1992.
A comparison of student learning at "involving" and other metropolitan universities
Kuh, G. D. & Vestper, N.
American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, , 1992.
College student experiences questionnaire: Norms for the third edition
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1992.
Joint determination of college student achievement and effort
Erekeson, O. H.
Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 433-446, 1992.
Psychometric supplement to the CSEQ third edition, 1990
Pace, C. R., & Swayze, S.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1992.
Self-reported gains in academic and social skills
Bauer, K. W.
Journal of College Student Development, 33(3), 492–498, 1992.
Students at metropolitan universities: Viewing involvement through different lenses
Schuh, J. H., Andreas, R. E., & Strange, C. C.
Metropolitan University, 2(3), 64-74, 1992.
Academic locus of control, self-esteem, and perceived distance from home as predictors of college adjustment
Mooney, S.P, Sherman, M.F., & Lo Priesto, C.T.
Journal of Counseling & Development, 69 445-448., , 1991.
Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and personal development outside the classroom
Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. S., Whitt, E. J., & Associates
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
Research findings on the seven principles
Sorcinelli, M. D.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 47, , 1991.
The role of admissions and orientation in creating appropriate expectations for college life
Kuh, G. D.
College and University, 66(2), , 1991.
Assessing the undergraduate experience
Pace, C. R.
Assessment Update, 2(3), 1, 2, 4, & 5, 1990.
Assessment measures
Pike, G. R.
Assessment Update, 2(1), 8-9, 1990.
College student experiences questionnaire (3rd ed.)
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1990.
Joint factor analysis of the college student experiences questionnaire and the ACT Comp objective exam
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H.
Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 425-441, 1990.
The impact of the freshman year on epistemological development: Gender differences
Magolda, M. B.
The Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 259–284, 1990.
The undergraduate experience: Commonalities and differences among colleges
Baird, L. L.
Research in Higher Education, 31(3), 271-278, 1990.
The undergraduates: A report of their activities and progress in college in the 1980s
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1990.
Quality of student experiences of freshman intercollegiate athletes
Stone, J. A., & Strange, C. C.
Journal of College Student Development, 30(2), 148-154, 1989.
Review of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire
DeCoster, D. A.
In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.) The tenth mental measurements yearbook Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.
Review of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire
McCammon, S.
In J. C. Conoley & J. J. Kramer (Eds.) The tenth mental measurements yearbook Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.
Accuracy of self-reported activities and accomplishments of college-bound students
Laing, J., Sawyer, R., & Noble, J.
Journal of College Student Development, 29(4), 362-368, 1988.
Assessing institutional effects on retention
Mencke, R. & Sahoo, C.
The Twenty-Eighth Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, , 1988.
College involvement, perceptions, and satisfaction: A study of membership in student organizations
Abrahamowicz, D.
Journal of College Student Development, 29(3), 233-238, 1988.
Contradicting the critics (Report No. 5)
Pace, C. R.
, , 1988.
Extent of involvement, satisfaction with college, and progress toward educational goals
Sanders, J., & Kress, D.
Terre Haute, IN: Indiana State University, Office of Student Research, 1988.
Involvement and growth of students in three academic programs
Ory, J. C., & Braskamp, L. A.
Research in Higher Education, 28(2), 116-129, 1988.
Outcomes, assessment, and academic improvement: In search of usable knowledge
Ewell, P. T.
In J. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research New York, NY: Agathon, 1988.
The college environment revisited: A review of research and theory
Baird, L. L.
In J. C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research New York, NY: Agathon, 1988.
The impact of college residence on the development of critical thinking skills in college freshmen
Inman, P., & Pascarella, E.
Journal of College Student Development, 39(6), 557-568, 1988.
Comparison of opinions about college between humanities program students and non-humanities program students
Berryman-Miller, S.
The Journal of Negro Education, 56, 162-171, 1987.
CSEQ: Test manual and norms: College student experiences questionnaire
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1987.
Good things go together
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute, 1987.
Achievement and the quality of student effort
Pace, C. R.
In T. M. Tomlinson & H. S. Walberg (Eds.) Academic work and educational excellence: Raising student productivity Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1986.
Researching academic programs: An inquiry into an emerging field
Conrad, C., & Pratt, A.
In J. C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research New York, NY: Agathon, 1986.
Separate paths to separate places
Pace, C. R.
, , 1986.
A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition
Bean, J.P. & Metzner, B.S.
Review of Educational Research, 55 (4), 485-540, , 1985.
Expectation and reality in freshman adjustment to college
Baker, R., McNeil, O. V., & Siryk, B.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32 (1), 94-103, , 1985.
Perspectives and problems in student outcomes research
Pace, C. R.
New Directions for Institutional Research, 1985(47), 7-18, 1985.
Program quality in higher education: A review and critique of literature and research
Conrad, C., & Blackburn, R.
In J. C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research New York, NY: Agathon, 1985.
Review of college student experiences questionnaire
Brown, R. D.
In J. V. Mitchell, Jr. (Ed.) The ninth mental measurements yearbook Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, 1985.
Review of college student experiences questionnaire
Miller, J. K.
In J. V. Mitchell, Jr. (Ed.) The ninth mental measurements yearbook Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, 1985.
The college curriculum: Where's the content?
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute, 1985.
The credibility of student self-reports
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, 1985.
Historical perspectives on student outcomes assessment with implications for the future
Pace, C. R.
NASPA Journal, 22(2), 10-18, 1984.
Measuring the quality of college student experiences: An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, 1984.
Student effort: A new key to assessing quality
Pace, C. R.
Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute, 1984.
Self- and teacher expectancy effects on academic performance of college students enrolled in an academic reinforcement program
Haynes, N.M. & Johnson S.T.
American Education Research Journal, 20 (4), 511-516, , 1983.
Student background and quality of effort correlates of reported grades, opinions about college, and perceptions of magnitudes of cognitive and affective attainment by students in a public comprehensive university
Michael, J. J.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43(2), 49, 1983.
Tests in print iii: An index to tests, test reviews, and literature on specific tests
Mitchell, J. V., Jr. (Ed.).
Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, 1983.
Faculty expectations of college students
Forsberg, I., & Greenbaum, A.
College Student Journal, 15(4), 387-392, 1981.
Inspiration, aspiration, and expectations of college freshmen at Jackson State University
Nichols, O. C.
College Student Journal, 15(4), 384-386, 1981.
The meaning of response categories: How often is 'occasionally,' 'often,' and 'very often'?
Pace, C. R., & Friedlander, J.
Research in Higher Education, 17(3), 269-281, 1981.
Measuring the quality of student effort
Pace, C. R.
Improving teaching and institutional quality Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education, 1980.
Educational expectations and college attrition
Muskat, H.
NASPA Journal, 17(1), 17-22, 1979.
Measuring outcomes of college: Fifty years of findings and recommendations for the future
Pace, C. R.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Perceptions of the university climate among students in different academic majors at two colleges of arts and sciences
Pascarella, E.T.
Research in Higher Education, 4 165-176., , 1976.
Perceptions of the university climate among students in different academic majors at two colleges of arts and sciences
Pascarella, E.T.
Research in Higher Education, 4 165-176., , 1976.
Student expectations of college: Some implications for student personnel administrators
Karman, T. A.
NASPA Journal, 11(4), 52-59, 1974.
The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas
Biglan, A.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (3), 195-203., , 1973.
Change in environmental expectations and perceptions
King, H. & Walsh, W.B.
Journal of College Student Personnel, 331-337, , 1972.
Relationship between the psychosocial maturity of entering college freshmen and their expectations about college
Waterman, A. S.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(1), 42-46, 1972.
Characteristics of students who make accurate and inaccurate self-predictions of college achievement
Keefer, K. E.
The Journal of Educational Research, 64 (9), 401-404, , 1971.
The role of the faculty in the accrediting of colleges and universities
American Association of University Professors
Policy documents and reports Washington, DC: Author, 1968.
Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development
Hu S. & Kuh, G.D.
Journal of College Student Development, , 0.
Education disrupted: Students beginning college during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kinzie, J. & Cole, J.S.
New Directions for Higher EducationNew Directions for Higher Education, Perspectives From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students and Academic Life, 199, 27-40, 0.
In the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, students entering college in fall 2021 had an unprecedented culmination to high school and transition to college. This chapter explores the experience of entering college students following these unprecedented circumstances, examining high school disruptions, including changes in the learning environment and its relationship to instructional mode preferences in college, and documenting students?? sense of optimism for college, their mental and emotional health, and perceptions of academic difficulty. Results show that the educational impact of the pandemic was not uniform across student groups and will remain an important factor in these students?? educational journey.
Full version
High-impact practices and student-faculty interactions for gender-variant students
BrckaLorenz, A., Garvey, J. C., Hurtado, S. S., & Latopolski, K.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, , , 0.
The vast amount of research on student success and engagement in college focuses on a narrative for majority student populations that does not account for unique experiences across social identities. This article examines the experiences of gender-variant students (i.e., students who do not identify as either cisgender men or women) regarding engagement in high-impact practices and student?faculty interactions using a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative data set collected from the 2014 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement. Although high-impact practice participation was similar for gender-variant and cisgender students, positive student-faculty interaction was found to be a significant predictor for increased high-impact practice participation for gender-variant students. Results from this study may also point to chillier climates of certain major fields for gender-variant students. Implications for these findings focus on investigating major choice as a mediating factor for high-impact practice participation and advocating for the inclusion of different gender identities in surveys, institutional data, and higher-education research.
Successful student outcomes assessment: Six institutional case studies including the role of student affairs
Beeler, K. J., Benedict, L. & Hyman, R.
(Available from the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 1875 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 418, Washington, DC 20009), , 0.
The use of student engagement findings as a case of evidence-based practice
Kinzie, J.
New Directions for Higher Education, 2017 Summer(178), 47–56, 0.
The chapter considers student engagement to discuss the use of assessment evidence to advance evidence-based practice and to illustrate a scholarship of practice.
Full version
The use of student engagement findings as a case of evidence-based practice
Kinzie, J.
New Directions for Higher Education, 2017 Summer(178), 47–56, 0.
The chapter considers student engagement to discuss the use of assessment evidence to advance evidence-based practice and to illustrate a scholarship of practice.
Full version
Worth The Squeeze: What Learning Improvement Is and Why It Matters
, , 0.
Full version
Worth The Squeeze: What Learning Improvement Is and Why It Matters
Kern, J.A. Kinzie, J & Fulcher, K.H.
, 0.
Full version
Scholarly Papers
Am I a professional? A quantitative study of faculty professional identity
Chamis, Ella; Braught, Emily; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2024, November.
The field often takes the professional identities of its faculty for granted, and faculty professional identity development is largely understudied. In this person-centered quantitative study, we explore the importance of faculty professional identity and consider its influencing factors for development. Our findings provide clarity and guidance in developing faculty professional identity.
Full version
Examining the relationship between faculty identity and their civically engaged teaching practices
Jin, Seonmi; Zhang, Xiaoxia; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2024, November.
This study explores the relationship between faculty??s identity and their civically engaged teaching practices, applying the Diversity Learning Environment model (Hurtado et al., 2012). We used the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), which included 13,531 faculty responses from 65 participating institutions, and conducted a multi-level modeling analysis.
Full version
A Multi-Institutional Examination of Mind and Body Well-being for First-Generation
Yuhas, Bridget; Copeland, Olivia; Feldman, Steven; BrckaLorenz, Allison
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2024, April.
First-generation students (FGs) often face unique challenges in navigating collegiate experiences which can impact their well-being. In this study, we examine undergraduate FGs?? mind and body well-being using data from two large-scale multi-institutional data sets. Specifically, we examine relationships between stressors and supports and assess the extent that FGs know how to get help at their institution for a variety of well-being issues. Results imply that FGs generally feel less institutional support for their well-being, that inverse relationships exist for mind and body stressors and institutional supports, and that results for knowing how to get help are mixed. Implications point to continued disaggregation to better understand FGs experiences and recognizing the importance of social capital to FGs success.
Full version
Connecting College Student Civic Engagement and Cultural Center Involvement
Copeland, Olivia; Feldman, Steven; BrckaLorenz, Allison
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2024, April.
In this study, we explore the relationship between cultural center involvement and college students?? civic engagement outcomes. We utilize data from a large-scale, multi-institutional data set to run a series of regression analyses. Findings indicate that participating in the activities of a cultural center positively correlates with higher levels of civic engagement skills and abilities as well as frequency of civic engagement. We also used effect coding in our models to explore sub-group differences within gender, sexual, and racial identity categories. Disaggregating by identity, our results indicate some disparities among students prior to considering their cultural center involvement. These findings present a significant counter to the widespread attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, evidencing the continued relevance and positive influence of cultural centers on all students.
Full version
Faculty Perceptions of Their Disciplinary Cultures: Re-Evaluating Biglan??s Dimensions
Braught, Emily; Hiller, Stephen C.; Nelson Laird, Thomas
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2024, April.
Disciplinary cultures are an important part of understanding the faculty experience. For fifty years, the Biglan dimensions have been frequently relied on by researchers interested in considering disciplinary differences as parts of their studies; however, applying a cultural lens draws attention to the possibility that over time, disciplinary cultures may have changed. Through exploring faculty perceptions of their disciplines using an item set derived from key cultural aspects of Biglan??s dimensions, compared to the Biglan dimensions, this exploratory study offers insights into the evolution of disciplinary cultures, highlighting the variation and fluidity of disciplinary cultures that faculty experience in their disciplines today.
Full version
Connecting College Student Civic Engagement and Cultural Center Involvement
Copeland, Oliva M., Feldman, Steven, BrckaLorenz, Allison
ACPA Annual Convention, Chicago, IL, 2024, March.
In this study, we explore the relationship between cultural center involvement and college students?? civic engagement outcomes. We utilize data from a large-scale, multi-institutional data set to run a series of regression analyses. Findings indicate that participating in the activities of a cultural center positively correlates with higher levels of civic engagement skills and abilities as well as frequency of civic engagement. We also used effect coding in our models to explore sub-group differences within gender, sexual, and racial identity categories. Disaggregating by identity, our results indicate some disparities among students prior to considering their cultural center involvement. These findings present a significant counter to the widespread attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, evidencing the continued relevance and positive influence of cultural centers on all students.
Full version
Investigating the Campus Pride Index??s Relationship to Perceived Student Support
Copeland, Olivia M., Feldman, Steven, BrckaLorenz, Allison
ACPA Annual Convention, Chicago, IL, 2024, March.
The Campus Pride Index (CPI) is often used as a litmus test for assessing the level of LGBTQ+ inclusion and support within higher education institutions. However, little research has explicitly examined the relationship between CPI rating and LGBTQ+ students?? perceptions of supportiveness. To explore this, we analyzed 118,244 student responses about their institution??s support for diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. Results indicate that at top-rated CPI institutions, LGBQ+ students had lower perceptions of support than their peers. We discuss the implications of these results, focusing on how institutions may uncritically utilize CPI as the ceiling for LGBTQ+ support rather than a minimum, with ideas for how student affairs practitioners can utilize CPI while also going beyond CPI??s metrics.
Full version
Examining campus support systems for LGBQ+ college students' mental health and well-being
Feldman, Steven; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2023, November.
In this study, we explore LGBQ+ college students?? experiences related to mental health and wellbeing, using the Proud & Thriving Framework. Our research utilizes a large scale, multi-institutional, quantitative and qualitative data set that includes a variety of institutional types and geographic locations across the United States. We use a series of OLS regression analyses and descriptive analyses to explore LGBQ+ students?? difficulties, support networks, knowledge about institution-provided supports, and student-suggested ways that their institution has supported their mental health and well-being. We find that large portions of LGBQ+ students do not know how to get help with various difficulties and that students within the LGBQ+ community had differing relationships with risks and supports depending on their specific LGBQ+ identity such as asexual students struggling less with workload-related issues and pansexual students struggling more with health-related issues than their LGBQ+ peers. We conclude with suggestions for campus staff, faculty, and higher education researchers on tangible ways that they can work to improve campus environments and experiences for LGBQ+ college students.
Full version
Somewhere to Stay and Thrive: Relationships between Persistence and Environments for Diverse Faculty
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Christiaens, Roman; Feldman, Steven; Russell, Alethia; Wenger, Kevin
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2023, November.
As colleges and universities invest in efforts to cultivate diverse learning environments, a primary focus has been hiring and retaining faculty with underrepresented and marginalized backgrounds. Using data from a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative data set, we explore how faculty persistence relates to aspects of a faculty member??s environment. We found that faculty perceptions of work-life balance and within-work balance were the strongest indicators of a faculty member??s intentions to persist. Relationships between persistence and aspects of environment tended to be strongest for LGBQ+ faculty. Institutions interested in supporting and retaining diverse faculty can use these findings to better understand their institution??s environment for faculty and pinpoint areas to implement change.
Full version
Exploring Relationships Between Faculty Values for and Practice in Developing Student Quantitative Reasoning
Hu, Tien-Ling & BrckaLorenz, Allison
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2023, April.
The American Association of Colleges and Universities listed quantitative literacy as an essential practical skill. Colleges and universities play a key role in preparing students with career skills. Building on two critical perspectives: the importance of quality teaching to quality learning and the importance of quantitative reasoning in workforce success, the study explores the relationship between faculty values for quantitative reasoning, how much faculty structure their courses to help develop students?? real-world skills, and to what extent faculty encourage students to participate in career-related activities. The findings show that faculty values for the importance of quantitative reasoning significantly predicted how they structure their courses to help develop students?? numerical skills and how they encourage students to participate in career-related activities.
Full version
Faculty Feelings Matter: Environmental Experiences of Queer Faculty of Color
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Chamis, Ella; Feldman, Steven
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2023, April.
Despite an emphasis on diversifying the professoriate, higher education has failed to make significant progress in recruiting and retaining diverse faculty in the academy. Literature points to issues of campus climate, discrimination, and workplace stress as common reasons for diverse faculty to leave their positions. Using the College + University Teaching Environment framework, Quare Theory, critical methodological philosophies, and a large-scale multi-institution quantitative dataset, this study examines affective components of a faculty environment for queer faculty, faculty of color, and queer faculty of color. Results indicate strong relationships between perceptions of support, sense of belonging, mental health, and stress with faculty persistence in their role as well as additional stress for LGBQ+ faculty of color.
Full version
Institutional Environments for Diverse and Inclusive College Teaching: Exploring Disciplinary Variation
Hiller, Stephen C.; Hu, Tien-Ling; Nelson Laird, Thomas; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2022, November.
This study examines the relationships of disciplinary cultures with three aspects of teaching environments: diversity in the curriculum, the use of inclusive pedagogies, and teaching autonomy. Using data from the College + University Teaching Environment survey, we found significant differences across disciplinary areas and Biglan dimensions.
Full version
Intersectionality and Sense of Belonging: Unpacking the Student Veteran Experience
Morris, Phillip Allen; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Burke, Jim; Chamis, Ella; Russell, Alethia; Weiss, Jennifer
Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2022, November.
Military veterans are increasingly diverse students with multiple identity intersections. Using variable- and person-centered analyses with data from NSSE (n= 12,668), we examined impacts of veterans?? diverse identities on the multi-item factors Sense of Belonging, Collaborative Learning, Student-Faculty Interaction, and Quality of Interactions. Policy and practice implications are discussed.
Full version
Advising during the pandemic: What we learned from research and educational practice
Cole, James and Kinzie, Jillian
NACADA, Portland, Oregon, 2022, October.
The pandemic created new challenges for students and campuses alike. Students experienced major disruptions in their educational experiences resulting in heightened mental health and academic concerns that contributed to an increasing equity gap. Campuses realized that they needed to re-align, prioritize, and develop new approaches to advising to be meet the needs of these students. Much of what was learned since 2020 is now part of the new normal. This presentation will highlight the academic and mental health challenges faced by thousands of entering fall 2022 students, focusing on first-year and transfer students, students of color, and first-generation. The presentation will describe how two institutions responded to this challenge. An important component of this presentation will be participants learning from each other and sharing how their campuses responded.
Full version
Environments that Motivate Teaching Excellence: The College + University Teaching Environment Framework
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Brandon, Josclynn; Nelson Laird, Tom
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2021, November.
Inequities and discrimination built into the systems and structures of higher education prevent faculty from doing and receiving recognition for their best work. The framework proposed here guides our understanding of faculty needs, motivations, and supports that are necessary for healthy teaching environments and the wellbeing of diverse faculty.
Full version
Teaching during the Pandemic: A Spectrum of Faculty Perspectives
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Hu, Tien-Ling
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2021, November.
In this study, we holistically investigated the ways the pandemic altered how faculty navigated their roles. We examined how faculty adapted course reparation and teaching practices while considering faculty teaching needs and personal relationships. Findings from two national surveys show differences in faculty experiences by race, gender, sexual orientation, rank, and discipline. One finding showed White faculty tended to be less flexible regarding changes to their courses while Asian faculty tended to be more flexible in comparison to the average faculty response. We discuss both broad and specific implications for institutions and faculty for comprehending faculty teaching practices as well as understanding faculty holistically.
Full version
College Students Responding to Sexuality-Based Items: A Differential Test Function Analysis
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2021, April.
Surveys are often intended to collect data across a swath of individuals yet sometimes the items favor certain respondents over others. Differential test functioning (DTF) analysis helps us understand if there are underlying latent characteristics that may affect the way a group of individuals responds to items. This study sought to examine if differences existed in the responses to items pertaining to college students?? feeling safe and supported regarding their sexual orientation. Results indicate that there appears to be differences in an item for queer first year respondents, but no differences when looking at senior students. More research is needed to precisely understand which items are functioning differently.
Full version
Disciplinary Differences in Faculty Emphasis on Deep Approaches to Learning
Hiller, Stephen C.; Nelson Laird, Thomas F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2021, April.
This large-scale study compares how Biglan and Holland conceptualizations of academic disciplines in their ability to explain differences in faculty emphasis on deep approaches to learning in their courses. To examine these differences, several multiple regressions models are conducted 6,500 faculty and instructor responses to the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), using effect coding to better compare disciplinary categories. Analyses examining disciplines using Biglan??s three dimensions or Holland??s theory suggest differences within each conceptualization that largely align with previous research. Comparisons between these two conceptualizations, while showing some overlap, indicate that Biglan??s dimensions explain slightly more variation, with a slightly greater range of magnitude in some effect sizes. These findings underscore for researchers, faculty, and educational developers the need to examine disciplinary effects on teaching practices while also suggesting for researchers the need to appropriately align disciplinary conceptualizations with their area of study.
Full version
Higher Learning Commission Annual Meeting 2021: National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Showcase Presentation
Kinzie, Jillian
Higher Learning Commission Annual Meeting, 2021, April.
In 2020, NSSE celebrated two decades of focused attention on student engagement and quality in undergraduate education. This session will showcase findings about high-impact practices, collaborative learning, and academic advising, and lessons learned from institutions that have made productive use of their results to inform improvements for student persistence and success.
Full version
A Quasi-Experimental Multilevel Study Examining High-Impact Practices and Deep Approaches to Learning
Fassett, Kyle T.; Haeger, Heather; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2020, November.
High-impact practice research often focuses on improving student persistence and academic achievement with less of an emphasis on the development of student learning processes. Further, many studies historically center majority populations in research due to sample size restrictions or methodological procedures. This study uses national survey data to examine over 347,000 seniors? experiences at more than 1,100 four-year colleges and universities with high-impact practices and students? reported learning processes. A hierarchical linear model with propensity scores and effect codes show the relationship between six high impact practices and students? learning processes while de-centering motivating factors and majority populations. Findings indicate both service-learning and learning communities promoted the outcomes under investigation with mixed results among the others. Differences emerged by race/ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, and ability status. We broadly discuss implications for higher education and future research.
Full version
Difficult Discourse and Critical Pedagogies: A Large-Scale Mixed-Methods Exploration of Faculty Practice
Hurtado, Sarah; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Sisaket, Lesley; Washington, Sylvia
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2020, November.
Using critical pedagogy as our framework, this study?s purpose is to explore faculty members? ability to engage in difficult discourse with their students and their use of related critical pedagogies. The findings come from a large-scale multi-institution mixed-methods study to provide guidance for faculty to participate in this work.
Full version
Trial and Error: Socialization?s Failure to Teach Us How to Teach
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Hurtado, Sarah; Palmer, Dajanae; McCoy-Simmons, Casey
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2020, November.
Socialization is a major component to faculty development, but without intentional direction it can fail to produce effective educators. The purpose of this large-scale mixed-methods study is to explore teaching influences, missed opportunities to prepare faculty for handling challenging teaching situations, and ways we can improve the socialization process. Results highlight the importance of faculty experiences as undergraduate and graduate students, the value of professional associations and conference participation, and the great range in faculty desires for professional development as educators. Potential implications include a focus on early socialization experiences, encouraging the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, and providing equitable opportunities to support vulnerable populations.
Full version
A multi-institutional study of teaching development opportunities and faculty practice
Fassett, K.; BrckaLorenz, A.; Hiller, S.; Nelson Laird, T.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2020, April.
Research on faculty teaching development is robust, with small-scale research studies on specific teaching development experiences or practices in particular fields. To contextualize the myriad of teaching development efforts available to faculty, this large-scale multi-institution study of nearly 4,500 faculty seeks to broaden our understandings of who participates in teaching development practices, how their participation relates to their institutional environments, and how their participation connects to use of effective teaching practices. Results show there are some notable trends by field, identity, the type of courses taught, and institutional characteristics. The overview of professional development participation in this study gives strength to positive findings from smaller-scale research studies and provides a solid base for more specific studies of these practices.
Full version
Are Black women faculty and Women of Color faculty synonymous?
Priddie, C.; Palmer, D.; Silberstein, S.; BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2020, April.
Black women faculty in the professoriate are often lumped into broader women of color categories when examining their experiences in academia. However, women of color are not a monolith and their experiences should be examined with disaggregation. The current study examined the time allocation of Black women faculty in relation to other women of color faculty to assess whether narratives compiling all women of color faculty together are appropriate. Results showed that Black women faculty differ in how they allocate their time in relation to their women of color counterparts. Our findings suggest that studies conducted aggregating the stories of women of color are not portraying the unique experience Black women faculty are facing.
Full version
Classifying higher education institutions by their general education requirements
Holcombe, E.; Nelson Laird, T.; Kwon, J.; BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2020, April.
General Education (GE) curricula specify requirements, most often fulfilled through coursework, that undergraduate students need to satisfy in addition to and often preceding a specialized major or program. Due to the decentralized nature of the American higher education system and lack of national requirements or guidelines, however, GE requirements vary from one institution to another. This exploratory study investigates patterns of GE requirements among a selection of 154 institutions and determines whether and how institutions could be grouped or classified by their GE requirements. Our five-dimension typology is parsimonious and meaningfully distinguishes between GE patterns giving us insightful information about the values and goals of institutions that are not communicated through our traditional categorizations.
Full version
Developing transferable skills for the public good
Kirnbauer, T.; BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2020, April.
Transferable skills are crucial for undergraduates to be prepared to enter the workforce after college. Previous research has shown how effective educational approaches enhance student learning. There is, however, limited research that understands how the emphasis on transferable skills relates to the value of deep approaches to student learning. This paper analyzes how faculty emphasis of transferable skills, through analytical writing and problem-solving, is related to deep approaches to learning in higher education. Data come from a large-scale, multi-institutional study that surveys faculty at four-year institutions. Findings indicate that the intentional development of transferable skills has a positive relationship with emphases on deep approaches to learning. The study reinforces the importance of collaboration between multiple stakeholders to foster student learning.
Full version
Examining the relationship between faculty development opportunities and teaching practices
Fassett, K.; BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2020, April.
Teaching is arguably the lifeblood of higher education as students enroll in higher education institutions to learn new information. Faculty often partake in developmental opportunities that seek to improve their pedagogical practices and the student experience. Seeing the importance in understanding teaching, this study uses a multi-institution data set to examine the relationship between development opportunities and faculty use of effective teaching practices and course goals. Findings indicate that informal practices including discussing teaching with colleagues, speaking with students beyond course evaluations about classroom practices, and reading pedagogy books increased use of effective teaching practices. These findings have implications for faculty developers coordinating teaching development opportunities, administrators investing funding in development, and faculty who are looking to change their practices.
Full version
Student Living Arrangements: An Exploration of Marginalized Identities
Fassett, Kyle T.; Gonyea, Robert M.; Graham, Polly A.; Fosnacht, Kevin
ACPA-College Student Affairs Educators International Convention, Nashville, TN, 2020, March.
While past research found on-campus living to benefit student success, recent studies find mixed support, particularly for marginalized groups. This study focuses on first-year and sophomore students of color, LGBQ+ students, gender non-binary students, and students with disabilities, analyzing where they live as related to a variety of outcomes. Data come from 76 residential colleges and universities that participated in NSSE during 2018. Results show differences in where students report living and students? engagement and perceptions of belongingness and safety in their living communities.
Full version
Culturally engaging courses and campuses for LGBQ+ issues
BrckaLorenz, A., Duran, A., Haeger, H. & Duenaz, U.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This study examined student perceptions of how open their institution is to integrating LGBQ+ topics in curricula and how this relates to other forms of engagement. We found differences by major and sexuality, and that relationships between engagement and LGBQ+ topic inclusion are strong for LGBQ+ and non-LGBQ+ students.
Full version
Examining the relationship between living environments and sense of community: A multi-institution study
Hurtado, S., Fassett, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This study seeks to expand the often-mixed results about college living arrangements. We examine differences between various on-campus and off-campus options as they relate to students sense of community and belonging. We specifically focus on students from marginalized backgrounds who have been historically underrepresented in college environment studies.
Full version
Exploring interactions of race and discipline in teaching practices: Focusing on faculty of color in STEM
Hiller, S., BrckaLorenz, A., Priddie, C., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This study seeks to center the experiences of minoritized faculty to better understand how diverse faculty approach teaching in different disciplines. Findings suggest that students in STEM courses taught by faculty of color may experience deeper and more meaningful learning than in STEM courses taught by White faculty.
Full version
Top college choice among students? sexual orientations
Fassett, K. T., & Pike, G. R.
ssociation for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This paper aims to examine college enrollment trends of queer students using Perna?s (2006) conceptual model of student college choice focusing on aspects of capital and the recruitment of these students. The research questions of the study are: what differences exist between students selecting their top institution by sexual orientation, and how do social factors influence queer students selecting these institutions? Data from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) paired with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) for students entering college in 2017 and 2018.
Full version
Top college choice differences among students' sexual orientations
Fassett, K., & Pike, G.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This paper aims to examine college enrollment trends of queer students using Perna??s (2006) conceptual model of student college choice focusing on aspects of capital and the recruitment of these students. The research questions of the study are: what differences exist between students selecting their top institution by sexual orientation, and how do social factors influence queer students selecting these institutions? Data from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) paired with the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) for students entering college in 2017 and 2018.
Full version
What's your threshold? How international students use vague quantifiers of behavioral frequency in student surveys
McCormick, A., Rocconi, L., & Dumford, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Many student surveys on the undergraduate experience ask respondents to quantify various aspects of their collegiate experiences. Studies of the survey response process have shown that enumeration is cognitively challenging and subject to various forms of error. As an alternative to enumeration, many surveys use vague quantifiers (VQs) such as ?very often,? ?often,? ?sometimes,? ?rarely,? or ?never.? Previous research findings generally support the use of VQs from a concurrent validity standpoint. One important area that has gone unexplored involves international students?how they interpret and use VQs and whether these interpretations and uses differ from those of domestic students. A related concern involves heterogeneity within the international student population. To the extent that the use of VQs differs between international and domestic students, or differs among international student populations, users of student survey data should be aware of these differences and their implications for the validity and interpretation of results. Informed by these concerns, we ask the following research questions: 1. To what extent do domestic and international students interpret VQs differently? 2. Among international students, to what extent do students from Western and non-Western countries interpret VQs differently?
Full version
Advancing truth: Expanding our knowledge of LGBQ+ faculty
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Merckle, R.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019, April.
Most research about queerness at colleges and universities has been aimed at examining the student experience. Research on queer faculty often has quantitative limitations, has grown outdated, or is qualitative in nature. From this, we know that the experiences of queer faculty are often difficult. Through a large-scale, multi-institution, multi-year investigation of LGBQ+ faculty, this study aims to give an overview of the academic lives of these understudied academics. We investigate who they are, at what kinds of institutions are they employed, and different ways they contribute to undergraduate education. With this story, we hope to strengthen the voices of qualitative studies and encourage higher education to think more broadly about notions of diversity and identity.
Full version
An examination of inclusivity and support for diversity in STEM fields
BrckaLorenz, A., Haeger, H., & Priddie, C.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019, April.
The lack of diversity in STEM professions is an ongoing concern for the US both in terms of social justice and in having a globally competitive workforce. This study provides information for campus leaders to be proactive in considering a wide array of identities to meet the needs of students beyond attending to structural forms of diversity. Data from a large-scale, multi-institution study of students‘ perceptions of inclusive coursework and institutional commitment to diversity in STEM fields furthers what we know about diversity in these majors. Results encourage campus leaders to additionally consider sexual orientation and disability status in conversations about diversity and to think about how culturally engaging and inclusive courses go beyond the content of the course.
Full version
Centering Black women faculty: Magnifying powerful voices
Priddie, C., Palmer, D., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019, April.
While much of the quantitative research Black women faculty, has taken a comparative approach to understanding their experiences, this study provides a counternarrative, centering their experiences as faculty. This large-scale, multi-institution glance at Black women faculty helps to give us an overview of these women across the country, looking at who they are, where they are, how they spend their time, and what they value in undergraduate education. This study allows us to strengthen various arguments made in qualitative studies of Black women faculty and give voice to a community that can be invisible. This study reaffirms and reinvigorates the need to continue to create avenues for recruitment, hiring, support, promotion, and retention of Black women across all disciplines.
Full version
Does enjoyment, guilt, and/or rewards motivate faculty research productivity? A large-scale test of Self-Determination Theory
Stupnisky, R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019, April.
What motivates faculty to be productive researchers is largely unknown as institutional, demographic, and social-environmental factors explain limited variance. The current study tested the extent to which self-determined motivation served as a predictor of university faculty member‘s research productivity. Analysis of a large-scale USA sample of 1,980 faculty from 21 institutions using structural equation modeling found autonomous motivation (enjoyment, value) positively related to self-reported research productivity and number of publications, beyond time spent on research. The basic needs of autonomy and competence predicted autonomous motivation, and indirectly predicted achievement. External motivation (rewards) had a relatively small positive relationship with research productivity, while introjected motivation (guilt) had no relationship. The results contribute to both the faculty development and motivation research literatures.
Full version
Employing differential item function analysis in survey research
Paulsen, J., Merckle, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019, April.
One of the key assumptions involved in using any survey or measurement is that the instrument works consistently across groups. This is particularly important in survey research where group comparisons are ubiquitous. Differential item functioning analysis examines whether the instrument systematically biases in favor of one group. The findings from such an analysis are unattainable in traditional approaches to examining instrument validity, and yet, it is rare to find DIF analysis in surveys. This process illustrates DIF analysis with logistic regression using the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement. We find FSSE items did not show the presence of DIF. This provides confidence to users of this instrument that it measures the same constructs in the same way across different groups.
Full version
Examining students’ use of, preferences for, and learning with e-textbooks
Abaci, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Quick, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019, April.
E-textbooks (e-texts) are becoming more available in higher education as they offer a cost advantage
and features that are intended to enhance teaching and learning. Although previous studies speak to
student experiences and preferences for e-texts, these studies are often limited in scope. The purpose
of this study is to understand student experiences with e-texts and the factors that drive their
preferences for textbook medium with a large-scale multi-institution data set. Findings indicate that e-text
use and preferences differ by a variety of student characteristics, most notably students‘ class level
and major field. In general, students who more frequently used the interactive features of e-texts felt
that their use of these tools contributed to their learning and interactions with others.
Full version
Time well spent: Flipped classrooms and effective teaching practices
Fassett, K. T., BrckaLorenz, A., Strickland, J., & Ribera, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, 2019, April.
Good teaching practices are the crux of student education and require constant evaluation to meet current generations‘ learning needs. Flipped classrooms have sought a foothold in higher education to provide opportunities for deep learning through the delivery of content online prior to attending class while having activities related to processing and applying the information during class. Using a large-scale, multi-institution study of faculty teaching flipped courses, this study empirically links flipped procedures to other forms of effective educational practice and additionally focuses on the motivations and impacts on the faculty side of this pedagogical practice. Findings indicate numerous learning and development benefits for students with implications for supporting and motivating faculty across disciplines, faculty identities, and course types.
Full version
The relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement
Hurtado, S., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Fosnacht, K.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Boston, MA, 2019, March.
Residential learning communities (RLCs) are residence hall environments designed to deliver
academic and social benefits. For decades, RLCs have been touted as an effective means to
increase student success. Yet, substantial changes in the defining characteristics of campus
housing and student diversity have led to new questions about the impact of living on campus
and the benefits of RLCs in particular. Consequently, we investigated the continued efficacy of
RLCs as an effective educational practice. Using data from a diverse, multi-institution sample of
first-year and sophomore students, this study provides insight into the relationships between
RLC participation, student engagement, and perceived gains in learning.
Full version
Bringing their perspective to campus: Students’ experiences with inclusive courses and diverse environments
Kinzie, J., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
How much do students experience courses that emphasize sharing their own perspectives or respecting diverse ideas? This study uses data from a multi-institution survey to explore student experiences with inclusive courses and perceptions of institutional commitment to diversity and discuss a dozen campus responses to their institutional assessment results.
Full version
International students' reflective-integrative learning: Variation by geographical regions of origin
Oktafiga, D. A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
International students are an important and growing population at colleges and universities in the United States. Although some is known about the behaviors of these students in higher education, more information about how these students engage in reflective-integrative learning activities can help institutions create spaces for these students to thrive both academically and interpersonally. Using a large-scale, multi-institution survey of over three thousand international seniors, this study moves away from the common practice of grouping international students together and begins to disaggregate by exploring senior international students' reflective-integrative learning participation by the students' geographic region of origin. Findings indicate that there are differences in participation in reflective-integrative learning activities among international students from different regions as well as between international and domestic students, with notable differences from Asian students.
Full version
The effects of the first-year residence hall roommate assignment policy on interactional diversity and perceptions of the campus environment
Fosnacht, K., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Hurtado, S.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
A heterogenous student body is valued in part because diverse interactions among students help create educated and competent citizens and promotes student learning and development. Campus housing is a primary area for diverse interactions as students navigate living with individuals who differ from themselves. This study investigates how the roommate
assignment process influences interactional diversity and perceptions of the campus environment
for first-year students living on campus, and if these relationships differ by race/ethnicity. On
average, students whose roommates were assigned by the institution (as opposed to choosing their own roommates) had a trivial increase in interactional diversity, but perceived a less supportive campus environment. However, the latter relationship differed by race. In particular, Asian, Black, and multiracial students who were assigned roommates by the institution perceived a less welcoming campus environment than their same-race peers who chose their roommates.
This difference was not observed for White students.
Full version
The intersections of race and sexuality in LGBQ+ college students’ belongingness, institutional commitment, and outness
BrckaLorenz, A., Duran, A., Fassett, K., & Palmer, D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate how student subgroups within the LGBQ+ community differed in their perceptions of belongingness, institutional commitment, and outness. Findings from this study revealed how professionals can create targeted initiatives to support collegians who identify with specific racial or sexual minority groups
Full version
The time is now: A study promoting STEM faculty use of culturally inclusive teaching
Ribera, A., Priddie, C., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
This study aims to inform the conversation of inclusion in STEM. We analyzed nearly 3,000 faculty who shared their experiences with using culturally inclusive teaching in their selected undergraduate course. Our study serves as tool to promote discussions about strategies campus leaders may adopt to reinforce inclusion for all students.
Full version
Wake up, institutions! Understanding the social and political causes of student activists
BrckaLorenz, A., Palmer, D., Kirnbauer, T., Miller, D., & Wright, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
The purpose of this large-scale quantitative study was to better understand the social and political causes in which students are active. Through our findings, we encourage colleges and universities to #wakeup and adopt a more proactive philosophy for their engagement with and support of students surrounding activism.
Full version
Creative coursework exposure: Enhancing college student engagement across disciplines
Miller, A. L.
Southern Oregon University Creativity Conference, 2018, August.
Previous research suggests that creativity training can be effective in academic settings and that teachers, in particular, can have an impact on creativity (Scott et al., 2004). Furthermore, incorporating creativity into classroom activities and assignments can encourage student engagement in the educational process (Halpern, 2010). This study extends research on creativity and student engagement in higher education, using data from the ?Senior Transitions? topical module of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Responses from over 61,000 seniors at 266 different U.S colleges and universities were used to explore how exposure to creative coursework can predict student engagement in a variety of areas. NSSE‘s measure of creative coursework includes items on generating new ideas, taking risks without fear of penalty, evaluating multiple approaches to problems, and inventing new methods. Ordinary least squares regression models were conducted to determine the effect of creative coursework exposure on NSSE‘s established measures of student engagement: reflective and integrative learning, higher-order learning, use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, diverse discussions, student-faculty interaction, effective teaching practices, quality of interactions, and supportive environment. The results suggest that creative coursework is a significant positive predictor of student engagement, even after controlling for sex, transfer status, enrollment status, first-generation status, age, SAT/ACT, race/ethnicity, major, grades, percentage of online courses, control (private/public) and size. Potential reasons for these patterns of results will be discussed. These findings can help to inform curricular and programming enhancements for college students across all major fields, enriching their educational experiences through exposure to creative coursework.
Full version
Dimensions of expectations: How it breaks freshman myth
Mu, L., & Cole, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
First-year college students often arrive with unrealistic academic and engagement expectations that typically result in many of their expectations going unmet. This phenomenon is referred to as freshman myth. Due to the gap between the expected and actual engagement, investigations about their association at the average level may conceal the true relationship. In the current study, we used longitudinal student survey data from a national sample to explore how the variation in expectations influences the association of the expected and actual engagement of first-year college students. The results revealed that, at the same expectation level, entering college students who had more varied expectations were more likely to fulfill their expected engagement in the first academic year. An institution‘s environment did not show significant mediation on the association of expected and actual engagement.
Full version
Examining faculty burn-out, well-being, and job performance
Stupnisky, R. H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Guay, F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
This study tested a conceptual model based on self-determination theory to examine how university faculty members‘ motivation for teaching predicts their utilization of teaching best practices and explored if faculty at various higher education institution types are differentially motivated for teaching. Data from a national online survey of 1,671 faculty from 19 universities were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Support for the overall model showed faculty autonomy, competence, and relatedness positively predicted autonomous (intrinsic, identified) motivation but not controlled (introjected, external) motivation. Autonomous motivation, in turn, predicted greater incorporation of effective teaching strategies, namely instructional clarity, higher-order learning, reflective and integrative learning, and collaborative learning. There were no differences found across faculty at doctoral, master‘s, and bachelor‘s institutions in terms of autonomous motivation mean levels nor for the predictive effects of autonomous motivation on teaching best practices. The findings have implications for the faculty motivation and teaching research literatures as well as for faculty development initiatives aimed at improving teaching effectiveness.
Full version
Exploring perspectives on culturally inclusive practice: Institutional emphasis of diversity, inclusive coursework, and student gains
BrckaLorenz, A., Kinzie, J., Hurtado, S., & Sanchez, B.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
In the last few decades, diversity, inclusion, and equity goals have proliferated across institutions in the US, and decades of research point to the benefits of culturally inclusive content and pedagogy on student outcomes. Despite these findings, it is not sufficient simply to know if students are exposed to these experiences; rather, we must understand how students interpret and perceive them as they relate to the institution‘s commitment to inclusion. Using data from undergraduates and faculty in a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative study, this paper presents findings regarding the ways students engage in culturally inclusive content and pedagogy, faculty practices for inclusivity, and how these influence students‘ educational gains and perceptions of institutional commitment to diversity, inclusion, and equity goals.
Full version
Faculty types and effective teaching: A cautionary exploration of how faculty spend their time
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T. F., Yuhas, B., Strickland, J., & Fassett, K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
Most research on faculty time focuses on research productivity, leaving the time they spend on other activities largely unexplored. Time spent teaching is certainly as core to institutional missions as research and is more likely to shape students‘ experiences and learning. This large-scale, multi-institution study of over 16,000 full-time faculty examines how much time they spend on teaching, research, and service. Five distinct groups, based on time use, are described. Additionally, the relationships between the groupings and the use of effective educational practices are explored. Surprising results, such as teaching-heavy faculty scoring the lowest on measures of teaching effectiveness, raise questions about faculty roles and autonomy and what conditions inspire the use of best practices in teaching.
Full version
Measuring the diversity inclusivity of college courses: An update
Nelson Laird, T. F., Hurtado, S. S., & Yuhas, B.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
In our current educational and national contexts, few things matter more than finding ways to facilitate learning across differences. Including diversity in the college curriculum is one well-established way to promote this learning. In this update to Nelson Laird‘s (2011) work, we use questionnaire responses from 4,468 faculty at 42 colleges and universities to show that all types of faculty are including diversity in some aspects of their courses, while certain faculty?such as women, faculty of color, and those who perceive a strong commitment to diversity among the people at their institutions?are more likely to include diversity than their colleagues. We discuss implications for faculty, faculty development, and students in the paper.
Full version
Student and faculty perspectives on the emphasis of inclusive and culturally engaging coursework
Silberstein, S. & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
Higher education provides opportunities for students from homogeneous backgrounds to be introduced to new concepts and experiences, and it has the potential to create environments that engage and include students from marginalized backgrounds. It is not enough to strive for structural diversity; institutions should intentionally create formal diversity experiences, such as coursework focused on inclusive and culturally engaging activities. This large-scale, multi-institution study of undergraduate and faculty perceptions of inclusive and culturally engaging coursework gives insight into the ways faculty create supportive environments in their classrooms and the students who are participating in these activities. This paper focuses on areas in which campuses are succeeding in creating more inclusive and culturally engaging classroom environments and areas that need improvement.
Full version
Undergraduate financial knowledge and the role of financial education programming
Fosnacht, K., & Dugan, B. J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2018, March.
College is an increasingly risky investment for students due to increased cost burden placed on students and their families and the associated student debt. In response, colleges and universities have increased their financial education programming hoping to mitigate some of the deleterious effects of this change. Therefore, we conducted an exploratory analysis of financial education programming by examining its relationship with financial knowledge. After holding other characteristics constant, we found little efficacy of many types of financial education programming. The single program with a significant and positive relationship was student loan counseling, which had a small to trivial influence on financial knowledge. Consequently, colleges and universities should reevaluate their financial education efforts to examine if these resources are being spent wisely.
Full version
Biracial students’ collegiate interactions and perceptions of the campus environment
BrckaLorenz, A., Harris, J., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
The purpose of this research is to focus on the amount of and relationship between biracial students‘ collegiate interactions and their perceptions of the campus environment. Findings from this research explore an often understudied biracial student population and complicate the assumption that biracial students are a monolithic group.
Full version
High-impact practices: Is the impact positive or negative for students of color?
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
Although high-impact practices are promoted as mechanisms to improve the quality of undergraduate education for all students, it has been suggested that they may create the opportunity for distinctly negative, harmful experiences for students of color. This study examines the impact of HIP participation within racial/ethnic groups, finding generally positive effects.
Full version
Marginalization at the crossroads: Exploring the experiences of queer students of color
BrckaLorenz, A., & Clark, J.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
Queer students of color present a unique combination of marginalized racial and sexual identities. In this large-scale multi-institutional study, we explore the engagement, perceptions of campus environment, and satisfaction of thousands of queer students of color. Results highlight some of the struggles and successes of this often-silenced group of students.
Full version
Peering into the box of grit: How does grit influence the engagement of undergraduates?
Fosnacht, K., Copridge, K., & Sarraf, S.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
Angela Duckworth‘s concept of grit has become a popular way for admissions leaders to incorporate non-cognitive traits into admissions decisions. Despite this popularity, the validity of grit has been questioned by numerous scholars. This study investigated the construct and concurrent validity of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) using a large multi-institutional sample of first year and senior students. It also examined the measurement invariance of Grit-S to examine if the scale varied across populations. The results indicate that the criterion validity of Grit-S is not suitable for usage in high-stakes situations. However, the scale seems to be relatively invariant across important subgroups. The concurrent validity analyses revealed that one dimension of grit, perseverance of effort, was significantly and positively correlated to the NSSE Engagement Indicators, a perceived gains scale, time spent studying, and GPA. However, the second dimension of grit was frequently negatively related to the same measures.
Full version
Religious intolerance on campus: A multi-institutional study
Broderick, C., & Fosnacht, K.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
Incidents of religious intolerance and discrimination have become too common in American society and today‘s college campuses are not immune to these incidents. Previous research has shown the negative influence of perceived hostile campus cultures on students‘ overall learning and development. This study investigated the religious and spiritual discrimination experiences of college and university students. With particular attention paid to students‘ self-identified religious/spiritual identities, the study found that students who identify with a non-Christian, World faith tradition experienced a greater number of discriminatory acts than their Christian peers. Additionally, the results show that a greater respect for beliefs on campus was negatively correlated with experiencing acts of religious intolerance. In contrast, increased comfort in expressing religious and spirituality beliefs on campus was positively related to greater incidents of religious intolerance.
Full version
Viewing higher education as a sea of islands: The impact of student engagement on cultural validation of Native Hawai'ian and Pacific Islander students
Saelua, N., Ribera, A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Museus, S. D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Houston, TX, 2017, November.
Knowing that culturally diverse students find validation to be a motivating factor for their success on college and university campuses, this large-scale multi-institution study of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) students examines their views on cultural validation and specific forms of engagement that can help NHPI students feel valued.
Full version
The role of religion and spirituality in promoting a positive campus culture: A multi-institutional study
Fosnacht, K., & Broderick, C.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, May.
Discriminatory acts against religious minorities at our nation‘s college campuses has been too common. Previous research has linked discrimination to perceptions of a hostile campus climate, which negatively influences students learning and development. This study investigated the correlates of two measures that capture students‘ perception of the campus climate. It pays particular attention to the role of religious identity and attending a religiously affiliated institution to assess how these factors influence students‘ perception of the respect for their beliefs and comfort in expressing their views on campus. The results indicate few differences by religious identity in students‘ perception of the respect for their beliefs, but significant differences by religion in their comfort in expressing their views. Additionally, attending a religiously affiliated institution was positively correlated with students‘ comfort in expressing their beliefs, even for religious minorities.
Full version
Typology of students: A view from student transition from high school to college
Mu, L., & Cole, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, May.
Several recent studies have successfully identified several college student types. One limitation of past studies has been their reliance on one-time cross sectional assessments. As a result, we are left to ponder the stability or consistency of student behaviors as the academic year progresses. This study uses longitudinal data of student engagement to investigate the stability of student engagement typology. Guided by behavioral consistency theory, this study explores the supportive elements of educational settings in order to find those under which students‘ behavior-based types are more likely to change. Results showed that there are generally four student types based on their engagement in a variety of activities. In higher education settings, most students stick to a pattern of behaviors while a small portion changed compared with their engagement types in high school. Students‘ background characteristics and institutional environment showed association with these shifts.
Full version
A comparison of international students’ engagement and faculty perceptions of international student engagement
Wang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, April.
With the exponential growth of international students pursing degrees at U.S. colleges and universities, an increasing number of faculty and staff have brought up questions and concerns about supporting international students‘ academic engagement and success. Although prior studies have explored the educational experiences of international students in the US, only a small number of them have investigated international student engagement at four-year institutions. Little is known about faculty‘s approaches to international student engagement and how they may differ from international students‘ self-reported engagement. Using large-scale and multi-institutional survey datasets, this quantitative study aims to explore international student engagement in learning strategies, collaborative learning, and student-faculty interaction, and to compare international student engagement from the perspectives of faculty and students. Recommendations on supporting international student engagement from an individual faculty level, department level, and institutional level are discussed in the end.
Full version
Applying item response theory to examine extreme survey response style
Wang, X., Ribera, A. K., & Gonyea, R. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, April.
Response style effect is a well-known survey limitation. By applying a generalized item response theory (IRT) model to the Global Perspective Inventory data from the 2014 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this study provides estimates of college students‘ extreme response style (ERS) tendency. Furthermore, findings reveal significant group differences in ERS tendency by two student characteristics?first-generation status and major choice (STEM vs non-STEM).
Full version
Social desirability bias and faculty respondents: Is ?good behavior? harming survey results?
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, April.
Social desirability bias has long been a concern for survey researchers, with mixed findings for student self-reports in higher education. To extend this research, the current study investigates the potential presence of social desirability bias in faculty surveys. In addition to the core Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, this study used responses from a social desirability measure given to 1,574 faculty members at 18 institutions. A series of 10 step-wise OLS regression analyses looking at engagement indicators (while controlling for other faculty and institutional characteristics) suggest that in all cases, social desirability bias does not seem to be a major factor in faculty survey responses. However, it is also important to consider how some items are ?sensitive? for specific populations.
Full version
The role of religion/spirituality in promoting a positive campus culture
Fosnacht, K., & Broderick, C.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Columbus, OH, 2017, March.
Postsecondary institutions are frequently forced to respond to discriminatory acts, including those against religious minorities. Such acts can create the perception of a hostile campus climate for students, which impinges on their learning and development. Campus climate research has traditionally focused on race and sex, but has largely neglected other important aspects of students' identities like religion and spirituality. In this study, we investigated how the religious/spiritual aspects of the campus climate influenced students' perceptions of the overall campus climate using data from a multi-institutional sample of first-year and senior undergraduates. Our multivariate results show that the religious/spiritual dimensions of the campus climate account for a significant proportion of the variance in students' campus climate perceptions.
Full version
Found my place: The importance of faculty relationships for seniors’ sense of belonging
Miller, A. L., Williams, L. M., & Silberstein, S. M.
John C. Dalton Institute on College Student Values, Tallahassee, FL, 2017, February.
The current study sought to explore whether senior students‘ faculty-related engagement influences their sense of belonging, particularly their feelings of institutional acceptance. This study utilizes data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to explore these relationships. Results suggest that increased student-faculty interaction, use of effective teaching practices, and participation in research with faculty have a positive impact on feelings of institutional acceptance for seniors. Furthermore, certain student demographics, college experiences, and institutional characteristics also play a role in this aspect of belongingness. Institutions can use this information to increase programming and resources directed at improving student engagement with faculty.
Full version
Employing quasi-experimental methods to relate first-year student participation in research with faculty to desired outcomes
Fosnacht, K., & Zilvinskis, J.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Columbus, IN, 2016, November.
Undergraduate research opportunities with faculty are becoming increasingly common and previously been found to positively influence student learning. However, the literature on this activity is generally weak methodologically and/or is not generalizable. This study uses quasi-experimental
methods to examine the influence of research with faculty using a large national sample. We found that research with faculty experiences had significant and positive effects on
multiple aspects of student engagement for a sample of first-year students, particularly student-faculty
interaction. Additionally, we found differential effects of undergraduate research participation between STEM and non-STEM majors. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Full version
Examining student-faculty interaction among Black/African American female undergraduates: An in-depth analysis of NSSE 2008&ndash2012 data
Wheatle, K. I. E., Davis, L. P., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Columbus, OH, 2016, November.
The current study examines student-faculty interaction by employing OLS regression models on a large-scale sample of student engagement survey data to compare Black female interaction with faculty to their Black male, White female, and White male peers. Within-group analyses will reveal impact of various student characteristics among Black women students.
Full version
First-year students' time use in college: A latent profile analysis
Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A. C., & Lerma, R.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Columbus, OH, 2016, November.
Students‘ time expenditures influence their learning and development. This study used latent profile analysis to identify a typology of how first-year students spend their time using a large, comprehensive sample. It identified four time usage patterns by first-year students titled balanced, involved, partiers, and parents. Sex, expected major field, on-campus residency, age, Greek-life membership, and standardized test scores were predictive of students‘ time use patterns. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Full version
Effective advising: How academic advising influences student learning outcomes in different institutional contexts
Mu, L., & Fosnacht, K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
Using survey data from 156 bachelor‘s-granting institutions, this study explored the relationship between academic advising services and senior‘s grades and self-perceived gains. We found advising experiences has a positive relationship with students‘ grades and self-perceived learning gains. Additionally, our results indicate that the institutional advising climate is positively correlated with perceived learning gains, but not grades. The results also showed that the relationships of advising and students‘ learning and development varied across institutions. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Full version
High-impact practices and student-faculty interactions for gender variant students
BrckaLorenz, A., Garvey, J. C., Hurtado, S. S., & Latopolski, K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
The vast amount of research on student success and engagement in college focuses on a narrative for majority student populations that does not account for unique experiences across social identities. This paper examines the experiences of gender variant students (i.e., students who do not identify as either cisgender men or women) regarding engagement in high-impact practices and student-faculty interactions using a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative data set. Although high-impact practice participation was similar for gender variant and cisgender students, positive student-faculty interaction was found to be a significant predictor for increased high-impact practice participation for gender variant students. Results from this study may also point to chillier climates of certain major fields for gender variant students. Implications for these findings focus on increasing gender variant students‘ participation in high-impact practices, creating more safe and positive learning environments for gender variant students, and advocating for the inclusion of different gender identities in surveys, institutional data, and higher education research.
Full version
Maintaining inequality: An analysis of college pathways among women at large public institutions
Tukibayeva, M., Ribera, A. K., Nelson Laird, T. F., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
Armstrong and Hamilton (2013) proposed a framework of three college pathways?party, professional, and mobility?that lead to economically unequal postgraduation outcomes and vastly different college experiences for female students. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), we examined the responses from 42,504 women seniors at 183 four-year large public institutions to identify how the potential income of their college major choice relate to the pathways. We found that the economic advantage of major choice is not equally distributed among students: party pathway students selected the least lucrative college majors, professional pathway students selected the most lucrative majors, and first-generation students on all pathways tended to select majors with less potential income than their peers with college-educated parents. Students on the three pathways also engaged differently in three measures of academic engagement (three of the ten NSSE Engagement Indicators): Reflective and Integrative Learning, Learning Strategies, and Student-Faculty Interaction.
Full version
Moving students to read: Unpacking the relationship with reflective and integrative learning
Wang, R., & Ribera, A. K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
College students‘ reading motivation and reflective and integrative learning play a significant role in influencing students‘ academic performance and engagement. Understanding students‘ reading motivation will help faculty members adjust their course design and provide sufficient support and resources in order to accommodate student learning. Using data collected in 2013 from 47 four-year colleges and universities located in the U.S., this study explores individual characteristics of students who tend to be intrinsically motivated to read. This study also explores the relationship between intrinsic reading motivation and students‘ level of engagement in reflective and integrative learning. Recommendations for enhancing students‘ reading motivation and reflective and integrative learning are provided.
Full version
The teaching practices and time allocation of faculty and graduate student instructors
Wang, R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
Few studies have compared teaching behaviors between faculty and graduate student instructors (GSIs). Using a large-scale multi-institution dataset, this study takes a closer examination of the variation of effective teaching practices, proportion of time spent on in-class activities, and time commitment on teaching-related activates of faculty and GSIs with different demographic and course characteristics. Results suggest that faculty utilize more effective teaching practices than GSIs across all demographic, course characteristics, and disciplines. Faculty spent a greater proportion of time in lecture and discussion, whereas GSIs spent more time in small-group activities. GSIs spent less time than faculty at different academic ranks in all teaching-related activities. This study recommends more resources and support should be provided to GSIs to enhance effective teaching practices and time management in teaching.
Full version
Understanding faculty experiences with discrimination: The role of intersecting identity and institutional characteristics
Hurtado, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
Understanding the experience of faculty members has been an important focus of higher education literature, particularly the prevalence of discrimination for underrepresented populations. Experiences with discrimination have the potential to negatively impact aspects of faculty overall experience, including satisfaction and retention and perceptions of campus climate. Most previous literature focuses on one or two specific identity characteristics (e.g. gender and race/ethnicity) and less attention has been paid to ways in which various identity characteristics intersect in one‘s experience. Using a large-scale multi-institution data set, this quantitative study examines faculty experiences with discrimination by identity and institutional characteristics, its impact on faculty ability to work, and perceptions of institutional support. Findings indicate nearly half of faculty who experienced discrimination indicated it was based on two or more identities and of the identities provided, academic rank was the highest reported reason for discrimination.
Full version
Livin' on a prayer: A quasi-experimental investigation into the efficacy of learning communities
Fosnacht, K., & Graham, P. A.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2016, March.
With the increasing adoption of learning communities by post-secondary institutions, it is imperative to document their effectiveness, as the existing research is not definitive. In this study, we found that learning communities have a positive impact on students‘ engagement and perceived gains using a quasi-experimental approach, confirming previous research; however, learning communities do not appear to drastically alter the student experience on average. Additionally, we found that the estimated effect of learning communities varies widely across institutions on a variety of measures. Consequently, it appears that while some learning communities are extremely impactful, others have a negligible impact on students.
Full version
Living on campus: Does it still make a difference?
Graham, P. A., Hurtado, S. S., & Gonyea, R. M.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2016, March.
While the benefits of living on campus have been well documented, the changing landscape of living arrangements, programming efforts, and other factors underline the need to reexamine its impact. Using national survey data from first-year students, this study investigates the relationship of residential status with engagement and perceived gains in learning and development. Results indicate, after controlling for student and institution characteristics, that student residence has an inconsequential effect on the dependent variables. Implications for practice and additional research are discussed.
Full version
Looking across high-impact practices: First-year student democratic awareness & democratic participation
Weiss, H. A., & Fosnacht, K. J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2016, March.
Creating educated and informed citizens for our diverse democracy has long been one of the objectives of the U.S. educational system. Traditionally, service-learning has been the primary tool for colleges and universities to promote civic outcomes; however, other practices also hold the potential to improve civic outcomes. In this study, we find that service-learning, learning communities, and research with faculty are positively and significantly correlated to two measures of democratic engagement for a multi-institutional sample of first-year students. The results have important implications for how postsecondary institutions promote civic outcomes.
Full version
Learning online: Unintended consequences for engagement?
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L.
Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI, 2016, January.
A rapidly increasing number of colleges and universities are looking for ways to deliver course content online. This paper investigates the effects of taking courses through an online medium on students‘ engagement using data from the 2015 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). A series of 10 OLS regression analyses, controlling for certain student and institutional characteristics, suggested several significant effects of taking online courses for first-year students as well as seniors. Students taking more courses using an online medium showed higher use of learning strategies and quantitative reasoning yet lower collaborative learning, student-faculty interactions, effective teaching practices, discussions with diverse others, and quality of interactions. The change in these engagement indicators based on the percentage of classes taken online reveals that the online environment might encourage certain types of engagement but not others.
Full version
Focus on the finish line: Does high-impact practice participation influence career plans and job attainment?
Miller, A. L., Rocconi, L. M., & Dumford, A. D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Denver, CO, 2015, November.
High-impact practices (HIPs) are an important component of student engagement in higher education, as they promote learning, development, and persistence among students. The goal of this study was to extend the research on HIPs to explore potential connections with HIP participation and career outcomes. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study explores whether high-impact practice (HIP) participation influences plans for career and further education for graduating seniors, and whether HIP participation has a positive impact on job attainment for these students. The results of logistic and multinomial regression analyses suggest that even after controlling for a variety of other demographic and institutional factors, HIP participation is a significant predictor of future career plans and attainment. The findings are discussed in the context of the Chaos Theory of Careers (Pryor & Bright, 2003), which emphasizes the role of multiple influences and chance, as well as acknowledging nonlinear paths in career advising and development. HIP participation can give students a career-related advantage through transferable skill development, engaging in learning opportunities, and generating ?stories? for potential employers.
Full version
Graduate student instructors, their courses, and the support they need
BrckaLorenz, A., Wang, R., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Denver, CO, 2015, November.
While some existing literature exposes graduate students instructor‘s (GSIs) various approaches
to teaching, and the importance of professional development, there is little research on the ways
in which GSI characteristics may impact their needs and preferences for professional
development (Boman, 2013). Led by these gaps in the literature, this study explores the diverse
characteristics of GSIs employed at eight research universities in the U.S. and investigates the
ways in which these characteristics impact GSI needs for professional development and support
in teaching. The results of this study offer implications for practice and recommendations for
future research that enhance GSIs teaching and learning, as well as their overall graduate
education and preparation.
Full version
Undermatching and the first-year experience: Examining effect heterogeneity
Fosnacht, K.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Denver, CO, 2015, November.
Academic undermatching, which occurs when a student with the academic credentials to compete for admission to a selective school enrolls at a substantially less-selective institution, has increasingly gained the attention of policymakers and researchers as a potential reason for the nation‘s lower-than-desired college completion rate. The relationship between undermatching and college outcomes, however, is not well understood. Following up on a previous study that found undermatching had mixed effects on outcomes in first-year students‘ engagement, perceived gains, and satisfaction, this study examines if these relationships vary by race/ethnicity, parental education, and gender. Results indicate that the relationship between undermatching and the aforementioned outcomes differed by race/ethnicity and gender but not by parental education. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Full version
An alternative approach: Using survey panels to inform assessment
Sarraf, S., Fernandez, S., Houlemarde, M., & Wang, X.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
As an experiment, eight mini-surveys based on selected items from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) were administered to 500 college students over an eight-week period. NSSE staff recruited participants from five diverse colleges and universities in order to investigate this alternative survey panel approach to see what impact it would have on various data quality indicators. Results indicate a dramatic increase in student participation rates and less missing data from those who responded.
Full version
Barriers in returning to learning: Engagement and support of adult learners
Rabourn, K. E., Shoup, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Adult learners are a growing population in the U.S. postsecondary education system that experiences distinct barriers to academic success. However, higher education institutions continue to create and adhere to policies that favor traditional-age college students. Given that adult learners are becoming more common across the higher education landscape, it is important to better understand their experiences to ensure this population is supported to success. This study used data from the 2013 and 2014 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement to identify the characteristics of today‘s adult learners and to assess how their engagement differs from that of traditional-age students. We found that adult learners are more likely to take all of their classes online, begin their education at another institution, and enroll part time. Compared to their traditional-age peers, adult learners are more engaged academically and have more positive perceptions of teaching practices and interactions with others, but they interact less with peers and faculty and find their campuses to be less supportive.
Full version
Contextualizing student engagement effect sizes: An empirical analysis
Rocconi, L., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
The concept of effect size?a measure of the strength of association between two variables?plays a crucial role in assessment, institutional research, and scholarly inquiry, where it is common with large sample sizes to find small or even trivial relationships or differences that are statistically significant. Using the distributions of effect sizes from the results of 984 institutions that participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in 2013 and 2014, the authors empirically derived new recommendations for the interpretation of effect sizes which were grounded within the context of the survey. We argue for the adoption of new values for interpreting small, medium, and large effect sizes from statistical comparisons of NSSE Engagement Indicators, High-Impact Practices, and student engagement data more generally.
Full version
Does use of survey incentives degrade data quality?
Cole, J. S., Sarraf, S. A., & Wang, X.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Overall, this study found little evidence that survey incentives negatively affect data quality. Our analyses showed minimal differences between incentive and non-incentive groups with regard to straight-lining, item skipping, total missing items, and survey completion. Contradicting Barge and Gehlbach‘s finding, we found, in fact, that incentive respondents actually had better data quality than non-incentive respondents. Measurement invariance analysis also demonstrated that the presence of an incentive did not compromise the validity of NSSE Engagement Indicator scores or the underlying factor structures. The current study‘s findings with such a robust sample should allay any serious concerns NSSE users may have about incentives undermining data quality.
Full version
Item nonresponse bias on the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
Chiang, Y.-C., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Survey researchers often wonder about the impact of missing data and whether a sample with missing data is representative of a larger population. This study investigates the prevalence of item nonresponse bias among participants in the FSSE survey and its impact on the estimates of ten FSSE scale scores by comparing item nonresponse patterns across faculty-level characteristics such as gender identity, racial or ethnic identification, citizenship, employment status, academic rank, and the number of undergraduate or graduate courses taught. These analyses examined a set of FSSE items that comprise ten FSSE scales.
Full version
Mining text data for useful information
Zilvinskis, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Text mining presents an efficient way to access the extensive amount of data found in written records by converting words into numbers and using algorithms to detect relevant patterns. This presentation focuses on the fundamentals of text mining, including an overview of key concepts, prevalent methodologies, and popular software packages. The utility of text mining is demonstrated through two examples: (1) using text to create a learning analytics system at a premier community college (CUNY Guttman), and (2) refining survey items on the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE).
Full version
Optimizing long surveys for smartphones: Why it’s important
Sarraf, S., & Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
This discussion group addressed various questions related to optimizing a relatively long survey instrument for smartphones based on a National Survey of Student Engagement experimental administration. Colleges and universities across the country administer many surveys to their students, but optimizing them for smartphones may not be receiving the necessary attention it deserves. With this in mind, the following questions were addressed based on a paper: Why should survey developers consider optimizing their instruments for smartphones? What impact can smartphone optimization have on various survey data quality indicators? What does a smartphone-optimized survey format look like?
Full version
Using canonical correlation analysis to examine student engagement and learning
Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A., & Pike, G. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Using canonical correlation analysis, this study examines the relationships between measures of student engagement from NSSE and perceived gains in learning. The study draws on institution-level data from NSSE participants in 2011 and 2013. Several significant relationships were found between engagement and learning. For example, learning outcomes associated with application, like acquiring job-related skills, were positively associated with the engagement indicators of quantitative reasoning and collaborative learning. This presentation also provides attendees with an introduction to the logic and methods underlying canonical correlation analysis.
Full version
What is the impact of smartphone optimization on long surveys?
Sarraf, S., Brooks, J., Cole, J., & Wang, X.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Hollywood, FL, 2015, May.
Using results from a ten-institution experiment that used the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this study details the impact that smartphone optimization has on a survey with over 100 questions. The study's research questions center on how optimizing a survey for smartphones affects various data quality indicators including early abandonment, missing data, item nonresponse, duration, straight-lining, and subjective student evaluations. The study also investigates scale measurement invariance for NSSE's ten Engagement Indicators. Results indicate that the smartphone-optimized survey format outperforms both smartphone-unoptimized and desktop survey formats in several ways.
Full version
Civic engagement, service-learning, and faculty engagement: A profile of Black women faculty
Wheatle, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Existent research on African American (or Black) women faculty suggests that they are disproportionately overlooked during the tenure and promotion process, largely due to the academy‘s overvaluing of research activities and undervaluing of service-based and teaching activities. These studies largely utilize qualitative inquiry to develop a narrative about the experiences of Black women faculty. The current study seeks to test this narrative quantitatively by using a large-scale sample of faculty engagement survey data to compare Black women faculty‘s encouragement of civic engagement and use of service-learning to that of their Black male, White female, and White male counterparts. Findings suggest that Black women faculty are more encouraging of civic engagement among their students and include more service-learning within their courses than others.
Full version
Global perspectives in curricula and deep approaches to learning: Examining faculty practices for engagement
Peck, L., Chiang, Y.-C., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Many higher education institutions today are placing a high level of importance on internationalization. One of the most popular means of providing students with a global perspective is through internationalizing a course curriculum. Global learning experiences in the classroom are seen as a way to expose students to multiple points of view on issues and foster cross-cultural understanding. Using results from the 2014 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this study compared faculty use of global perspectives in student learning to their use of reflective and integrative learning and higher order learning practices?to see how the two are related. The influences of faculty characteristics, such as gender and academic rank, as well as institutional characteristics, will also be explored.
Full version
Revisiting the relationship between institutional rank and student engagement
Zilvinskis, J., & Rocconi, L. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Using data from the 2013 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE),
multilevel models were employed to explore the relationship between student engagement and
three institutional ranking schemes: U.S. News, Forbes, and Washington Monthly. Findings
reveal few relationships exist between NSSE‘s measures of student engagement and the three
institutional ranking schemes, except for a negative relationship between the three ranking
schemes and student-faculty interactions; implications of these findings are included.
Full version
Seeking advice: An exploratory analysis of how often first-year students meet with advisors
Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A. C., Nailos, J., & Ribera, A. K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
While it is well understood that academic advising helps students adjust to and deal with the challenges of college, little is known about what influences the extent of their interactions with advisors. Using data from 52,546 full-time, first-year students at a diverse set of 209 institutions, we examined how often students met with academic advisors, and how this varies by student and institutional characteristics. We find that the typical first-year student met with an advisor one to three times during their first college year. However, the number of meetings varied across student subpopulations and institution types. Findings aim to inform wider discussions about academic advising and student support on college campuses.
Full version
Social media: An opportunity for engaging undergraduates
Yuhas, B., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
The rise of online social media within the past decade has had a profound influence on the way we connect with others and will likely continue to be a meaningful component of students‘ lives, campus culture, and the college experience. This large-scale study of students at four-year colleges and universities examines the engaging and disengaging use of social media sites (SMS) on campuses. Additionally, this study examines how SMS use varies by student characteristics and relates to other forms of educationally effective engagement. Results indicate that SMS use cuts equally across many, but not all, student characteristics. In addition, SMS use can be both a substantive distraction from engagement as well as a tool for increased positive engagement.
Full version
What characteristics predict student-faculty interaction and important relationships with effective educational practice
Wang, R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Chiang, Y.-C.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Student-faculty interaction is significantly beneficial to college students‘ engagement and success. Past studies of student-faculty interaction (SFI) have focused on the relationship between student characteristics and SFI or between faculty members‘ qualities, skills, or approaches and SFI. This study uses a large-scale multi-institution data set to take a closer examination of the relationships between faculty characteristics, course characteristics, institutional characteristics, faculty course goals, and faculty values for campus support with SFI. Results suggest that several faculty, course, and institution characteristics predict increased SFI. Additionally, results also indicate that faculty who do more to structure their courses for student growth and development and more strongly value a supportive campus environment for students interact with students more frequently.
Full version
What influences end-of-course evaluations? Teaching and learning vs. instrumental factors
McCormick, A., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Student evaluations of courses and teaching in the form of end-of-course surveys are ubiquitous in higher education, and at many institutions they serve as the primary basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness in the promotion and tenure process. Course evaluations of teaching are also controversial. It is often asserted that students use them to reward professors for easy courses and punish them for demanding ones, and many faculty believe that students‘ evaluations are influenced by their expected grade. This study investigates the relative influence of teaching and learning versus instrumental influences in students‘ overall course evaluation ratings using data from a diverse sample of 44 four-year institutions.
Full version
Don’t put baby in the corner alone: Where and with whom students live can impact their peer belonging and institutional acceptance
Dumford, A. D., Ribera, A. K., & Miller, A. L.
NASPA Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2015, March.
With current concerns about graduation rates, it is crucial that students feel a sense of belonging during their transition to college and throughout their college experience. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of where students live and with whom they share their living space on how students perceive their integration with peers as well as with their institution. Data from the 2014 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement are used to explore the benefits and disadvantages of different living situations. Implications for these results are also discussed.
Full version
Information use during the first college year: Findings from the NSSE Experiences with Information Literacy module
Fosnacht, K.
Association of College & Research Libraries Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2015, March.
Using data collected from over 17,000 first-year students attending 76 bachelor‘s-granting U.S. institutions, this study investigated how often students engage in activities associated with developing information literacy skills. It found that most students frequently used information sources in their coursework, but substantially fewer students critically and effectively used information sources. It conducted a latent class analysis which identified four distinct ways or types first-year students engaged with information sources. The study also conducted a multinomial logistics regression analysis to investigate which student and institutional characteristics were correlated with the four latent classes identified.
Full version
Promoting democratic engagement during college: Looking beyond service-learning
Howe, E. C., & Fosnacht, K.
NASPA Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2015, March.
Preparing students to be engaged participants in our democratic society has long been an important college outcome. Over the past few decades, postsecondary institutions have primarily attempted to improve civic outcomes by integrating service activities into their curricula. While research on the impacts of service learing is plentiful, research on how other educationally beneficial activities influences democratic outcomes is scarce. In this study, we find that service-learning may not be a panacea for promoting democratic outcomes, as other high-inpact practices, most prominently learning communities, had greater or equivalent relationship to two dimensions of democratic engagement.
Sense of peer belonging and institutional acceptance in the first year: The role of high-impact practices
Ribera, A. K., Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Tampa, FL, 2015, March.
This study examines the role that high-impact practices play in shaping first-year students' sense of belonging as it relates to peers and institutional acceptance. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (n=9,371), results reveal troublesome gaps for historically underrepresented populations in their sense of belonging among their peers and affiliation with the institution. Yet, when students participated in certain high-impact practices (learning communities, service-learning, research with faculty, and campus leadership), positive associations were found, even after controlling for other institutional and student-level characteristics. Implications for first-year programming are discussed.
Engaging in the margins: Exploring differences in biracial students' engagement by racial/ethnic makeup
Harris, J., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2014, November.
Due to socio-historical understandings of race in America and traditional methods of data collection and analysis, biracial undergraduate students‘ engagement in college remains unexplored. This research utilizes a national data set to shed light on the biracial student population and their engagement on campus. Findings problematize the ideology that biracial individuals are a monolithic group, fostering an overdue conversation concerning biraciality in higher education and providing critical implications for future research and practice.
Full version
Exploring the effects of a HIP culture on campus: Measuring the relationship between the importance faculty place on high-impact practices and student participation in those practices
Nelson Laird, T., BrckaLorenz, A., Zilvinskis, J., & Lambert, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2014, November.
This study explores campus cultures that value high-impact practices by examining the relationship between the importance faculty place on high-impact practices and student participation in six different educationally beneficial high-impact activities. We further explore how faculty and institutional characteristics affect the importance faculty place on undergraduate high-impact practice participation.
Full version
Participation in undergraduate research at minority-serving institutions
Haeger, H., BrckaLorenz, A., & Webber, K.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2014, November.
Despite the prevalence and effectiveness of undergraduate research, there is little information on undergraduate research participation at minority-serving institutions (MSIs), nor how undergraduate research affects educationally effective engagement for underrepresented minority (URM) students. This research examines undergraduate research participation at MSIs, predictors of participation for URM students, and benefits of participation.
Full version
Exploring how course evaluation outcomes are collected, shared, and used
BrckaLorenz, A., McCormick, A., & Peck, L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
End of course evaluations are a widely used means of assessing student learning experiences and provide opportunities for faculty to refine their teaching and course content. However, the way institutions collect and share those results varies. Using data from the 2013 National Survey of Student Engagement and Faculty Survey of Student Engagement administrations, this presentation examines how different types of institutions collect and distribute course evaluation results, how much students access course evaluation information, and how much faculty use course evaluation information to improve their courses and teaching. Student use of external evaluation sources (e.g., ratemyprofessor.com) to select courses is also be examined.
Full version
Exploring how course evaluation outcomes are collected, shared, and used
BrckaLorenz, A., McCormick, A., & Peck, L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
End of course evaluations are a widely used means of assessing student learning experiences and provide opportunities for faculty to refine their teaching and course content. However, the way institutions collect and share those results varies. Using data from the 2013 National Survey of Student Engagement and Faculty Survey of Student Engagement administrations, this presentation examines how different types of institutions collect and distribute course evaluation results, how much students access course evaluation information, and how much faculty use course evaluation information to improve their courses and teaching. Student use of external evaluation sources (e.g., ratemyprofessor.com) to select courses is also be examined.
Full version
Survey lottery incentives and institutional response rates: An exploratory analysis
Sarraf, S., & Cole, J.S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
Many institutional and educational researchers are well aware that response rates for assessment surveys have been declining over the past few decades (Dey, 1997; Laguilles, Williams, & Saunders, 2011). As a result, many researchers have noted that our ability to adequately assess student academic experiences, satisfaction, engagement, use of campus resources, and other
important topics in higher education are at risk (Pike, 2008). Consequently, use of incentives are one tool that many institutional researchers have come to rely on to boost or hold steady their response rates for various campus student surveys. Though research regarding the efficacy of incentives to boost survey response rates in higher education is scant, the research that does exist suggests that incentives are an effective way to boost institutional response rates (Heerwegh, 2006; Laguilles, Williams, & Saunders, 2011). The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of lottery incentives (the mostfrequently used incentive approach) to boost responses rates for institutions using the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE).
Full version
Taking surveys with smartphones: A look at usage among college students
Sarraf, S., Brooks, J., & Cole, J.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2014, May.
The widespread adoption of mobile technologies has dramatically impacted the landscape for
survey researchers (Buskirk & Andrus, 2012), and those focusing on college student populations are no exception. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), one of the largest U.S. college survey assessment projects, annually surveys hundreds of thousands of undergraduate students at college and university campuses throughout the United States and Canada. Internal NSSE analyses show the number of smartphone respondents is increasing each year.1 This analysis showed that in 2011, only about 4% of
NSSSE respondents used a smartphone, but by 2013 that figure had increased to 13%. Preliminary
results from the 2014 administration suggest the percentage continues to increase, with roughly 18% of respondents using smartphones to complete the survey. Using 2013 NSSE data, the purpose of this study is to examine college student demographics and engagement results by smartphone respondent status. The results of this study will provide insights into the prevalence of college?aged survey respondents using smartphones, and the impact this technology has on survey responses.
Full version
Testing the new scales on the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Chiang, Y.-C., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) annually collects information from thousands of faculty at baccalaureate degree-granting colleges and universities about student engagement both in and out of the classroom. With the update to the FSSE instrument in 2013, new scales were rigorously tested to aid in reporting and discussions about student engagement. FSSE staff have documented the array of analyses and tests used to evaluate the quality of these scales, including descriptive analysis and studies of validity and reliability.
Full version
Testing the new scales on the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Chiang, Y.-C., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) annually collects information from thousands of faculty at baccalaureate degree-granting colleges and universities about student engagement both in and out of the classroom. With the update to the FSSE instrument in 2013, new scales were rigorously tested to aid in reporting and discussions about student engagement. FSSE staff have documented the array of analyses and tests used to evaluate the quality of these scales, including descriptive analysis and studies of validity and reliability.
Full version
Bridge or barrier: The impact of social media on engagement for first-generation college students
Haeger, H., Wang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2014, April.
Social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, are an integral part of communication for today‘s college students. This research explores whether this shift in communication functions to create more connections or whether it functions as another avenue for social reproduction of privilege for first-generation college students. Analysis on how first-generation students use social media to build and maintain social connections along with what factors most impact the formation of social capital through social media suggests that first-generation students use social media less than their peers, especially in building new relationships and in learning about events on campus. Despite this, social media use is still an important tool in making connections to peers and faculty on campus for first-generation students.
Full version
Selectivity and the college experience: How undermatching shapes the college experience among high-achieving students
Fosnacht, K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2014, April.
This study examined how undermatching impacts the college experiences of high achieving first-year students. Using propensity score modeling, it found that undermatching was associated with less academic challenge, but higher levels of student-faculty interaction and active and collaborative learning. The results also indicate that undermatches report fewer gains in their learning and development and less satisfaction with their institution. The implications of undermatching and how to reduce its prevalence are discussed.
Full version
Financial stress and its impact on first-year students’ college experiences
Fosnacht, K., & Dong, Y.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2013, November.
This study examined the relationship between undergraduate engagement and financial stress coping strategies. The study found that students who evidenced financial stress perceived a less supportive campus environment, but tended to participate in more academically beneficial activities. The results indicated that magnitude of the impact of financial stress varied by the type of financial stress coping strategy used.
Full version
How important are high response rates for college surveys?
Fosnacht, K., Sarraf, S., Howe, E., & Peck, L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
How important are high survey response rates for estimating population statistics related to the college experience? Given a general decline in survey participation rates among college students, the answer to this question has broad implications for institutional researchers who often use surveys. Survey methodologists have found that low response rates do not necessarily bias results. This study tests this proposition using results from about 250 colleges and universities that administered NSSE. Findings indicate that survey population estimates based on simulated low response rates are very similar to those based on actual high response rates.
Full version
Institutional satisfaction and the development of transferable skills
Miller, A., & Fosnacht, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
Transferable skills, such as problem solving and analytical writing, play an important role
in students‘ appeal to prospective employers. This study explores whether senior students‘
development of these transferable skills were related to their perceptions of satisfaction with
their higher education institutions. Using data from the NSSE 2012 administration, regression
analyses suggest that problem solving skills were a significant positive predictor of institutional
satisfaction, even when controlling for other demographic and institutional characteristics.
Analytical writing skills were also a significant positive predictor of institutional satisfaction.
Full version
Senior leaders and teaching environments at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominately White Institutions
Cole, E. R., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Lambert, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, May.
Various scholars have entered the conversation on the educational effectiveness of HBCUs in comparison to PWIs. There is, however, an absence of research that examines the potential relationship between teaching practices and how faculty feel senior leaders (e.g., deans, provosts, presidents) contribute to fostering an environment that enhances their classroom effectiveness. This study uses data from the 2012 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) to examine the differences between faculty perceptions of senior leaders on HBCU and PWI campuses. The results add to our understanding of how much senior leaders support both faculty teaching practices and teaching-related resources.
Full version
Student perspectives on the importance and use of technology in learning
BrckaLorenz, A., Haeger, H., Nailos, J., & Rabourn, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
Under constant demands to improve the quality of higher education within an increasingly digital world, technology is often seen as a way to increase learning and collaboration on college campuses. The current generation of college students has grown up with technology, and these students are among the earliest adopters of new advances in technology (Jones, 2002; Haney, 2011). Allowing students to connect to their campus community, collaborate with peers, acquire new information, and demonstrate their learning through technology is essential for college campuses seeking to meet the needs of today‘s college students. Though access and use of technology is highest in traditional age college students, disparity still exists in who uses technology and at what age they are exposed to it (Jones et al., 2009; Pew Research Center, 2012; Wilson, Wallin, & Reiser, 2003). Race, gender, age, socioeconomic status, among other factors, can impact the level of technical proficiency students come to college with and should be considered in how technology is implemented on college campuses (Goode, 2010; Hargittai, 2010; Huang, Hood, & Yoo, 2012). In order to effectively use technology to improve education, we must investigate how students are currently using technology, what they want from their colleges in the use of technology, how technology impacts educational outcomes, and how these factors differ for different student populations. How do these perceptions of importance vary by different types of students and students in different institutional settings? To what extent has students‘ technology use enabled them to understand, demonstrate their understanding, or study on their own or with others? How does such uses of technology relate to other important forms of educationally effective engagement? This study uses a large-scale dataset to explore these issues and provide information to institutions of higher education to effectively implement greater technology use among students.
Full version
Exploring the effect of parental education on college students’ deep approaches to learning
Ribera, A. K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, April.
This study provides insights into how students‘ deep approaches to learning may be directly and indirectly affected by parental education, a component of SES. Goyette and Mullen (2006) found that students from lower SES families tended to hold lower degree aspirations and favor vocationally-focused majors. Hansen (1997) reported that students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds were less likely to select into degree tracks that are common gateways into graduate school such as fields in the arts and sciences. While it appears students‘ educational aspirations and choice of major is partly influenced by their social upbringing, it is unclear if these decisions also affect how they approach learning. We also do not know if parental education has a direct impact on students‘ engagement in deep approaches to learning (DAL). The following study explores these issues in tandem.
How much effort is needed? The importance of response rates for estimating undergraduate behaviors
Fosnacht, K., Sarraf, S., Howe, E., & Peck, L.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, April.
Survey methodologists have found that low response rates do not necessarily bias results. This study tests this proposition using results from several hundred colleges that administered a student survey. Findings indicate that survey population estimates based on low response rates are very similar to those based on high response rates.
Full version
Undergraduates in the professional fields: Exploring the impact of institutional characteristics on time spent preparing for class
Ribera, A. K., Rocconi, L. M., & McCormick, A. C.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, April.
Using data from over 137,000 full time seniors enrolled at 543 four year colleges and universities in 2011, this study explores the relationship between the amount of time students spent preparing for class each week and both institutional context and field of study, with a particular focus on five professional fields (business, education, engineering, nursing, and allied health) relative to arts & sciences. Controlling for student and institutional characteristics, results indicate both systematic
differences in study time related to field of study and a positive relationship between selectivity, Carnegie type, and study time. Moderating effects were found between discipline and institutional selectivity, Carnegie type, and control. Findings promise to inform national and disciplinary discussions about academic rigor, student effort, and learning outcomes.
Full version
Undergraduate coping with financial stress: A latent class analysis
Fosnacht, K.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Las Vegas, NV, 2013, March.
Undergraduates are increasingly caught between three financial realities. First, the sticker and net cost of attending college has outpaced the rate of inflation (Baum & Ma, 2012). These increases result from factors ranging from declining state subsidies (Quintero, 2012), increased enrollments (Bound & Turner, 2007), and effects of the 2008 recession (Baum & Ma, 2012). Second, in the decade between 2001 and 2011, family incomes declined across the entire income distribution after accounting for inflation (Baum & Ma, 2012). Therefore, many parents of undergraduates experienced financial hardship and
Were less able to pay for college costs. Finally, due to their low incomes and assets and lack of financial knowledge, students constitute a financially vulnerable population (Avard, Manton, English, & Walker, 2005; Berkner & Wei, 2006; Chen & Volpe, 1998; Murphy, 2005). Consequently, undergraduates have had difficulty absorbing the additional college cost burden placed upon them over time. The rapidly rising amount of student loans debt incurred per borrower highlights this fact (Baum & Payea, 2012). Due to these financial realities, a significant source of stress for undergraduates is their finances. In one recent national study, approximately a third of students recently described their finances as ?traumatic? or ?very difficult? to handle (American College Health Association, 2012). Another study, focusing specifically on financial stress, found even higher rates among a national sample of undergraduates and recent graduates (Trombitas, 2012).
Approximately a third of the respondents in the latter study stated that financial stress negatively impacted their academic performance or progress. An impression supported by previous research associating financial stress with dropping out of college, lower academic performance, anxiety, and depression (Joo, Durband, & Grable, 2008; McPherson, 2012; Ross, Cleland, & Macleod, 2006). The available evidence clearly indicates that undergraduates frequently experience financial stress; however, less is known about how first-year students react to financial stress and how it varies by demographic groups. To fill in this gap, this study investigated how undergraduates coped with financial stress and how coping strategies correlated with student characteristics.
Full version
Faculty emphasis on diversity conversations and conversations with diverse others
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T., & Shaw, M.
AAC&U Modeling Equity, Engaging Difference Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2012, October.
Using data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this study examines how
often faculty structure class sessions around diverse topics and how often faculty report students having serious conversations with diverse others in their courses. Findings suggest that faculty most often structure course sessions around economic and social inequalities and report students having the most conversations with people of differing economic or social backgrounds. Faculty members‘ gender and race matter in predicting these measures of diversity in the classroom, but disciplinary area was the strongest predictor. Implications for assessment and institutional research are discussed.
Full version
Accuracy of self-reported grades: Implications for research
Cole, J. S., Rocconi, L., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Digging deeper into institutional data: Enhancing campus assessment findings with the FSSE report builder
Cole, E. R., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Shaw, M. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Exploring the fringe benefits of supplemental instruction
Ribera, A. K., BrckaLorenz, A., & Ribera, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Faculty emphasis on diversity topics and conversations with diverse others
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shaw, M. D., Cole, E. R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Cervera, Y.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Using data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this study examines how
often faculty structure class sessions around diverse topics and how often faculty report students having serious conversations with diverse others in their courses. Findings suggest that faculty most often structure course sessions around economic and social inequalities and report students having the most conversations with people of differing economic or social backgrounds. Faculty members‘ gender and race matter in predicting these measures of diversity in the classroom, but disciplinary area was the strongest predictor. Implications for assessment and institutional research are discussed.
Full version
Faculty fostering collaborative learning and personal and social responsibility
Ribera, T., Ribera, A.K., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Faculty lend a helping hand to student success: Measuring student-faculty
Lambert, A. D., Rocconi, L. M., Ribera, A. K., Miller, A. L., & Dong, Y.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
NSSE 2.0 launching in 2013! (NSSE demonstration session)
Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Playing with numbers: An examination of quantitative reasoning activities in college
Rocconi, L. M., Lambert, A. D., Sarraf, S. A., & McCormick, A. C.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Student and faculty member engagement in undergraduate research
Webber, K., Nelson Laird, T. F., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
The dependability of the NSSE 2012 pilot: A generalizability study
Fosnacht, K. & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Updating the National Survey of Student Engagement: Analyses of the NSSE 2.0 pilots
BrckaLorenz, A., Gonyea, R., & Miller, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Updating a large-scale survey is not a simple task. This paper gives an overview of how the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) used quantitative analyses to update their survey over the course of several years and two survey pilot administrations. A description of the pilot instruments and pilot data will be followed with an overview of the quantitative methods used to analyze both individual items and groupings of items for the improvement of the survey. A brief overview of the results from these analyses gives a picture of how the 2013 NSSE evolved.
Full version
Using cognitive interviews to improve survey instruments
Haeger, H., Lambert, A. D., Kinzie, J., & Gieser, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2012, June.
Full version
Response quality and demographic characteristics of respondents using a mobile device on a web-based survey
Guidry, K. R.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, 2012, May.
Estimation of expected academic engagement behaviors: The use of vague quantifiers versus tallied responses
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, April.
Full version
Examining the importance of teaching clarity: Findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
Ribera, T., BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., & Nelson Laird, T.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, April.
Patterns in faculty teaching practices on the campuses of historically black colleges and universities and predominantly White institutions
Shaw, M. D., Cole, E. R., Harris, C. J., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, April.
Full version
Respondent use of straight-lining as a response strategy in education survey research: Prevalence and implications
Cole, J. S., McCormick, A. C., & Gonyea, R. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, April.
Full version
Deeply affecting first-year students' thinking: The effects of deep approaches to learning on three outcomes
Nelson Laird, T. F., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Mayhew, M. J., & Blaich, C. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 2011, November.
Full version
Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., Kinzie, J., & Ribera, T.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2011, October.
Full version
Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., Kinzie, J., & Ribera, T.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2011, October.
Full version
Does college environment have the same effect on all students?
Dong, Y., & Cole, J. S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Estimating behavior frequencies
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Identifying disciplinary peers: A process for classifying fields of study based on faculty
Shaw, M. D., Lambert, A. D., Haywood, A. M., Cole, E. R., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Adult learners' sense-making on academic success in college: A view from three urban commuter institutions
Ziskin, M., Zerquera, D., & Torres, V.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
College readiness to be engaged
Qi, W., & Cole, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Full version
Predicting academic competence with in-class and out-of-class engagement: Within and cross disciplinary differences
Qi, W., & Cole, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Full version
Relationship between faculty perceptions of institutional participation in assessment and faculty practices of assessment-related activities
Haywood, A. M., Shaw, M. D., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Cole, E. R.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Full version
Understanding evidence-based improvement in higher education: The case of student engagement
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Kormaz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Full version
Assessment for improvement: Faculty perceptions of institutional participation in assessment by field
Haywood, A. M., Shaw, M. D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2010, November.
Going deep into mechanisms for moral reasoning growth: How deep learning approaches affect moral reasoning development for first-year students
Mayhew, M. J., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Blaich, C. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2010, November.
A comparison of student and faculty academic technology use across disciplines
Guidry, K. R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2010, May.
Full version
Documenting institutional support of and faculty engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Ribera, T.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, 2010, May.
Interactive technology and effective educational practices
BrckaLorenz, A., & Garver, A. K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2010, May.
Full version
Establishing differences between diversity requirements and other courses with varying degrees of diversity inclusivity
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Engberg, M. E.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009, November.
Examining the transfer student experience: Interactions with faculty, campus relationships, and overall satisfaction
McCormick, A. C., Sarraf, S. A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Haywood, A. M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009, November.
Full version
Analysis of multiple years of NSSE data: Tips and strategies
BrckaLorenz, A., & Williams, J. M.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Dallas, TX, 2009, October.
Full version
Analysis of multiple years of NSSE data: Tips and strategies
Williams, J. M., BrckaLorenz, A., Gonyea, R. M., Lambert, A. D., & Shoup, T. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA., 2009, June.
High school and expected first-year engagement: A motivation perspective
Cole, J., & McCormick, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Measuring change: Using multi-year analysis of National Survey of Student Engagement results to assess educational improvement
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A., Korkmaz, A., & Buckley, J.
, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
The engagement of career and technical education students who transfer to four-year institutions
Qi, W., & Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Time spent on research with undergraduate students: Gender differences among STEM faculty
Lambert, A. D., Garver, A. K., BrckaLorenz, A., & Haywood, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA., 2009, June.
Full version
What’s the score? Diverse experiences among collegiate athletes and non-athletes
Cruce, T. M., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
When parents hover: Student engagement and helicopter parents
Shoup, R., Gonyea, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Engaging online learners: A quantitative study of postsecondary student engagement in the online learning environment
Chen, P. D., Guidry, K. R., & Lambert, A. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2009, April.
Faculty at coeducational and women’s colleges: How do their teaching practices compare?
Nelson Laird, T. F., Niskod-Dossett, A. S., Garver, A. K., & Chen, D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2009, April.
Full version
How often is ?often? revisited: The meaning and linearity of vague quantifiers used on the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T.F., Korkmaz, A., & Chen, P.D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA., 2009, April.
Full version
Student-faculty research: Priming the pump for additional student-faculty contact
Buckley, J. A., Korkmaz, A. & Kuh, G. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA., 2009, April.
Full version
Writing, engagement, and successful learning outcomes
Gonyea, R. M., & Anderson, P.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2009, April.
Full version
Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research
Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Direct, indirect, and contingent relationships between learning community participation and educational outcomes
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Full version
The disciplinary effects of undergraduate research experiences with faculty on selected student self-reported gains
Buckley, J. A., Korkmaz, A., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, 2008, November.
The impact of study abroad on senior year engagement
Gonyea, R. M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Full version
The predictive validity of a measure of deep approaches to learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., Niskode-Dossett, A., Banks, J. V.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Full version
Understanding the diversity inclusivity of college courses
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Full version
Assessing and improving undergraduate education in the United States: The National Survey of Student Engagement
McCormick, A. C.
General Conference of the OECD Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, Paris, France, 2008, September.
Full version
Differences in high school engagement and college expectations between underachieving and overachieving students
Cole, J. S., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Full version
Gender & racial-ethnic gaps among entering science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Full version
The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Garver, A. K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, 2008, May.
Full version
How gender and race moderate the effect of peer interactions across difference on student and faculty perceptions of the campus environment
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Niskod, A. S.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2008, March.
Full version
Engaging African American students: Compare student engagement and student satisfaction at HBCUs and their self-identified PWIs using National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data
Chen, P. D., Ted, I., & Davis, L. K.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2007, November.
This study compares African American students‘ educational engagement and satisfaction at Historical Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) and their self-identified peer Predominantly White Institutions (PWI). Data of this study came from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) that includes a sample of 1,631 seniors from 17 HBCUs and 2,939 seniors from 246 PWIs. The reuslts of this study show that African American seniors at HBCU‘s
are generally equally or more engaged in educationally purposeful activities than their peers at PWIs. However, the higher engagement of African American students at HBCUs does not translate into higher student satisfaction. A further investigation indicated that student‘s
relationships with administrative personnel and offices may be the prominent factor affecting
student satisfaction at HBCUs.
Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender students and their engagement in educationally purposeful activities in college
Gonyea, R. M., & Moore, J. V.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2007, November.
Three research questions guided this study:
1. What are the demographic and enrollment characteristics of GLBT students attending four
year colleges? 2. What is the relationship of GLBT status to student engagement as represented by the NSSE benchmarks of effective educational practice? 3. Do GLBT students who are more open to others about their sexual orientation differ from those who are less open?
Full version
The relationship between gender and student engagement in college
Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Kuh, G. D., Umbach, P., Blaich, C., & Korkmaz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2007, November.
This paper examines the engagement patterns of male and female undergraduates in different types of baccalaureate-granting institutions. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical linear modeling show that on balance, undergraduate women participate more frequently than their male counterparts in educationally purposeful activities. Male first-year and senior students devote less time and effort to academic challenge tasks, such as working hard to meet expectations and spending time studying; senior males also participated less often in active and collaborative learning activities. Institutional type is unrelated to gender differences in engagement. The results point to areas where institutions could focus efforts to enhance the quality of the undergraduate experience for all students.
Full version
Gender gaps: Understanding teaching style differences between men and women
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A., & Niskod, A. S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Using data from over 9,000 faculty that participated in the Faculty Survey of Student
Engagement, this study found gender differences in the percentage of class time spent on various
activities, a measure of teaching style, but that the gaps between men and women in lecturing
and active classroom practices, for example, can vary by factors including disciplinary area and
course size.
The individual and environmental effects of part-time enrollment status on student-faculty interaction
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Cruce, T. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2007, April.
Based on over 55,000 responses from seniors at 224 public colleges and universities, this
study focuses on the difference between full-time and part-time students‘ interactions with
faculty, the effect of those interactions on self-reported gains in general education, and the
differential impact of institutions with greater percentages of part-time students. We found, not
surprisingly, that part-time students interact with faculty less and report slightly less gains in general education than their full-time peers. We also found that the proportion of part-time
students is a negative predictor of full-time student interactions with faculty, suggesting that
campuses with greater percentages of part-time students are negatively effecting the engagement
of full-time students. The effect of student-faculty interaction on self-reported gains in general education was relatively strong for all students (in fact, slightly stronger for part-time students), which implies that campuses that can find a way to increase the student-faculty interaction of full-time and part-time students will see a beneficial impact on student outcomes.
Full version
Unmasking the effects of student engagement on college grades and persistence
Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2007, April.
This study examines the relationships between student engagement, college GPA, and persistence for 11,000 students attending 18 baccalaureate-granting institutions. Data sources included student-level information from the National Survey of Student Engagement, academic transcripts, merit aid, and ACT/SAT score reports. Engagement had positive, statistically significant effects on grades and persistence between the first and second year of study for students from different racial and ethnic backgrounds. Equally important, engagement had compensatory effects for historically underserved students in that they benefited more from participating in educationally purposeful activities in terms of earning higher grades and being more likely to persist.
Full version
Gender gaps: Understanding teaching style differences between men and women
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., & Niskod, A. S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007.
Using data from over 9,000 faculty that participated in the Faculty Survey of Student
Engagement, this study found gender differences in the percentage of class time spent on various
activities, a measure of teaching style, but that the gaps between men and women in lecturing
and active classroom practices, for example, can vary by factors including disciplinary area and
course size.
Full version
General education courses and the promotion of essential learning outcomes
Nelson Laird, T. F., Niskod, A. S., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2006, November.
Full version
The influence of high school engagement and pre-college expectations on first-year student engagement and self-reported learning outcomes at liberal arts institutions
Gonyea, R. M., Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2006, November.
For nearly three decades, national reports have underscored the need to better prepare students
for college-level work. Indeed, making the transition from high school to college is a significant leap for most students (Miller, Bender, Schuh & Associates, 2005). Given concerns about college readiness, the range of expectations that students bring with them about the demands of college-level work, and the obligation of college and universities to do their part in enhancing student success in college, it would be instructive to know what students expect to do in college, their behavioral patterns established prior to entering college, and how students‘ expectations for
college and pre-college experiences affect what they do and how much they learn during the first
year. Greater understanding about the gaps between prior experiences, expectations and behavior can inform efforts to revise pre-college socialization, orientation, and first-year experience initiatives, as well as other efforts designed to enhance student learning and improve persistence and graduation rates.
Full version
Disciplinary differences in faculty members' emphasis on deep approaches to learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., Schwarz, M. J., Kuh, G. D., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
?Deep learning? is important in higher education because students who utilize such an approach
tend to get more out of their educational experiences. As learning is a shared responsibility between students and faculty, it is equally important to examine how much faculty members emphasize deep approaches to learning as it is to assess how much students employ these
approaches. This study examines disciplinary differences in faculty members‘ emphasis on deep
approaches to learning. On average, faculty in education, arts and humanities, and social science
fields emphasize deep learning more than their colleagues from other disciplinary areas, which is
not entirely consistent with findings from a previous study on students.
Full version
First-year students’ plans to volunteer: An examination of the predictors of community service participation
Cruce, T. M., & Moore, J. V.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
The impacts of community service participation on college student development are extensive and well-documented. The characteristics of students that predict volunteerism, however, are not well understood. The purpose of this study is thus to estimate the differences in first-year students‘ plans to volunteer while in college (i.e., ?Done,‘ ?Plan to do,‘ ?Do not plan to do,‘ or ?Have not decided‘) by their background characteristics and by the characteristics of the institutions that they attend. Study results suggest changes to several campus policies and programs that may remove barriers to successful community service participation among first-year students.
Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
The concept of deep learning is not new to higher education. However, deep learning has drawn
more attention in recent years as institutions attempt to tap their student‘s full learning potential. To more fully develop student talents, many campuses are shifting from a traditional passive, instructor-dominated pedagogy to active, learner-centered activities. Using exploratory and
confirmatory factor analysis on multiple years of data from the National Survey of Student
Engagement, this study examines the structure and characteristics of items about student uses of
deep approaches to learning. Institutions and researchers can use the resulting scales to assess
and investigate deep approaches to learning.
Full version
The relationship between student engagement and selected desirable outcomes in the first year of college
Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
This study examines the relationships between student engagement in the first year of college and three desirable outcomes of undergraduate education. Student engagement is a domain of constructs that measures both the time and energy students devote to educationally purposeful activities and how students perceive different facets of the institutional environment that facilitate and support their learning. The three outcomes represent a portion of what is meant
by success in the first year experience, namely obtaining good grades, acquiring intellectual
skills that are important for future academic achievement and success in the professional world,
and gaining knowledge of a general nature in step with the commonly embraced liberal arts
mission of the general curriculum. The study is a secondary analysis of existing data utilizing
two primary data sources: student responses to the fourth edition of the College Student
Experiences Questionnaire and student records maintained by Indiana University Bloomington.
Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to model the complex relationships between
the students‘ precollege characteristics, engagement behaviors and perceptions, and the outcome variables. The findings point to four conclusions: (a) different forms of engagement are
precursors to different outcomes, (b) different forms of engagement interact to contribute to
desired outcomes, (c) high expectations coupled with adequate support are requisite conditions
for learning and development in the first college year, and (d) grades do not necessarily represent
how much students believe they have learned. Implications for research, policy and practice are
also offered.
Full version
An examination of workload of faculty of color by rank
Johnson, S.D., Kuykendall, J.A., & Nelson Laird, T.F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2005, November.
The institutional quality debate: U.S. News quality indicators and the National Survey of Student Engagement
Sarraf , S. A., Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J., Kandiko, C., Padgett, R., & Harris, K.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Philadelphia , PA, 2005, November.
This study explores the relationship between two commonly accepted measures of institutional
quality ? USNWR ranking indicators and NSSE‘s benchmarks of effective educational practice.
More specifically, this study will explore the proportion of total variation in NSSE benchmark
scores that can be explained at the student and institution level, what proportion can be explained
by USNWR indicators of institutional quality, and, lastly, how individual USNWR variables such
as peer academic reputation, retention and graduation performance, faculty resources, student
selectivity, financial resources, and alumni giving relate to NSSE benchmarks.
Full version
Deep learning and college outcomes: Do fields of study differ?
Nelson Laird, T. F., Kuh, G. D., & Shoup, T. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, San Diego, CA, 2005, May.
Full version
Latino college student success at Hispanic-Serving Institutions: NSSE as a tool to understand seniors' experiences and perceptions
Andrade, S., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, San Diego, CA, 2005, May.
Full version
The impact of faculty uses of diversity for instruction
Umbach, P. D., Wawrzynski, M. R., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, San Diego, CA, 2005, May.
African American and Hispanic student engagement at Minority Serving and Predominantly White Institutions
Nelson Laird, T. F., Bridges, B. K., Salinas Holmes, M., Morelon-Quainoo, C. L., & Williams, J. M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2004, November.
African American and Hispanic student engagement at Minority-Serving and Predominantly White Institutions
Nelson Laird, T. F., Bridges, B. K., Salinas Holmes, M., Morelon, C. L., & Williams, J. M
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2004, November.
Full version
Getting inside the college experience: Using NSSE to examine students' experiences with diversity and their relationships to other forms of student engagement and outcomes
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Best Practices in Closing the Achievement Gap Conference, University of Wisconsin, Oconomowoc, WI, 2004, October.
Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Boston, MA., 2004, June.
Intercollegiate athletes and effective educational practices: Winning combination or losing effort?
Umbach, P. D., Palmer, M. M., Kuh, G. D., & Hannah, S. J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Boston, MA, 2004, June.
Full version
Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Boston, MA, 2004, June.
Measuring quality: A comparison of U.S. News rankings and NSSE benchmarks
Pike, G. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL., 2003, May.
Full version
Student experiences with diversity at liberal arts colleges: Another claim for distinctiveness
Umbach, P. D., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL., 2003, May.
Full version
Combining the National Survey of Student Engagement with student portfolio assessment
Stoering, J. M., & Lu, L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2002, June.
First-generation and low income students: Using NSSE data to study effective educational practices and students—Self-reported gains
Filkins, J. W., & Doyle, S. K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, Canada, 2002, June.
Full version
Using results from the CSEQ for institutional improvement
Kuh, G. D.
, Presented at the winter meeting of the Collaboration for College Teaching and Learning, Minneapolis., 1999, February.
Great expectations: What students expect from college and what they get
Olsen, D., Kuh, G.D., et al.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Miami, FL, November.
Student living arrangements: An exploration of marginalized identities
Fassett, K. L., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Fosnacht, K. J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Columbus, OH, March.
While past research found on-campus living to benefit student success, recent studies find mixed support, particularly for marginalized groups. This study focuses on first-year and sophomore students of color, LGBQ+ students, gender nonbinary students, and students with disabilities, analyzing where they live as related to a variety of outcomes. Data come from 76 residential colleges and universities that participated in NSSE during 2018. Results show differences in where students report living and students? engagement and perceptions of belongingness and safety in their living communities.
Influences on students' openness to diversity and challenge in the second and third years of college
Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Miami, FL.
Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D.
Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. D.
Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
Test item
Anderson, Kathy
test.
Presentations
Exploring how inclusive name/pronoun policies and practices relate to quality of interactions
Feldman, Steven; Copeland, Olivia; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2024, November.
Using a large-scale, multi-institution dataset, we explore the relationship between name/pronoun policies and practices and college students?? quality of interactions with other students, advisors, faculty, staff, and administrators on campus. Findings indicate that more affirming policies and practices were associated with more positive quality of interactions, especially for transgender students.
Full version
Complex Identities: Writing and Using Identity Demographic Questions
BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for Institutional Research Forum, Denver, CO, 2024, May.
Examining educational quality and student or staff experiences within an institution means we must look at subgroups in the data we collect. Some defining characteristics of the respondent experience can be relatively easy to capture in a survey question, but others, particularly questions about identity, can be a challenge. Often the goals of good survey practice contrast with the variable and complex nature of identity. This session will first focus on how to balance the competing needs of creating clear, concise, and easily answerable questions on aspects of identity that are sensitive, complex, and not easily defined. We will also examine strategies for using and sharing the data and results gathered from complex identity questions. We will look at a variety of examples and scenarios, and participants should prepare to share and discuss their specific population challenges as well as any advice for working with complex identity demographics.
Full version
Faculty Perceptions of Disciplinary Cultures and Their Relationship to Teaching: Validating Becher's Convergent-Divergent Dimension
Hiller, Stephen C.; Braught, Emily; Nelson Laird, Thomas
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2024, April.
Becher??s (1989) seminal work on academic disciplines proposed the Convergent-Divergent dimension to capture one social dynamic that distinguished disciplinary cultures, and yet little work has explored how the Convergent-Divergent dimension relates to faculty teaching practices. This study operationalizes this dimension in items appended to the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). With nearly 700 responses from faculty in 98 disciplines, this study examines the relationship of a Cultural Convergence construct with faculty teaching practices and whether faculty taught similarly to their disciplinary peers. Findings indicate that cultural convergence does not influence teaching practices in four of five areas, though the more convergent a discipline, the more faculty tend to teach similarly to their peers in three of five areas of teaching.
Full version
Options for Assessing the Faculty Practice in HIPs
BrckaLorenz, Allison
Community-Engaged Alliance Summit & Research Symposium, Bloomington, IN, 2024, April.
This session discusses options for assessing faculty involvement in engaging students in high-impact practices (HIPs). We will talk about assessing faculty use of effective, educational, high-impact practices as well as ways to create environments that support and motivate faculty to do their best work engaging students in HIPs.
Full version
Beyond The Classroom: Student Perceptions of Faculty Support for Mental Health and Well-Being
Russell, Alethia; Chamis, Ella; Kinzie, Jillian
NASPA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2024, March.
The 2023 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) included a new MHWB topical module that invited undergraduates to respond to an open-ended prompt to describe one way their institution supported their MHWB. We used thematic analysis to examine more than 13,000 responses to this open-ended prompt. Findings revealed that students perceived faculty serve in three distinct roles that supplement and, in some cases, supplant institution support for MHWB. Our paper session further details those findings.
Full version
Promoting Campuswide Use of NSSE Data: Fostering Student Engagement, Social Identity, and a Sense of Belonging
Kinzie, J., Russell, A., & Wenger, K.
NASPA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2024, March.
Students?? sense of belonging and social identities matter to engagement. In 2023, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) revised items with a critical eye toward inclusion by expanding social identity questions so students see themselves in response options and to make the survey more relevant for today??s students. This interactive session features an overview and discussion of recent NSSE results for social identities and belonging and introduces two resources for inclusive and campuswide data sharing and use in student affairs.
Full version
Supporting and retaining faculty with diverse community, workload satisfaction, and feeling valued
BrckaLorenz, A., Chamis, E., Priddie, C.
AACU Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, Philadelphia, PA, 2024, March.
Higher education continues to struggle in efforts to hire, support, and retain diverse faculty. Using a conceptual framework that focuses on how environments contribute to faculty??s ability to thrive and do their best work as educators, we will explore how faculty structural diversity (a proxy for a diverse and inclusive community), satisfaction with work-life and within-work balance, and perceptions of being valued by their institution relate to their intentions to stay at their institution, the professoriate, or academia altogether. Join this session to discuss how these aspects of environment relate to faculty retention and to contribute to a growing collection of ideas about how to create community, workload satisfaction, and perceptions of institutional value for diverse faculty. Participants will leave this session with thoughts on how these issues manifest on their campus and ideas for how to assess and improve their own efforts to support and retain diverse faculty.
Full version
Assessing College Student Mental Health and Well-Being: Implications for Campus Support and Promising Practice
Kinzie, Jillian; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Chambers, Tony; Huber, Susan; Yuhas, Bridget
AACU Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2024, January.
Concern about college students?? mental health and the need for institutions to provide more support are on the rise. This session will draw from three research projects??Student Well-Being Institutional Support Survey (SWISS), National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Mental Health & Well-Being module, and the Center for Healthy Minds and Human Flourishing course??to combine assessments and expand understanding of student mental health, perceptions of support, and effective interventions. We will highlight the most current and important findings about college student mental health and well-being, discuss implications for colleges and universities and considerations for equity, and exchange ideas about campus interventions that show the most promise.
Full version
A Quantitative Review of Faculty Practices and Perceptions of the Scholarship for Teaching and Learning
Braught, Emily; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Summit, 2024.
How do faculty perceive and interact with scholarship for teaching and learning? This session will review findings from the 2022 and 2023 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), exploring the extent to which classroom- and institutional-level assessment efforts are used to make improvements and hone teaching practices, the extent to which faculty collaborate and build community with one another to share out teaching practices, and the extent to which external motivations influence faculty frequency of practices related to the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Full version
Beyond Demographics: Incorporating Equitable and Inclusive Language about Student Identities in Surveys
Miller, Angela; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Kilgo, Cindy Ann; Priddie, Christen; Wenger, Kevin; Zhu, Yihan
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2023, October.
A new workgroup within the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) focuses on Equity in Survey Design, Administration, Analysis, and Reporting (ESDAR). The workgroup has made changes to survey items for the 2023 administration. These revisions were aimed at more inclusive and equitable language, particularly related to items asking about student identities such as gender identity, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, first-generation status, and Greek life participation. Attendees will learn about the rationale behind these revisions, and be asked to reflect on whether their own institutional assessments use equitable and inclusive language.
Full version
Beyond the score: Investigating the relationship between the Campus Pride Index and perceived student support
Copeland, Olivia; Feldman, Steven; BrckaLorenz, Allison
LGBTQIA2S+ Higher Education Research Symposium, 2023, October.
Full version
Faculty Members are Not the Problem: Improving Faculty Teaching Environments to Foster Teaching Excellence
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Nelson Laird, Tom
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2023, October.
Given challenges with technology, the pressures of the academy, political meddling in higher education, inequitable conditions, and students whose needs are complex and changing rapidly, faculty members find themselves struggling with workload, their own health issues, competing priorities, and how to be effective teachers in a challenging time. Using data from two large-scale multi-institution assessment projects, we invite you to examine with us aspects of faculty teaching environments that contribute to faculty members' success as educators. By using measures of, for example, institutional policies and processes, access to instructional resources, and institutional climates for diversity, we will illustrate how a better understanding of the teaching environment can improve faculty development efforts. Join us for an exchange of ideas about ways to foster environments that motivate teaching excellence and support faculty in both their work and personal lives.
Full version
Measuring students?? socioeconomic status using different frameworks and analyses
Hu, Tien-Ling; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for Institutional Research Forum, Cleveland, OH, 2023, June.
Different from the traditional measures of SES using proxies for economic capital such as low-income status and federal financial aid that do not include all the theoretical considerations of SES, this session compiles several SES and cultural capital-related frameworks, survey items, and data analyses and present several alternative ways to measure SES in the field of higher education. Audiences in this session will learn about several SES measures and data analyses. In addition to the presentation, an interactive discussion will be demonstrated to create a mutual learning environment between presenters and audiences. The session provides researchers with alternative ways to study student success for the low-income student population in higher education.
Full version
Building on Tradition: Approaches to More Inclusive Data Analysis
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Hu, Tien-Ling
Association for Institutional Research Forum, Cleveland, OH, 2023, May.
Institutional research and assessment depends heavily on our ability to characterize the students we study into categories and on our inclination to generalize the results. Although this work is necessary for understanding student experiences, it does present challenges for critical and inclusive approaches to data analysis. In this session, we will discuss common issues and solutions associated with inclusive data analysis by investigating a series of data analysis examples that feature small sample sizes for marginalized students. We will discuss traditional variable-centered versus person-centered methodological approaches, strategies for creating groups to use in comparative analyses, challenges in quantitatively capturing aspects of identity, and tips for communicating the results, validity, and data quality of such analyses to broad audiences.
Full version
Complex Identities: Writing and Using Identity Demographic Questions
BrckaLorenz, Allison
Association for Institutional Research Forum, Denver, CO, 2023, May.
Examining educational quality and student or staff experiences within an institution means we must look at subgroups in the data we collect. Some defining characteristics of the respondent experience can be relatively easy to capture in a survey question, but others, particularly questions about identity, can be a challenge. Often the goals of good survey practice contrast with the variable and complex nature of identity. This session will first focus on how to balance the competing needs of creating clear, concise, and easily answerable questions on aspects of identity that are sensitive, complex, and not easily defined. We will also examine strategies for using and sharing the data and results gathered from complex identity questions. We will look at a variety of examples and scenarios, and participants should prepare to share and discuss their specific population challenges as well as any advice for working with complex identity demographics.
Full version
An Examination of Environments That Support and Retain Diverse Faculty
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Chamis, Ella
AACU Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, Henderson, NV, 2023, March.
Despite an emphasis on diversifying the professoriate, higher education has failed to make significant progress in supporting and retaining diverse faculty in the academy. In this session, we will present a conceptual framework grounded in empirical research that can guide our understanding of how institutions can create environments to support and retain diverse faculty as well as motivate teaching excellence. Join us for a discussion about the components of this framework, supported by qualitative and quantitative findings from studies that have used this framework as a guide. Participants will leave this session with thoughts on how these components manifest on their campus, ideas for how to assess the teaching environments of their faculty, and suggestions from other attendees about their efforts to support and retain diverse faculty.
Full version
Changing Expectations? Trends in Student Engagement Expectations and Academic Beliefs
Cole, James & Kinzie, Jillian
Annual Conference on The First-Year Experience, Los Angeles, CA, 2023, February.
The past several years has presented many challenges to higher education, including how to effectively align campus support services and academic resources to support students. Using data from Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this session will illustrate trends in student expectations and beliefs. We will also use data from individual campuses (de-identified) to illustrate changes to their entering student body and the connection to actual behaviors reported several months later on NSSE. Discussion will focus on how campuses can keep abreast of student trends and how to best support student success.
Full version
First Year Seminars' Influence on Student Engagement and Belonging
Kinzie, J., & Wenger, K.
First-Year Experience and Students in Transition Conference FYE, Los Angeles, CA, 2023, February.
First-Year seminars (FYS) have been vigorously studied and found to positively influence persistence, engagement, and student success. This session will explore new research from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to understand the relationship between seminars and student engagement, intent to return, and sense of belonging, and how results vary by a range of student identities. Even more, new results from NSSE 2022 distinguish the influence of a success skills-based course from an academic first-year seminar. Join us to explore this evidence and discuss what it suggests for efforts to enhance engagement and equity in first-year student success.
Full version
Sense of Belonging in the First Year of College
Wenger, Kevin & Cole, James
Annual Conference on The First-Year Experience, Los Angeles, CA, 2023, February.
Studies have demonstrated the important role of sense of belonging to first-year persistence and overall academic success. Using data from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this session will examine entering first-year student expected academic expectations, beliefs, and prior experiences that influence sense of belonging for students near the end of their first-year of college. Results will focus in interventions that can increase social sense of belonging, as well as ways to identify students that may benefit from efforts to increase sense of belonging on their campus.
Full version
Faculty Teaching Environments: Supporting & Retaining Diverse Faculty
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Chamis, Ella
AACU Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2023, January.
Despite an emphasis on diversifying the professoriate, higher education has failed to make significant progress in supporting and retaining diverse faculty in the academy. Literature points to issues of campus climate, discrimination, and workplace stress as common reasons for diverse faculty to leave their positions. In this session, we will present a conceptual framework grounded in empirical research that can guide our understanding of how institutions can create environments to support and retain diverse faculty as well as motivate teaching excellence. Join us for a discussion about the components of this framework, supported by qualitative and quantitative findings from studies that have used this framework as a guide. Participants will leave this session with thoughts on how these components manifest on their campuses, ideas for how to assess the teaching environments of their faculty, and suggestions from other attendees about their efforts to support and retain diverse faculty.
Full version
Sense of Belonging and First Year Student Success
Cole, James and Kinzie, Jillian
SAIR Conference 2022, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2022, October.
Sense of belonging influences student persistence and success. Findings from NSSE 2022 and BCSSE 2021 reveals that while most first-year students feel comfortable being themselves, feel valued, and feel part of the community at their institution, differences exist for marginalized subpopulations. In this session, we review findings in an interactive discussion, introduce publicly available data visualization, and offer examples of how institutions have used their data to assess and influence belongingness. Discussion will focus on identifying actions practitioners can take to influence belonging for marginalized student populations on their campus.
Full version
Making the Switch From Static to Dashboard Reporting
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Cole, James; Hu, Tien-Ling; Kinzie, Jillian
Association for Institutional Research Forum, Phoenix, AZ, 2022, June.
Different from the traditional static reports, dynamic online reporting is more efficient to communicate findings to decision makers. Making the switch from traditional static reporting to new online interactive dashboards can be a daunting task. Participants in this session will learn about several large-scale national survey center projects that made the switch from static to dashboard reporting. Interactive discussions will focus on four topics: (1) motivations, internal and external, for implementing a switch to dashboard reporting; (2) advantages and successes in making the switch; (3) challenges, concerns, and potential solutions for moving to dashboards; and (4) resources that are useful for implementation and maintenance of dynamic reports. Join us for this discussion about making the transition from static to interactive online reporting and prepare to leave with a commitment to making the switch yourself!
Full version
Examining Black STEM Students' Experiences with Collaborative Learning
Priddie, Christen
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2022, April.
Educators continue to examine how to increase Black student representation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields in higher education. There is an increased call to implement collaborative learning in STEM classrooms, but current implementations do not articulate how collaborative learning can be culturally relevant for Black students. Using a critical approach, the purpose of the current study was to establish knowledge of Black STEM students?? collaborative learning experiences. Results showed that Black STEM students valued the maintenance of their contributions in collaborative learning while placing little value in being recognized for their collaborative contributions. The current study highlighted how STEM educators should center Black STEM students?? values and experiences while transforming an active learning practices already being implemented.
Full version
Gathering Evidence for an Assessment of Environments That Motivate Teaching Excellence
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Brandon, Josclynn; Hu, Tien-Ling; Priddie, Christen; Nelson-Laird, Thomas F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2022, April.
Inequities and discrimination within the systems and structures of higher education prevent faculty from doing and receiving recognition for their best work as educators. The purpose of this study is to present the validation testing and overview of results from a new project designed to help institutions understand the teaching environments in their local context and for researchers to understand teaching environments in higher education. The assessment instrument examined here guides our understanding of faculty needs, motivations, and supports that are necessary for healthy teaching environments and the wellbeing of diverse faculty. Findings from this study add to our knowledge of faculty teaching cultures as well as provide an example of how to collect validity evidence for climate assessment instruments
Full version
Getting Beyond the High-Impact Practice (HIPs) Checklist: Assessing and Designing for Quality and Equity
Jillian Kinzie and Beth Manke
WASC Accreditation Resource Conference, 2022, April.
HIPs, such as undergraduate research, service-learning, and internships, represent experiences associated with student learning and success. Yet, implementation matters more than the label. This session shares findings about HIP participation and quality, including considerations for student subgroups, and discusses institutional efforts, featuring CSU Long Beach, to assess and design more effective and equitable experiences.
Full version
Retaining Black women faculty: Cultivating an equitable teaching environment
Brandon, Josclynn; BrckaLorenz, Allison
, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2022, April.
Current research on the experiences of Black women faculty often focuses on the challenges they face and the reasons why they leave the academy. Instead, this study examined the experiences and success strategies of Black women faculty who have successfully navigated the tenure and promotion process. Findings can inform new and aspiring Black women faculty in navigating the academy, advise institutional leadership who are looking to recruit and retain Black women faculty, and promote discussions and tangible action items to improve inequities within the professoriate. Themes from interviews revolved around policies and procedures that are problematic for Black women specifically, the importance of support networks, the failure of institutional programs, and their persistence as an act of caring.
Full version
Using Sense of Belonging Data to Foster Equitable Student Success: New Findings from NSSE
Colleen Lofton, Jillian Kinzie and Allison BrckaLorenz
NASPA 2022, 2022, March.
Sense of belonging influences student persistence and success. NSSE 2020 findings from 521 bachelor's granting colleges and universities show most first-year students feel a sense of belonging, yet notable differences were found for traditionally marginalized subpopulations. In this session, we will provide an overview of findings through an interactive discussion, publicly available data visualization, and examples of how institutions have used their data to assess and impact belongingness. Prepare to identify actions you can take to influence sense of belonging on your campus for marginalized student populations.
Full version
Expectations for engagement? What 1st year students and transfers say
James Cole and Jillian Kinzie
First Year Experience Annual Conference, 2022, February.
Understanding entering student expectations is critical to assure that staff can align appropriate institutional resources for each student. This session will include how the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) provides comprehensive information about your entering first-year and transfer student's prior academic experiences, as well as their expectations and beliefs regarding the upcoming academic year. Participants will learn how other institutions use BCSSE for academic advising, retention efforts, faculty and staff development, and other activities. Participants will be encouraged to share their campuses current practices and how BCSSE could facilitate best practices on their campus.
Full version
Entering Students and the Pandemic: Campus Responses and Continued Action
Jim Cole and Jillian Kinzie
First Year Experience Annual Conference, 2022, February.
By February 2022, new students who experienced a pandemic disrupted high school will be well into their first college year. How did colleges & universities adapt and how are they continuing to respond to entering student circumstances? This facilitated dialogue session is framed by data about entering students, and then encourages FYE practitioners to share ideas and learn from one another's experiences related to 2021 entering student expectations and needs and institutional practices to support their success. Join us to exchange ideas and contribute to the evolving body of information about pandemic-responsive practices.
Full version
First-Year Seminars: Evidence of HIP Qualities and Outcomes
Jillian Kinzie and Kevin Wenger
First Year Experience Annual Conference, 2022, February.
First Year Seminars (FYS) are positively associated with persistence and fostering student success. Yet, their content, form and outcomes can vary. This session first highlights research exploring FYS student's exposure to the eight essential dimensions theorized to define High-Impact Practices (HIPs) as a way to prompt enhancements to FYS quality, and then discusses the association between FYS and outcomes such as sense of belonging, intent to return and NSSE Engagement Indicators as evidence of the contribution of FYS. Join us to discuss the implications of this research and to give input on this new item set.
Full version
Enhancing Sense of Belonging for Equitable Student Success: New Findings from NSSE
Jillian Kinzie, Alex McCormick, and Bob Gonyea
AAC&U Annual Meeting, 2022, January.
Students' sense of belonging influences persistence, well-being, and success. Yet students from underrepresented racial-ethnic identities and other diverse backgrounds report lower belonging than their peers. To help educators understand sense of belonging for their campus community, and especially for student subpopulations, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) added sense of belonging measures to the 2020 survey. Results show that while most first-year students feel comfortable being themselves, feel valued, and feel part of the community at their institution, there are notable differences between subpopulations. NSSE created a public Sense of Belonging interactive dashboard to support the investigation of results filtered by institution and student characteristics. This session highlights results, demonstrates the interactive dashboard, and involves participants in a discussion of the engagement behaviors positively associated with sense of belonging and how campuses can positively influence belonging to promote equitable student success.
Full version
Motivating Teaching Excellence: Identifying Supportive Environments for Diverse Faculty
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Brandon, Josclynn
, 2022, January.
Multitudes of theories, findings from scholarly work, and our everyday experiences show us that inequities and discrimination are built into the systems and structures of higher education. These systemic issues prevent faculty from doing their best work. We will present the groundwork for a conceptual framework that can guide our understanding of how institutions can create faculty teaching environments that motivate teaching excellence and support diverse faculty. Join us for a discussion about how the components of this framework manifest on your campus and leave with ideas on how to assess and improve your institution's teaching environments for diverse faculty.
Full version
NSSE Showcase session at SACSCOC Annual Meeting: Making the Most of NSSE for Equity and Student Success
Kinzie, Jillian
Southern Association of Colleges & Schools: Commission on Colleges, 2021, December.
The link between student engagement in educationally effective practice and student success is strong. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) provides participating institutions information about the conditions that matter for student learning and success, which can then help diagnose and point to action to improve quality and equity in the undergraduate experience. This session frames NSSE as a tool for promoting equity and student success and highlights new findings about sense of belonging, advising and high-impact practices.
Full version
Success of the Siloed: Strategies for Retaining Black Women Faculty
Brandon, Josclynn; BrckaLorenz, Allison
POD Network Conference, Virtual, 2021, November.
Despite diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, many Black women faculty still face difficulties - including hostile work environments, a lack of mentorship, and unfair critiques. We conducted a mixed-methods study that touched on these issues from the perspective of the strategies and support structures that allowed these women to persevere despite these difficulties. Our presentation will discuss these findings and provide suggestions to institutional leaders, faculty colleagues, and aspiring Black women faculty for how to create access to these paths of success, and more equitable spaces for these valuable members of the academy.
Full version
Assessing Sense of Belonging for Student Success: New Findings from NSSE
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Lofton, Colleen; Kinzie, Jillian
Assessment Institute, 2021, October.
Sense of belonging influences student persistence and success. NSSE 2020 findings from 521 bachelor??s granting colleges and universities show most first-year students feel comfortable being themselves and feel valued and a part of the community at their institution, yet notable differences were found for traditionally marginalized subpopulations. This session will provide an overview of findings through an interactive discussion and publicly available data visualization. Facilitators will provide examples of how institutions have used their data to assess and impact belongingness. Participants will identify actions their institution can take to influence the sense of belonging on their campus for marginalized student populations.
Full version
NSSE's 3rd Decade: Highlighting New Emphases in Assessment and Student Engagement
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Cole, Jim; Gonyea, Robert; Kinzie, Jillian; McCormick, Alex; Sarraf, Shimon
Assessment Institute, 2021, October.
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is excited to enter our 3rd decade of assessment to improve educational quality and student outcomes. This session will highlight NSSE's suite of surveys – the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and new emphases, including survey items on effective teaching and sense of belonging and data visualization tools. We'll also introduce enhancements including Topical Modules to assess inclusiveness and cultural diversity, advising, and quality in online education and HIPs
Full version
Recovering Equilibrium for Student Engagement, Learning and Success
Kinzie, Jillian
University of Wisconsin System Meeting, 2021, October.
As we continue to operate in a disrupted undergraduate experience, what should colleges and universities have front of mind to foster equitable student learning and success? Decades of research affirms that learning mindsets, such as sense of belonging, purpose and expectations for success and support, can increase students?? likelihood of retention and success. In addition, students?? experiences in collaborative learning, High-Impact Practices (HIPs) and advising can enhance learning. These factors are perhaps more critical than ever as we seek to ensure success for all students. This session draws on recent data from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) regarding students entering college in 2021 and findings from the 2021 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to highlight vital student success practices. The importance of disaggregated data to explore quality and differences by student subpopulations will also be discussed.
Full version
NSSE/ACUHO-I Housing Study: Reflections on Three Years of Research
Gonyea, Robert; Fosnacht, Kevin; Graham, Polly; Fassett, Kyle T.
ACUHO-I Annual Conference & Expo, 2021, June.
With funding and support from the ACUHO-I Foundation, researchers from the National Survey of Student Engagement studied the influence of college student housing at 76 diverse residential institutions. A culmination of three years of research, this session highlights implications for practice in the areas of persistence, living-learning communities, roommate matching, and housing differences among diverse students. We also will discuss the future of housing research.
Full version
Assessing Student & Faculty Experiences in CV-19: Lessons for Our New Future
Kinzie, Jillian; McCormick, Alex; Sarraf, Shimon; and Blaich, Charlie; Wise, Kathy (Higher Education Data Sharing and Wabash College Center for Inquiry)
Association for Institutional Research, 2021, May.
Assessing Student & Faculty Experiences in CV-19: Lessons for Our New Future, is a research presentation with NSSE staff Jillian Kinzie, Alexander McCormick, Shimon Sarraf, and Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium colleagues, Charlie Blaich and Kathy Wise.
Full version
Data for Decision-Making: Inclusion & Engagement with Cultural Diversity
Kinzie, Jillian; Silberstein, Samantha; Palmer, Dajanae; McKinley, Kristin (Lawrence University); Nicholas, Jason (Northern Michigan University)
Association for Institutional Research, 2021, May.
A panel session with NSSE staff Jillian Kinzie, Dajanae Palmer, and Samantha Silberstein, with Jason Nicholas (Northern Michigan University) and Kristin McKinley (Lawrence University) discussing the use of NSSE??s Inclusion & Engagement with Cultural Diversity Topical Module.
Full version
Making the Most of NSSE for Equity and Student Success
Kinzie, Jillian; Gort, Amy (Metropolitan State University)
Higher Learning Commission Annual Meeting, 2021, April.
The link between student engagement in educationally effective practice and quality learning and student success is strong. Recently, HLC identified student engagement and connection, as a core component in a Heuristic Model of Student Success, and includes surveys like the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to assess this element. Student engagement represents something institutions can facilitate and results can diagnose and point to action to improve the conditions for student success. This session frames NSSE in HLCs recent student success heuristic and then illustrates how institutions have effectively used student engagement results to influence student success initiatives.
Full version
Two Sides of a Coin: Patterns of Student & Faculty Participation in High-Impact Practices
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Nelson Laird, Thomas F.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2021, April.
The higher education community continues to perpetuate high-impact practices as means for improving student success. Yet, challenges exist for assuring all students participate equitably in these beneficial educational experiences; one inhibiting factor may be a lack of faculty support. We examined the responses from 12,147 faculty and 28,504 seniors at 83 institutions to better understand the relationship between faculty who emphasize or participate in high-impact practices and students who do participate. Results indicate potential inequities in faculty participation in engaging students in high-impact practices. Faculty values of importance in participation relates to whether they participate reveling implications for future conversations about faculty hiring and development.
Full version
Enhancing career-preparation equity for international students
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Zhu, Yihan; Gopal, Kriti
AAC&U Conference on Diversity, Equity, and Student Success, 2021, March.
In this session, we will explore the unique challenges of international students with respect to support for career-related skill development and experiences with career services on campus. We will present findings from quantitative and qualitative responses of more than 4,500 senior international students over the past five years at hundreds of four-year colleges and universities. Through discussion, participants will learn about international students?? confidence in using skills and abilities essential to their future careers and how institutions can create new career services supports for this large group of minoritized students.
Full version
Understanding and Improving Survey Data Quality: Key Insights from NSSE
Sarraf, Shimon
Overseas Chinese Association for Institutional Research (OCAIR), 2021, February.
What has NSSE learned over the past ten years related to understanding and improving survey data quality? This presentation covers various topics, including the effect of survey incentives, learning management systems, and campus promotions on survey response, the importance of optimally formatting long surveys for small screen devices, the effectiveness of panel data collection, and how to evaluate response rates.
Full version
Sense of Belonging and the First-Year Experience
Cole, Jim; Kinzie, Jillian
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, 2021, February.
With the turmoil and uncertainty of this past year, a students? sense of belonging is now more critical than ever. This presentation will use NSSE and BCSSE-NSSE combined data to highlight the important connections between sense of belonging, student expectations, intention to persist, quality of relationships with advisors, faculty, and other students, academic engagement, as well as other important aspects of the first-year student experience. This session will include opportunities for discussion and reflection, as well as include current institutional examples of data use.
Full version
Doing Academic Advising Well: Findings about Advising Practice at Research Universities
Kinzie, Jillian; McCormick, Alex; Silberstein, Samantha; Gonyea, Bob; Dugan, Brendan
Association of American College & Universities Annual Meeting, 2021, January.
High-impact practices (HIPs) represent a core feature of a high-quality undergraduate education and are often hailed as life-changing events. The literature identifies a set of essential elements common across HIPs, yet to date most evidence about HIPs has been limited to student participation in designated HIPs, with scant empirical examination of their implementation. We report on a multi-institution study of students?? exposure to these el! ements of quality in seven HIPs (first-year seminar, learning communities, service-learning, research with faculty, study abroad, internships and field experiences, and culminating senior experiences) to deepen understanding of HIP quality and to explore racially minoritized student access to high-quality HIPs and discuss strategies to enhance quality standards and equity.
View presentation
Full version
The Influence of Faculty on Marginalized Student Participation in High-Impact Practices
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Nelson Laird, Thomas F.
Association of American College & Universities Annual Meeting, 2021, January.
As creators and facilitators of high-impact practices, understanding how faculty promote or inhibit student participation is integral in continuing to equitably promote their benefits. Data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) paired with data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) show differences in faculty participation in high-impact practices, the importance faculty place on student participation, and how these factors impact student participation. We will share findings from 83 diverse institutions to start a conversation about the faculty labor associated with high-impact practices and ways to increase equity in student participation of high-impact practices.
Full version
Belonging, teaching environments, & grading: An exploration of faculty emotion
Fassett, Kyle; Nelson Laird, Thomas; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Strickland, Joe
POD Network Annual Conference, 2020, November.
The session provides an overview of faculty members? sense of belonging to their institutions, their sense of supportive teaching environments, and their thoughts about grading. Findings from our large-scale, multi-institutional study help faculty developers and other administrators better understand faculty members and how these affective constructs vary by faculty sub-groups. Participants will be invited to join in a conversation about the results and how the study?s findings could lead to providing better support to faculty members in their varied roles on college campuses.
Full version
Faculty Use of Collaborative Learning and Approaches to Learning: Examining Social Aspects of Online Learning
Hiller, Stephen; Nelson Laird, Thomas
Association for the Study of Higher Education, 2020, November.
This large-scale study expands knowledge of online teaching by comparing faculty practices around collaborative learning and deep approaches to learning in online and in-person courses. Findings indicate that online faculty emphasize deep approaches more than in-person, but use collaborative learning less. Implications for faculty and researchers are discussed.
Full version
Navigating difficult discourse: Understanding faculty strategies for challenging teaching situations
Hurtado, Sarah; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Sisaket, Lesley; Washington, Sylvia
POD Network Annual Conference, 2020, November.
Using critical pedagogy as a guide, we illuminate how educators can approach teaching in a way that humanizes students and encourages the examination of oppressive practices and ideologies through discourse centered on difficult topics. Presenters will offer insights from a large-scale mixed-methods study of faculty preparation for dealing with difficult situations in their courses and supporting students with complex concerns. This session will provide evidence-based practices and strategies to support the work of faculty and faculty developers in dealing with difficult situations involving incivility, disclosure of sensitive information, sexual assault, mental health, and other challenging topics.
Full version
No one taught me to teach: Preparation for challenging situations
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Hurtado, Sarah; McCoy-Simmons, Casey; Palmer, Dajanae
POD Network Annual Conference, 2020, November.
Socialization is often the mechanism through which faculty acquire knowledge of teaching behaviors, but teaching-related training can have a powerful impact on practice. This session will provide evidence-based practices and strategies to support the work of educational developers by sharing results from a large-scale, multi-institution mixed methods study asking faculty about influences on their teaching, examples of teaching-related training that has been useful, and training they wish they?d had. We will additionally share strategies faculty have used and how prepared faculty feel to deal with difficult situations in their courses such as student incivility and controversial events on campus.
Full version
All NSSE session recordings from the 2020 Assessment Institute are now available for viewing.
Assessment Institute, 2020, October.
- 05A Plenary Session and Panel Discussion
Teresa Leyba Ruiz, Glendale Community College; Stephen P. Hundley, IUPUI, Keston H. Fulcher, James Madison University; Natasha Jankowski, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) and University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and NILOA; Verna F. Orr, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and NILOA; Hamsa Marikar, Watermark - 07B* Advancing Institutional Assessment: Lessons from Excellence in Assessment 2020 Designees
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); Frank Hall, Northwestern State University of Louisiana; Kristen Springer Dreyfus, East Carolina University (ECU); and Rebecca Lewis and Diane Waryas Hughey, The University of Texas at Arlington - 08D Dealing with Tough Moments: Assessing Faculty Preparation for Teaching Challenges
Kyle T. Fassett and Allison BrckaLorenz, Indiana University-Bloomington; and Sarah S. Hurtado, University of Denver - 09O NSSE?s 3rd Decade: Synthesizing Contributions and Highlighting New Emphases in Assessment and Student Engagement
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); Robert Gonyea and Alexander McCormick, Indiana University-Bloomington - 12A Assessing HIP Quality: Evidence from the Literature and Students? Experience
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); Brendan Duggan, Robert Gonyea, Alexander McCormick, and Samantha Silberstein, Indiana University-Bloomington - 13A Assessing the Faculty Role in High-Impact Practices
Kyle T. Fassett, Allison BrckaLorenz, and Thomas F. Nelson Laird, Indiana University-Bloomington - 14J Assessment with the Improvement of Student Learning as the End Goal
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); Kathleen Gorski, Waubonsee Community College; Kathleen Gorski, Natasha Jankowski, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA); and Monica Stitt-Bergh, University of Hawai?I at M?noa - 15C Developing Culturally Responsive Multiple Assessments of Student Learning in Diversity-Inclusion-Social Justice (DISJ) Core Courses and National Survey Results (CECE and NSSE) to Advance Campus Conversations
Jesse Mills, Carole Huston, Paula Krist, and Antonieta Mercado, University of San Diego - 16B A Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Examining High-Impact Practices
Kyle T. Fassett, Indiana University-Bloomington - 18A Equity and Inclusivity in the Assessment of High-Impact Practices
Heather Haeger, California State University, Monterey Bay; and Allison BrckaLorenz, Indiana University-Bloomington - 20D Better Together: How Student Learning Outcomes Assessment and Faculty Development Can Partner to Strengthen Student Success
Pat Hutchings, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) and Bay View Alliance (BVA); and Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University?Bloomington and National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA)
Assessing the Faculty Role in High-Impact Practices
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Nelson Laird, Thomas F.
Assessment Institute, 2020, October.
High-impact practices are effective educational practices leveraged to improve student outcomes, and often faculty members are key to their facilitation. This session examines faculty roles in emphasizing students? participation and engaging students in these practices. We will share characteristics of faculty who encourage and partake in these activities with an emphasis on assessment practices for gathering more information about faculty experiences with high-impact practices. Attendees will have the opportunity to learn from one another through sharing their own challenges and successes in measuring faculty involvement in high-impact practices and how they cultivate a culture of high-impact experiences on campus.
Full version
Dealing with tough moments: Assessing faculty preparation for teaching challenges
Fassett, Kyle T.; BrckaLorenz, Allison; Hurtado, Sarah
Assessment Institute, 2020, October.
Faculty are increasingly placed in situations where they have to navigate difficult teaching situations (student incivility, disclosure of sensitive information, controversial events, etc.) and challenging conversations with students (sexual assault, racism, mental health, etc.). As such, it is important to examine faculty preparation for managing such situations, what strategies they implement when they encounter these concerns, and what related training they wish they had received. Findings from a large-scale quantitative and qualitative study of teaching challenges will guide a discussion about assessing and supporting faculty efforts to navigate difficult teaching situations through professional development programming.
Full version
Equity and Inclusivity in the Assessment of High-Impact Practices
Heager, Heather; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Assessment Institute, 2020, October.
As we seek to assess what works and what needs improvement in High-Impact Practices (HIPs), it is essential that we critically examine our assessment strategies and methodologies. Many assessment plans inadvertently overlook the experiences of diverse student populations and only focus on large, aggregate data that reflects the experiences of traditionally privileged, majority students. This session will focus on how to conduct more inclusive assessment, including specific strategies for: creating more inclusive survey questions, how to assess the experiences of small populations in order to improve the experiences of small populations, more equitable quantitative methods, and democratically engaged assessment strategies.
Full version
High School Disrupted: First-Year Expectations of 2020 High School Graduates
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Southern Association for Institutional Research, Virtual, 2020, October.
The COVID pandemic left no part of education untouched. Spring 2020 was clearly a dramatic shift for high schools, teachers, and students. With little online learning experience, this is the first entering class with increased responsibility for directing their own learning. This session highlights survey findings from thousands of 2020 high school graduates entering college. The study examines their high school learning experiences, college expectations and preparedness, as well as their feeling prepared to taking future online courses. The presenters will facilitate discussion among the participants about what we have collectively learned and how this can inform future plans.
Full version
How Do We Know Advising Is Done Well? Using NACADA Core Competencies to Assess Advising
Cole, James & Kinzie, Jillian
NACADA Annual Conference, 2020, October.
This sessions suggests how institutions can use NSSE & the Advising Module to:
* consider advising practice overall (are students experiencing quality advising to support learning, engagement and persistence?),
* assess the impact of advising aligned with NACADA standards,
* investigate differences in advising experiences by race/ethnicity, first generation status, gender identity, and disability status for their students, and
* determine if groups of students for example, those earning lower grades or who have lower intentions to return differ in their advising experiences.
View the recorded presentation
Full version
New insights into faculty advising: An overview of national patterns and trends
Fassett, Kyle; Woodlee, Kara M.; BrckaLorenz, Allison
NACADA Annual Conference, Virtual, 2020, October.
This session provides an overview of faculty advisors across the U.S. using a large-scale data-set from the 2019 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). Presenters will share survey findings including an overview of the national landscape of faculty advisors, what faculty tend to emphasize during the advising process, and what can be done to support faculty in their roles as advisors. Participants will be invited to share their experiences collaborating between faculty and advising units. Implications for attendees will be highlighted through a large group discussion.?
Full version
Revisiting the Impact of LLCs on Student Engagement and Success
Fosnacht, Kevin, Gonyea, Robert M., Fassett, Kyle T., & Graham, P.
ACUHO-I Academic Initatives, Virtual, 2020, October.
Campus housing has changed markedly in recent years, prompting questions about its impact and the benefits of living-learning communities (LLCs) in particular. Sponsored by an ACUHO-I research grant, we surveyed a diverse, multi-campus sample of residents to study the relationships between LLC participation, engagement, perceived gains in learning and development, and persistence. Results affirm LLCs promote engagement in expected ways, but also point to areas for improvement. Implications for practice will be discussed.
Full version
Roommate Assignments: Managing The Process and Supporting Students of Color
Gonyea, Robert M., Graham, Polly, Fosnacht, Kevin, & Fassett, Kyle T.
ACUHO-I Business Operations Conference, Virtual, 2020, October.
Getting a roommate is one of the first milestones of a student?s campus experience. In the past decade, the rise of social media and online roommate-matching sites has changed how students find roommates, and the proportion of incoming students choosing their preferred roommate has increased. Lately, however, multiple institutions moved to requiring incoming students to have institutionally-assigned roommates in the hope of increasing cross-cultural interactions. We investigated this assertion using data from 76 schools participating in an ACUHO-I sponsored study. Results show that preventing students from choosing their own roommates is not an effective method of increasing interactional diversity. We also discovered that the policies can have negative consequences for students of color. Considering these findings, the NSSE research team makes recommendations for institutions.
Full version
Survey Inclusivity: Centering Minoritized Groups in Survey Design
Priddie, Christen; BrckaLorenz, Allison
Assessment Institute, 2020, October.
The emergence of critical quantitative methodologies emphasizes the importance of using race-conscious approaches to highlight the centrality of race in student experiences, as a neutral approach can support a deficit framing. This session explores why it is important to center racially minoritized groups in survey design in order to move toward more equitable assessments of their experiences. Discussion will focus on an example of intentionally centering Black college student experiences in a quantitative study of collaborative learning and perceptions of campus climate with tips and strategies for participants to center racially minoritized voices in their own assessments.
Full version
Campus Housing, Student Engagement and Persistence
Gonyea, Robert; Fosnacht, Kevin; Graham, Polly; Fassett, Kyle
ACUHO-I 2020 Virtual Summit, 2020, June.
For the past three years, a team of researchers from the National Survey of Student Engagement has been studying the impact of residence life on first-year and sophomore students enrolled at 76 residential campuses. This session will overview their findings and make recommendations to improve practice. Topics covered include student engagement, living-learning programs, roommate selection, and persistence.
Full version
Lost at the crossing? Tips for assessing intersectional experiences
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Fassett, Kyle T.; Kirnbauer, Tom; Washington, Sylvia
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, 2020, May.
Faculty and administrators are often tasked with educating the whole student upon their arrival at college, so it is important to understand ways to assess the whole student. Often student demographics and characteristics are examined one at a time such as by examining differences by racial/ethnic, gender, or other known influences on the student experience. Disaggregating data in this way, allows us to better understand how different students understand and participate in their environment. This poster provides an overview of four different examples to better examine small populations with attention to intersections of identity.
Full version
Person-centered approaches to inclusive data analysis
BrckaLorenz, A., Kirnbauer, T., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA., 2020, May.
Demographic questions are critical to our understanding of student and faculty experiences, allowing us to learn about marginalized subpopulations, find areas of inequity, and close gaps in achievement. Although this work is necessary, it does present challenges for critical and inclusive approaches to data analysis. Person-centered approaches, grouping people based on similar experiences or outcomes, allow for more nuanced stories of experiences. To illustrate the benefits of this approach, facilitators will guide participants through a series of examples using person-centered explorations, unpacking the challenges and possible solutions for using such methods for more critical and inclusive quantitative analyses and reporting.
Full version
Senior international students' perceptions of gains while attending U.S. colleges
Oktafiga, D.; BrckaLorenz, A.
NAFSA 2020 Annual Conference & Expo, St. Louis, MO, 2020, May.
Using the 2015-2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data from senior college students (n=13,950), this study explores the variations of senior international students? perceptions of gains while attending 1,029 U.S. colleges/universities. Results indicate that seniors from the African Sub-Saharan region gained the most in terms of academic and personal skills while seniors from Canada perceived gains the least.
Full version
What's next for student engagement and institutional assessment
Kinzie, J.; BrckaLorenz, A.; Gonyea, R.; Kirnbauer, T.; Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, 2020, May.
Over the past 20 years, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) has helped institutional researchers gain insight into institutional quality. Further, a shifting higher education landscape requires institutional researchers to reconsider how assessment is conducted. NSSE continues to search for innovative ways to understand student engagement and serve as a valuable assessment tool for institutions. In this session, we will focus on three areas that impact institutional assessment: changing student demographics, developments in teaching and learning, and innovative approaches to assessment. The session will conclude with an active discussion with participants about the trends and possibilities at their institutions.
Full version
Collegial and departmental support matters: An exploration of teaching cultures and practice
Strickland, J.; Hengtgen, K.; BrckaLorenz, A.; Nelson Laird, T.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2020, April.
Even though many colleges and universities are increasingly supporting teaching and learning centers, SoTL, faculty learning communities, and other evidence-based teaching practices, uncertainty still remains regarding the impact of these practices and programs on quality student learning. Often colleges and universities simply give ?lip service to the idea? of good teaching, and yet lack organizational commitments and structures to truly support teaching. Using a large-scale, multi-institutional study of teaching cultures, this study explores faculty perceptions of commitment to quality teaching and faculty perceptions of departmental and institutional support for teaching. The results carry implications for departmental and institutional initiatives in support of teaching and the improvement of pedagogical practice towards equitable college student learning.
Full version
"Step it up": Increasing LGBTQ+ inclusivity in and out of class
BrckaLorenz, Allison; Duran, Antonio; Haeger, Heather; Velasquez, Selena
AAC&U's Diversity, Equity, and Student Success Conference, 2020, March.
Creating a positive campus climate for LGBTQ+ folx requires efforts both in-and out-of-class. The lack of representation/visibility of diverse experiences can be detrimental for all students regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. To frame the discussion of LGBTQ+ inclusive courses and campuses, this session will utilize analyses from a large-scale, multi-institution quantitative and qualitative data set. This study examined student perceptions of the inclusion of LGBTQ+ issues in curricula and the relationship to other forms of engagement. We use individual?s write-in responses along with scholarship to guide an organic dialogue where participants share their experiences as well as learn strategies to bring back to their own communities.
Full version
Including mental wellness: A more holistic view of student success
Washington, S.; Brandon, J.; Holmes, B.; BrckaLorenz, A.
ACPA-College Student Affairs Educators International Convention, 2020, March.
To better support diverse student populations, this study uses large-scale, multi-institution survey data that focuses on students? mental wellness. Participants in this session will discuss the relationship that race and gender have on students? mental wellness, explore how adverse feelings affect student success, and gain insight into students? awareness of how to get help. Implications will focus on holistic and proactive solutions.
Full version
Campus Housing, Student Engagement and Persistence
Gonyea, Robert; Fosnacht, Kevin
ACUHO-I State of the Profession, New Orleans, LA, 2020, February.
This presentation summarizes recent research examining the direct and indirect relationships of first-year and sophomore students' living arrangements on student engagement and persistence.
Full version
Student engagement and institutional assessment: Current trends and future possibilities
McCormick, A., Kinzie, J., BrckaLorenz, A., Gonyea, R., Sarraf, S.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2020, January.
With the National Survey of Student Engagement marking its 20th year, we invite participants to explore the trends and possibilities of engagement as a lens for examining institutional quality. This session, conducted as a research town hall, will focus on three broad areas:
1. Changing demographics?What are the emerging demographics on your campus? How will new kinds of students challenge and shape what we know about engagement?
2. Developments in teaching and learning?Do current measures of engagement adequately cover what is essential to the improvement of student learning? What new forms of engagement should we assess?
3. Approaches to assessment?What trends should a large-scale survey assessment project consider over the next decade to facilitate evidence-informed improvement?
After briefly introducing each topic, the presenters will facilitate an active discussion with participants about the trends and possibilities at their institutions and in higher education overall.
Full version
Aligning deep learning with classroom time use: A view of disciplinary variations among faculty
Hiller, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2019, November.
This exploratory study seeks to reimagine research into disciplinary differences in teaching approaches through multilevel methods that allow the examination of over 100 specific disciplines. Findings suggest that focusing on broad categories of disciplines could mask underlying variations in how faculty approach teaching.
Full version
Diversity beyond content: Examining physical and life science fields
BrckaLorenz, A., Priddie, C., & Haeger, H.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Transforming STEM Higher Education Conference, Chicago, IL, 2019, November.
This session uses large-scale multi-institutional data to examine the experiences of diverse students within specific fields of the STEM conglomerate. Within specific STEM disciplines, we first examine a nuanced view of compositional diversity, then student engagement in culturally engaging course work, and finally perceptions of institutional commitment to diversity. In doing this, we find some fields to be highly supportive of diversity, thus problematizing the STEM umbrella. In this session, we will discuss the idea that support for diversity in STEM fields can be improved by looking within. We will focus on practical behaviors faculty and staff can do to foster more support for diversity in STEM fields and how the cultures of STEM fields themselves shape the meaning of diversity in courses.
Full version
Educational environments for faculty: Improving postsecondary teaching through assessment
Strickland, J., BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., Nelson Laird, T.
Professional and Organizational Development Network Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2019, November.
This session focuses on understanding the relationship between faculty members' educational environments and their teaching practices. Results from a large-scale, multi-institutional study give insight into these environments by documenting faculty sense of departmental belonging, collegial commitment to quality teaching, and access to resources to meet high standards. Participants will engage in a conversation about how to best assess educational environments, differences across faculty characteristics, and how to create momentum for change.
Full version
Mining and maximizing NSSE data to advance student success
Kinzie, J. (NSSE, Indiana University Bloomington), Castellino, L. (Humboldt State University), Swarat, S. (California State University Fullerton), & Shindledecker, E. (San Francisco State University)
California Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Seaside, CA, 2019, November.
Student engagement data provides colleges and universities useful insights into aspects of the undergraduate experience that matter to understanding the whole student and, importantly, what the institution does to promote their success. Yet making full use of institutional National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data is challenging. This session highlights the varied approaches undertaken by institutional research professionals at several CSUs to maximize NSSE data use and mine results to address the system's Graduation Initiative 2025. Participants will learn from effective examples of sharing data in a "Did You Know?" campaign, the use of first-year student data to influence retention, approaches to studying the benefits of high-impact practices, and efforts to interpret qualitative student comments, and will reflect on practices for their own institution.
Full version
Using student engagement data to inform decision making about student success
Kinzie, J. (NSSE, Indiana University Bloomington), & Henderson, A. (Stetson University)
National Association of College and University Business Officers Integrating Analytics Forum, Orlando, FL, 2019, November.
More than 1,600 four-year colleges and universities have data from NSSE about student engagement in practices that matter to student learning and success. Although many institutions use these data to monitor and document effectiveness, too few regularly use their results to make data-informed decisions. This session highlights lessons from campuses that have effectively used NSSE data to make strategic decisions about resource allocation and to inform efforts to enhance undergraduate education. We will highlight how Stetson University used powerful data visualization to expand access to and use of NSSE data to inform institutional decision making and to explore the role of institutional research in helping colleges and universities know where to invest. Join this discussion about general lessons for using educational quality measures and, in particular, how NSSE data can help you make better decisions about student success.
Full version
20 years of student engagement: Insights about students, assessment, and college quality
Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., & McCormick, A.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
In 2020 the National Survey of Student Engagement enters its third decade assessing the quality of undergraduate learning and success. In 20 years, the student engagement movement has surely changed our notions of quality in higher education. Most institutions now value a culture of evidence, promoting deep approaches to learning, developing high-impact practices, and tracking engagement indicators. This session reviews the most important findings about student engagement in the past two decades, and asks participants to consider what engagement will look like in the next decade. What is next for assessing quality in undergraduate education and collecting evidence for improvement?
Full version
Assessing environmental factors that promote quality collegiate teaching
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T., Fassett, K., Hiller, S., & Strickland, J.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
As the need to improve undergraduate education intensifies, assessment of student and faculty practices should be complemented by information about the environmental conditions that help faculty members do their best work. This session focuses on understanding the relationship between faculty educational environments and their teaching practices. Results from a large-scale, multi-institutional study give insight into these environments by documenting faculty sense of departmental belonging, collegial commitment to quality teaching, and access to resources to meet high standards. Session participants will engage in a conversation about how to best assess educational environments, and how to create momentum for change.
Full version
Assessing the quality of undergraduate living arrangements: Relationships with engagement and persistence
Fosnacht, K., Gonyea, R., Fassett, K., & Graham, P.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
This presentation overviews research findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement's living arrangements study. It discusses student persistence, the sophomore experience, roommate matching policies, and living-learning communities.
Full version
Challenges and benefits of cross sectional assessment
Fassett, K. & BrckaLorenz, A.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
Repeated assessments are intended to generate knowledge about changes occurring on campuses to make informed decisions; however, data often lay dormant, not reaching their full potential beyond a single use. This session clarifies the differences between the uses of longitudinal studies and cross?sectional examinations and discusses strategies for using cross?sectional data to discover trends in student outcomes. Examples include investigations of teaching practices and student engagement over time. Examples will be provided for using both multi?institutional and single institution data sets.
Full version
Getting beyond the label: What makes high-quality HIPs, how widespread are they, and who has access to them?
McCormick, A., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Dugan, B., & Silberstein, S.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
High-impact practices (HIPs) represent a core feature of a high-quality undergraduate education and are often hailed as life-changing events. The literature identifies a set of essential elements common across HIPs, yet to date most evidence about HIPs has been limited to student participation in designated HIPs, with scant empirical examination of their implementation. We report on a multi-institution study of students?? exposure to these elements of quality in six HIPs (learning communities, service-learning, research with faculty, study abroad, internships and field experiences, and culminating senior experiences) to deepen understanding of HIP quality and which students have access to high-quality HIPs.
Full version
Getting lost at the crossing? Tips for assessing intersectional experiences
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., Kirnbauer, T., & Washington, S.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
Faculty and administrators are often tasked with educating the whole student upon arrival at college, so it is important to understand ways to assess the whole student. This session will discuss factors to consider when quantitatively examining intersecting aspects of students?? identities, student characteristics, and collegiate endeavors. Case studies will provide examples of challenges and strategies for better understanding ways to assess and better understand the experiences of students with intersecting identities. Attendees will discuss their own challenges and solutions for intersectional analyses and leave with tangible takeaways for their work.
Full version
Identifying and helping students develop confidence and growth mindset
Cole, J., & Holmes, B.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 2019, October.
Self-efficacy and growth mindset research suggests that entering first-year students with a high degree of academic confidence are more engaged during their first year of college, set higher academic goals, and generally are more academically successful. This session will discuss general principles that can help enhance student confidence and growth mindset. We will also use strength-based advising as a guide to discuss how to best serve incoming students who may be lacking in academic confidence and feelings of helpless regarding their academic performance. This session will culminate with examples advisors may use from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) survey to inform practice.
Full version
Revisiting the impact of LLCs on student engagement and success
Fosnacht, K., Graham, P., Gonyea, R. M., Hurtado, S., & Fassett, K.
ACUHO-I Academic Initiatives Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2019, October.
Campus housing has changed markedly in recent years, prompting questions about its impact and the benefits of living-learning communities (LLCs) in particular. Sponsored by an ACUHO-I research grant, we surveyed a diverse, multi-campus sample of residents to study the relationships between LLC participation, engagement, perceived gains, and persistence. Results affirm LLCs promote engagement in expected ways, but also point to areas for improvement. Implications for practice will be discussed.
Full version
The next decade of HIPs: Increasing access, quality, and equity
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Institute 2019, Indianapolis, IN, 2019, October.
Many colleges and universities promote the value of high-impact practices (HIPs)--such as service-learning, undergraduate research, internships, and study abroad--and evidence demonstrates that students benefit. Yet simply offering such activities does not guarantee high-quality learning or even participation. Over the past decade, we??ve learned the importance of intentionally designed HIPs that are delivered with fidelity, but shaped to the context, a defined purpose and inclusive pedagogy. This session briefly reviews the HIP landscape, introduces new findings about HIP quality and equity, and suggests practical approaches to scaling and ensuring the quality of HIPs.
Full version
Faculty development for all? Investigating participation in development opportunities
Fassett, K., Strickland, J., Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2019, June.
The session provides a broad overview of current faculty development practices, the faculty members who participate, and how participation relates to the use of effective teaching strategies. The session will incorporate the Faculty Learning Outcomes Framework to help attendees situate how the participation in faculty development practices relates to potential classroom outcomes. Data come from the 2014-2018 administrations of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) at 33 institutions. Patterns were examined based on faculty characteristics, disciplines, and demographics related to participation in teaching mentorships, teaching learning communities, and teaching-focused conferences.
Full version
Innovations in teaching: A flipped classroom narrative
Fassett, K., Strickland, J., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2019, June.
The session will offer insights from hundreds of faculty teaching at 18 four-year colleges and universities who have applied flipped classroom techniques in their selected courses. Using data collected by the 2018 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, presenters will share findings on the types of courses that faculty tend to flip as well as ways in which they structure the delivery of their course content. Session participants will also learn about the challenges and benefits faculty experienced in flipping a course and the reasons why they turned to this pedagogical approach. The general purpose of this session is to inspire thoughtful and strategic planning for faculty and offer an example of how assessment professionals may gauge institutional support for innovative teaching practices.
Full version
The ACUHO-I/NSSE Student Housing Study: What have we learned so far?
Graham, P., Fosnacht, K., Fassett, K., Gonyea, R. M., & Hurtado, S.
ACUHO-I Annual Convention and Expo, Toronto, Canada, 2019, June.
Backed by an ACUHO-I Sponsored Research Grant, researchers from the National Survey of Student Engagement surveyed over 55,000 first-year, sophomore, and senior students about their housing, roommates, safety, finances, and well-being. Combining these responses with data on engagement; information about campus facilities, policy, and programming from the ACUHO-I Campus Housing Index; and enrollment records from the National Student Clearinghouse, we are gaining a better understanding of the relationship of housing conditions, student learning, and outcomes. Come listen and ask questions as we share what we have learned about topics like roommate policies, living-learning communities, and more.
Full version
The relationship of sophomore living arrangements on engagement and perceived outcomes
Gonyea, R. M., Fosnacht, K., Fassett, K., & Graham, P.
ACUHO-I Annual Convention and Expo, Toronto, Canada, 2019, June.
Much of the conversation about living on campus focuses on first-year students. In this session, we offer a deep dive into understanding the housing experiences of sophomores at 76 institutions. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement and supported by an ACUHO-I Sponsored Research Grant, participants will learn how the background characteristics and engagement of on- and off-campus sophomores are associated with perceptions of safety and support, financial stress, programming, and more. After a presentation of findings, we will engage in a discussion about what this means for housing and residence life policy and practice.
Full version
The role of residence life in undergraduate persistence
Fosnacht, K., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P., & Fassett, K.
ACUHO-I Annual Convention and Expo, Toronto, Canada, 2019, June.
For many decades, living on campus was believed to be a primary determinant of undergraduate persistence and success. However, more recent research must raise questions about expanding diversity and the experiences of underrepresented groups, changing living arrangements, new programs and learning opportunities, and the changing campus environment in general. This session will present results from a study supported by an ACUHO-I Sponsored Research Grant that examined residence life's contribution to the persistence of first-year and sophomore students at 76 institutions. It will also detail the role residence life programming and factors like perceptions of safety on persistence.
Full version
What motivates us to teach? Examining faculty motivation for teaching
Strickland, J., Fassett, K., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2019, June.
Understanding faculty motivations for teaching can provide a powerful window into what encourages instructors to do the work of teaching. We administered a brief survey developed from self-determination theory to over 2,000 instructional staff at nineteen institutions. Using data collected through the 2018 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, we investigated how varying faculty and institutional characteristics relate to intrinsic, introjected, and external motivations to teach. In this session, participants will be provided insights into how these three motivation types link to identified faculty and institutional characteristics, as a way to promote the highest levels of instructional effectiveness. Teaching and faculty development initiatives can be designed to explicitly focus on meeting the needs of faculty members to inspire motivation types that highly correlate with effective teaching practices.
Full version
A brief introduction to R
Dugan, B.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Aggregate measures: Development, creation, and validation
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Kirnbauer, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Item and scale development are critical components to survey research and are often an institutional researcher‘s best tool for understanding higher education populations. As such, it is vital to develop and use sound instruments that provide useful information. This poster presentation will discuss methods for operationalizing concepts, creating items, forming aggregate measures, and using appropriate means for validation and reevaluation. Processes and examples from national large-scale, multi-institution, longitudinal survey projects will be used as a starting point to show viewers suggestions and provide tips at each stage of the aggregate life cycle.
Full version
Celebrating NSSE's 20th: Making the most of student engagement data
Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
In this session, Bob Gonyea and Jillian Kinzie share NSSE‘s achievements, highlight effective institutional reporting and data uses, and preview plans for assessment in the project‘s next several years.
Full version
Crises and considerations for assessment
Fassett, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Crises have been studied showing large-scale negative effects on aspects of higher education institutions. However, there has been limited discussion or research about how they appear to influence the operation of institutional research. Given the heightened climate on campuses over the last several years, it is important to consider how crises alter our work. This discussion group begins a conversation about how to prepare, endure, and reflect on ways to analyze data when there may be discontinuity in assessment practices due to crisis.
Full version
How are survey response rates changing? Findings from NSSE
Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
How much have survey response rates changed at colleges and universities over the last decade? Using a National Survey of Student Engagement longitudinal data set (2010 to 2018) based on approximately 1,000 institutions, this study investigates how much response rates have changed over the years, the degree of variability in response rates within any given year, and what factors influence these outcomes, such as school undergraduate enrollment and the use of survey incentives. While reviewing this poster presentation, attendees will also gain an appreciation for one statistical method well suited for understanding change over time-latent growth curve modeling.
Full version
Illustrating career advancement opportunities in IR with web-scraped data
Dugan, B.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Measuring quality in online education: A NSSE–QM collaboration
Sarraf, S., Kinzie, J., & Burch, B.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
The purpose of this discussion is to explore the extent to which the actual experiences of learners in online courses align with standards for quality online courses as reflected in the Quality Matters Rubric. QM has a dearth of cross-institutional data. NSSE helped! The question set was administered via the standard NSSE administration in spring 2018 to about 6,000 first-year and senior undergraduate students from 21 four-year colleges and universities (non-profit, publics and privates, some QM members) who responded about their online learning experiences in ?entirely online courses? for that term.
Full version
Tableau tips and tricks: Building dynamic dashboards with survey data
BrckaLorenz, A., & Kirnbauer, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
IR professionals are responsible for communication information to a broad audience through interactive data visualizations. For many professionals, using Tableau as a tool to create dynamic and appealing visualizations may be frustrating. The purpose of this poster presentation is to help decode Tableau jargon and provide participants with a guide for using essential Tableau features. This presentation will provide guidance on how to import custom colors, the power of using calculated fields and parameters, and other suggestions for building Tableau dashboards using survey data. Examples of visualizations will be shown using data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE).
Full version
The effect of nonresponse bias in undergraduate student surveys
Fosnacht, K., Gonyea, R., & Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Undergraduate living arrangements and persistence
Fosnacht, K., & Gonyea, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2019, May.
Comparison of the effects of campus environment and teaching practices on international students' perceived gains through reflective-integrative learning
Oktafiga, D. A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Comparative and International Education Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2019, April.
This session presents findings from a study of international students' college experience that explored the relationships among self-reported perceived gains, reflective-integrative learning, supportive campus environment, and effective teaching practices by considering international students' geographical regions of origin.
Full version
An examination of inclusivity and support for diversity in STEM fields
Haeger, H., BrckaLorenz, A., & Priddie, C.
AAC&U Diversity, Equity, and Student Success Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2019, March.
To diversify STEM fields, it is imperative that institutions of higher education move beyond looking at diversity in terms of numerical representation on a narrow set of categories (race/ethnicity, gender 38 and socioeconomic status) by exploring the culture and climate of campuses. Using data from a large- scale, multi-institution study of undergraduate students, we not only look at how proportionally represented students are in STEM fields by a wide variety of identity characteristics, but also explore how perceptions of institutional commitment to inclusivity and culturally engaging coursework compare for STEM and non-STEM students. Within STEM fields, we also examine how students with different identity characteristics perceive institutional commitment to inclusivity.
Creating a lasting impact: Constructing and assessing significant student learning opportunities
Palmer, D., Silberstein, S., & Kinzie, J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 2019, March.
Full version
Improving diversity and inclusion in college courses should account for varied faculty roles
BrckaLorenz, A. & Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U Diversity, Equity, and Student Success Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2019, March.
Despite the overwhelming support for including diversity in coursework, experiences, and environments in higher education, our progress in creating diverse and inclusive curricula falls short. Through an interactive discussion of results from an empirical study of nearly 40,000 full-time faculty employed at over 400 four-year colleges and universities over the past five years, participants in this session will explore the relationship between how faculty approach their scholarly work and their inclusion of diversity in the curriculum. Discussion will focus on multiple aspects of courses (i.e., more than course content) and on what participants and their institutions can do to better to support how different types of faculty create inclusive and culturally engaging spaces.
Full version
Searching for belonging: Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students of color in American higher education
Greathouse, M., & BrckaLorenz, A.
National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education Annual Conference, New Brunswick, NJ, 2019, March.
This session will highlight findings from a national study of queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students of color at 4-year colleges and universities across the United States. Participants will learn about the intersections of race, gender, sexuality and gain a better understanding of the experiences, strengths and disparities among queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students of color.
Full version
Entering students' experience: BCSSE for first-year and transfer students
Cole, J., & Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Las Vegas, NV, 2019, February.
Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) can now be used to survey your first-year, transfer, and older students. Since 2007, nearly 900,000 entering first-year students at more than 500 institutions have completed BCSSE. The updated web survey now includes questions specifically for incoming transfer and older students. This session will describe how data about entering first-year, transfer, and older students provides comprehensive information about your students‘ experiences. Institutions use BCSSE for academic advising, retention models, faculty and staff development, and other assessment needs. This session will present the new survey, revised reports, and details regarding fall and winter administrations.
Full version
Leveraging survey data and predictive analytics to support first-year students
Bombaugh, M., & Cole, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Las Vegas, NV, 2019, February.
This session will discuss the emerging trend of using predictive data to identify and support first-year students. For several years, USF-Tampa has been using an in-house persistence model to identify 10-12% of new first-year students at risk of not persisting to the second year. In Fall 2016, USF incorporated BCSSE data into the predictive model. BCSSE Advising Reports and results are shared with academic advisors, first-year seminar instructors, and housing personnel who provide targeted interventions for these students. BCSSE data not only strengthened the statistical model, but also identified which BCSSE variables were significant predictors of first-year persistence.
Full version
Documenting the value of higher education with student engagement data
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., Gonyea, R. M., & Nez, E.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2019, January.
A key component of the college value story is the explication of
specific knowledge, skills, and habits of mind that students gain from
their undergraduate education. This session will demonstrate the use
of aggregate National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) results
to document graduating senior outcomes, highlight new findings from
the Senior Transition module that reveal seniors‘ confidence in essen
-
tial skills and abilities valued by employers, and explore the specific
educational practices associated with these outcomes. We will discuss
the implications of this narrative; illustrate approaches to communicat-
ing it; feature examples from institutions that have used their data
to communicate their unique value stories, including students‘ open-
ended comments to give authentic voice to the quantitative data and
exchange ideas about crafting data-rich value stories.
Full version
Mapping and NSSE: Relating institutional internationalization efforts and student global learning
Kinzie, J., Helms, R., & Brajkovic, L.
Association of International Education Administrators Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2019, January.
Using results from the 2016 iteration of the American Council on Education (ACE) Mapping Internationalization on U.S. Campuses survey and NSSE's Global Learning Topical Module, ACE and NSSE conducted a joint analysis of the two data sets to study the relationship between institutional internationalization efforts and the student global learning that results. This session will address the question of "what works" in producing globally competent graduates, along with implications of the research findings for campus strategies and practice.
Full version
Reshaping the narrative on faculty time and motivations
BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2019, January.
Often lost in discussions about what students are doing and learning while in college are the critical roles that faculty play in students‘ learning and development. Relying on results from a large-scale, multi-institution study of thousands of faculty members, participants will examine how faculty spend their time on scholarly activities and how this time allocation relates to good teaching practices. Additionally, participants will discuss why faculty might be allocating their time in different ways, focusing particularly on faculty motivations and what institutions could do to support current trends or reshape the narratives about faculty productivity at their institutions. Connecting faculty time allocation to good teaching practices and motivations for teaching and doing research will provide participants with practical solutions and forewarn potential challenges for maintaining or changing current narratives about faculty work and postsecondary educational spaces.
Full version
The spiritual campus climate for diverse learners
Fosnacht, K.
NASPA Religious, Secular, and Spiritual Identities Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2018, December.
This session will overview three research studies that analyzed the spirituality campus climate for a diverse, multi-institution sample of undergraduates. The first study examined how two aspects of the spirituality campus climate, students‘ comfort in expressing their spiritual beliefs and perceptions of the respect for their beliefs on campus, were related to perceptions of the overall campus climate. The second study investigated how students‘ religion and institution type were related to the spirituality campus climate. The final study examined the correlates of being the victim of an act of religious intolerance on campus. Student affairs professionals will learn how they can utilize the studies‘ findings to improve the spiritual campus climate on their campuses.
Full version
A 10-year cross-section of STEM faculty teaching
Fassett, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
Studies have shown that faculty in STEM are slow to adopt pedagogies that improve learning outcomes. This study centered on female STEM faculty, as they have been, and are currently, marginalized in these disciplines. To explore faculty teaching practices, the study used data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), which collects data on the ways and extent to which faculty engage students at four-year colleges and universities. A cross-sectional approach used data from three survey administrations spanning ten years to uncover differences in pedagogical approaches among female and male faculty. The Carnegie Basic Classifications for 2005, 2010, and 2015 were used to identify institution types. Master‘s colleges and universities with smaller, medium, and larger programs were collapsed into one group for the analysis. Each year, 48 to 71 institutions were represented in the sample. Of the total 62,000 FSSE respondents in 2007, 2012, and 2017, respectively 1,521; 917; and 1,300 met the criteria of working at a master‘s institution and in a STEM field. Female faculty were found to be using active teaching practices more than their male counterparts.
Full version
A time for action: Relating student identity and experiences with activist behaviors
Zilvinskis, J., Morgan, D., & Dugan, B.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2018, November.
Using data from an experimental item set administered with the NSSE in which more than three thousand respondents were asked about their involvement in activism, multilevel modeling was employed to measure the relationship between these behaviors and student backgrounds, high-impact practice participation, involvement in student activities, and institutional characteristics. characteristics.
Full version
Examining flipped classes: Planning, enacting, and assessing innovation
Strickland, J., BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Ribera, A.
Professional and Organizational Development Network Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2018, November.
A flipped classroom is one in which traditional in-class activities are completed outside of class to provide facetime for active learning. In this session, participants will learn more about flipped classrooms by examining a large-scale study of flipped classroom practice at 18 institutions. Common characteristics of courses and faculty that incorporate flipped designs, motivations for flipping classes, and benefits and challenges will all be discussed. Participants will be encouraged to reflect on the importance of this teaching practice to meet current student needs with an opportunity to apply lessons learned about flipped classrooms to improve their own practices.
Full version
Assessing faculty experiences teaching a flipped course
Ribera, A., BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Strickland, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2018, October.
The session explores flipped classrooms as an innovative pedagogical practice. Facilitators in this session will offer insights from hundreds of faculty who have applied flipped classroom techniques in their courses. Presenters will share findings on the types of courses that faculty tend to flip as well as ways in which they structure the delivery of their course content. Session participants will also learn about the challenges and benefits faculty experienced in flipping a course and why they turned to this pedagogical approach. Discussion will focus on how assessment professionals may gauge institutional support for innovative teaching practices.
Full version
Assessing for diversity: Evidence from NSSE’s Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity and Global Learning modules
Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A. C.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2018, October.
The assessment of inclusivity and cultural responsiveness and of global learning are current imperatives for higher education. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) recently added two new Topical Modules asking students more about inclusive educational practices and perceptions of their global learning experiences. This session highlights findings from these question sets, examines common items for course-based learning and how results vary by institution and student characteristics, what results suggest about global learning practice and inclusivity, and includes a discussion about campuses' use of these findings to create environments that support all students and leverage the educational benefits of diversity and internationalization.
Full version
Support by any other name: Disaggregating supportive environments for faculty
Priddie, C., Silberstein, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2018, October.
This session aims to provide a deeper understanding of the importance of disaggregating data to improve campus environments for minoritized faculty members. Responses from faculty members at approximately 30 institutions who participated in the Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity topical module of the Faculty Survey for Student Engagement will be used to examine how identity and discipline influence differing perspectives of supportive environments. Participants will have the opportunity to learn about approaches to working with disaggregated data and discuss ways in which supportive environments can be improved for different faculty populations.
Full version
Using a typology of faculty to assess undergraduate education and plan for faculty development
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Nelson Laird, T.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2018, October.
In this session, participants will learn about the relationships between a typology of faculty members and measures of effective educational practice. The typology comes from faculty responses on the time they spend on teaching activities; research, creative, or scholarly activities; and service activities from over 24,000 faculty at 154 institutions that participated in the 2017 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). After an interactive presentation of findings, participants will discuss the implications for assessing undergraduate education and planning for faculty development at their campuses.
Full version
Using a typology of faculty to assess undergraduate education and plan for faculty development
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Nelson Laird, T.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2018, October.
In this session, participants will learn about the relationships between a typology of faculty members and measures of effective educational practice. The typology comes from faculty responses on the time they spend on teaching activities; research, creative, or scholarly activities; and service activities from over 24,000 faculty at 154 institutions that participated in the 2017 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). After an interactive presentation of findings, participants will discuss the implications for assessing undergraduate education and planning for faculty development at their campuses.
Full version
Using evidence to promote effective educational practice and the success of all students
Hayek, J., Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A.
SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference, Denver, CO, 2018, August.
Combining findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) with insights from a system-level chief academic officer, this session first provides an overview of public institutions‘ student engagement results by race/ethnicity and first-generation status, including results suggesting progress in American higher education in providing welcoming, supportive environments for all students and a positive association between participation in high-impact practices and higher levels of satisfaction and perceived support for all racial/ethnic groups. The presenters then highlight new evidence regarding students‘ experiences with a variety of inclusive and culturally engaging practices, showing?by student characteristics such as racial/ethnic identity, gender identity, and sexual orientation?the relationships of these activities to educational practices that promote learning and development and to students' perceived gains in areas such as informed, active citizenship and understanding people of other backgrounds. The session concludes by discussing how institutions and states can best promote equitable experiences and what the findings on inclusivity and cultural diversity suggest for preparing students to participate in a diverse workplace and a globally interconnected world.
Full version
Housing, student engagement, and persistence: A first look
Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P., Hurtado, S., & Fosnacht, K.
ACUHO-I Annual Conference and Expo, Denver, CO, 2018, July.
Through an ACUHO-I Foundation grant, National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) researchers are examining the relationship between students' living environments, engagement, and persistence. In Spring 2018, NSSE collected survey data about on- and off-campus living situations and perceptions from first-year, sophomore, and senior students at 75 bachelor's degree-granting institutions. This session provides a first look at results, including relationships between housing options and students' perceptions of safety and support, financial stress, and programming.
Full version
The NSSE/ACUHO-I living environment study: What questions should we put to the data?
Gonyea, R. M., Fosnacht, K., Graham, P., & Hurtado, S.
ACUHO-I Annual Convention and Expo, Denver, CO, 2018, July.
Senior housing officers (SHOs) are invited to provide meaningful input on the ACUHO-I-sponsored NSSE project, Campus Housing, Student Engagement, and Persistence: A Multi-Institutional Study. Researchers will discuss the surveys and other data collected from 75 institutions in 2018. SHO input will help researchers adapt analyses and reports to the needs of ACUHO-I institutions.
Full version
Assessing inclusiveness and engagement in cultural diversity and global learning: Lessons from NSSE’s Topical Modules
Kinzie, J., Cavallo, J., & Kenesson, S.
Higher Education Data Sharing Annual Conference, Spokane, WA, 2018, June.
The assessment of inclusivity and cultural responsiveness and global learning are current imperatives for higher education. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) added two new modules asking students more about inclusive educational practices and perceptions of their global learning experiences. Despite articulating goals to advance globalization and diversity, institutions have sometimes fallen short in the ways they have enacted these goals. Further, students‘ perceptions of institutional commitment to these goals vary and this in turn influences their experience. Therefore, it is important to understand the specific ways in which institutions enact their commitments and what influences students‘ perceptions of these commitments. This session highlights findings from these sets, examines how results vary by student characteristics, what results suggest about global learning practice and inclusivity. Discussion will then focus on campuses‘ use of these findings to create environments that support all students and to leverage the educational benefits of diversity and internationalization, including for example, to make the case for a more integrated campus diversity plan and a more comprehensive campus climate survey, and to spur further analyses of the impacts of students‘ perceptions of institution‘s emphasis on diversity and supportive environment on student success rates (e.g., academic standing, retention).
Full version
Assessing small populations: Recognizing everyone counts in your counts
BrckaLorenz, A., & Hurtado, S.
Student Affairs Assessment and Research Conference, Columbus, OH, 2018, June.
Quantitative and survey research depends heavily on large sample sizes, but a focus on the ?average student? in quantitative analyses often hides diverse voices. Participants in this session will discuss common issues and solutions associated with giving voice to small populations of college students (e.g., gender variant, multiracial, LGBQ+). Participants will discuss administration issues related to small populations such as increasing response rates, identifying special subpopulations, and writing more inclusive survey questions. Tips for disaggregating, responsibly aggregating, and choosing inclusive comparative information will be provided. Additionally, participants will discuss strategies for analyzing and communicating about the results from small populations as well as approaches for communicating about the validity and data quality from small sample sizes.
Full version
Creating inclusive and culturally engaging courses and spaces
Kinzie, J., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Conference, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, 2018, June.
Recently, diversity, inclusion, and equity goals have proliferated across institutions of higher education. Recognizing the importance of a student‘s perception of their institution‘s commitment to diversity, the experiences they have interacting with others, and their exposure to culturally engaging and inclusive practices in their courses, this session provides an overview of these perceptions and activities. The data featured in this session comes from the 2017 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement, administered at 72 four-year colleges and universities across Canada. This interactive session will provide participants with an overview of student participation in inclusive and culturally engaging activities and interactions, how much students perceive their institution supports and values diversity and inclusion, and how institutions can and have used this information for positive change in addition to hearing from other institutions about the challenges and success they have had surrounding issues of diversity and inclusion.
Full version
Examining time allocation and effective teaching practice: The changing roles of today’s faculty
Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
International Consortium for Educational Development Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2018, June.
Given the array of expectations and increased scrutiny from various stakeholders in the United States, faculty must be careful and intentional with how they balance their time. The categorization of faculty based on time used for teaching, research, and service raises some interesting points of discussion about the roles of today‘s faculty. This interactive session explores how over 16,000 faculty from 154 colleges and universities in the U.S. spend their time on professorial activities, the consequences of more specialized roles for faculty, and how time allocation relates to effective teaching practices. Participants will be encouraged to share how these patterns of time allocation and faculty roles compare for faculty at their institution and as well as their regional context.
Full version
Revisiting the connection between high-impact practices and student activism
Dugan, B., & Morgan, D.
Civic Learning and Democractic Engagement Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 2018, June.
High-impact practices (HIPs) are often viewed as primary ways to help college and universities achieve a range of educational outcomes, including preparing students to participate in democracy. Utilizing new data from the NSSE, this session will help educators explore the connection between HIPs and student activism toward huancing and updating their understanding of the relationship between these concepts.
Full version
Assessing small populations: Recognizing everyone counts in your counts
BrckaLorenz, A., Fassett, K., & Hurtado, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
Quantitative and survey research depends heavily on large sample sizes, but there are a variety of reasons why larger sample sizes may not be possible. Participants in this presentation will discuss common issues and solutions associated with assessing small populations of college students and instructors. Examples will focus on the experiences of gender variant and LGBQ+ students and faculty. Participants will also learn about and discuss administration issues related to small populations such as increasing response rates and identifying special subpopulations. Next, participants will learn about and discuss strategies for analyzing and communicating the results from small populations. Finally, participants will learn about and discuss approaches for communicating the validity and data quality from small sample sizes.
Capturing demographic data on queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students
Greathouse, M., BrckaLorenz, A., Hoban, M., Huesman, R., & Stolzenberg, E.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
diversity, gender, sexual orientation
Full version
High-impact practices and personality: Are HIPs biased for certain traits?
Miller, A. L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
This poster presents findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), investigating whether high-impact practice (HIP) participation is more common in students with certain personality traits. In addition to the core NSSE items, this study uses responses from experimental items on the Five-Factor Model of personality, given to 10,255 students at 34 institutions. A series of exploratory t-tests, looking at the different HIPs included on NSSE, suggests several significant differences. Specifically, those higher in Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Intellect are more likely to do learning communities, research with faculty, internships, leadership roles, and capstone experiences. Conversely, those higher in Conscientiousness are less likely to hold leadership roles or do study abroad. Understanding of these differences can help institutions develop new HIP programming that is more appealing and inclusive for all students, regardless of personality traits.
Full version
Learning strategies in high school and first year in college
Mu, L., & Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
Due to the different academic demands on students between high school and college, high school students transitioning to college often experience unanticipated academic difficulty. One consistent factor for academic success in high school and college is an effective use of learning strategies. However, given the varying academic demands, it is not clear how consistently students engage in the effective use of learning strategies across these two environments. The stability of these learning strategies across these two domains is relatively unknown. The research questions for this study are 1. Does the use of learning strategies change from high school to the first year in college? 2. Do individual students change their learning strategy use after entering college? 3. Is an institution's academic environment associated with individual students' leaning strategy use?
Full version
Lost in translation: Transforming survey data to get started with Tableau
BrckaLorenz, A., Dugan, B., & Ribera, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
IR professionals must not only collect, analyze, disseminate, and archive information about their institutions, they must also report findings to a wide variety of stakeholders. One way to communicate information to a broad audience is through interactive data visualizations. Data visualization tools, such as Tableau, are often built with a mindset that may not be as familiar to today‘s IR professional, and learning a new tool from a different educational culture may be daunting. This presentation aims to bridge the gap between traditional data-analyst-thinking with tools such as SPSS and business intelligence tools such as Tableau. Participants will learn about the merits of ?long? versus ?wide? data and tips for converting from one format to another. Participants will learn how to use these converted data in Tableau; how Tableau jargon maps to traditional data-analyst terminology; and ways to get started using survey data in Tableau.
Full version
Maximizing survey data for outreach, assessment, programming, and beyond
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
This presentation provides a variety of real-life examples of how institutions have used survey data collected from students, faculty, and alumni within multiple contexts. Examples are drawn from institutions participating in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), and the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project (SNAAP). The types of data use cover numerous categories: sharing on campus; recruitment; academic and career advising; publicity, alumni relations, and donor outreach; planning, assessment, and accreditation; program and curricular change; and advocacy and public policy. Attendees will learn about ways that they can optimize the use of available survey data for many different audiences, allowing the institutional research office to serve as a bridge that connects other stakeholders with available data.
Full version
Maximizing survey data for outreach, assessment, programming, and beyond
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
This presentation provides a variety of real-life examples of how institutions have used survey data collected from students, faculty, and alumni within multiple contexts. Examples are drawn from institutions participating in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), and the Strategic National Arts Alumni Project (SNAAP). The types of data use cover numerous categories: sharing on campus; recruitment; academic and career advising; publicity, alumni relations, and donor outreach; planning, assessment, and accreditation; program and curricular change; and advocacy and public policy. Attendees will learn about ways that they can optimize the use of available survey data for many different audiences, allowing the institutional research office to serve as a bridge that connects other stakeholders with available data.
Full version
Ticking away the moments: Assessing faculty roles with time on task
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T., Fassett, K., & Yuhas, B.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
More frequent calls for accountability in higher education have led to increased scrutiny on what students are doing and learning while in college. Because faculty are important contributors to the student experience, the ability to realistically analyze how faculty spend their time engaging students in learning is a key component in being able to answer these calls for accountability. The purpose of this presentation will be to examine and discuss how faculty time on task can be used to enhance a wide variety of conversations about faculty roles, development, contributions, and productivity. A new method of analyzing faculty productivity will be presented, and participants will discuss how such an assessment of faculty time can be useful in discussions about institution mission and goals, faculty roles at the institution, faculty professional development, and faculty tenure and promotion.
Full version
Transparent quality: Framing and building a psychometric portfolio
Paulsen, J., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2018, May.
High quality data and assessment instruments have become essential for institutional researchers to take a data-driven approach to informing decision-making and strategic planning. Instruments and the resulting data they collect can be studied for different aspects of validity and reliability as well as the procedures and standards used to reduce error, bias, and increase the rigor of the data. This presentation will focus on a framework for operationalizing and organizing a wide variety of studies to investigate data quality. Participants in this session will see how a large-scale quantitative survey project designed and created a psychometric portfolio with studies designed to make survey instrument and data quality transparent so that higher education leaders, researchers, and professionals can trust the results. Challenges and potential solutions, including thinking about strategies for conducting studies of data quality with limited time and resources will be discussed.
Full version
Emerging research on queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students in higher education
Greathouse, M., BrckaLorenz, A., Hoban, M., Rankin, S., & Stolzenberg, E.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum students remain a significantly underserved population within higher education, despite the presence of significant disparities across measures of campus climate, academic engagement, and overall health. This paper explores the campus climate, overall health, and academic engagement of queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum undergraduate students attending four-year colleges and universities in the US through an analysis of seven national data sets, including the 2017 data sets of the National Survey of Student Engagement (Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University Bloomington), the 2016 Undergraduate Student Experience at the Research University Survey (SERU-AAU Consortium, Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California-Berkeley and University of Minnesota Twin Cities), the 2016 American College Health Association--National College Health Assessment, and the 2016 data sets of four surveys conducted by the Cooperative Institutional Research Program, including The Freshman Survey (TFS), the Your First College Year Survey (YFCY), the Diverse Learning Environments Survey (DLE), and the College Senior Survey (CSS) (University of California-Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute).
Full version
Engaging insights from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2018, April.
Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) offer institutions helpful diagnostics about strengths and shortcomings in the undergraduate student experience. This session will highlight recent findings for student persistence, high-impact practices, and diversity education and also will demonstrate effective uses of NSSE results in accreditation self-studies and quality improvement plans.
Full version
Gifted education at the college level: Are faculty who teach honors courses really more engaging?
Miller, A. L., & Silberstein, S. M.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2018, April.
This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing various engagement-related practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two experimental items about teaching honors courses. A series of OLS regression analyses suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more engaging in the areas of student-faculty interaction, learning strategies, and collaborative learning. Additional analyses for high-impact practices also suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more likely to work with undergraduates on research, and to think that it is important for students to participate in learning communities, study abroad, and research with faculty.
Full version
Diversifying the professoriate: Designing systems to interrupt inequality
Haeger, H., BrckaLorenz, A., & Wise, J.
AAC&U Diversity, Equity, and Inclusive Democracy 2018 Conference, San Diego, CA, 2018, March.
Despite the clear benefits of faculty diversity, few institutions have faculty bodies that mirror the diversity of their student bodies let alone their local communities. Led by facilitators with backgrounds in educational research, and student and faculty diversity programs, this session will put research and theory into practice by interrogating the structures that perpetuate the status quo and imagine systems to create more equitable representation in the professoriate. Findings from the Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity module from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement will be presented and used as a launching point for discussion. Participants will examine the barriers to faculty diversity at different types of institutions, faculty positions (tenure track or adjunct), and career stages; leverage existing knowledge about successful interventions to approach the issue from a system level; and develop a model of key elements needed to create system-level change to support diverse faculty.
Full version
Queer and gender variant students: Exploring civic engagement for increasingly diverse populations
BrckaLorenz, A., Greathouse, M., Kinzie, J., & Stolzenberg, E.
AAC&U Diversity, Equity, and Inclusive Democracy 2018 Conference, San Diego, CA, 2018, March.
Colleges and universities offer students a significant opportunity to be exposed to issues of inclusion and diversity, including course-based diversity initiatives and inclusive environments. Yet, it is critical to know how much faculty include these initiatives in their practice and how they align with students‘ perceptions of their experiences and the environment. Workshop facilitators will highlight results from the 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement and Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity topical module to introduce participants to these new findings and the important relationship between course-based diversity experiences and perceptions of inclusive environments. Results will be disaggregated by various student demographic and institutional characteristics to strengthen discussion. Participants will consider a case study from an institution that administered the module and then engage in the identification of actionable ideas.
Full version
Queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum student experience in higher education
Greathouse, M., Rankin, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Hoban, M.
NASPA Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2018, March.
Presenters in this session conducted a joint meta-analysis of queer-spectrum and trans-spectrum student responses to their respective surveys. The meta-analysis includes NSSE, ACHA-NCHA, SERU and all CIRP surveys conducted during the 2016-2017 academic year. Presenters will discuss the complicated landscape for survey research with these populations, the limitations of these instruments, and implications for policy and practice.
Full version
Student engagement with inclusivity and cultural diversity: Considering new NSSE module results
Kinzie, J., BrckaLorenz, A., & Silberstein, S.
AAC&U Diversity, Equity, and Inclusive Democracy 2018 Conference, San Diego, CA, 2018, March.
Colleges and universities today are invested in preparing their graduates for democratic participation. Learning more about the extent to which queer and gender variant students engage with civic activities is important to ensure responsive programming, but also to understand the ways that queer and gender variant students may be participating and making civic commitments. Participants will engage in an interactive presentation of findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the CIRP Freshman Survey and College Senior Survey, sharing their perspectives on anticipated and unanticipated findings related to queer and gender variant students‘ engagement in civic-minded activities and leadership experiences. Participants will discuss findings utilizing case studies that explore the ways in which institutions of various profiles cultivate and sustain civic engagement among queer and gender variant students. They will work together to generate ideas for sustaining or creating high levels of civic learning.
Full version
The HIP landscape at public institutions: Exploring variation in intention and participation by student characteristics
Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R.
High-Impact Practices in the States Annual Conference, Dominguez Hills, CA, 2018, February.
Public colleges and universities have a particular obligation to make HIPs available to more students. Yet, for state and institution leaders to maximize student learning through HIPs, we must identify disparities in access and, in particular, explore gaps in students‘ expectations and actual participation levels by student characteristics. This session will explore 2016 and 2017 public institution results from the National Survey of Student Engagement to highlight student participation in HIPs by key demographics including first-generation status and racial-ethnic group. Because less is known about them, we will focus on first-year student expectations for HIPs and then will discuss how results inform institutional policy and practice regarding student expectations, approaches to closing equity gaps, and benchmarking institutional performance.
Full version
The student-athlete experience and the eight key elements of high-impact practices
Bell, L., Ribera, A., & Gonyea, R.
High-Impact Practices in the States Annual Conference, Dominguez Hills, CA, 2018, February.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE to understand first-year student expectations
Cole, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Antonio, TX, 2018, February.
Using data from Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this session focused on the relationship between entering first-year students‘ expectations and their actual experiences near the end of the academic year. We discussed how the expectations gap relates to the quality of academic experiences and persistence for first-year students. Discussion included how institutions can use BCSSE and NSSE data to understand the expectations and academic experiences of their first-year students.
Full version
An inclusive American Dream runs through the faculty, but which faculty?
Nelson Laird, T., BrckaLorenz, A., & Silberstein, S.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2018, January.
Institutional support for diversity and inclusivity is an imperative for colleges and universities and is likely essential to an expanded and inclusive American Dream. While many institutions focus on increasing and supporting the diversity of their student population, faculty members need more attention and support because a diverse and inclusive faculty body can mentor, role model, and create positive change for an increasingly diverse student body. Session facilitators share three faculty profiles: 1) the US faculty of 2027; 2) the faculty at the 100 most inclusive campuses based on National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) results; and 3) the faculty who tend to use inclusive practices more. Through comparing these profiles and how faculty with various demographics and characteristics feel supported by their institution, session participants will engage questions and derive lessons about improving institutional inclusivity while effectively managing a changing faculty.
Full version
Assessing inclusiveness and engagement with cultural diversity: Assuring success for all
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A., Gonyea, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2018, January.
Institutional support for diversity, inclusivity, and cultural responsiveness represents an imperative for higher education given demographic projections and the needs of a pluralist society. In 2017, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) added an optional question set asking students more about inclusive teaching practices in courses, intercultural learning, and perceptions of their institution‘s cultural responsiveness. This session highlights findings from this item set, discusses the relationship between these activities and other effective educational practices, examines how these relationships vary between traditionally marginalized students and more privileged students as well as by major field, and includes a discussion of the opportunities and challenges educators face as they seek to improve inclusion, engagement with diversity, and cultural responsiveness. Discussion includes how campus leaders can use these findings to create environments that more fully support students of all backgrounds, leverage the educational benefits of diversity, and promote transformative learning outcomes.
Full version
Close correlation or discouraging disconnect: The impact of internationalization efforts on student global learning
Helms, R. M., Kinzie, J., Cole, J., & Whitehead, D. M.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2018, January.
Using data from the 2016 iteration of ACE‘s Mapping Internationalization on US Campuses survey and NSSE‘s Global Learning Module, ACE and NSSE conducted a joint analysis of administrator and student responses to study the relationship between internationalization initiatives and activities undertaken by the institution, and students‘ experiences of these activities and the global learning that results. This session will present the results of the joint analysis of data from over 70 institutions that participated in both studies, after which session participants will be invited to discuss the implications of the data for their work. Drawing on expertise from AAC&U and campuses with which ACE, AAC&U, and NSSE have worked, the discussion will also include examples of promising practices and strategies for maximizing the impact of global learning initiatives.
Full version
Sexual violence is everyone’s problem: Faculty roles and responsibilities
Hurtado, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2018, January.
Ensuring all students have access to an equitable educational experience is an essential goal of higher education, and addressing the issue of sexual violence on campus is necessary for meeting this goal. Although efforts to eliminate sexual violence have proliferated across the country, little attention has been paid to faculty members‘ role and responsibility in this area. Given that faculty members maintain significant power and influence within institutions of higher education and regularly interact with students, their role in addressing the issue of sexual violence cannot be ignored. This session discusses the importance of dispersing responsibility as a means for creating equitable learning environments. Interactive conversations in this session will also explore individual and institutional barriers to faculty members‘ involvement and potential solutions to these barriers.
Full version
Assessing diversity inclusivity in college courses: Updates and trends
Nelson Laird, T. F., Hurtado, S. S., & Yuhas, B. K.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2017, October.
Using results from multiple administrations of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), participants in this session will examine how courses include diversity, what faculty and course characteristics predict that inclusion, and whether results have varied over time. The results come from survey items based on a comprehensive framework describing how nine course elements (e.g., purpose, content, assessment) vary in their inclusion of diversity. Session participants will learn about the framework and results and also will engage with the facilitators to discuss the implications of the results for those working to assess the inclusion of diversity across the curriculum.
Full version
Engagement insights: Applying NSSE to student affairs assessment
Kinzie, J., Ribera, A., & Hurtado, S.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2017, October.
Student affairs is under pressure to improve student success and demonstrate the effectiveness of programs and contributions to student outcomes. One practical approach to address this issue is for student affairs assessment professionals to take advantage of available data and assessment resources such as the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). In this session, participants will learn about recent findings about student engagement, persistence, and student learning relevant to student affairs; will practice applying existing student engagement data to inform strategic goals and initiatives related to the co-curriculum; and will exchange ideas about effective approaches to using NSSE data in student affairs.
Full version
Examining diversity inclusivity in college courses: Updates and trends
Nelson Laird, T. F., Hurtado, S. S., & Yuhas, B. K.
Professional and Organizational Development Network Annual Conference, Montreal, ON, Canada, 2017, October.
Full version
Exploring disciplinary differences in global engagement and learning
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U 2017 Global Engagement and Social Responsibility Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2017, October.
Session facilitators will describe disciplinary differences in global engagement and learning (GEL) by sharing results from NSSE‘s Global Learning Topical Module. Through active exchange?including anticipating results, engaging with presented results, and discussion with others in the session?participants will learn about 1) students‘ exposure to global and international topics; 2) students‘ engagement with global issues in and outside of the classroom; and 3) students‘ perceptions of how much their institution facilitated their development along several dimensions of global and intercultural competence. Participants will also discuss their reactions to the findings and share what they are doing on their campuses to assess GEL and how findings from their assessment efforts inform accreditation activities. Presenters will end the session by sharing information and resources NSSE staff have compiled to aid in the assessment of global engagement and intercultural competence.
Full version
Student engagement and the library
Fosnacht, K.
Missouri Library Association Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2017, October.
Full version
Supporting faculty who advise: Using findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement to activate discussions
Ribera, A., & BrckaLorenz, A.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2017, October.
The primary objective of this session is to have an informed discussion about ways to better support faculty who serve as academic advisors at four-year institutions. Session participants will leave this session with at least one personal and actionable goal to improve the conditions of faculty advisors at their institution. Using survey results from over 8,000 faculty advisors who taught undergraduates at 127 four-year institutions as a backdrop, participants will engage in active discussions about the academic culture and reward structures that affect faculty advisors. Participants will also learn the degree to which serving as a faculty advisor contributes to their use of effective educational practices in the classroom.
Full version
The biology pipeline: Understanding the persisters, leavers, and joiners
Cole, J.
Indiana College Biology Teachers Association Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2017, October.
Full version
Why do we teach? Examining faculty teaching experiences and motivation
Recipient of the 2017 Robert J. Menges Award for Outstanding Research in Educational Development
BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Stupnisky, R. H.
Professional and Organizational Development Network Annual Conference, Montreal, ON, Canada, 2017, October.
Understanding faculty motivations for teaching can provide a powerful window into what encourages instructors to do the work of teaching. We administered a brief survey developed from self-determination theory to instructional staff at nineteen institutions across the country. These survey items investigated faculty experiences and motivations for teaching. The results varied by race and discipline, among other factors, and we will give an overview of our findings in this session. Discussion will focus on how these findings can inform faculty development and hiring practices. This session was a recipient of the 2017 Robert J. Menges Award for Outstanding Research in Educational Development.
Advancing learning and success in college: What the evidence shows
McCormick, A. C.
Indiana University Annual Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2017, July.
Full version
What does an engaging campus look like? The role of surveys in the assessment of student engagement
Gonyea, R. M.
Association for the Promotion of Campus Activities Annual Staff & Student Leadership on Broadway Experience, New York, NY, 2017, July.
If you walked onto the most engaging campus, what would you see? The contribution of out-of-class experiences to student engagement cannot be overstated. Interest in creating the conditions that enhance student learning and success is at an all-time high. Today‘s student affairs professional knows how to use observable evidence to effectively plan, implement, assess, and improve outcomes. Student engagement surveys provide some of that evidence for institutions wishing to make student achievement, satisfaction, persistence, and learning a priority.
Full version
Applying NSSE findings to improve student persistence
Kinzie, J.
NASPA Assessment and Persistence Conference, Orlando, FL, 2017, June.
In 2016, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) released findings about engagement practices influencing retention and graduation as well as results about the importance of learning support to first-year retention. This session will focus on these recent NSSE findings in an interactive presentation that invites participants to consider results in relation to their persistence practices as well as apply NSSE institutional results. We will also exchange ideas about assessment approaches to dig deeper on critical issues for student success.
Full version
Educational practices that relate to civic gains and voting rates: Lessons from NSSE and NSLVE
Kinzie, J., Thomas, N., & Casellas Connors, I.
Civic Learning & Democratic Engagement Meeting, Baltimore, MD, 2017, June.
Many colleges and universities have invested in civic innovations to prepare graduates for democratic participation. Interest in what students do in college and graduates civic participation influenced the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE) to examine the connection. This session will share preliminary results and introduce lessons from NSSE and NSLVE‘s studies of civic practices and climates to launch conversations about political engagement definitions and new NSSE student activism items.
Full version
Engagement and characteristics of queer students
BrckaLorenz, A., & Clark, J.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Halifax, NS, Canada, 2017, June.
Research shows there are differences in the college experience for queer students. Sexual orientation impacts academic experiences, intellectual development, and student perceptions of campus climate. This session will explore the participation of nearly 800 queer first-year and seniors students in activities that promote learning and development at ten institutions. Additional demographics and characteristics of queer students as well as patterns of engagement in activities such as reflective and integrative learning, student-faculty interaction, and high-impact practices. Although some comparison will be made to straight students at Canadian institutions and queer students at institutions in the US, the focus of this discussion will be on queer students at Canadian institutions. Participants will be encouraged to reflect on and discuss the engagement of queer students in different contexts and what that means for efforts to increase or maintain a high level of engagement for queer students in courses and across institutions.
Full version
First-year college students' expected and actual engagement
Mu, L., & Cole, J. S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, June.
Using longitudinal student survey data, the current study explored the relationship of new college students‘ expected and actual engagement, covering three aspects of student engagement: collaborative learning, student-faculty interaction, and discussions with diverse others. The results support findings of previous studies about the positive correlations between freshmen‘s expectations and actual behaviors in relation to student engagement. In addition, we found, for students who had the same expected engagement level, those with more varied expectations for different activities better fulfilled their expectation of engagement. We also utilized a structural equation model to investigate the relationship of expected and actual engagement. The model further showed that students‘ perceived college environment significantly moderates the relationship of expected and actual engagement in collaborative learning and discussions with diverse others but not in interactions with faculty. Besides the structural measure, an institution‘s basic Carnegie classification did not have statistically significant moderation between expectation and actual engagement in all engagement aspects. The findings imply a caring campus environment promotes a higher level of realization of that expectation.
Full version
How residence life professionals can use engagement data
Hurtado, S. S., Graham, P. A., & Gonyea, R. M.
ACUHO?I Annual Conference, Providence, RI, 2017, June.
Student affairs professionals (including residence life) are often expected to incorporate assessment and evidence-based practices in their work. One approach is to take advantage of existing data and assessment resources such as from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). This session introduces NSSE's administration, data, and reports, and demonstrates how staff can use engagement data to promote improvements within residence life.
Full version
Living environments and engagement: Results from a multi-campus study
Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Hurtado, S. S.
ACUHO?I Annual Conference, Providence, RI, 2017, June.
As housing professionals adapt to contemporary changes in on-campus living, we present a study by the National Survey of Student Engagement (in collaboration with ACUHO-I) about the relationship between facets of the living environment with engagement and perceived growth in learning, with an emphasis on programming, staffing, and perceived safety and support. Results will be disaggregated by underrepresented subgroups, and discussion will focus on how the results inform residence life practice.
Full version
Making the most of NSSE: An overview of customization options, reports, and resources
Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, June.
This session highlights NSSE‘s customization features, including comparison groups, modules, report sampling, major field groups, LMS portal links, incentives, and more. Participants and NSSE staff will exchange ideas about the project and reports. Current and new users are encouraged to attend!
Full version
NSSE data visualization to inspire action on results
Kinzie, J., Zilvinskis, J., Prewitt-Freilino, P., Gutheil-Bykerk, J., Abbey, C., & Burrow, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, June.
Participants in this session will describe the role of data visualization within campus decision making that motivates action, share ideas for presenting institutional NSSE results, identify considerations when designing a compelling visualization, and exchange ideas and build understanding of what data visualization inspires and for whom.
Full version
Student financial knowledge: Initial results from a multi-institutional study
Fosnacht, K., & Dugan, B. J.
NASPA Symposium on Collegiate Financial Well-Being, Washington, DC, 2017, June.
Using recently collected data, this presentation examined a variety of issues related to students finances, focusing on students‘ use of financial education counseling and courses available at their institution, students‘ financial knowledge, and their levels of financial stress.
Full version
Using write-in responses to improve survey measures
Yuhas, B., BrckaLorenz, A., & Zilvinskis, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, June.
Conscientious quantitative researchers are always looking to fine-tune their survey instruments to best capture the responses of populations. In order to continue this work and update their instrument, the staff at a large-scale multi-institution survey undertook a study of write-in responses collected from instructional staff in the 2013-2016 administrations. These responses were analyzed to determine whether they could have fit into an existing response option, would require editing the item, or signaled confusion among respondents. Once these distinctions were drawn, researchers made decisions about whether and how to change response options to more fully represent the population's needs.
Full version
Evolving identities: Survey changes over time
BrckaLorenz, A., & Clark, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, May.
Studies show there are differences in the college experience for students from underrepresented backgrounds, including non-heterosexual and gender variant students. These differences in experience are due in part to experiences of discrimination and negative campus climate for these students. This presentation will examine how a large-scale survey for students at colleges and universities was updated to include more inclusive items about gender identity and sexual orientation, and will explore the various identities described by students. Challenges for surveying, analyzing, and disseminating results will also be discussed. Finally, participants will learn about the engagement, perceptions of campus support, and satisfaction of students with varying gender identities and sexual orientations from a longitudinal, large-scale, multi-institution survey of students at four-year colleges and universities.
Full version
Improving survey data quality through experimentation
Sarraf, S., & Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Washington, DC, 2017, May.
With help from a large and diverse group of colleges and universities over the past decade, the National Survey of Student Engagement has conducted various randomized experiments aimed at improving survey response rates and minimizing missing data. This session provides an overview of this effort and a summary of major findings. Attendees will gain a better understanding of various issues that could help with developing their own surveys, including smartphone optimization, email subject lines, progress indicators, survey page length, and using learning management systems for recruitment.
Full version
If the engagement fits: Effective educational practices that relate to college students’ sense of belonging
Miller, A. L., Ribera, A. K., & Dumford, A. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, 2017, April.
The current study sought to explore whether first-year and senior students‘ engagement influences their sense of belonging, particularly their connections with peers (peer belonging) and feelings of acceptance from members of the institution such as faculty, administrators, and student affairs professionals (institutional acceptance). This study utilizes data from the 2014 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to explore these relationships. Results suggest that certain student demographics, college experiences, institutional characteristics, and many aspects of engagement do impact students‘ feelings of peer belonging and institutional acceptance. Institutions can use this information to increase programming and resources directed at improving student engagement, knowing that students‘ peer belonging and institutional acceptance, both of which contribute to a positive collegiate experience, could also increase.
Full version
"It's not me, it's you": An analysis of factors that influence the departure of first-year students of color
Snchez, B., Copridge, K., Clark, J., & Cole, J. S.
NASPA Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2017, March.
Nationally, college student persistence has hovered around 80% for nearly three decades; however, at many institutions the persistence rate for students of color is substantially lower. As practitioners, it is important for us to investigate why many might be leaving. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement‘s First Year Experiences and Senior Transitions module, participants will gain a deeper understanding of the factors that influence students of color‘s decision to leave an institution.
Full version
Exploring student engagement, gender identity, and sexual orientation
BrckaLorenz, A., Clark, J., & Hurtado, S.
AAC&U Diversity, Learning, & Student Success Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2017, March.
This session will present the latest NSSE findings about gender identity and sexual orientation and how students with gender variant and non-straight identities engage in effective educational practices. After three years of data collection from hundreds of colleges and universities across the country, a fairly comprehensive picture of student identity can be examined. Participants will discuss study findings and share issues their campuses face in identifying and engaging students with nontraditional identities. Further, session facilitators and participants will work together to create plans for making change in areas they can influence (courses, departments, programs.)
Full version
Improving student understanding of sexual assault policies and procedures
Hurtado, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Columbus, OH, 2017, March.
The purpose of this session is to review findings from a multi-institutional study assessing students level of awareness of institutional sexual assault policies and procedures and the relationship to institutional support. In addition to broad findings, this session will discuss which students are less likely to have an understanding of these policies. This session will rely on participant discussion focused on how to better inform all students of important sexual assault information as a means for promoting positive campus climates.
Full version
Indigenous and Pacific Islander students and faculty in higher education
BrckaLorenz, A., Saelua, N., & Kinzie, J.
AAC&U Diversity, Learning, & Student Success Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2017, March.
Indigenous and Pacific Islander scholars are often the most invisible populations on college and university campuses, even though Native identities, cultures, and symbols are ubiquitous in higher education (Native mascots, ?lu‘au? themed parties). Yet very little is known about these complex, often marginalized communities, due to the limited amount of large-scale research focused on small populations. This poster will present findings about indigenous and Pacific Islander students and faculty from four years of data collection from hundreds of colleges and universities across the country. Participants will learn more about who these populations are, how these students are engaging in effective educational practices, and how these faculty are contributing to undergraduate student engagement.
Full version
Living environments and student engagement: Research findings and implications
Gonyea, R. M., Hurtado, S., & Graham, P. A.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Columbus, OH, 2017, March.
While past research points to various benefits of living on campus, it is important for student affairs professionals to reflect on and adapt to contemporary changes in on-campus living. This session reviews findings from a set of questions that were developed in collaboration with ACUHO-I and appended to the National Survey of Student Engagement. Findings include the relationship between living environments (facilities, programs, staff, safety, etc.) with engagement and perceived gains in learning and development. The session encourages discussion on how these findings can inform practice.
Full version
Rising up: Responding to student demands for more inclusive campuses
BrckaLorenz, A., Mac, J., To, D., & Na, V.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Columbus, OH, 2017, March.
In the past year, student groups released a list of demands at over 80 institutions. This session will highlight emerging themes of systemic and structural racism from those demands, in addition to exploring the various responses from these institutions. Through the use of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) Model, participants will discuss and share strategies on intentionally supporting the needs of racially diverse students at their institutions.
Full version
Linking first-year persistence with help-seeking behaviors and academic perseverance
Cole, J. S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Atlanta, GA, 2017, February.
Using data from Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this session will focus on the help-seeking behaviors and academic perseverance of first-year students who seriously considered leaving their institution. Discussion will include how institutions can use BCSSE data to identify these struggling students and NSSE data to understand how these students are using the academic resources on your campus.
Full version
Building coherence through vertical integration of high-impact practices across the undergraduate curriculum
Koch, A. K., Keup, J. R., Kinzie, J., Eagan, K., & McNair, T. B.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2017, January.
As campuses invest significant human and fiscal resources to provide support, implement high-impact practices (IHPs), and create meaningful learning opportunities for students from orientation to graduation, there is a need to create a seamless approach to the administration of HIPs across the undergraduate experience. A truly integrated approach to support structures, curriculum, and pedagogical practices has the potential to increase the relevance, accessibility, and effectiveness of HIPs for students; streamline the delivery of services, increase the quality of HIPs, and create economies of scale at the institutional level; and respond to the call to treat high-impact practices "as a set of effective tools rather than as discrete experiences...to conceptualize the collective impact [of] these practices...on student success and learning" (Finley & McNair, 2013, p. 1). This session draws upon national data and institutional case studies that highlight the connections between HIPs toward the creation of a coherent and integrated institutional approach to enhance student transition, learning, development, and success.
Full version
Going global: Assessing student experiences using NSSE's new global learning module
Kinzie, J., Cole, J., & Helms, R.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2017, January.
Our rapidly globalizing world demands that colleges and universities expand
opportunities for global learning and embrace internationalization as an
institutional priority. This session highlights results from the National Survey of Student Engagement‘s (NSSE) new Global Learning Topical Module to explore the extent to which student experiences and coursework emphasizes global affairs, world cultures, nationalities, religions, and other international topics and what these experiences contribute to global learning gains. We will explore
variation by student characteristics, discuss how campuses are using results
to enhance global initiatives, and introduce a collaborative project with the American Council on Education to explore the relationship between students‘ experiences and internationalization initiatives undertaken by the institution.
Full version
High-impact practices and students of color: Investigating the hypothesis of harm
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R. M., & Ribera, A. K.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2017, January.
Concerns have been raised that high-impact practices may create opportunities for impactful but highly negative experiences for students of color by creating situations in which students may be exposed to microaggressions and other racist behaviors. To test the hypothesis of negative HIP impact for students of color, we investigated three related questions using data from the 2015 administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement: 1) Do students of color who participate in HIPs evidence lower perceptions of quality of interactions with others on campus, and faculty in particular, relative to their peers who did not participate in HIPs?; 2) Do students of color who participate in HIPs evidence lower perceptions of campus support than their peers who did not participate in HIPs?; and 3) Do students of color who participate in HIPs evaluate their overall educational experience less favorably than their peers who did not participate in HIPs?
Full version
Paying attention to often ignored small subpopulations in assessment work
BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association of American Colleges and Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2017, January.
A more diverse society has led to a more diverse college-going population and faculty body, but the need for restoring public trust in higher education is especially important for subpopulations that have traditionally been marginalized within the higher education system. Often these groups represent small proportions of an overall population, which can present a variety of challenges when trying to conduct assessments of their experiences. This session explores the challenges and possible solutions for those working toward improving the experiences of small subpopulations. The session will consist of highly interactive discussions focusing on the value of inclusivity in restoring public trust in higher education, reflections on assessing the experiences of small subpopulations, and creating plans for further understanding the experiences of small subpopulations for the purpose inclusive improvement.
Full version
A comparison of STEM students' expectations for engagement and faculty teaching practices
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, J., & Wang, L.
AAC&U Transforming Undergraduate STEM Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2016, November.
A misalignment of first-year student engagement expectations and the teaching practices of STEM faculty can undermine first-year students‘ engagement in effective educational practices. In this session, facilitators and participants will examine the results from 68 institutions that have participated in two large-scale national surveys to compare the engagement expectations of first-year STEM students and the teaching practices of lower-division STEM faculty. Presenters and audience will discuss what it means to align faculty teaching practices with student expectations. Session participants will be encouraged to reflect on opportunities and challenges they will likely face as they seek to improve student engagement.
Full version
But what are you going to do with your life? Arts majors, future plans, and career skills
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
National Association for Gifted Children Annual Convention, Orlando, FL, 2016, November.
This study investigates findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), comparing career plans and skills across 11 major fields. Responses from over 31,000 graduating seniors across 126 different universities suggest that while arts majors are more likely to have non-traditional career plans, including self-employment, they also have higher confidence in creative thinking skills and report greater coursework emphasis on creativity. However, arts majors were lacking confidence in other areas, including business and financial skills. The implications of these findings for parents, counselors, and artistically gifted high school students in the process of choosing a college will be presented.
Full version
Do high achieving students benefit from honors college participation? A look at student engagement for first-year students and seniors
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
National Association for Gifted Children Annual Convention, Orlando, FL, 2016, November.
This study investigates findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), comparing various aspects of student engagement between Honors College and general education students. Responses from 1,339 Honors College students and 7,191 general education students across 15 different universities suggest a positive impact for Honors College participation on reflective and integrative learning, use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, diverse discussions, and student-faculty interaction for first-year students, even when controlling for other student and institutional characteristics. For senior students, Honors College participation suggested more frequent student-faculty interaction. Potential experiential and curricular reasons for these differences are discussed.
Full version
Engaging international students through effective teaching strategies
Wang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Professional and Organizational Development Conference, Louisville, KY, 2016, November.
With a rapid increase in the enrollment of international students in U.S. higher education institutions, more and more faculty members have encountered challenges in teaching international students. In this session, facilitators will use Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) data to discuss faculty approaches to the engagement of their international students. Facilitators and participants will discuss the strategies faculty members employ in teaching international students. Goals of this session include understanding the challenges that faculty members face in teaching international students and discussing the implementation of effective teaching strategies in participant‘s courses and campuses.
Full version
Improving survey data quality through experimentation
Sarraf, S., & Cole, J.
North East Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2016, November.
With help from a large and diverse group of colleges and universities over the past decade, the National Survey of Student Engagement has conducted various randomized experiments aimed at improving survey response rates and minimizing missing data. This session provides an overview of this effort and a summary of major findings. Attendees will gain a better understanding of various issues that could help with developing their own surveys, including smartphone optimization, email subject lines, progress indicators, survey page length, and using learning management systems for recruitment.
Faculty use of rubrics: An examination across multiple institutions
Thomas F. Nelson Laird, John Zilvinskis, & Polly A. Graham
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2016, October.
Assessment professionals identify rubrics as key tools in measuring student learning; however, the
field of higher education lacks a clear picture of how much faculty use these tools as well as the ways rubrics are developed and used. For assessment professionals and faculty who work to improve undergraduate education, better understanding rubric development and use should enhance their ability to assist faculty members and ultimately improve teaching and learning on campuses. Relying on data from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), we will describe rubric implementation and development across over 20 institutions and discuss the implications of our findings.
Full version
Identifying and advising entering first-year students who expect a high degree of academic difficulty
Cole, J.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2016, October.
This session focuses on using the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Advising Reports, as well as data the National Survey of Student Engagement, to better understand and advise entering first-year students expecting high levels of academic stress during their first year of college.
Full version
Using NSSE results to inform campus plans to expand high-impact practices and assess impact
Kinzie, J., & Zilvinskis, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2016, October.
Many campuses are planning to increase students‘ participation in high-impact practices. This session will explore how National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) institutional reports and annual results can be used to inform institutional efforts to plan, design, and assess HIPs, and will include considerations regarding entering students‘ expectations for HIPs, differences in participation by student
characteristics, and patterns of participation by major. Working through a case study, we will discuss how NSSE results can inform campus design and evaluation of HIPs.
Full version
Living environments and student engagement: Implications for research and practice
Hurtado, S. S., Graham, P. A., & Gonyea, R. M.
ACUHO-I Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2016, July.
While past literature documents a number of benefits of living on campus, it is important for housing professionals to reflect on and adapt to contemporary changes to the landscape of on-campus living. After recapping results from the NSSE/ACUHO-I collaboration study (reported in the earlier session entitled Living Environments and Student Engagement: Research Study Results) the presenters engaged the audience in a focused discussion of the meaning of the findings. Rationale from literature was presented as well as implications for practice. Participants were expected to deepen their understanding of the differences between varying types of living environments (facilities, programs, access to staff, safety, community issues, etc.) in order for practice to be informed and improved. We also brainstormed areas for future research.
Full version
Living environments and student engagement: Research study results
Hurtado, S. S., Graham, P. A., & Gonyea, R. M.
ACUHO-I Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2016, July.
While the benefits of living on campus are well documented, the changing landscape of living arrangements, programmatic efforts, and other factors underline the need to reexamine its impact. This study used experimental survey questions drafted by the National Survey of Student Engagement in collaboration with ACUHO-I. Data were provided by first-year and senior students attending 36 bachelor‘s degree-granting institutions. The researchers investigated the characteristics of on- and off-campus living environments (facilities, programs, access to staff, safety, community issues, etc.) and their relationship with engagement and perceived gains in learning and development. This session engaged the audience in discussion about the rationale and development of the experimental questions, research methods, and findings.
Full version
Collecting, analyzing, and reporting on data from small populations
BrckaLorenz, A., Hurtado, S., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Quantitative and survey research depends heavily on large sample sizes, but there are a variety of reasons why larger sample sizes may not be possible. Participants in this session will discuss common issues and solutions associated with assessing small populations of college students and instructors, with considerations for special subpopulations (gender variant, multiracial, etc.) as well as considerations for small institutions. Participants will also learn about and discuss administration issues related to small populations such as increasing response rates and identifying special subpopulations. Next, participants will learn about and discuss strategies for analyzing and communicating about the results from small populations. Finally, participants will learn about and discuss approaches for communicating the validity and data quality from small sample sizes.
Full version
Direct and indirect effects of engagement on grades
Gonyea, R., Cole, J., & Rocconi, L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Grades are perhaps the best predictor of a attaining a college diploma. Using NSSE data from nearly 20,000 first-year and senior students in 2012 and matched year-end grades from 42 participating institutions, the authors tested path models to determine the direct and indirect effects of student background, engagement, and campus environment on end of year grades. Total effects on GPA show that time spent studying, the use of learning strategies, and courses where faculty used effective teaching strategies had positive overall effects on grades. Coursework involving quantitative reasoning had a negative effect, probably due to the added rigor of STEM courses.
Full version
Gender identity and sexual orientation: Survey challenges and lessons learned
BrckaLorenz, A., Clark, J., & Hurtado, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Research shows there are differences in the college experience for students from underrepresented backgrounds, including non-heterosexual and gender variant students. This is due in part to experiences of discrimination and negative campus climate for these students. Participants in this session will learn about and discuss the assessment of and conversations about gender identity and sexual orientation on other campuses, and the challenges and potential solutions for writing more inclusive survey questions about complex identities. Challenges and potential strategies for surveying, disseminating results, and talking about difficult or sensitive topics on college campuses will also be discussed. Finally, participants will learn about the engagement, perceptions of campus support, and satisfaction, of students with varying gender identities and sexual orientations from a longitudinal, large-scale, multi-institution survey of students at four-year colleges and universities.
Full version
Graduate student surveys: Assessment landscape, challenges, and solutions
BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Most assessments of the graduate student experience are institution-based and largely focused on satisfaction exit surveys. Very few of these surveys touch on the experiences of graduate students as instructors or teaching assistants. Further lacking are trends from large-scale surveys or national data on the experiences of graduate students, which is especially concerning given the increasing number of graduate students entering the classroom to teach undergraduate students. Participants in this session will discuss how the assessment of graduate student experiences varies on different campuses, as well as examine the challenges and potential solutions associated with assessing these experiences. Finally, participants will learn about one large-scale survey of graduate student experiences, see a selection of results gathered from two years of administration of this survey, and hear about how institutions have used these results for graduate student professional development purposes.
Full version
Involving online students in high-impact practices
Wang, R., Zilvinskis, J., & Ribera, A. K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Using a large-scale survey of student engagement, this study examined the extent to which taking all online courses affects senior students‘ participation rates in high-impact practices (HIPs), such as internship and study abroad. Online students‘ perceived gains in knowledge, skills, and personal development were also examined by whether or not they participated in a HIP. Overall, findings revealed that online students‘ participation rates in HIPs were relatively lower than students who did not take all of their courses online. Of the six HIPs, online students engaged most in service-learning experiences as part of a course requirement and least in study abroad. Online students who participated in a HIP reported greater gains in knowledge, skills, and personal development compared to online students who did not participate in a HIP. This study suggests institutions should pay special attention to the needs of online students and develop strategies for promoting their HIP participation.
Full version
Making the most of NSSE: An overview of updates, customization options, reports, and applications
Gonyea, R., Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
This session highlights new features, including the mobile-optimized survey and LMS/portal promotion, and uses of student engagement results. Participants and NSSE staff will exchange ideas about the project and reports. Current and new users are encouraged to attend!
Full version
Mediation effect of collaborative learning for student-faculty interaction
Mu, L., & Ribera, A. K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Using National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data from senior students (n=95,491), this poster presentation explores the interplay between two effective educational practices--student-faculty interaction (SFI) and collaborative learning (CL). Results from multi-group structural equation model show collaborative learning has a positive mediation effect on SFI for self-reported gains in learning outcomes but a negative mediation effect on SFI for college grades. Further, we find frequencies of SFI and collaborative learning vary by academic disciplines as measured by Holland type.
Full version
Using NSSE as a catalyst for improvement: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., Owens, S., & Du, F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
One of the more challenging phases of assessment is taking action on results. This session will explore the latest field-tested lessons from nearly two dozen institutions that have successfully used the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to improve undergraduate education. Representatives from two institutions will discuss their use of data to improve the first-year experience, and to engage departments in enhancing student learning by creating dashboard displays, infographics, and customized reports. The session will provide an opportunity to learn about approaches employed by institutions that have made effective use of results, and to discuss proven strategies for taking action.
Full version
Variations in the instructional behaviors of graduate student instructors
Wang, R., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016, June.
Graduate students who teach, or graduate student instructors (GSIs), play a significant role in influencing undergraduate students‘ learning experiences and outcomes. Using multi-institution data from a large-scale survey of graduate student teaching practices, this project aims to explore the extent to which instructional behaviors vary across GSIs‘ demographic background and the types of courses they teach. The extent to which GSIs employed effective teaching practices, and relationships between setting clear course goals and employing effective teaching practices among GSIs will also be examined. This poster presentation is important to AIR members, because the findings will not only help graduate schools to ensure the quality of the classes taught by GSIs, but also provide useful information to graduate faculty advisors and academic support staff for preparing future faculty members.
Full version
What do we know about student participation in activities that develop transferable skills?
Miller, A., L., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, London, ON, Canada, 2016, June.
Learners who are equipped to effect positive change in a rapidly changing world must develop useful and transferable skills in order to be productive members of the workforce and society. Transferable skills in areas such as communication, analysis and problem-solving, and the application of knowledge in real-world settings are critical components of an education that can empower individuals to deal with the complexity, diversity, and advances of the 21st century. Using data from the 2013, 2014, and 2015 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this session explores the participation of over 20,000 first-year and senior students in activities that promote the development of valuable skills such as verbal and written fluency and analytic inquiry at fourteen Canadian higher education institutions. NSSE annually collects information about first-year and senior students‘ participation in programs and activities that institutions provide for their learning and personal development. In this session, we focus on student participation in transferable skill development for the workplace.
Full version
Biracial, Black, and White students’ engagement at HBCUs and non-HBCUs
Harris, J., & BrckaLorenz, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, April.
The purpose of this research is to fill several gaps in the literature on college student engagement by exploring differences in engagement for White students, Black students, and Black/White biracial students within and between different institutional types.
Full version
Connecting to improve faculty understanding and preparation for issues of sexual assault
Hurtado, S., & BrckaLorenz, A.
NASPA Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2016, March.
The prevalence of sexual assault on college campuses is a major concern. The purpose of this session is to understand the level at which faculty are prepared to address this issue on their campus. Results are examined from a multi-institution study of faculty‘s understanding of policies and procedures regarding incidents of sexual assault and perceptions of their institution‘s support for those who have experienced sexual assault. The session relies on participant discussion focused on the role of faculty in promoting a positive campus climate.
Full version
Hanging in the towel: Student considerations for leaving IU
BrckaLorenz, A., & Copridge, K.
Indiana University Bloomington First-Year Experience Conference, Bloomington, IN, 2016, March.
In 2015, Indiana University Bloomington (IUB) participated in an administration of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). This survey measures aspects of student engagement, the amount of time and effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities. Institutions using NSSE data to assess the student experience may investigate the relationships between aspects of engagement and student persistence. In this presentation, we will examine IUB student responses to questions asking about the challenges students faced in their first year, how they chose to get help with their coursework, and what reasons they had if they considered leaving IUB in their first year. Potential solutions for persistence barriers will be discussed.
Full version
Patterns of effective teaching practice for general education and non-general education courses
BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2016, February.
With over a decade of data collection and hundreds of institutional participants in the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), much can be learned about the engaging educational practices within general education courses at a variety of institution types and educational contexts. In this session, facilitators will use FSSE data to compare the degree to which instructors of general education courses and non-general education courses emphasize various forms of student engagement. Goals of the session include examining these comparisons within different campus or disciplinary contexts, discussing the goals of general education in promoting student engagement, and reflecting on opportunities and challenges in seeking to improve or examine student engagement within general education courses.
Full version
Using BCSSE to understand financial stress and academic engagement
Cole, J., & Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2016, February.
Being able to afford a college education is one of the biggest challenges many entering, first-year students will face. This session will focus on understanding the deleterious effects that financial stress has on academic experiences of first-year students. We will explore how financial stress is linked with activities such as expected difficulty learning course material,
managing time, and getting needed help. We will discuss how institutions can help facilitate the academic success of students who are experiencing financial stress.
Full version
College students' experiences with writing: What do we know, and how are institutions applying local findings?
Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R. M., McCormick, A., Paine, C., & Blake, L. P.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, January.
AAC&U‘s Essential Learning Outcomes and the Degree Qualifications Profile identify writing as a key outcome. Virtually all colleges and universities aim to develop proficient writers. Recent evidence suggests that experiences critical to developing writing competence correspond to broader benefits in student learning. And ?Writing Across the Curriculum? initiatives make clear that the responsibility to develop this important competency is shared across departments.
Consistent with AAC&U‘s emphasis on enhancing institutional structures and practices to support student success, many institutions monitor students‘ exposure to and participation in effective educational practices through the use of student surveys such as the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). To enable deeper examination of specific practices and experiences, in 2013 NSSE began offering a menu of topical modules to complement the core survey‘s breadth of focus. Results from topical modules provide a fresh opportunity to ?drill down? on educational quality and make targeted improvements in teaching and learning.
One of the new modules investigates students‘ experiences with writing. Whereas the core survey focuses on the number of assigned papers of various lengths, the writing module probes a range of activities and experiences promoted by those who teach composition?interactive writing processes, meaning-making tasks, and clarity of instructor expectations for writing assignments.
This research-informed panel presentation session (1) highlights recent findings from NSSE‘s Experiences with Writing module, including how these experiences vary across subpopulations and major fields, and (2) provides examples of how institutions are making productive use of their results. NSSE researchers report on large-scale findings, and two panelists share what they have learned and how they are using results to guide improvement.
Full version
Mapping the HIP landscape
Nelson Laird, T. F., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2016, January.
Scholars and organizations have begun to encourage participation in multiple HIPs during an undergraduate college career. Although there is much variation in the average amount of student HIP participation at different institutions, no one has examined whether or not that variation can be attributed to particular institution characteristics. In this session, facilitators focus on how various characteristics relate to higher levels of HIP participation at the institution level. Participants in this session will learn about one way to assess HIP participation. Then, based on that approach, they will examine visual representations, ?maps,? displaying the relationships between institution characteristics and increased participation in HIPs. Additionally, participants will think about the implications for individual institutions, institutions with particular characteristics, and state and federal policy makers.
Full version
Are we who we claim to be? Perceptions of mission engagement among students and faculty at religiously affiliated and independent institutions
Graham, P., Broderick, C., Ribera, A., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Denver, CO, 2015, November.
While the importance of institutional mission is acknowledged within the higher education community, there is a lack of empirical evidence investigating how missions are implemented. Using survey data from students and faculty, this study investigates perceptions of mission engagement at religiously affiliated and independent institutions. Implications for practice are discussed.
Full version
College teaching goes pop: Enhancing the classroom with mass media
Yuhas, B., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2015, November.
Ever wished you could find new ways to invigorate a course you've taught many times, or a general education requirement that inspires low levels of student engagement? Consider using popular culture examples to engage students, incorporate diverse voices in the classroom, and increase student participation! Results from a large-scale study of the use of pop culture in college instruction will be shared; and through case studies and session discussions, participants will learn best practices for incorporating pop culture in their own classrooms.
Full version
Faculty perceptions of campus safety and how to improve support
Hurtado, S., BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2015, November.
The issues of campus safety and sexual assault are important to colleges and universities. As we continue making progress in these areas, it is crucial that we better understand the views of faculty and how they can contribute to this process. In this session, participants will learn about faculty perceptions of campus safety and support for crisis response and incidents of sexual assault at 16 institutions. Participants will be invited to share reactions and personal experiences as well as help generate ideas for ways faculty can help to make the environments at their institutions more supportive in these areas.
Full version
Reforming STEM education: Examining change by discipline, 2004&ndash2012
Kinzie, J., Nelson Laird, T. F., Mack, K., & Shute, C.
AAC&U STEM Conference, Seattle, WA, 2015, November.
Participants will gain awareness of trends in effective educational practices in STEM fields; explore how different STEM fields have or have not been changing; and consider trends as a basis for assessing effectiveness of STEM education reform efforts and what may be needed for ongoing reform. Much of the effort in reforming undergraduate STEM education over the last several decades has focused on improving undergraduate teaching and learning and demonstrating the effectiveness of certain educational practices. This session will highlight results from a current study using time series data from the National Survey of Student Engagement between 2004 and 2012 for a diverse cohort of institutions to assess trends in the use of effective educational practices in particular STEM fields. Discussion will focus on interpreting findings by comparing engagement between STEM and non-STEM and across STEM fields, and investigating trends in relation to reform efforts, including Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL). Results will be presented to encourage audience interaction and interpretation of findings with special attention to differences by field and what this suggests for institution, department, and STEM field transformation in teaching and learning.
Full version
To read or not to read? Investigating students' reading motivation
Ribera, A. K., & Wang, R.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2015, November.
Motivation to read plays a significant role in college students' academic engagement and overall performance. Faculty may influence students' reading motivation through the types of reading they assign and strategies to approach the reading assignments. Disciplinary context also plays a unique role. Using data from 2013 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this study investigates differences in college students' reading motivation by assignment type. Variation by students majoring in hard and soft fields at four-year colleges and universities are also explored. Recommendations for ways faculty may enhance students' reading motivation are provided.
Full version
Are seniors ready for the "real world"? Transitions, plans, and differences by major field
Miller, A. L., & Dumford, A. D.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, October.
Miller, A.L., & Dumford, A.D. (2015, October 27). Are seniors ready for the ?real-world?? Transitions, plans, and differences by major field. Session presented at the 2015 Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana.
A recent focus in higher education has been the lack of preparedness that graduates face upon entering the workforce. Coupled with criticisms of low income levels in certain major fields, institutions are looking to reconcile skill development and career advising. Utilizing new 2015 module questions from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), this presentation provides findings concerning the career plans of graduating seniors and their readiness to use a variety of skills and abilities. Several trends are also revealed when looking at the results by major field, suggesting the need for some curricular revisions and enhanced career services.
Full version
Assessing the experiences and practices of faculty and graduate students who teach
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T., & Ribera, A.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, October.
Assessing the experiences and teaching practices of faculty and graduate students can be particularly challenging. This session examines the assessment of faculty and graduate students who teach undergraduates by sharing the experiences and challenges of institutions participating in large-scale surveys of faculty and graduate students‘ teaching practices. Participants will be encouraged to share their ideas, challenges, and solutions associated with assessing faculty and graduate students who teach. Ideas from the presenters as well as from session participants will be used to create brief action plans for improving the assessment and experiences of faculty and graduate students who teach.
Full version
Building academic strengths: Using BCSSE to identify and support students with low confidence
Cole, J., & Ribera, A.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2015, October.
A brief description of the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) will be followed by a discussion of connections between student success, self-efficacy, and academic confidence; strength-based advising; and ways to use BCSSE data to enhance first-year students' academic confidence.
Full version
Examining student leadership as a high-impact practice
Gonyea, R. M., & Zilvinskis, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, October.
Assessment professionals are often asked to measure the quality of co-curricular activities. For example, when a student holds a formal leadership role in a student organization, what does that look like? How does that experience relate to learning and development? High-impact practices (HIPs)?characterized by their intensity, collaboration, and effectiveness?have gained attention in the assessment world. This session explores the quality of student leadership experiences and what it might take to label them ?high-impact.? The presenters will identify populations that are more or less likely to participate in HIP-level leadership and will recommend how educators can enhance leadership experiences.
Full version
NSSE's new reports and tools for exploring your data
Gonyea, R. M.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, October.
After a general review of new measures on the updated NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement), this session guides users through NSSE‘s many useful reports and online tools that facilitate evidence-based assessment.
Full version
Examining patterns of effective teaching practices across disciplinary areas
BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2015, June.
Variation in the use of effective teaching practices across disciplinary areas can be an impediment to improving undergraduate education but can also provide an opportunity for dialog. Using data from the 2013 and 2014 administrations of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this session will explore the similarities and differences in patterns of engaging teaching practices across disciplinary fields for instructors in Canada and the United States. FSSE measures instructor perceptions and expectations of undergraduate student engagement in educationally purposeful activities and the extent to which instructors promote student learning and development in their courses at four-year colleges and universities. The focus of engaging teaching practices examined in this session will be the value instructors place on students participating in reflective and integrative learning activities, instructor emphasis on higher-order learning activities, and the opportunity students have to engage in discussions with diverse others. During this session, participants will 1) learn about a method for measuring instructor engagement in effective teaching practices, 2) examine and discuss patterns in engaging teaching practices across disciplinary fields for instructors at Canadian institutions, 3) consider how these patterns compare to those of instructors in the United States, and 4) discuss what these patterns say about the different teaching contexts and fields and what that means for efforts to improve undergraduate education. Understanding the similarities and differences in disciplinary cultures in different contexts may help make sense of the disciplinary dissonance and shed light on how to achieve teaching and learning improvement across contexts.
Full version
Exploring NSSE's civic engagement results to enhance educational experiences
Kinzie, J., Domagal-Goldman, J., Schmidl-Gagne, K., & Turrentine, C.
Civic Learning & Democratic Engagement Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2015, June.
In 2013, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) offered a new topical module on civic engagement. The module complements questions on the core survey about service-learning, community service and becoming an informed and active citizen. The presenters introduce NSSE‘s civic engagement module. Their discussion involves participants in considering aggregate findings and campus-level results, as presenters highlight how representatives from one institution have used their results.
Full version
The relationship of on-campus living with student engagement
Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P., & Fernandez, S.
ACUHO-I Conference, Orlando, FL, 2015, June.
On-campus living has traditionally been recognized as beneficial to the undergraduate student experience. However, as higher education and subsequently residence life evolve to meet the needs of a new generation of students, it is important to reassess the impact of on-campus living on student learning and development, seeking an understanding of successes and areas of underperformance. Using data from the 2013 and 2014 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), including over 300,000 first-year and senior students from 973 institutions, this session compares students who live on campus with their counterparts in other housing arrangements. We share initial findings related to NSSE‘s ten Engagement Indicators and other key engagement measures as we explore new research questions and focus areas for a report co-published with ACUHO-I in support of their research agenda in the fall of 2015.
Full version
A look within: STEM faculty emphasizing deep approaches to learning
Dumford, A. D., Ribera, A. K., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Disciplinary culture plays a significant role in the extent faculty emphasize and students‘ engage in deep approaches to learning. This study narrowly focuses on STEM faculty and the variation in their emphasis on two components of deep learning--reflective and integrative learning and higher-order learning. Specifically, patterns in faculty promoting deep approaches to learning in mathematics, biology, mechanical engineering, computer science, physics, and psychology are examined. The effect of gender in these fields is also considered.
Full version
Does allowing survey takers to switch devices improve responses?
Dumford, A., & Miller, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
With the growing reliance on tablets and smartphones for internet access, understanding the effects of completion device on online survey responses becomes increasing important. This discussion group will explore experiences for those using online surveys and how they can be optimized. The discussion leaders work on a large national survey project and recently did a study investigating how respondents switch device types when allowed to do so and how this switching affects survey responses. For example, those who start the survey on a smartphone, and to a lesser effect tablet users, seem to switch devices at higher rates. Differences concerning how the device switching affects survey completion, time spent responding, and quality and completeness of responses will also be discussed.
Full version
Gender identity: What we can learn from inclusivity
BrckaLorenz, A., & Hurtado, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
The number of students with gender variant identities is growing on college campuses, but, currently, it is difficult to collect reliable statistics on this population. This presentation examines how a large-scale survey for students at colleges and universities was updated with a more inclusive item about gender identity and explores the various gender identities described by students. Study results will also investigate similarities and differences between students with gender variant identities on measures of student engagement, campus support, and satisfaction. Participants will discuss challenges in assessing students with complex or nontraditional identities and strategies for providing an equitable, high-quality education for all.
Full version
Getting to use: What stimulates and impedes use of student engagement results?
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A., Olsen, D., Blaich, C., & Wise, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
The ultimate goal of assessment projects, including the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), is not to gather data. It‘s to catalyze improvement in undergraduate
education. Yet, moving from data to campus action is challenging. This session addresses the challenges of data use, blending expert panelist insights with focused audience
discussion about what stimulates and impedes action. With the updated NSSE in mind, panelists and the audience
consider broad topics about using evidence, including sharing results, anticipating evidence use, striving for perfect data, involving students, and planning for action, and also
discuss what promotes effective data use.
Full version
How often is often? Testing the meaning of vague quantifiers
Dumford, A. D., Chiang, Y.-C., Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Survey researchers often wonder about the meaning of vague quantifiers such as ?sometimes? or ?often? as employed by surveys. This study focuses on assessing the equivalence reliability of the updated Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), with particular emphasis on whether two parallel forms of items produce similar results (e.g., have equal means, variances, and errors). These analyses examined a set of FSSE questions asked in two different ways?first, with vague quantifiers and, second, with a quantifiable time allocation. This poster will provide details about the methods and results of these analyses using data from the 2014 administration of FSSE.
Full version
Latino STEM student participation in undergraduate research
Zilvinskis, J., Wang, R., & Dumford, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Undergraduate research with a faculty member is considered a high-impact practice that enhances student engagement and academic achievement. Using a large-scale multi-institution dataset from the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study explored senior Latino STEM students‘ undergraduate research experiences. Results suggest that Latino students are underrepresented among the STEM student population and are less likely to participate in undergraduate research compared to White and Asian STEM students. Additionally, the findings of this study indicate that some Latino students in STEM fields (e.g., first-generation, transfer, living off campus) have lower odds of participating in undergraduate research. In order to increase the participation of undergraduate research among Latinos in STEM fields, institutional researchers should recommend early intervention to provide additional academic resources and increase intentional financial aid for these students.
Full version
Making the most of NSSE: A detailed overview of survey updates, customization options, reports, and assessment applications
Ribera, A., Rocconi, L., & Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
This workshop will help extend institutional research professionals‘ use of the updated survey and include a review of survey content, new customization options, reporting, and assessment opportunities. The goal of this workshop is to help IR professionals make a seamless transition to using and maximizing the benefits of the updated NSSE, and to exchange ideas about approaches to using student engagement results.
Full version
Predictability of students' plans to participate in undergraduate research
Zilvinskis, J., & Ribera, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
The focus of this study is to measure the predictability of first-year students‘ plans to participate in undergraduate research compared to the completion of this activity by senior year. The sample for this study includes the paired survey responses of 43,554 students who participated in the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). These students completed the survey as first-year students between 2004 and 2008, then again as a seniors three or four years after their initial participation in the survey. By using logistic regression, researchers determined that students who planned to participate in undergraduate research as first-years were twice as likely to complete undergraduate research experiences by the time they were seniors. Plans to participate were the strongest predictor, but transfer status, grades, and academic major also influenced student participation in undergraduate research.
Full version
Socializing mammies? Examining graduate student engagement of Black women graduate instructors
Wheatle, K., & BrckaLorenz, A.
National Conference on Race & Ethnicity in American Higher Education, Washington, DC, 2015, May.
Existent research on Black women faculty suggest that student and colleague expectations of the roles these faculty should assume, including the stereotypical ?mammy,? create environments in which Black women are forced to overload advising, service, and mentoring, working themselves to exhaustion in lieu of producing research and publications (Griffin & Reddick, 2011). Yet, little is known about how Black women allocate their time to teaching, advising, and other professional development activities while they are graduate students. In this session, the presenters will describe findings from a large-scale sample of engagement survey data collected from graduate student instructors (GSIs) to explore self-perceptions of teaching experiences of Black/African American women GSIs. This session should benefit current and prospective graduate students, faculty, and practitioners who provide teaching and professional development resources for graduate student instructors.
Full version
Something to talk about: Getting your campus excited to discuss data
BrckaLorenz, A., & Yuhas, B.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
As calls for increased quality in higher education continue, institutional researchers can lead the way for campuses to make data-driven decisions that improve undergraduate education. Easily accessible data exercises that get to the heart of issues campus administrators and faculty care about are an effective way to begin this process. Learn how to get campus constituents excited about working with data and using data to improve practice.
Full version
The mediator of student-faculty interaction and learning outcomes
Mu, L., Ribera, A., & Wang, X.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
Do seniors‘ learning effort to engage in Higher-Order Learning, Reflective and Integrative Learning, Learning
Strategies, and Quantitative Reasoning mediate the effect of Student-Faculty Interaction (SFI) on Learning Outcomes as measured by self-reported college grades and gains in knowledge, skills, and personal development?
Full version
The updated NSSE: Exchanging ideas and examples of data use
Gonyea, R. M., & Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO, 2015, May.
NSSE‘s updated survey, modules, new customization options, and redesigned reports offer participating institutions more refined ways to assess educational quality. This session provides an opportunity to highlight features and the use of
student engagement results and for participants and NSSE staff to exchange ideas about the project and reports. Current and new users are encouraged to attend and share ideas!
Full version
Institutional environment, student motivation, and study abroad participation
Mu, L., & Borden, V.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2015, April.
Using national longitudinal data gathered through the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study explored the impact of student‘s intention and institutional environment on study abroad participation. Under Input-Environment-Output model and push-pull factors framework, the study systematically examined how student background characteristics, study abroad intention and institutional environment interactively affected study abroad behavior. The results showed that students who had study abroad plan in the first year were more likely to go abroad than those who didn‘t state a plan. Sophisticated institutional environment measures had varied effects. Among them, enriching educational experience displayed as a strong push factor, while active and collaborative learning acted as a pull factor. Practical suggestions were made to higher education institutions to promote study abroad participation.
Full version
You hold the questions; who holds the data? Professional advisors collaborating with data handlers to assess student engagement and advising
Ribera, A., & Broderick, C.
NACADA Great Lakes Region 5 Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, April.
Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), session participants will learn of strategies to collaborate with data handlers on their campus to assess student engagement and academic advising. After a brief overview of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE), as well as the popular NSSE academic advising module, participants will work in small groups to identify how data from these surveys can be used to better understand the impact of advising on student success. This session will also include strategies to collaborate with data handlers on their campus to assess student engagement and academic advising. Presenters will lead a discussion about ways to forge campus partnerships and encourage impactful dialogue on the improvement of academic advising and student engagement.
Full version
Contextualizing student engagement effect sizes: An empirical analysis
Rocconi, L. M., & Gonyea, R. M.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2015, March.
The concept of effect size?a measure of the strength of association between two variables?plays a crucial role in institutional research where it is common, with large sample sizes, to find small differences that are significantly different. In this study, we used the distributions of effect sizes from the National Survey of Student Engagement results of 984 institutions that participated in 2013 and 2014 to empirically derive new recommendations for the interpretation of effect sizes. New definitions of "small," "medium," and "large" are grounded within the context of the original survey questions. In this session, we present the rationale, data sources, methods, and creative approach to the analysis, and invite participants to probe the advantages and disadvantages of these.
Exploring student engagement and gender identity
BrckaLorenz, A., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U Diversity, Learning, & Student Success Conference, San DIego, CA, 2015, March.
Through an interactive presentation of findings from a new item about gender identity on the National Survey of Student Engagement, participants in this session will learn about the different gender identities of college students and how students with diverse gender identities engage in effective educational practices. Participants will discuss study findings and share issues their campuses face in identifying and engaging students with nontraditional gender identities. Further, session facilitators and participants will work together to create plans for making change in areas they can influence (courses, departments, programs, etc.).
Full version
Promoting high-impact practices: Institutional approaches to increase engagement and equity
Kinzie, J.
AAC&U Diversity, Learning, & Student Success Conference, San Diego, CA, 2015, March.
Participants will gain familiarity with High-Impact Practices (HIPs) and the features that make them effective; learn about recent research, equity gaps by student characteristics, and new National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) HIP reports; consider institutional approaches to assessing and ensuring equity; and apply lessons learned. HIPs, such as undergraduate research and service-learning, demonstrably enhance student engagement and success. Although research shows participation in HIPs benefits all students, especially those from historically underrepresented groups, not all students participate. This session will feature recent NSSE results on HIPs, highlight institutional approaches to assessing these structures, and illustrate how NSSE‘s new HIP reports and annual results can be used to optimize HIPs. Participants will discuss approaches to ensuring equity in participation, including setting expectations for new students, and models for student and academic affairs collaboration.
Full version
Student engagement and the updated NSSE: Exploring leadership, learning support, and persistence
Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Tampa, FL, 2015, March.
Full version
Teaching development issues for diverse associate instructors
Kearns, K., BrckaLorenz, A., La Touche, R., & Lynton, J.
IU-Bloomington Center for Innovative Teaching & Learning Series on High-Impact Practices, Bloomington, IN, 2015, March.
Graduate students from diverse backgrounds prepare for and experience their instructional activities differently from their majority colleagues. These experiences can diminish graduate students‘ confidence and impede their teaching efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity. Learn about the teaching experiences of diverse IUB graduate students from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors (FSSE-G). In addition, hear first-hand teaching experiences from Rachel La Touche (Sociology) and Jordan Lynton (Anthropology), participants of the CITL‘s Intersections of Identity and Instruction Graduate Student Learning Community. Graduate student participants will develop a context for their experiences and acquire strategies for seeking mentoring that is attentive to their teaching concerns.
Using the updated NSSE to support evidence-informed improvement and accreditation
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2015, March.
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and its affiliated surveys, FSSE and BCSSE, provide a fresh look at engagement, including insights about learning with technology, quantitative reasoning, and learning strategies. This presentation highlights findings, including those from the survey's new Topical Modules, and illustrates effective uses of NSSE results in accreditation as well as approaches to supporting evidence-informed improvement.
Full version
Interventions for first-time students informed with mixed methods analysis
McCormick, E., Beck, C. N., & Cole, J. S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Dallas, TX, 2015, February.
Using cognitive, non-cognitive and environmental factors, Montana State University developed a program to improve the persistence of at-risk first-time students. Cognitive factors include ACT and SAT scores and high school GPA. The Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement was used to assess non-cognitive factors. Environmental factors include engagement facilitated by the ChampChange program. Results indicate that students who engaged 20 or more times through the ChampChange program were retained 84% compared to 51% of students who engaged only 1-4 times. The aim of this presentation is to present the results of the study and discuss how implications for other campuses.
Full version
Assessing global learning to improve student learning and educational practice
Braskamp, L., Kinzie, J., & Reason, R.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2015, January.
What college experiences are most influential in fostering elements of global learning? How can educators create a campus ethos and learning opportunities that encourage student global and holistic learning? Authors of three national assessment tools?Global Perspective Inventory (GPI), National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE),and Personal and Social Responsibility Inventory (PSRI)?will present assessment strategies that connect student experiences, engagement,and campus climate with specific student learning outcomes, especially those related to global learning and global citizenship. They will highlight evidence from the use of these tools that focus on environmental
conditions such as student experiences and perceptions of the campus community that enhance global learning. They will engage the audience
in considering the kind of evidence that would help them adapt curricula and co-curricular activities so that more students develop a deeper
understanding of global cultures, developments, and interconnections, across a variety of majors and career goals.
Full version
The updated NSSE: Fresh opportunities to engage faculty in assessment results
Dueweke, A., Hutchings, P., Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2015, January.
The updated National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) provides greater specificity on measures that matter for improving student learning. Yet, too often results reside at the institution-level, demonstrating grand measures of educational quality, and only occasionally getting to faculty to influence teaching and learning practice. The promise of assessment depends on growing and deepening faculty involvement and use of results. This session explores the question: ?What do NSSE results mean for faculty?? Panelists and participants will address the topic and discuss ways to leverage student engagement results to inform instruction and efforts to enhance high-impact practices, guide faculty development initiatives, and connect to the scholarship of teaching and learning and projects to improve educational quality.
Full version
Are our writing assignments effective?
Cogswell, C.A., Howe, E.C., & Gonyea, R.M.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Dallas, TX, 2014, November.
As evidenced by their steadily growing investment in writing-across-the-curriculum programs, institutions recognize how writing can increase student engagement and learning. This session explores how faculty members use writing assignments in their teaching and how this compares across academic disciplines and by faculty characteristics. Special sets of questions appended to the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) point to ways faculty members can design effective writing tasks. Participants will discuss how interactive writing processes, meaning-constructing writing tasks, and clear expectations increase students‘ likelihood to engage in deep approach to learn. Implications for faculty and academic leaders will be presented.
Full version
Faculty and graduate student instructors’ perspectives on professional development
BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T., & Harris, J.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Dallas, TX, 2014, November.
This session aims to document current uses and needs regarding professional development for senior faculty, new faculty, and graduate student instructors (GSIs). Findings from faculty members at approximately twenty institutions that participated in the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and from GSIs at eight institutions that participated in the pilot of FSSE for Graduate Student Instructors (FSSE-G) are utilized to identify impactful methods of professional development as well as potential areas for improvement. The goal of the session is to help participants understand ways they can enhance faculty and GSI experiences within the classroom.
Full version
Putting the you in UR: The influences of faculty participating in undergraduate research
Haeger, H., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Dallas, TX, 2014, November.
This session uses mixed-methods research to facilitate a discussion of faculty participation in undergraduate research and how to leverage student participation as a resource for faculty and an enriching experience for students. Quantitative analysis will explore faculty values and teaching practices in relation to engaging students in research experiences. The influences of institutional characteristics on faculty involvement in undergraduate research, including proportion of adjunct faculty and the diversity of the student and faculty populations will also be assessed. A qualitative analysis will highlight strategies faculty have used to engage traditionally underrepresented students in research at a Hispanic Serving Institutions.
Full version
The who, what, and where of learning strategies
Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Ahonen, C.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2014, November.
This study uses data from the National Survey of Student Engagement and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement to explore whether there is congruence for academic disciplines in the student use and faculty encouragement of learning strategies. OLS regression models also suggest demographic and environmental predictors of student learning strategies.
Full version
What matters most to course success? Student and faculty perspectives
BrckaLorenz, A., Fernandez, S., Peck, L., Wang, L., & Zilvinskis, J.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Dallas, TX, 2014, November.
In this session, we will examine the results from a large-scale multi-institution survey of students and faculty responding to the question ?What matters most to making a course successful?? Participants will discuss findings on the similarities and differences between student and faculty perceptions of what makes a course successful and will share ideas about how to communicate about and contribute to a successful course from the perspectives of both students and faculty. By examining what course success means from both perspectives, we may be able to effectively and efficiently do more with less.
Full version
Assessing faculty members' and graduate student instructors' engagement in and views about professional development
Harris, J., Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2014, October.
This session aims to document current uses and needs regarding professional development for senior faculty, new faculty, and graduate student instructors (GSIs). Findings from faculty members at approximately twenty institutions that participated in the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) and from GSIs at eight institutions that participated in the pilot of FSSE for Graduate Student Instructors (FSSE-G) are utilized to identify impactful methods of professional development as well as potential areas for improvement. The goal of the session is to help participants understand ways they may assess faculty and GSI experiences with professional development in order to foster improvement.
Full version
Exploring high-impact practices using NSSE data, reports, and modules
Kinzie, J., & Ribera, A.K.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2014, October.
Full version
Graduate student instructor engagement in and perspectives on professional development
BrckaLorenz, A.
Lilly Conference on College & University Teaching & Learning, Traverse City, MI, 2014, October.
This session aims to document current uses and needs regarding professional development for graduate student instructors (i.e. graduate students who teach undergraduates). Findings from graduate student instructors (GSIs) at eight institutions that participated in the pilot of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors (FSSE-G) are utilized to identify impactful methods of professional development as well as potential areas for improvement. The goal of the session is to help participants understand ways they can enhance GSI professional development as instructors.
Full version
The student veteran experience: Implications for advising from data
Cogswell, C.A., Nailos, J.N., Cole, J.S., & Wheatle, K.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2014, October.
This presentation presents aggregate data looking at the engagement of veteran students at colleges and universities. Using findings from the National Survey of Student Engagement, the researchers will (a) facilitate discussion among participants regarding best practices at their campuses (b) familiarize participants with NSSE data and its uses (c) encourage participants to utilize data at their institutions to enhance their advising practices related to veteran students. The researchers will present methods of analysis utilized for this research and how they can be adapted for use at the institutional level. These objectives will be met through an overview of issues and trends related to veteran students, small group discussion activities, presentation of NSSE data and findings, and highlighting connections between data with institutional resources.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate college readiness
Cole, J.S., & Cogswell, C.A.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 2014, October.
Traditional indicators of college readiness mainly focus on subject-specific high school academic preparation. However, they do not reflect the students‘ readiness to be meaningfully engaged during their first-year of college. With data from the Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), we investigated the connection between high school and first-year academic engagement and the role of advisors to facilitate student engagement.
Full version
Categorizing identities: Race, gender, disability, and sexual orientation
BrckaLorenz, A., Haeger, H., & Zilvinskis, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
In survey research, the treatment of demographic information often ignores the complexity of identity. Instead of treating aspects of identity as clear-cut, simple questions, self-categorization theory illustrates the fluid and contextual nature of self-identification (Abdelal, 2009; Onorato & Turner, 2004; Turner, Oakes, & Haslam, 1994). Accounting for the fluidity and multiplicity of individual identity in survey research can be difficult. For example, the U.S. Census in 2000 was the first time that respondents could select more than one racial category. Certainly, this change in the survey could lead to more accurate representation of individual identity, but there may be disadvantages to augmenting demographic questions, such as difficulty comparing to data from previous years or unintended consequences like multiracial individuals being ?lumped‘ together despite having very different experiences. For institutional researchers, collecting demographic data can create competing priorities between uniform data reporting for national agencies, specialized information gathering for institutional partners, and inclusive question wording that represent the complexity of identity.
Full version
Faculty still matter to student engagement
Nelson Laird, T., Lambert, A., Cogswell, C.A., & Ribera, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
This study is a follow up to Umbach and Wawrzynski‘s (2005) much cited work connecting faculty teaching practices to student engagement. It relies on data from the same two national surveys used in the previous study. However, both the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement and National Survey of Student Engagement were significantly updated in 2013. As a result, our findings, which come from an updated and expanded set of measures for both students and faculty members, (1) confirm the prior study‘s findings by showing that students report higher levels of engagement and learning at institutions where faculty members use effective educational practices more and (2) show previously untested relationships between faculty practices and student engagement.
Full version
Moving from faculty surveys to faculty engagement
Benson, R. T., Cumming, T., BrckaLorenz, A., & Maas, P.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
This session is designed to help IR professionals think about engaging faculty in the process of survey administration and data usage. Providing both local and national perspectives on how survey data can be deployed to understand and support faculty, the session addresses some of the biggest roadblocks and most promising practices for understanding the experiences of faculty and engaging them in the process
of sense-making and institutional improvement.
Full version
The updated NSSE: Exchanging ideas & examples of data use (NSSE Sponsor Session)
Gonyea, R., & Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
NSSE recently launched an updated survey and
redesigned reports. This session provides an
opportunity to highlight innovative uses of student engagement results and for participants and NSSE staff to exchange ideas about the survey project and new reports. Current and new users are encouraged to attend and share ideas!
Full version
What have we learned? Using NSSE data 2001&ndash2013: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., Cogswell, C.A., & Wheatle, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Orlando, FL, 2014, May.
A central objective of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) is to encourage the use of student engagement results to assess and improve quality in undergraduate education. This session highlights lessons learned about data use from hundreds of institutional accounts of using NSSE data. A systematic examination of institutional data use examples provides a source of collective lessons about effective use of student engagement results and potential considerations for shifts in institutional research practice.
Full version
A fresh look at student engagement for accreditation and improvement
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2014, April.
The updated National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), and its affiliate surveys, FSSE and BCSSE, provide a fresh look on engagement, including insights about learning with technology, quantitative reasoning, and learning strategies. This session will highlight findings, and demonstrate effective uses of NSSE results in accreditation self-studies and quality improvement.
Full version
Out and about on campus: Engagement, climate, and perceptions of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and questioning collegians
BrckaLorenz, A., Haeger, H., Blockett, R., & Harris, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2014, April.
As the conversation on sexuality continues to evolve, scholarship around college students and sexual orientation must also advance in higher education research. This study expands on previous research by utilizing a large-scale sample of students that explores the satisfaction, engagement, quality of relationships, and perceptions of campus support that gay, lesbian, bisexual, and questioning (GLBQ) students experience in college. While preliminary results show similar levels of engagement between GLBQ and heterosexual students, several differences stand out. For example, GLBQ students did noticeably more reflective and integrative learning in their coursework, but they had lesser quality interactions with their peers and felt that their institution did not support them as strongly in their non-academic responsibilities.
Full version
Rating my professors: Influences on student ratings and faculty beliefs about those influences
BrckaLorenz, A., McCormick, A., & Peck, L.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2014, April.
Little research exists regarding the differences between student and faculty perceptions of what influences how students respond to end-of-course evaluations. This study provides evidence of both similarities and differences between what influences students‘ course evaluation ratings and faculty members‘ perceptions of what influences student ratings. The differences offer insight into how both faculty and students perceive the purpose, use, and results of these evaluations. Findings also indicate that different types of students have different perceptions in how evaluation results are used, and different types of faculty use these results more or less frequently. Finally, connections are made between perceptions of campus support and perceptions of whether or not results are used to improved courses and teaching.
Full version
Faculty and diversity: Opportunity, encouragement, and inclusion
Nelson Laird, T. F., BrckaLorenz, A., & Peck, L.
AAC&U Diversity, Learning, & Student Success Conference, Chicago, IL, 2014, March.
Participants will hear findings from research on faculty and diversity education and discuss how these findings could be used to improve how diversity contributes to student learning.
Through a presentation of findings from a new ?diverse perspectives? section on the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), participants in this session will learn about how faculty perceive diversity offerings on campus, how much they encourage students to participate in diversity activities, and how much they include diversity content in their courses. Further, participants will gain an understanding of how these diversity indicators relate to one
another and what predicts them. Session facilitators and participants will work together to create plans for making change in areas they know that they can influence (e.g., their courses, departments, or programs).
Full version
The NSSE update: Analysis and design of ten new Engagement Indicators
BrckaLorenz, A., & Gonyea, R.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014, March.
Full version
Assessment Administrators Anonymous: 12 steps for involving faculty in assessment
Kinzie, J., & Lindsay, N.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, Portland, OR, 2014, February.
Participants will learn strategies for enhancing faculty engagement in assessment on their campuses, including approaches to overcoming barriers to faculty involvement and meaningful incentives for faculty engagement. Realizing the promise of assessment depends on growing and deepening faculty involvement. The need is particularly acute in the assessment of general education?the area of undergraduate education that can lack faculty ownership. This session will explore the dynamics of faculty involvement in assessment and identify twelve steps for increasing faculty engagement. Using effective approaches revealed in National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA) case studies and practiced at institutions that have increased faculty involvement, presenters will spark audience discussion and encourage participants to consider approaches to apply on their own campuses.
Full version
Assessing experiences and engagement that foster global learning and development
Kulich, J., Kinzie, J., & Engberg, M.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2014, January.
This session will illustrate an approach for assessing the impact of students‘ engagement with meaningful educational experiences on their global learning and development. We will discuss the results of a particular four-year study at Elmhurst College together with broader research conducted by the Global Perspectives Institute and the NSSE Institute.
Full version
Civic learning and effective educational practice: A focus on service-learning and civic engagement
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A., & Stevens, M.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2014, January.
Fostering civic learning is a central purpose of higher education. As campuses seek to strengthen democratic engagement, it is useful to understand the extent to which students have access to the experiences that develop civic engagement skills. This session will promote discussion about educational practices that build students‘ capacity for civic learning by exploring National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) findings
from an in-depth service-learning item set and the new civic engagement module. Join us to exchange ideas about results in relation to efforts to enhance service learning, strengthening connections between course content and service experiences, and outcomes associated with civic engagement skills.
Full version
Undergraduate quality & the changing faculty: Examining pieces of the puzzle
Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2014, January.
Institutions deal with pressures to improve undergraduate quality and manage their changing faculties, tasks that sometimes seem at odds. Facilitators of this session?with more than a decade of data from initiatives such as the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE)?will share three faculty profiles: 1) the faculty in 2025; 2) the faculty at the 50 highest scoring NSSE institutions; and 3) the faculty who tend to use effective practices more. Through comparing these profiles, session participants will engage questions and derive lessons about improving undergraduate quality while effectively managing a changing faculty.
Full version
The updated NSSE: New opportunities to assess educational quality
Kinzie, J., & Smallwood, B.
Southern Association of Colleges & Schools Commission on Colleges Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2013, December.
Full version
Advising from the faculty perspective
Ribera, A., & Peck, L.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburg, PA, 2013, November.
Academic advising is essential for students to navigate the college experience. It is
positively linked to many desirable outcomes and behaviors including student retention and engagement. Faculty are often expected to fulfill this role, in addition to teaching and research duties, with little to no training or resources. Session facilitators will lead a discussion about the role of faculty as academic advisors and the
typical roadblocks they face. Participants will also discuss recent findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement that report on faculty perceptions of advising and resources most commonly used to support their work.
Full version
Faculty use of writing assignments: Exploring classroom teaching practices
Cole, E. R., Gonyea, R. M., & Ahonen, C.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburg, PA, 2013, November.
As evidenced by their steadily growing investment in writing-across-the-curriculum programs, institutions recognize how writing can increase student engagement and learning. This session explores how faculty members use writing assignments in their teaching and how this compares across academic disciplines and institutional characteristics. Special sets of questions appended to both the Faculty Survey
of Student Engagement (FSSE) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) point to ways faculty members can design effective writing tasks. Participants will discuss how interactive writing processes, meaning-constructing writing tasks, and clear expectations improve students‘ success in learning. Implications for faculty developers are also presented.
Full version
Influences on course evaluation: Student and faculty perspectives
BrckaLorenz, A., Peck, L., & McCormick, A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2013, November.
End-of-course evaluations are often used as stand-alone indicators of an instructor‘s overall effectiveness and as input for faculty promotion and tenure purposes. In this session, we will examine the results from a large-scale multi-institution survey of students and faculty responding to questions about the uses of and influences on students‘ ratings on course evaluations. Participants will discuss findings on the perceptions and uses of course evaluations from both the student and faculty perspective, will share examples of the course-evaluation issues and solutions on their campuses, and will generate ideas for future research on course evaluations.
Full version
Racial and gender inequities in undergraduate teaching: Findings and concerns
Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2013, November.
As campuses try to reinvigorate undergraduate education, they encourage faculty to rely on educational experiences and promote outcomes much applauded in higher education (e.g., high-impact practices). In this session, participants will learn about racial and gender differences in how much faculty use and emphasize some of these practices and outcomes. Facilitators and participants will discuss implications of the findings, including concerns about equity and the need for institutional planning and faculty development as avenues to mitigate inequity.
Full version
Responsive and responsible: Levels of faculty encouragement of civic engagement
Cole, E. R., & Howe, E. C.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburg, PA, 2013, November.
This session explores faculty members‘ perceptions of institutional emphasis on conflict resolution skills and examines how often they encourage students to engage with local, state, national, and global issues. Using data from the 2013 administration of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), this session engages
attendees in discussion about which faculty, course, and institutional characteristics are likely to encourage student participation in civic engagement activities. Presenters will also facilitate a discussion among participants about learning from these faculty results, ideas for future research in this area, and implications for faculty developers and teaching practices.
A broad prospective on students' experiences with academic advising: Sharing results from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Ribera, A.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2013, October.
Study Overview: This poster provides an overview of recent results from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). In the spring of 2013, 224 four-year colleges and universities opted to add a set of items about academic advising to the NSSE survey. Over 57,000 first-year students and 83,000 seniors provided responses. Purpose: Results are intended to offer a broad perspective on students‘ academic advising experiences. Findings may prompt general discussions among the academic advising community about potential areas for future research and improvements. Encouraging contributions are also highlighted.
Advancing assessment in student affairs: Emphasizing learning, creating partnerships, and using evidence to improve
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2013, October.
Full version
Assessing involvement in faculty development
Nelson Laird, T., BrckaLorenz, A., & Peck, L.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2013, October.
Full version
NSSE Engagement Indicators: A conversation about transition and use
Rocconi, L. R., & Kinzie, J.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Memphis, TN, 2013, October.
Full version
Psychometric properties and factorial invariance for the updated BCSSE survey
Cole, J., & Dong, Y.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Memphis, TN, 2013, October.
Full version
Stimulating dialogue and improvement in high-impact practices using new NSSE reports
Kinzie, J., & Ribera, A. K.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2013, October.
Full version
Assessing student engagement with an updated NSSE: New possibilities
Kinzie, J.
NASPA Assessment & Persistence Conference, Denver, CO, 2013, June.
Full version
Service-learning and beyond: Civic learning impact, implications, and more
Kinzie, J., & Stevens, M.
NASPA Civic Learning & Democratic Engagement Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, 2013, June.
Full version
Degree aspirations and deep approaches to learning
Ribera, A. K., Rocconi, L. M., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
Engagement in deep approaches to learning has been
linked to several beneficial outcomes, such as higher GPAs, retention of course material, and critical thinking skills. Previous studies indicated that higher degree aspirations
have positive effects on student outcomes.
This study investigated the relationship between students‘ levels of degree aspirations and their engagement in deep approaches to learning. Findings demonstrated that students with higher degree aspirations engaged more frequently in deep
approaches to learning. However, this relationship was not consistent across discipline areas; for instance, compared with other academic disciplines, the effect of degree aspirations on deep learning was strongest for arts and humanities majors.
Full version
Estimation of expected academic engagement behaviors: The use of vague quantifiers vs. tallied responses
Cole, J. S.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2013, May.
Full version
Faculty understanding and perceptions of the tenure process
BrckaLorenz, A., Peck, L., Ribera, A., & Ribera T.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
The tenure process varies greatly by disciplinary area and institutional type. Gender, race or ethnicity, and age have also shaped the way faculty experience and perceive the process.
In order to support faculty members with diverse
backgrounds and interests, campus leaders should make it a priority to routinely evaluate the equity of tenure processes at their institutions.
This poster informs participants of a multi-institutional study that assessed the peer support
faculty received while going through the process as well as to what extent their processes were reasonable, fair, work-life balanced, and satisfying. Differences by faculty and
institutional characteristics are shared.
Full version
New first-year students and their high school academic performance, video game, and social media use
Cole, J. S.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, May.
NSSE Engagement Indicators: A conversation about transition and use
BrckaLorenz, A., & Gonyea, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
With the update to the National Survey of Student
Engagement instrument in 2013, new measures of
engagement were rigorously tested to replace the historic Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice. Participants discuss and compare the overall content of these new Engagement Indicators to see how the updated content has
been added, retained, or rearranged from the benchmarks. Participants discuss the challenge of longitudinal comparability of individual questions and indicators, and learn new ways to evaluate longitudinal questions. Discussion
focuses on three questions: What are the compositions and properties of NSSE‘s new Engagement Indicators? How do the Engagement Indicators relate to the NSSE Benchmarks?
How can institutions transition between using these two measures of engagement?
Social media: A tool to increase college students' engagement and success
Haeger, H., Rios-Aguilar, C., Deil-Amen, R., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
Social media is an attractive option for colleges because it an cost-effectively catalyze connections between students and counselors, advisors, and faculty.It is critical to begin
to examine if and how higher education institutions are incorporating the use of social media to connect with students and facilitate their success. The presentation addresses national trends in social media use at 2-year and
4-year colleges along with how institutional researchers can explore the use of social media on their own campuses. This information can inform policy decisions on the use of social
media by institutional agents. This presentation is particularly important for institutional researchers, college leaders, and administrators seeking to assess the value and impact of social media to promote student success.
Student expectations for academic performance
Cole, J. S., & Anderson, D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
First-year student expectations play an important role in academic success and second-year persistence. This study examined the role of unmet academic expectations and persistence.
Persisters did not differ from non-persisters in
self-reported academic confidence. However, the groups were quite different in academic performance, with non-persisters earning a mean GPA of 2.59, compared to 3.32 for persisters.
This study found that 62% of those who persisted performed at or above their academic expectations, while only 41% of non-persisters met or exceeded their GPA expectations. More
than one-third of non-persisters fell short of their expectations by a full letter grade or more.
Full version
Survey data quality: Do verbal ability and text readability matter?
Cole, J. S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
This study examined data quality by levels of respondents‘ verbal abilities and grade level reading estimates of survey text. Results indicate that students with very low verbal ability (relative to their college peers) were significantly more likely to take longer to complete each screen, skip items, break off from the survey, ?skip through? screens, and straight-
line items. Four estimates of grade level readability were very accurate in predicting the occurrence of straight-lining. This presentation includes a detailed discussion of results,
implications for developing surveys, and the use of common computer programs to calculate readability of text.
Full version
Survey data quality: Does verbal ability and text readability matter?
Cole, J. S.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2013, May.
This study examined data quality by levels of respondent verbal ability and grade level reading estimates of survey text. Results indicate that students with low verbal ability (relative to their college peers) were significantly more likely to take longer to complete each screen, skip items, break-off from the survey, ?skip through? screens, and straight-line items. The estimates of grade level read-ability were accurate in predicting the occurrence of straight-lining, but not other suspicious data.
Full version
The NSSE report builder: An online tool for assessing student engagement
Fosnacht, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Builder is an online interactive tool that allows users to create custom reports derived from NSSE data by selecting from a variety of student and institutional characteristics.
The session demonstrates how the report builder can aid in the assessment of student engagement through its ability to compare both students and institutions. Participants learn how to analyze their institutions‘ NSSE data with the report
builder and to create their own personalized reports.
Why has student engagement increased? A decomposition analysis
Fosnacht, K.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2013, May.
In response to stakeholders‘ demands to improve the quality of undergraduate education, institutions have implemented a wide variety of reforms. It is unclear if these reforms have
resulted in systemic improvement in educational outcomes for undergraduates. Using data from the National Survey of Student Engagement, this study investigates how student engagement changed between the 2004 and 2010 academic years and the reasons for the changes over time. The results suggest that students have become more engaged
and indicate that the quality of undergraduate education is improving nationally. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Full version
Assessing experiences and engagement that foster global learning and development
Braskamp, L., Kinzie, J., & Kulich, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2013, April.
Information engagement: Preliminary results from the NSSE information literacy module
Fosnacht, K., & Donovan, C.
Association of College & Research Libraries Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2013, April.
Full version
Participation in study abroad and research with faculty: Do expectations matter?
Cole, J. S., & McCormick, A. C.
AAC&U Student Success Conference, Miami, FL, 2013, April.
Full version
Understanding the intent to graduate of freshman Asian international undergraduates in U.S. Institutions: Implications for studies of international student retention
Qi, W., Dong, Y., & Cole, J. S.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2013, April.
Updated NSSE: New opportunities to assess and improve quality
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2013, April.
Full version
Accountability and learning: Integrating NSSE and outcomes assessment to inform student affairs practice
Kinzie, J., Cammarata, M., & Romano, C.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Las Vegas, NV, 2013, March.
Full version
Measuring service-learning while promoting student engagement
Wang, R., Dong, Y., Shi, D., Wilmot, H., & Haeger, H.
NASPA Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, 2013, March.
Supporting diverse groups of first-generation students
Ribera, A. K., Haeger, H., & Hitchcock, T.
NASPA Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, 2013, March.
Foster, sustain and improve quality in the first college year: Creating magical processes and making dreams?reality
Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2013, February.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate college readiness
Cole, J. S., & Howe, E
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2013, February.
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate college readiness
Cole, J. S., & Howe, E
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2013, February.
Using BCSSE data for faculty development
Cole, J. S., & Howe, E.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2013, February.
Full version
Considering disruptive innovations that improve student engagement
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., & Salisbury, M.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2013, January.
Full version
Faculty involvement in reinvigorating undergraduate education: An area of inequity?
Nelson Laird, T., & BrckaLorenz, A.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2013, January.
Full version
Fugitive knowledge: Documenting data use for the collective good
McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., Blaich, C., & Wise, K.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2013, January.
Full version
The updated NSSE: New opportunities to assess liberal learning
Gonyea, R. M., Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A. C.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2013, January.
Full version
Examining teaching clarity: Student engagement and faculty practice
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., & Ribera, T.
Symposium on Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, Banff, Canada, 2012, November.
Full version
Faculty technology use patterns: Comparing HBCUs and PWIs
Shaw, M. D., Cole, E. R., Harris, C. J., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2012, November.
Full version
Examining the importance of teaching clarity: Findings from FSSE
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., Nelson Laird, T., & Ribera, T.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Seattle, WA, 2012, October.
Full version
Faculty teaching use patterns: Comparing HBCUs and PWIs
Cole, E. R., & Harris, C. J.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Seattle, WA, 2012, October.
Identifying disciplinary peers: Pairing faculty across fields of study
Shaw, M. D., Lambert, A. D., Cole, E. R., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Seattle, WA, 2012, October.
Full version
Values of the tenure process: Findings from FSSE
BrckaLorenz, A., Ribera, T., & Shaw, M.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Seattle, WA, 2012, October.
Full version
High-impact practices and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A.
Faculty Colloquium on Excellence in Teaching Leadership Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2012, September.
Full version
Making change in the first college year: Lessons from institutions that improved student engagement
Kinzie, J.
International First-Year Experience Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, July.
Full version
Clarity in the undergraduate classroom: Understanding faculty perceptions of teaching clarity behaviors
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E. R., & Ribera, T.
Society of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2012, June.
Full version
Feasible, scalable, and measurable: Information literacy assessment and the National Survey of Student Engagement
Boruff-Jones, P., Donovan, C., & Fosnacht, K.
American Library Association Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2012, June.
Full version
Straight-lining and survey reluctance: Prevalence and implications
Cole, J. S., Bowers, A., McCormick, A. C., & Brummet-Carter, H.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, 2012, May.
Full version
The relationships between survey page length, progress indicators, and item completion rates
Tukibayeva, M., & Sarraf, S.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2012, April.
Full version
Using student engagement results to assess and improve educational quality
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2012, April.
Promoting high-impact practices: Approaches to increase engagement and expand access
Kinzie, J.
AAC&U Student Success Conference, Seattle, WA, 2012, March.
Utilizing SPSS macros to save time in institutional research
Lambert, A. D. & Rocconi, L. M.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2012, March.
Exploring the expectations and experience Gap in the first college year: How do first-generation students fare?
Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Antonio, TX, 2012, February.
Full version
First-year students reported use of video games and social media in high school: Should we be concerned?
Cole, J. S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Antonio, TX, 2012, February.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate first-year student financial stress and engagement
Hernandez, S., & Cole, J. S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Antonio, TX, 2012, February.
Full version
Reforming undergraduate education: Lessons from institutions that improved student engagement
McCormick, A. C., & Kinzie, J.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2012, January.
Full version
Updating NSSE: What's been done and where are we heading
Kinzie, J., & Sarraf, S.
North East Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2011, December.
Full version
Global awareness and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., & Gieser, J.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 2011, November.
Full version
Global awareness and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., & Gieser, J.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Charlotte, NC, 2011, November.
Full version
Using NSSE data to build support for academic programs
Kinzie, J., Hartley, H., & Sigman, S.
Council of Independent Colleges Annual Institute for Chief Academic Officers & Chief Advancement Officers, St. Petersburg Beach, FL, 2011, November.
Full version
Assessing engagement in the first year: Lessons from BCSSE and NSSE
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2011, October.
Full version
Faculty perceptions of institutional assessment and participation in classroom
Nelson Laird, T. F., Ribera, T., Shaw, M. D., Haywood, A., & Cole, E. R.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2011, October.
Full version
Faculty practices: Differences between HBCU and PWI campuses
Shaw, M. D., Harris, C. J., Cole, E. R. & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2011, October.
Full version
National Survey of Student Engagement technology initiatives community update
Arroway, P., BrckaLorenz, A., & Guidry, K. R.
EDUCAUSE Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, 2011, October.
Full version
Promotion personal and social responsibility in the classroom: Findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U Educating for Personal & Social Responsibility Conference, Long Beach, CA, 2011, October.
Using NSSE data in accreditation and quality improvement plans
Kinzie, J.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2011, October.
Full version
Contingent instructors’ engagement in the scholarship of teaching & learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., Ribera, T., & Garver, A. K.
Society for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2011, June.
Full version
What instructors report about their first-year students
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shaw, M. D., & Cole, E. R.
Society for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2011, June.
Full version
A review and application of scale development practices
BrckaLorenz, A., Ribera, T., & Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Digging deeper into institutional data: Using reports and tools from NSSE and FSSE to explore disciplinary differences
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shaw, M. D., & Cole, E. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Investigating social desirability bias in student self-report surveys
Miller, A. L.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Understanding the resources faculty use when trying out and refining new insights: Findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
Ribera, T. M., BrckaLorenz, A., Santucci, D. L., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate college readiness
Cole, J. S., & Qi, W.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, May.
Describing the process of developing interpersonal relationships in college
McGowan, B., & Torres, V.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Examining effective faculty practice: Teaching clarity and student engagement
BrckaLorenz, A., Cole, E., Kinzie, J., & Ribera, A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Exploring perceptions of diversity among students of color at a Predominantly White Institution
McGowan, B., & Torres, V.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Financial aid and temporal patterns in Latinos’ community college enrollment in a newcomer state
Gross J., Zerquera, D., & Torres, V.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Undergraduate research experience: Intention and doing for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors
Kormaz, A., Cole, J., & Buckley, J.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2011, April.
Full version
Using student engagement results to assess and improve educational quality
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2011, April.
Full version
Civic engagement on college campuses: Implications from NSSE and FSSE
Nelson Laird, T. F., Shaw, M. D., & Cole, E. R.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Baltimore, MD, 2011, March.
Full version
First-year persistence in STEM
Cole, J. S., & Korkmaz, A.
AAC&U Network for Academic Renewal Conference, Miami, FL, 2011, March.
Full version
High-impact practices: Promoting engagement and student and academic affairs
Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Baltimore, MD, 2011, March.
Full version
Assessing faculty perceptions of first-year student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Atlanta, GA, 2011, February.
Full version
Does living on-campus matter: Using NSSE data to understand the experiences of Black men
McGowan, B., & Cole, J. S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Atlanta, GA, 2011, February.
Full version
Promoting high-impact practices: Approaches to increase engagement and access in the first year
Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Atlanta, GA, 2011, February.
Full version
Using BCSSE-NSSE data to investigate first-year engagement and outcomes
Cole, J. S., & McGowan, B.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Atlanta, GA, 2011, February.
Full version
Linking institutional assessment and the scholarship of teaching and learning
Nelson Laird, T. F., McCormick, A. C., & Gale, R. A.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2011, January.
Full version
Making change: Insights about improving student engagement
Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A. C.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2011, January.
Full version
Effective teaching among nontenure track faculty: How discipline matters
Garver, A. K., Shaker, G., Palmer, M., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2010, November.
Full version
Encouraging diversity inclusivity in all courses: Developing new approaches
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2010, November.
Full version
Student and faculty perceptions of academic misconduct in higher education
Ribera, T. & BrckaLorenz, A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2010, November.
Full version
Capped off: Assessing college capstone courses
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2010, October.
Full version
Developing civic engagement skills on college campuses: A multi-campus assessment
BrckaLorenz, A., Cervera, Y., Garver, A., & Sarraf, S.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 2010, October.
Full version
Disciplinary variation in the effects of teaching general education courses: Implications for assessment and faculty development
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Garver, A. K.
Assessment Institute, 2010, October.
Full version
Diversity as a core strategy for institutional transformation
Barcel, R., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
AAC&U Facing the Divides: Diversity, Learning, & Pathways to Inclusive Excellence Conference, Houston, TX, 2010, October.
Full version
Insights for psychology faculty from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F.
American Psychological Association Annual Convention, San Diego, CA, 2010, August.
Building a psychometric portfolio: Evidence for reliability, validity, and other quality indicators in survey data collection
Gonyea, R., Korkmaz, A., BrckaLorenz, A., & Miller, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2010, June.
Full version
High impact practices that support first year student learning and engagement
Kinzie, J.
International Conference on the First-Year Experience, Maui, HI, 2010, June.
Full version
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate first-year engagement and college readiness to be engaged
Cole, J., & Qi, W.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2010, June.
Full version
How inclusive of diversity is your course or program?
Nelson Laird, T. F.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Boston, MA, 2010, March.
Full version
Maximizing high impact practices: What works
Kinzie, J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2010, March.
Full version
Assessing what really matters for student learning: Making productive use of your engagement data (Keynote Address)
Gonyea, R. M.
Celebration of Teaching & Learning?University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 2010, February.
Full version
Developing and assessing high impact educational programs to support first year student learning and success
Kinzie, J., Ross, F. E., & Evenbeck, S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Denver, CO, 2010, February.
Full version
Gauging writing and engagement levels to improve general education outcomes
Anderson, P., & Gonyea, R.M.
AAC&U Network for Academic Renewal Conference, Seattle, WA, 2010, February.
Full version
Incoming first-year students with learning disabilities: The academic challenge
Cole, J. S., & Tukibayeva, M.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Denver, CO, 2010, February.
Full version
Linking BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate first-year engagement outcomes
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Denver, CO, 2010, February.
Full version
Capping off the college experience: Participation and effects of capstone courses
Kinzie, J., McCormick, A. C., & Nelson Laird, T.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2010, January.
Full version
How writing contributes to learning and how institutions can increase that contribution: Lessons from NSSE & FSSE
Gonyea, R. M., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Anderson, P.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2010, January.
Full version
Using NSSE and FSSE to link technology to student learning and engagement
Guidry, K. R., Garver, A., & BrckaLorenz, A.
ELI Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, 2010, January.
Full version
Academic confidence and first-year engagement: Implications for orientation
Cole, J. S., & Qi, W.
National Orientation Directors Association Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2009, November.
Full version
Peer learning: Understanding faculty and course characteristics
Garver, A. K., Haywood, A., Ribera, T., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009, November.
Full version
Tracking the impact of assessment: Studying evidence-based improvement in colleges and universities
Kinzie, J.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009, November.
Full version
Unpacking the relationship between deep approaches to learning and critical thinking dispositions
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2009, November.
Academic advising and student athlete success in college
Hitchcock, T., & Cole. J. S.
NACADA Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX., 2009, October.
Full version
Assessing and enhancing student engagement and success
Kinzie, J., & McCormick, A.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2009, October.
Full version
Defining and using peer fields for inter- and intra-institutional assessment
Nelson-Laird, T. F., Shaw, M. D., Haywood, A. M., & McCormick, A. C.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2009, October.
Full version
Faculty engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning
Laird, T. F., Ribera, T., & Fernandez, S.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Houston, TX, 2009, October.
Full version
Instructional technology: A welcome change?
BrckaLorenz, A., Norris, K., & Palmer, M.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Houston, TX, 2009, October.
Full version
SOTL across the disciplines: Results from the faculty survey of student engagement
Nelson-Laird, T. F., Ribera, T., Garver, A. K., & Shaw, M. D.
International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning Annual Conference, Bloomington, IN, 2009, October.
Full version
The unengaged high school student as first-year college student: The advising challenge
Cole, J. S., & Hitchcock, T.
NACADA Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX., 2009, October.
Full version
Understanding the project, new developments, and U.S. campus-based initiatives
Sarraf, S.
Canadian Institutional Research & Planning Association Annual Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2009, October.
Full version
Validation of NSSE with liberal arts outcomes: Findings from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education
Blaich, C. F., & Seifert, T. A.
NSSE Tenth Anniversary Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, 2009, October.
Full version
Examining the ways collegiate instructors incorporate diversity
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Lilly Conference on College & University Teaching & Learning, Traverse City, MI, 2009, September.
Full version
Evaluating CLA and NSSE data together
Gonyea, R. M., & Nemeth, A.
CIC/CLA Consortium Summer Meeting, Jersey City, NJ, 2009, August.
Full version
Introduction to using CLA and NSSE data together
Gonyea, R. M.
CIC/CLA Consortium Summer Meeting, Jersey City, NJ, 2009, August.
Full version
Developing and assessing high impact educational programs to support first year student learning and success
Kinzie, J., & Ross, F. E.
International Conference on the First-Year Experience, Montreal, Canada, 2009, July.
An introduction to the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Assessing student engagement at the classroom level
Smallwood, R., Ouimet, J. A., & Chamberlain, T. A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Assisting students through the college choice process: Asking the right questions
Shaw, M. D.
Paul Munger Conference for Youth-Serving Professionals, Bloomington, IN, 2009, June.
Contextualizing NSSE effect sizes: Empirical analysis and interpretation of benchmark comparisons
Gonyea, R. M., & Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Displaying FSSE and NSSE results in combination: An overview of web-based tools and reports
Garver, A. K., Shaw, M. D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Linking BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate first-year engagement and outcomes
Cole, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA, 2009, June.
Full version
Using NSSE results to foster collaboration on assessment and retention
Kinzie, J.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2009, June.
Full version
Adopting SPSS macros to maximize office productivity
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA., 2009, May.
Full version
World class macros: Practical applications of Microsoft Excel macros for an institutional research office
Korkmaz, A., Moore, J., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Atlanta, GA., 2009, May.
Full version
10 years of student engagement results: Lessons from NSSE
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2009, April.
Full version
First-year student engagement and STEM: Gender and racial-ethnic differences
Lambert, A. D., Kinzie, J., & Cole, J. S.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA., 2009, April.
Full version
Understanding the effects of faculty work on promoting essential learning outcomes: How disciplinary context matters
Garver, A. K.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2009, April.
Using NSSE to assess educational effectiveness and improve quality
Kinzie, J.
Higher Learning Commission Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 2009, April.
Full version
Using student engagement surveys to demonstrate effectiveness and improve undergraduate learning and success
Kinzie, J., Jacobs, D. E., & Malmberg, M. A.
WASC Academic Resource Conference, Hollywood, CA, 2009, April.
Full version
Acting intentionally: Using NSSE to guide student affairs action
Bureau, D. A., & Shaw, M. D.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC., 2009, March.
Adopting SPSS macros to maximize office productivity
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, R.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2009, March.
Contextualizing NSSE effect sizes: Empirical analysis and interpretation of benchmark comparisons
Gonyea, R., & Sarraf, S.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2009, March.
High-impact practices: Why they work and who benefits
Kinzie, J., & Chamberlain, T.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
Innovative use of NSSE results in student affairs: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., Olson-Loy, S., & DiSabatino, G.
NASPA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2009, March.
Full version
Mapping the assessment skills and knowledge (ASK) standards to NSSE
Buckley, J. A. & Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
Supporting deep approaches to learning in student affairs
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., Shaw, M. D., & Ribera, T.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
Supporting deep approaches to learning in student affairs
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., Shaw, M. D., & Ribera, T.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
Supporting deep approaches to learning in student affairs
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., Shaw, M. D., & Ribera, T.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
The role of writing in student engagement and learning
Paine, C., Gonyea, R. M., Anderson, P., & Anson, C.
College Composition & Communication Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2009, March.
Full version
Using NSSE results to inform improvement and take action
Kinzie, J., Kenyon, C., Stephen, C., & Cicala, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Washington, DC, 2009, March.
Full version
Assessing and strengthening general education using NSSE: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., Burney, J., Boon, R., & Jonson, J.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2009, February.
Full version
Impact of working on first-year academic performance
Hitchcock, T., Cole, J. S., & Butler, T.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2009, February.
Full version
Transitions: Assessing writing & the first-year experience using BCSSE/NSSE data
Butler, T., Cole, J. S., & Hitchcock, T.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2009, February.
Full version
Linking student engagement and essential learning outcomes: Evidence and caveats
Nelson Laird, T. F., Terenzini, P. T., Seifert, T. A., & Reason, R. D.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2009, January.
Full version
NSSE and LEAP: Compatibility and connection with core learning objectives
Sill, D., Kinzie, J., & Evenbeck, S.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2009, January.
Full version
Supporting first-generation students: The role of learning communities to promote deep learning
Cole, J. S., McCormick, A., & Kinzie, J.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2009, January.
Full version
Using NSSE data to align higher education and fraternity/sorority community priorities
Bureau, D. A., & Druetzler, R.
Association of Fraternity Advisors Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, 2008, December.
Enhancing student learning and success: Engagement and high-impact practices
Kinzie, J.
NASPA IV?West National Conference, Tulsa, OK, 2008, November.
Full version
Instructional implications of student interactions across differences
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Niskode-Dossett, A. S.
Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching & Learning, Bloomington, MN, 2008, November.
Learning communities: Who benefits and do integrative activities matter?
Kinzie, J., & Sarraf, S.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Jacksonville, FL, 2008, November.
Full version
A sample LSSSE analysis.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Southern LSSSE Users Workshop., Atlanta, GA, 2008, October.
Contextualizing your LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Southern LSSSE Users Workshop., Atlanta, GA, 2008, October.
Emphasizing a shared responsibility for deep approaches to learning
Nelson Laird, T. F, & Garver, A. K.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Reno, NV, 2008, October.
Full version
Getting started using the LSSSE data.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Southern LSSSE Users Workshop., Atlanta, GA, 2008, October.
How faculty chose to improve their teaching across disciplinary areas
Garver, A. K., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2008, October.
Full version
Next steps: Basic analysis of the LSSSE data.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Southern LSSSE Users Workshop., Atlanta, GA, 2008, October.
Using NSSE to assess and enhance student engagement and student success: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., & Pennipede, B.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2008, October.
Full version
Using the LSSSE data for accreditation.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Southern LSSSE Users Workshop., Atlanta, GA, 2008, October.
Assessing student engagement in high-impact practices
Kinzie, J., & Evenbeck, S.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 2008, June.
Full version
Enhancing student success: Using NSSE and BCSSE data to shape student engagement
Kinzie, J., & Matveev, A.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 2008, June.
Full version
Incorporating diversity into undergraduate courses
Nelson Laird, T. F., Garver, A. K., & Niskod, A. S.
Society for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education Annual Conference, Windsor, ON, Canada, 2008, June.
Full version
Adapting and exceling: Automating report production with Microsoft Excel macros
Korkmaz, A., Moore, J., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Adopting SPSS macros to maximize office productivity
Chen, P. D., Sarraf, S., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Analysis of student-level NSSE response rates based on pre-college engagement
Gonyea, R. M., & Korkmaz, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Ensuring the quality of survey response through the data quality index (DQI): Using NSSE as an example
Chen, P. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Measuring the quality of academic advising: Making connections between academic advising and student success
Chen, P. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 2008, May.
Contextualizing your LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the West Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Santa Clara, CA, 2008, April.
Converting data into action: Using NSSE results in student affairs
Kinzie, J., Lindsay, N. K., & Casey, C.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, 2008, April.
Full version
Promoting student success through academic advising
Chen, P. D., & Christensen, C. R.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, 2008, April.
Full version
Student affairs assessment: Using intentional strategies to promote student success
Niskod, A. S., Bureau, D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, 2008, April.
Full version
Using the LSSSE data for accreditation.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the West Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Santa Clara, CA, 2008, April.
Getting started using the LSSSE data.
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the West Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Santa Clara, CA, 2008, March.
No time on my side: Examining factors affecting co-curricular involvement
Sarraf, S., Johnson, S., Davis, L., & Ahren, C
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, 2008, March.
Full version
Assessing general education learning outcomes: NSSE benchmarks and institutional practice
Kinzie, J.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, Boston, MA, 2008, February.
Full version
Assessing the first year experience: Using NSSE data and qualitative approaches to enhance student success
Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Francisco, CA, 2008, February.
Full version
Charting new waters: An SPSS primer
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the East Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Baltimore, MD, 2008, February.
Contextualizing your LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the East Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Baltimore, MD, 2008, February.
Effective educational practices and essential learning outcomes in general education courses: Differences by discipline
Nelson Laird, T. F., McCormick, A. C., & Chamberlain, T. A.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, Boston, MA, 2008, February.
Full version
Introducing LSSSE: The law school survey of student engagement
Watkins, L.
Deans of Students Meeting. University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law., Sacramento, CA, 2008, February.
Next steps: Basic analysis of the LSSSE data
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the East Coast LSSSE Users Workshop., Baltimore, MD, 2008, February.
Supporting the needs of diverse learners: First-year students’ academic confidence and student engagement
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, San Francisco, CA, 2008, February.
Full version
High impact activities: What they are, why they work, and who benefits
Gonyea, R. M., Kinzie, J., Kuh, G. D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2008, January.
Full version
Knowing our students: Legal education in the new millennium.
Watkins, L.
Presentation at the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2008, January.
A deeper dive into the LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Infilaw System LSSSE Workshop, Jacksonville, Fla., 2007, November.
A first look at the law school survey of student engagement
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Infilaw System LSSSE Workshop, Jacksonville, Fla., 2007, November.
Charting new waters: An SPSS primer
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Ohio LSSSE Users Workshop, Columbus, OH, 2007, November.
Contextualizing your LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Ohio LSSSE Users Workshop, Columbus, OH, 2007, November.
Examining LSSSE results for Florida coastal school of law
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Infilaw System LSSSE Workshop, Jacksonville, Fla., 2007, November.
Fostering student success in college
Kinzie, J.
Council of Independent Colleges Annual Institute for Chief Academic Officers & Chief Advancement Officers, Philadelphia, PA, 2007, November.
Full version
Getting started using the LSSSE data
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Ohio LSSSE Users Workshop, Columbus, OH, 2007, November.
How learning communities affect academic, social, and personal gains
Sarraf, S., & Williams, J. M.
National Learning Communities Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2007, November.
Full version
Improving deep learning on campus: Lessons from NSSE and FSSE
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Kinzie, J. L.
Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching & Learning, Bloomington, MN, 2007, November.
Next steps: Basic analysis of the LSSSE data
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Ohio LSSSE Users Workshop, Columbus, OH, 2007, November.
Qualitative research to complement the LSSSE results
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Infilaw System LSSSE Workshop, Jacksonville, Fla., 2007, November.
Using LSSSE data for accreditation
Watkins, L.
Program presented at the Ohio LSSSE Users Workshop, Columbus, OH, 2007, November.
Using NSSE to enhance student engagement and success: Lessons from the field
Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G. D.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2007, November.
Full version
Bringing assessment results to the faculty
Nelson Laird, T. F., Kinzie, J., & Chamberlain, T. A.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2007, October.
Full version
Exploring ways faculty incorporate diversity into undergraduate courses
Nelson Laird, T. F.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2007, October.
Full version
Never let it rest: Building educationally effective institutions to enhance student success
Kinzie, J.
National Consortium for Continuous Improvement Conference, Edmund, OK, 2007, October.
Full version
Pre-college student expectations for academic engagement: Are we prepared to teach these students?
Cole, J. S., & Nelson Laird, T.
International Society for Exploring Teaching & Learning Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2007, October.
Full version
Pre-college students’ expectations and attitudes regarding their first-year of college
Cole, J. S., & Kinzie, J.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Little Rock, AR, 2007, October.
Full version
Using NSSE to understand the student experience: Digging deeper into data to improve effective educational practice
Cole, J., & Sarraf, S.
Canadian Institutional Research & Planning Association Annual Conference, St. John's, Canada, 2007, October.
Full version
National Survey of Student Engagement: Writing item workshop
Gonyea, R. M., Paine, C., & Anderson, P.
Writing Program Administrators Conference, Tempe, AZ, 2007, July.
Full version
21st century students: Who they are, what we know about them, and what we need to know about them
Kinzie, J., Hall, J., & Singer, S.
Project Kaleidoscope Summer Institute, Washington, DC, 2007, June.
Full version
A more comprehensive look at first year engagement: A longitudinal assessment approach
Gonyea, R. M., Nelson Laird, T. F., & Cole, J. S.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Louis, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
Analysis of multiple years of NSSE data: Tips and strategies
Chen, P. D., Gonyea, R. M., Korkmaz, A., & Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Assessing faculty to better understand student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Garver, A.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
College student experiences questionnaire research program
Williams, J. M.
47th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Creating weights to improve survey population
Chen, P. D., & Sarraf, S.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
Driving report generation: Saving time with Excel macros
Gonyea, R. M., Moore, J., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
Engaging distance learners: Lessons learned from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Chen, P. D.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2007, June.
Learning at a distance: Engaged or not?
Chen, P. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Mind the gap: Assessing expectations and experiences in the first year of college
Kinzie, J.
First-Year Assessment Institute, Savannah, GA, 2007, June.
Full version
Now what? A facilitator's guide for using NSSE data
Kinzie, J.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
Student engagement in law schools and the LSSSE survey
Yaffee, J. & Watkins, L.
Northeast Association of Pre-Law Advisors, Philadelphia, PA, 2007, June.
The automated office: Using SPSS macros to drive productivity
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
The working student's experience
Moore, J., & Rago, M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Using LSSSE data - training opportunity
Watkins, L. & Williams, J.
Institute for Law School Teaching, Boston, MA, 2007, June.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to assess educational effectiveness at AICAD schools
Kinzie, J.
Association of Independent Colleges of Art & Design Consortium Meeting, Pratt Institute, New York, NY, 2007, June.
Full version
Validating NSSE for distance education
Chen, P. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Kansas City, MO, 2007, June.
Full version
The impact of format changes on web survey abandonment and response distributions
Kennedy, J., Gonyea, R. M., & Chamberlain, T.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2007, May.
Full version
Documenting differences in deep approaches to learning using NSSE and FSSE
Nelson Laird, T. F., & Buckley, J.
Indiana University Scholarship of Teaching & Learning Conference, Bloomington, IN, 2007, April.
Shaping deep approaches to learning on your campus
Garver, A., Nelson Laird, T. F., Johnson, S. D., Niskod, A. S., & Ingram, T.
ACPA?NASPA Joint Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2007, April.
Full version
Shaping deep approaches to learning on your campus
Garver, A., Nelson Laird, T. F., Johnson, S. D., Niskod, A. S., & Ingram, T.
ACPA?NASPA Joint Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2007, April.
The women's college advantage: Research implications and practical lessons
Kinzie, J., Niskod, A. S., Kloos, J. R., & Timko, S.
ACPA?NASPA Joint Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2007, April.
Full version
Using data to shape student engagement: NSSE and student affairs
Kinzie, J., Jackson, J., & Howard, C.
ACPA?NASPA Joint Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2007, April.
Full version
Analysis of multiple years of NSSE data: Tips and strategies
Chen, P. D., Gonyea, R. M., Korkmaz, A., & Sarraf, S.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, French Lick, IN, 2007, March.
Creating weights to improve survey population estimates
Sarraf, S., & Chen, P. D.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, French Lick, IN, 2007, March.
Full version
Law schools and the LSSSE survey
Ingham, J., O'Day, P., Watkins, L., & Yaffee, J.
American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, Boston, MA, 2007, March.
What you and your institution can do to promote change and student success
Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Whitt, E.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, 2007, March.
Full version
Assessing student engagement & educational effectiveness
Williams, J. & Holmes, M.
First Year Experience Annual Conference, Dallas, TX, 2007, February.
Assessing student engagement and educational effectiveness
Williams, J., & Holmes, M.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Dallas, TX, 2007, February.
Shaping student expectations: Does college orientation matter?
Williams, J.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Dallas, TX, 2007, February.
Connecting the dots: New evidence about why and how student engagement matters
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2007, January.
Full version
Learning, educating and the law school years
Sullivan, S., Watkins, L., & Henderson, W.
Program presented at th annual meeting of the Association of American Law Schools (AALS), Washington, DC, 2007, January.
Promoting essential learning outcomes in general education courses
Nelson Laird, T. F., Maguire, M., & Regosin, E.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2007, January.
Full version
Using evidence to document liberal education outcomes and promote institutional change
Kuh, G. D., Gonyea, R. M., Kinzie, J., Eubanks, D., Calendrillo, L., & Ouimet, J.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA., 2007, January.
Full version
Finding time: An examination of how much time faculty of color spend on work and other activities by rank
Kuykendall, J. A., Johnson, S. D., Nelson Laird, T. F., Niskod, A. S., & Ingram, T.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2006, November.
Full version
Life without ranking: How to use NSSE student-level comparison reports for institutional advancement
Chen, P. D.
Mid-America Association for Institutional Research Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2006, November.
The terms of engagement: African American college student engagement at a PWI
Johnson, S. D.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, 2006, November.
Advising students toward a greater appreciation for diversity
Cruce, T. M., Williams, J. M., & Moore, J. V.
NACADA Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2006, October.
College knowledge: From information to expectation
Williams, J. M., Cruce, T. M., & Moore, J. V.
NACAC National Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006, October.
Creating clear pathways to student engagement and success in college
Kinzie, J.
Ohio College Access Network Conference, Columbus, OH, 2006, October.
Full version
Engaging African American students: Compare student engagement and student satisfaction at HBCUs and their self-identified PWIs using National Survey of Student Engagement data
Chen, P. D., Ingram, T., & Davis, L. K.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Washington, DC, 2006, October.
Faculty perceptions of student engagement: A comparative examination across advising
Johnson, S. D., & Schwarz, M. J.
NACADA Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2006, October.
Fostering student success: What is the value of student engagement?
Kinzie, J.
NACAC National Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006, October.
Full version
Gender matters in college choice: Asking the right questions
Kinzie, J.
NACAC National Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006, October.
Full version
Getting faculty involved in the student engagement conversation: The faculty survey of student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Buckley, J., & Palmer, M.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2006, October.
Shaping student expectations: Does college orientation matter?
Moore, J. V., Cruce, T. M., & Williams, J. M.
National Orientation Directors Association Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2006, October.
Using what faculty say about improving their teaching
Nelson Laird, T. F., Buckley, J., & Palmer, M.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Portland, OR, 2006, October.
Full version
CCSSE & NSSE: Using student engagement data for institutional improvement
Gonyea, R. M., & Marti, C. N.
Tennessee Association for Institutional Research Conference, Nashville, TN, 2006, August.
Full version
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to understand students' experiences in the agricultural and related sciences
Nelson Laird, T. F.
ADSA?ASAS Annual Joint Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, 2006, July.
Full version
Moving ahead without falling behind: Managing information
Evensen, D., O'Day, P. T., & Seigel, M. L.
Program presented at the American Bar Association (ABA) Conference for Associate Deans, Englewood, CO, 2006, June.
Nonresponse effect in large-scale student survey: Lessons learned from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Chen, P. D.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 2006, June.
Beyond the headlines: Examining the college experiences of Division 1 high-profile athletes
Williams, J. M., Sarraf, S. A. & Umbach, P. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
Full version
Effectiveness through macros: Transform your analyses and save time with SPSS macros
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
Full version
Reporting EXCELence: Automate your report generation process using Microsoft Excel macros
Gonyea, R. M., Moore, J. V., & Shoup, T. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
Full version
Using qualitative methods to contextualize your NSSE results
Kinzie, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Chicago, IL, 2006, May.
Full version
Creating powerful partnerships: Implications from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
Johnson, S. D., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
NASPA Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2006, March.
Innovative avenues for faculty-student affairs collaborations: Data-mining the research
Buckley, J., & Nelson Laird, T. F.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Indianapolis, IN, 2006, March.
Innovative use of NSSE data in student affairs
Kinzie, J., Goldberg, L., & Hegeman, J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 2006, March.
Full version
Deep learning, liberal education, and institutional practice: Emerging findings, provocative lessons
Kuh, G. D., Nelson Laird, T. F., Kinzie, J., & Tagg, J.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2006, January.
Full version
Empirical research on law school engagement
Anderson, A., Hess, G., Kuh, G. D., O'Day, P. T., & Sterling, J.
Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2006, January.
Stepping stones to sustainable institutional change efforts
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Craft, W., & Francis, G.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2006, January.
Full version
Using new empirical studies to improve legal education
Carpenter, C., O'Day, P. T., Robel, L., & Sterling, J.
Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2006, January.
Effective educational practices that build institutional strength
Kinzie, J.
Council of Independent Colleges Annual Institute for Chief Academic Officers & Chief Advancement Officers, San Antonio, TX, 2005, November.
Full version
Engagement and advising: Faculty perceptions and practices
Schwarz, M. & Nelson Laird, T. F.
NACADA Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2005, October.
Full version
Promoting student success: Deep lessons for teaching and learning
Kinzie, J.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Milwaukee, WI, 2005, October.
Student engagement and faculty development: Faculty perceptions and practices
Nelson Laird, T. F., Buckley, J., & Schwarz, M. J.
Professional & Organizational Development Conference, Milwaukee, WI, 2005, October.
Full version
Toward strengthening general education: Education environments designed for learning
Kinzie, J.
Appalachian College Association Summit, Abingdon, VA, 2005, October.
Full version
What students say about advising: Findings and lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Gonyea, R. M., Schwarz, M. J., & Williams, J. M.
NACADA Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2005, October.
Full version
Engaged learning communities: Students, faculty, and institutions
Kuh, G. D.
AAC&U Greater Expectations Institute, Burlington, VT, 2005, June.
Full version
Taking stock of what matters to students' success
Kuh, G. D.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2005, June.
Full version
Using NSSE results to chart new territory in institutional assessment and educational effectiveness
Kinzie, J., & Springer, R.
NASPA International Assessment & Retention Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2005, June.
Full version
Law student engagement and campus involvement
Patrick T. O'Day(LSSSE)
, Seattle, WA, 2005, May.
Macro-mizing your time: Using SPSS to automate a report generation process
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, T. R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, San Diego, CA, 2005, May.
Full version
Student engagement in and out of the classroom
O'Day, P. T.
Program presented at the Pace University School of Law, White Plains, NY, 2005, May.
Understanding LSSSE results
O'Day, P. T.
Program presented at the Western New England College School of Law, Springfield, MA, 2005, May.
Using NSSE to understand students' experiences: Digging deeper into data to improve effective educational practice
Cruce, T., Kinzie, J., & Shoup, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, San Diego, CA, 2005, May.
Full version
A quality college experience: Perspectives from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J.
National Association of College Auxiliary Services West Annual Conference, Tucson, AZ, 2005, April.
Conference address: Student success in college: Implications for student affairs
Kuh, G., & Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Nashville, TN, 2005, April.
Digging deeper into law student engagement
O'Day, P. T.
Program presented at the Washington and Lee School of Law, Lexington, VA, 2005, April.
Enhancing learning: Deep lessons about effective educational practice and student success
Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Nashville, TN, 2005, April.
Full version
Other voices in the rankings debate
Alex M. Johnson, Jr. (University of Minnesota Law School), Sam Kamin (University of Denver College of Law), Rachel F. Moran (School of Law?University of California Berkeley), Patrick T. O'Day (LSSSE), Nancy B. Rapoport (University of Houston Law Center), and Lauren K. Robel (Indiana University School of Law?Bloomington)
Symposium: The Next Generation of Law School Rankings, 2005, April.
Other voices in the rankings debate
Johnson Jr., A. M., Kamin, S., Moran, R. F., O'Day, P. T., Rapoport, N. B., & Robel, L. K.
Panel discussion at the The Next Generation of Law School Rankings Symposium, Bloomington, IN, 2005, April.
Profiles of student engagement in co-curricular life: Lessons from research
Buckley, J., & Kinzie, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Nashville, TN, 2005, April.
Full version
Putting LSSSE results into action
Scott Cameron (Brigham Young University ? J. Reuben Clark Law School), George Kuh (LSSSE), Nicola Lee (Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center), Patrick T. O?Day (LSSSE), Gina Rowsam (Oklahoma City University School of Law)
, 2005, April.
Full version
Putting LSSSE results into action
O'Day, P. T.
Program presented at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, Detroit, MI, 2005, April.
Student engagement in law school
O'Day, P. T.
Program presented at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bowen School of Law, Little Rock, AR, 2005, April.
Technology and student engagement: Lessons learned from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F.
IHETS/IPSE All Partners Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005, April.
Full version
Using NSSE to understand students' experiences: Making the most of data in assessment
Kinzie, J.
SUNY Assessment Initiative, 2005, April.
Full version
Deep assessments of student success and educational effectiveness
Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J.
AAHE National Conference on Higher Education, Atlanta, GA, 2005, March.
Deep learning: Lessons from twenty campuses
Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J.
AAHE National Conference on Higher Education, Atlanta, GA, 2005, March.
Deep lessons: Using student engagement to advance student affairs practice
Schuh, J., Kuh, G., & Kinzie, J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2005, March.
Right-brain SPSS: Create methods to avoid reporting drudgery
Sarraf, S., & Shoup, T. R.
Indiana Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Greencastle, IN, 2005, March.
Full version
Student engagement and success: A discussion of best practices
Kinzie, J., Kuh, G. D., Manning, K., Schroeder, C., & Schuh, J.
NASPA Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2005, March.
Full version
Deep insights into the first college year: Creating pathways for student success
Kinzie, J., & Hinkle, S.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Phoenix, AZ, 2005, February.
Full version
Using student engagement to stimulate change on campus
Hayek, J. C., Cope, G., Cuevas, N., Hahn, S., & Shane, J.
AASCU Academic Affairs Winter Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2005, February.
A deeper look at student engagement, learning, and success
Kinzie, J., & Kuh, G.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2005, January.
Full version
Assessing civic engagement on college and university campuses: A partnership between ADP and NSSE
Kuh, G. D., Mehaffy, G. L., & Nelson Laird, T. F
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2005, January.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement update
Cameron, S., Kuh, G., Lee, N., O' Day, P., & Rowsam, G.
Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2005, January.
Promoting student success: Lessons from educationally effective colleges and universities (Pre-conference workshop)
Kuh, G. D., & Kinzie, J.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2005, January.
Highlights information from the NSSE 2004 annual report
Hayek, J.
California Association for Institutional Research, Anaheim, CA, 2004, November.
Institutional effectiveness and the levels of Hispanic student engagement at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) and Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs)
NSSE Staff
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2004, November.
Living-learning programs and residential colleges
Kuh, G. D.
Living-Learning Programs and Residential Colleges, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2004, November.
Presentation on BEAMS and users meeting for BEAMS campus faculty
Bridges, B.
HBC&U Faculty Development Network, Miami, FL, 2004, October.
Using student engagement data for improvement and accountability
Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 2004, October.
Workshop at the best practices in college retention conference sponsored for Maine colleges and universities by the Melmac foundation
Hayek, J.
Best Practices in College Retention Conference, Rockport, ME, 2004, October.
Building Engagement and Attainment of Minority Students(BEAMS) project: An initiative designed to improve student attainment at Minority-Serving Institutions
Bridges, B.
Patterson Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2004, September.
A deeper look at student engagement, learning, and success
Kinzie, J., Kuh, G. D., Hinkle, S., Schuh, J., Schroeder, C., Manning, K., Whitt, E., & Magolda, P.
ACPA?NASPA Joint Meeting, Denver, CO; Philadelphia, PA, 2004, April.
Assessing good practices in legal education: The law school survey of student engagement
Patrick O'Day (LSSSE)
, 2004, April.
Assessing good practices in legal education: The Law School Survey of Student Engagement
O'Day, P.
Franklin Pierce Law Center, Concord, NH, 2004, April.
Listening to learners: The law school survey of student engagement
Mark Gunty (University Notre Dame), Patrick O'Day (LSSSE), and Jerry Organ (University St. Thomas School of Law)
, 2004, March.
Listening to learners: The Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Gunty, M., O'Day, P., & Organ, J.
Religiously Affiliated Law Schools Conference, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 2004, March.
A dialogue with the law school survey of student engagement
Scott Cameron (Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School), Joanne Ingham (New York Law School), Patrick O'Day (LSSSE), and Lauren Robel (Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington)
, 2004, January.
A dialogue with the Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Cameron., S., Ingham, J., O'Day, P., & Robel, L.
Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2004, January.
Forging a new direction: How UTEP created its own brand of excellence
Kuh, G. D., & Natalicio, D. S.
, 2004.
Learning from NSSE: An approach to assessing and improving the first year experience
Kinzie, J.
Summer Institute on First-Year Assessment, Asheville, NC, 2003, July.
Full version
Using NSSE to improve learning and institutional effectiveness
Kinzie, J.
American Association for Higher Education Summer Academy, Snowbird, UT, 2003, July.
Full version
Do learning communities add value? Evidence from a national study
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL, 2003, May.
Faculty behaviors and their relationship to student learning and student engagement
Wawrzynski, M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, 2003, May.
Promoting institutional learning and change: Lessons learned from NSSE, DEEP, and BEAMS
Bridges, B., Kinzie, J., & invited NSSE users
NASPA Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2003, May.
Psychographic approach to classifying college students
Zhao, C.-M., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL, 2003, May.
Student experiences with diversity: Another distinctive imprint of liberal arts
Umbach, P., & Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL, 2003, May.
The National Survey of Student Engagement
Zhao, C.-M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Tampa, FL, 2003, May.
Digging deep to discover what matters to student success
Whitt, E., Kinzie, J., Mulholland, S., Schroeder, C., & Schuh, J.
American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Minneapolis, MN, 2003, March.
Full version
Courageous questions and reflective practice: Approaches to academic assessment that are do-able and worth doing
Barger, A., Dillingham, A. E., Gormly, A. V., Kinzie, J., Kuh, G. D., & Rawlings, D. H.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, 2003, January.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D., & O?Day, P
, Bloomington, IN, 2003.
Academic advising: Findings and experiences from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Zhao, C.-M., Bunnage, J., & Olsen, D.
NACADA Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2002, September.
Creating a culture of evidence using student engagement data
Kuh, G. D.
AAC&U Institute on Campus Leadership for Sustainable Innovation, Leesburg, VA, 2002, July.
Leading change for greater learning: First order principles for data-driven learning-centered improvements
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Summer Academy, Mount Snow, VT, 2002, July.
National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J.
Policy Center on the First Year of College Summer Assessment Institute, Asheville, NC, 2002, July.
Student engagement at doctoral research/intensive universities
Kuh, G. D.
National Conference for Carnegie Doctoral/Research Intensive Institutions, Bloomington, IL, 2002, July.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A tool for strengthening institutional accountability
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Summer Academy, Mount Snow, VT, 2002, July.
College students today: Why we can’t leave serendipity to chance
Hayek, J.
Indiana Public School/University Partnership, Indianapolis, IN, 2002, June.
NSSE: Participants, potential users, and colleagues
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Forum, Boston, MA, 2002, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: Implications for union professionals
Kuh, G. D.
Indiana Professional Development Seminar, Bloomington, IN, 2002, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: Strengthening institutional accountability for learning
Kuh, G. D.
Regents Administrative Committee on Student Affairs & Regents Administrative Committee on Academic Affairs Annual Joint Conference, St. Simon's Island, GA, 2002, June.
Undergraduate research on the undergraduate experience: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J.
Council on Undergraduate Research National Conference, New London, CT, 2002, June.
Using NSSE and CCSSE to improve effective educational practices workshop
Hayek, J., Ouimet, J., & Smallwood, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2002, June.
Using results from the National Survey of Student Engagement for institutional improvement
Bresciani, M., Kuh, G., & Troxel, W.
American Association of Higher Education Assessment Forum, Boston, MA, 2002, June.
Leadership, data, and public purposes
Hayek, J.
National Center for Public Policy & Higher Education Roundtable, Aptos, CA, 2002, May.
Assessing student development during the college years
Kuh, G. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2002, April.
Changing the way we talk about collegiate quality: Perspectives from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J., & Kerker, M.
Association for Institutional Research/Council for Advancement & Support of Education Colloquium, New Orleans, LA, 2002, April.
Establishing the validity and reliability of a national college student survey
Kuh, G. D.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2002, April.
Using results from the National Survey of Student Engagement for institutional improvement
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2002, March.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement as an indicator of quality at Historically Black Colleges and Universities
Bridges, B., & Harper, S
NASPA Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2002, March.
What’s on their minds? A conversation with undergraduate students
Kuh, G. D.
NASPA Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2002, March.
Enhancing student learning: Lessons from NSSE
Kuh, G. D.
University of Missouri System New Faculty Teaching Scholars, St. Louis, MO, 2002, February.
Enhancing student-centered learning: Why we can't leave serendipity to chance
Kuh, G. D.
University of Missouri?St. Louis Institutional Leadership Team, St. Louis, MO, 2002, February.
Student engagement in the first year of college
Kuh, G. D.
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience, Orlando, FL, 2002, February.
The general education we design and the general education students experience: Confronting questions of quality in student engagement and accomplishment
Kuh, G. D.
AAC&U General Education & Assessment Conference, Dallas, TX, 2002, February.
What can we learn about the next generation of teachers from student engagement patterns in college?
Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D.
Teacher Education Accreditation Council Annual Meeting, New York, NY, 2002, February.
Assessment in practice: Implementing National Survey of Student Engagement results on campus to enhance the first-year experience
Bleak, C., Huber, B., & O'Day, P.
First-Year Experience Conference?West, San Francisco, CA, 2002, January.
Continuous improvement: First lessons from NSSE
Kuh, G. D.
Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning, Scottsdale, AZ, 2002, January.
Cultivating the media: The NSSE experience
Kuh, G. D.
Pew Forum on Undergraduate Learning, Scottsdale, AZ, 2002, January.
Liberal education as transformation: Contemporary students and the values question
Kuh, G. D.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., 2002, January.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A tool for strengthening institutional accountability
Kuh, G. D.
ACPA Mid-Level Managers Institute, Bloomington, IN, 2002, January.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A tool for strengthening institutional accountability
Kuh, G. D.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., 2002, January.
Assessing first-year students and programs: No silver bullet
Swing, R.
, 2001, November.
Organizing for student success
Kuh, G. D.
Council of Independent College & University Chief Academic Officers & Chief Student Affairs Officers, Palm Springs, CA, 2001, November.
Reporting and interpreting effect sizes in higher education research
Hayek, J., Gonyea, R., & Zhao, C.-M.
Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference, Richmond, VA, 2001, November.
Assessing good practices in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J., & Bridges, B.
National HBC&U Faculty Development Symposium, Norfolk, VA, 2001, October.
NSSE/CSEQ luncheon presentation
Gonyea, R.
NASPA Assessment & Research Workshop for Student Affairs Professionals, Providence, RI, 2001, October.
Strategies for assessing and improving the first-year experience: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J., Bunnage, J. C., Harrington, C., Schlachter, S., & Troxel, W.
National Conference on Students in Transition, Oak Brook, IL, 2001, October.
Characteristics of learning-centered campuses
Kuh, G. D.
AAC&U Greater Expectations Institute?Campus Leadership for Sustainable Innovations, Leesburg, VA, 2001, July.
Greater expectations and connections with other national reform movements
Kuh, G. D.
AAC&U Greater Expectations Institute?Campus Leadership for Sustainable Innovations, Leesburg, VA, 2001, July.
AAHE research forum: Building an agenda for the scholarship of assessment
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Conference, Denver, CO, 2001, June.
Student responses on web vs. paper surveys: A test of mode effects
Carini, R., Hayek, J., Kuh, G., & Ouimet, J. A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
The balance between institutional improvement and public accountability: Perspectives from the National Survey of Student Engagement
Ewell, P., Hayek, J., Kuh, G., & McCormick, A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
The College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE): What's the difference and can one be used as a proxy for the other?
Gonyea, R., Hayek, J., Kuh, G., & Pace, R.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
The thrills and chills of survey research: Lessons from the field
Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
Using focus groups to establish the validity and reliability of college student surveys
Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Ouimet, J. A.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
Using NSSE to improve effective educational practice
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Conference, Denver, CO, 2001, June.
Using NSSE to promote persistence and student success (Plenary Address)
Kuh, G. D.
UW System Conference on the Use of Empirical Research in Improving Retention, Madison, WI, 2001, June.
Using results from the National Survey of Student Engagement for assessment and institutional improvement
Banta, T., Kuh, G., Pike, G., & Smith, E.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Conference, Denver, CO, 2001, June.
Using student engagement data to foster collaboration on assessment
Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Conference, Denver, CO, 2001, June.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to improve effective educational practice
Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Long Beach, CA, 2001, June.
What we (are pretty sure we) know about enhancing student success in the first year of college (Plenary Address)
Kuh, G. D.
Policy Center on the First Year of College National Summer Institute for Chief Academic & Chief Executive Officers, Brevard, NC, 2001, June.
Expanding student-centered learning: Why we can't leave serendipity to chance
Kuh, G. D.
Penn State University Teaching & Learning Colloquy, University Park, PA, 2001, May.
Accountability for community colleges: New demands, new tools, new opportunities
McClenney, K., Ouimet, J. A., & Roueche, J.
American Association of Community Colleges, Chicago, IL, 2001, April.
Assessing good practices in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Hayek, J.
New Jersey Association of Institutional Research Annual Conference, Columbia, SC, 2001, April.
Engaging commuter students: Redesigning campuses for the majority of America’s college students
Kuh, G. D.
National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition Teleconference, Columbia, SC, 2001, April.
Organizing for student success
Kuh, G. D.
National Conference on Trusteeship, San Francisco, CA, 2001, April.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A tool for strengthening institutional accountability
Kuh, G. D.
Western Association of Schools & Colleges Annual Meeting, Irvine, CA, 2001, April.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A tool for strengthening institutional accountability
Kuh, G. D.
North Central Association of Schools & Colleges Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2001, April.
Through student eyes: Using focus groups to interpret items and responses
Bunnage, J., Ouimet, J. A., & Kuh, G.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2001, April.
Assessing student engagement: A new approach to measuring quality
Kuh, G. D.
American Society for Quality Leadership for Quality in Education Workshop, Indianapolis, IN, 2001, March.
Creating better indicators of collegiate quality: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Bartanen, K., Kuh, G., O'Day, P., & Schroeder, C
NASPA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2001, March.
It's all Greek to me: Comparing student engagement between fraternity and sorority members and nonmembers
Carini, R., Hayek, J., Kuh, G., & O'Day, P.
NASPA Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2001, March.
Assessing student engagement in the first-year of college integrating surveys and using findings to inform policy decisions
Gonyea, R., & Ouimet, J. A.
First-Year Assessment National Forum, Houston, TX, 2001, February.
Assessing effective educational practice for students in transition
Hayek, J., Kaul, G., O'Day, P., & Ray, D.
National Conference on Students in Transition, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, November.
Early report on the National Survey of Student Engagement: Implications for effective practice
Ouimet, J. A., & Tracy, S.
Council of Independent Colleges Annual Institute for Chief Academic Officers, Tampa, FL, 2000, November.
Assessing good practices for the 21st century: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Bunnage, J., & Hayek, J.
NACADA Annual Conference, Orlando, FL, 2000, October.
Assessing good practices in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Bridges, B., Hoey, J., Hayek, J., Smallwood, R., & Ward, J.
Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Myrtle Beach, SC, 2000, October.
Benchmarks of best practice in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Borden, V., Hayek, J., Kuh, G., McLaughlin, G., & Olsen, J.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, June.
Student development in Christian colleges: Why we can't leave serendipity to chance
Kuh, G.
Association of Christians for Student Development, Upland, IN, 2000, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: An update on NSSE 2000
Kuh, G., Hayek, J., Kennedy, J., & McGuire, M.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: An update on NSSE 2000
Kuh, G., Ewell, P., Hayek, J., Gonyea, R., & Muffo, J.
American Association of Higher Education Assessment Conference, Charlotte, NC, 2000, June.
Web and mail survey: Comparisons based on a large-scale project
Kuh, G.
American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference, Portland, OR, 2000, May.
Assessing good practices in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G., Hayek, J., & Ouimet, J. A.
American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, 2000, April.
Implementing the National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G.
Consortium on Financing Higher Education Institutional Research Meeting, Washington, DC, 2000, April.
Assessing good practices: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Bunnage, J., Hayek, J., Heida, D., Kuh, G., & O'Day, P.
NASPA Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2000, March.
Assessing good practices in undergraduate education: The National Survey of Student Engagement
Brown, J., & Bunnage, J.
National Association for Women in Education National Conference, Boston, MA, 2000, February.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: A progress report
Kuh, G.
Association of American Colleges & Universities Annual Meeting, 2000, January.
The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Bunnage, J., Hayek, J., & O'Day, P.
Lilly Indiana Retention Forum, Indianapolis, IN, 1999, December.
Institutional research: Prospects and imperatives
Kuh, G. D.
North East Association for Institutional Research Annual Conference, Newport, RI, 1999, November.
What does the future hold for assessment?
Kuh, G. D.
Assessment Institute, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 1999, November.
Creating learner-centered campus environments
Kuh, G. D.
Student Learning Institute, Harrisonburg, VA, 1999, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Assessment Conference, Denver, CO, 1999, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement: An update for CIC participants
Kuh, G. D.
Council of Independent Colleges Annual Institute, St. Louis, MO, 1999, June.
The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D.
Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Seattle, WA, 1999, May.
The National Survey of Student Engagement
Kuh, G. D.
American Association for Higher Education Annual Meeting, 1999, March.
Do environments matter? A comparative analysis of the impress of different types of colleges and universities on character development
Kuh, G. D., & Vesper, N.
Annual Institute on College Student Values, Tallahassee, FL, February.
Assessment in practice: Implementing National Survey of Student Engagement results on campus
George Kuh (NSSE), Debbie Heida (Wittenberg University), Patrick O'Day (NSSE), George Wallman (North Dakota State University)
National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) 2002 National Conference, Boston, MA.
Digging deep for lessons about undergraduate student engagement and success
Kinzie, J
ACPA Donna M. Bourassa Mid-Level Management Institute, Bloomington, IN.
Getting faculty involved in the student engagement conversation: The faculty survey of student engagement
Nelson Laird, T. F., Johnson, S. D., Schwarz, M. J., & Niskod, A.
Assessment Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
Full version
Searching for the peach blossom Shangri-La: Student engagement of men and women STEM majors
Zhao, C-M., Carini, R. M., & Kuh, G. D
.
Using new empirical studies to improve legal education
Carpenter, C., O'Day, P. T., Robel, L., & Sterling, J.
Program presented at the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Annual Results
Career Preparation among Seniors
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 4.
Full version
Exploring Career Development at the University of Wisconsin?Madison
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 5.
Full version
Faculty Insights: Talking about Career Plans in the Disciplines
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 5.
Full version
Career Preparation for First-Year Students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 6.
Full version
Increasing Student-Faculty Interaction at Westmont College
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 7.
Full version
Faculty Insights: Talking about Career Plans with Lower-Division Students
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 7.
Full version
The Role of Majors in Preparing Students for Employment
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 8.
Full version
Advancing Information Literacy as a Core Competency at the University of San Diego
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 8.
Full version
Faculty Insights: Course Goals for Student Development
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 9.
Full version
Unconventional Post-College Plans of Graduating Seniors
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 10.
Full version
Enhancing the Quality of High-Impact Practices at Middle Georgia State University
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 11.
Full version
Faculty Insights: Job Skills Development
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 11.
Full version
A Closer Look at High-Impact Practices
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 12.
Full version
Faculty Insights: High-Impact Practices
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2018, 12.
Full version
Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 3.
Full version
Putting Results to Use: Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 4.
Full version
Positive Engagement Findings for Students of Color
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 4.
Full version
First-Generation Students Lag in HIP Participation
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 4.
Full version
Advancing Campus Diversity and Equity Goals
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 5.
Full version
New Insights on Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Engagement
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 6.
Full version
Out on Campus
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 7.
Full version
Student Activism and Engagement: Is There a Link?
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 8.
Full version
One College's Commitment to Civic Engagement
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 9.
Full version
Minding the Student-Faculty Expectations Gap
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 10.
Full version
Using BCSSE to Better Understand Student Success
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 11.
Full version
Faculty Incorporation of Diversity and Institutional Commitment
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 12.
Full version
How Faculty Spend Their Time
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 13.
Full version
FSSE Topical Module: Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity
In Engagement Insights: Survey Findings on the Quality of Undergraduate Education—Annual results 2017, 13.
Full version
Support for Learners and Its Link to Academic Effort, Academic Performance, and Retention
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 3 - 4.
Full version
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology: Assessing the Effectiveness of Campus Programs and Services for First-Year Students and Seniors
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 3.
Full version
Oregon Institute of Technology: Exploring General Education and Learning Outcomes
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 4.
Full version
Mindset Matters
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 5 - 6.
Full version
Winthrop University: Improving Retention and Graduation for Special Populations
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 6.
Full version
Perceptions of Safety and Belonging
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 7.
Full version
Dual Enrollment and the First-Year Academic Experience
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 8 - 9.
Full version
Carlow University: Assessing Learning with Technology to Enhance Instructional Practice
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 8.
Full version
Instructional Staff Race and Gender Relate to Experiences with Faculty
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 10 - 11.
Full version
Use of Rubrics Common Among Faculty
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2016, 11.
Full version
Institution-Level Correlations: Engagement, Retention, and Graduation
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 12.
Full version
A Report from the First Annual Teaching and Learning National Institute: Using Evidence for Improvement
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 13.
Full version
Motivating Students to Do Their Best Work
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 5.
Full version
Seniors? Post-Graduation Plans Influenced by Major and Participation in High-Impact Practices
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 6.
Full version
Financial Stress Remains a Concern, Especially for Historically Underserved Populations
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 7.
Full version
Enduring Effects: The Benefits of Good High School Study Habits Carry Forward into the First College Year
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 8.
Full version
Faculty Perceptions of Safety and Support
In Engagement insights: Survey findings on the quality of undergraduate education—Annual results 2015, 10.
Full version
Examining Differences Between Institutions
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 9.
Full version
Are Some Institutions More Hospitable to Certain Populations?
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 10.
Full version
Selectivity and Experiences with Faculty
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 11.
Full version
How Does Student Engagement Vary Across Institutions Within Majors?
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 12.
Full version
The Importance of Academic Advising
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 13 - 14.
Full version
Experiences with Information Literacy
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 14 - 15.
Full version
Social Media: An Opportunity to Engage Undergraduates
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 16.
Full version
Expected Versus Actual Grades: The Role of Engagement and Time on Task (BCSSE)
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 18.
Full version
Sleep Preferences and Engagement (BCSSE)
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 19.
Full version
Efforts to Improve Teaching Pay Off (FSSE)
In Bringing the institution into focus—Annual results 2014, 20.
Full version
Key Individual Questions Related to Academic Challenge
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 9.
Full version
Higher-Order Learning
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 10.
Full version
Reflective & Integrative Learning
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 10.
Full version
Engagement Indicators and High-Impact Practices: New Measures to Assess the Educational Experience
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 8.
Full version
Quantitative Reasoning
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 13.
Full version
Collaborative Learning
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 14.
Full version
Discussions with Diverse Others
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 15.
Full version
Student-Faculty Interaction
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 16.
Full version
Effective Teaching Practices
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 16 - 17.
Full version
Quality of Interactions
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 18.
Full version
Supportive Environment
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 18 - 19.
Full version
High-Impact Practices
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 20 - 21.
Full version
Topical Modules: Academic Advising
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 22.
Full version
Topical Modules: Learning with Technology
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 22 - 23.
Full version
Looking within FSSE Results
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 24 - 25.
Full version
First-Year Student Intentions to Major in STEM Fields
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 26 - 27.
Full version
Learning Strategies
In A fresh look at student engagement—Annual results 2013, 12.
Full version
Deep Approaches to Learning
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 10.
Full version
Looking Within: Analysis of Student Subgroups
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 11.
Full version
Study Time by Student and Institutional Characteristics
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 11.
Full version
Positive Trends in Student Engagement: Updated Findings
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 13.
Full version
Revisiting the DEEP Study After Ten Years: Lessons for Enhancing Educational Effectiveness
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 14.
Full version
Introducing the Updated NSSE Survey for 2013
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 15.
Full version
Factors Influencing Choice of Academic Major
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 16.
Full version
Financial Stress and Its Consequences
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 17.
Full version
Social Networking
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 18.
Full version
High School Engagement and Campus Support
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 19.
Full version
Faculty Survey Results by Major Field
In Promoting student learning and institutional improvement: Lessons from NSSE at 13—Annual results 2012, 20.
Full version
Service-Learning and the First-Year Experience
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 11.
Full version
Residence Life
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 11 - 12.
Full version
Greek Life
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 12 - 13.
Full version
Transfer Students
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 13 - 14.
Full version
Career Services
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 14.
Full version
Time Spent on Selected Activities
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 15.
Full version
Learning Strategies by Major Category
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 16.
Full version
Learning Strategies of First-Generation Students
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 16 - 17.
Full version
Coursework
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 18.
Full version
Global Awareness Experiences
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 18.
Full version
Difficulty Paying for College
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 19.
Full version
Time Faculty Expect Students to Spend Preparing for Class
In Fostering student engagement campuswide—Annual results 2011, 20.
Full version
Engagement Within the Disciplines
In Major differences: Examining student engagement by field of study—Annual results 2010, 10 - 14.
Full version
BCSSE and FSSE
In Major differences: Examining student engagement by field of study—Annual results 2010, 15 - 16.
Full version
The Engagement of Student Veterans
In Major differences: Examining student engagement by field of study—Annual results 2010, 17 - 28.
Full version
Exploring New Dimensions of Learning and Engagement
In Major differences: Examining student engagement by field of study—Annual results 2010, 19 - 21.
Full version
Improvement in Student Engagement Over Time
In Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time—Annual results 2009, 12 - 14.
Full version
Senior Year Experiences
In Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time—Annual results 2009, 15 - 16.
Full version
STEM Students and Teaching and Learning Technologies
In Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time—Annual results 2009, 18 - 20.
Full version
BCSSE and FSSE
In Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time—Annual results 2009, 21 - 22.
Full version
Promising Findings
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 11.
Full version
Disappointing Findings
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 11.
Full version
Within-Institution Variation
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 12.
Full version
Between-Institution Variation
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 12.
Full version
Supportive Campus Environment
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 13.
Full version
Enriching Activities
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 14.
Full version
Transfer Students
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 15.
Full version
Online Learners
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 15 - 16.
Full version
First Year Students' Engagement Disposition
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 17 - 18.
Full version
Underprepared Students
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 18 - 19.
Full version
FSSE
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 20.
Full version
BCSSE
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 20.
Full version
Student Writing
In Promoting engagement for all students: The imperative to look within—2008 results, 21 - 22.
Full version
Promising/Disappointing Findings
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 13.
Full version
Learning Communities
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 14 - 15.
Full version
Research with Faculty
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 15 - 16.
Full version
Study Abroad
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 17.
Full version
Senior Culminating Experiences
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 19 - 20.
Full version
Importance Faculty Place on High-Impact Practices
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 21.
Full version
Academic Advising
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 23.
Full version
Support from Friends and Family
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 24 - 25.
Full version
Entering First-Year College Students
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 25 - 26.
Full version
Another Look at Gender
In Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success—Annual report 2007, 27 - 28.
Full version
Distance Education Students
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 15.
Full version
Adult learners
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 15 - 17.
Full version
Part-Time and Working Students
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 17 - 18.
Full version
Part-Time and Working Students
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 19 - 20.
Full version
Reflective Learning
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 20 - 21.
Full version
BCSSE-FSSE-NSSE Institutional Examples
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 21 - 22.
Full version
Selected Results: Connecting the Dots?Linking Engagement and Success
In Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students—Annual report 2006, 23 - 24.
Full version
Most Frequent Activities
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 13.
Full version
Least Frequent Activities
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 13.
Full version
First-Year Student Experience
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 14 - 15.
Full version
Academic Efforts
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 16.
Full version
Deep Learning Across Fields of Study
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 17.
Full version
Student-Athletes
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 18.
Full version
"Swirling" Seniors: Multiple Institution Attendance
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 19.
Full version
Religion and Spirituality
In Exploring different dimensions of student engagement—2005 annual survey results, 21 - 22.
Full version
Arts, Wellness, and Spirituality
In Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success—2004 annual survey results, 16.
Full version
Civic Engagement
In Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success—2004 annual survey results, 18 - 19.
Full version
Deep Learning
In Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success—2004 annual survey results, 20 - 21.
Full version
Promising and Disappointing Findings
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 12.
Full version
Other Key Findings
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 13.
Full version
Educational and Personal Growth
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 14.
Full version
Integration of Knowledge and Experience
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 15.
Full version
Major Field of Study
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 16.
Full version
Information Technology
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 17.
Full version
Student-Athletes
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 18.
Full version
Changes from the First to Senior Year of College
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 18.
Full version
Faculty Perceptions of Student Engagement
In Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement—2003 annual report, 19.
Full version
Race and Ethnicity
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 21.
Full version
International Students
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 21.
Full version
Transfer Students
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 22.
Full version
Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 22.
Full version
Experiences with Diversity
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 23.
Full version
Learning Communities
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 23.
Full version
Grades and Engagement
In From promise to progress: How colleges and universities are using student engagement results to improve collegiate quality—2002 annual report, 23.
Full version
How and Why NSSE Differs from College Rankings
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 10 - 11.
Full version
Benefits of Benchmarks
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 12.
Full version
The Nature of the Student Experience Varies Greatly
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 13.
Full version
institutional Size Can Be a Key Factor in Student Engagement
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 14.
Full version
Every Sector Includes Some Institutions That Can Model Effective Educational Practice for Their Peers
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 14 - 15.
Full version
A Worrisome Gap: Student Time in Educational Activity vs. What Faculty and Others Say Is Optimal
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 15.
Full version
Level of Academic Challenge
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 15 - 16.
Full version
Active and Collaborative Learning
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 18 - 19.
Full version
Student Interactions with Faculty
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 20 - 21.
Full version
Enriching Educational Experiences
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 22.
Full version
Supportive Campus Environment
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 24 - 25.
Full version
First-Year Student Advising
In Improving the college experience: National benchmarks of effective educational practice—NSSE 2001 report, 26.
Full version
Active and Collaborative Learning
In The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice, 14 - 15.
Full version
Student Interactions with Faculty
In The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice, 16 - 17.
Full version
Enriching Educational Experiences
In The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice, 18 - 19.
Full version
Supportive Campus Environment
In The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice, 20 - 21.
Full version
Webinars
Teach Me How to NSSE! A Crash Course in Customizing and Promoting for Your Most Successful NSSE Administration Ever
Kriti Gopal, Bridgette Holmes and Select NSSE Project Associates
November 16, 2022.
Recording
HIP, HIP, Hooray! A Guide to Your HIP Quality Topical Module Results and Data
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea
October 5, 2022.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2022: Step-by-Step
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea
September 1, 2022.
Recording
Using NSSE Data in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Assessment Practices
Christen Priddie and Cindy Ann Kilgo
April 19, 2022.
Recording
Orientation to BCSSE 2022: Updates and Administration
Jim Cole
March 24, 2022.
Recording
Using BCSSE to Respond to COVID: Institutional Examples and Preparations for Fall 2022
Jim Cole, Ryan Padgett, and Alana Olschwang
January 27, 2022.
Recording
NSSE Major Field Report 2021 Tutorial
Bob Gonyea
December 29, 2021.
Recording
COVID Times & Student Engagement: Using and Interpreting NSSE 2021 Results
Shimon Sarraf, Bob Gonyea, Jim Cole and Alex McCormick
November 18, 2021.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2021: Step-by-Step
Bob Gonyea and Jillian Kinzie
September 23, 2021.
Recording
Students Entering College Fall 2021: What Colleges and Universities Should Know
Jim Cole and Jillian Kinzie
August 26, 2021.
Recording
Setting NSSE's Agenda for a Third Decade: Your Input Needed
Julie Carpenter-Hubin, Felix Wao, Vasti Torres and NSSE staff
April 14, 2021.
Recording
How to FSSE: Everything you need to know
Allison BrckaLorenz & Kyle Fassett
March 23, 2021.
Recording
High-Impact Practices: Interrogating Participation, Quality and Equity
Brendan Dugan, Jillian Kinzie, Alex McCormick and special guest NSSE founder, George Kuh
February 17, 2021.
Recording
The LRCs of Academic Advising?Listening, Respecting, and Caring
Jim Cole, Angie Miller & Bridgette Holmes
January 12, 2021.
Recording
Do Your Students Feel They Belong? Examining Sense of Belonging and Engagement
Allison BrckaLorenz, Jillian Kinzie and Colleen Lofton, NSSE Project Staff
December 1, 2020.
Recording
Customizing your NSSE Survey: Topical Modules and Consortia Participation
Angie L Miller
October 29, 2020.
Recording
How Do We Know Advising Is Done Well? Using NACADA Core Competencies to Assess Advising
Jim Cole & Jilian Kinzie
October 5, 2020.
Recording
Highlighting NSSE 2021: New Offerings in a Year Like No Other
Alexander C. McCormick, Jillian Kinzie and Jennifer Brooks
September 30, 2020.
Recording
Real Data Talk: NSSE 2020 Institutions? Plans to Analyze and Use Their Results
Jilian Kinzie and Jim Cole
September 3, 2020.
Recording
Webinar Beyond the Institutional Report: A Guide to your NSSE Data File
Allison BrckaLorenz & Bob Gonyea
August 26, 2020.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2020: Step-by-Step
Bob Gonyea and Jillian Kinzie
August 18, 2020.
Recording
NSSE 2020 Follow-Up Webinar: Using Results Collected During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Alex McCormick, Jillian Kinzie, Bob Gonyea, Allison BrckaLorenz, Shimon Sarraf and Jennifer Brooks, NSSE and FSSE Project Staff
June 2, 2020.
Recording
NSSE & Coronavirus 2020: Preliminary Analysis Results and Recommendations
Bob Gonyea, Brendan Dugan, Shimon Sarraf, and Kevin Fosnacht
May 18, 2020.
Recording
NSSE & FSSE 2020: Guidance on COVID-19 Disruptions
Alex McCormick, Jillian Kinzie, Bob Gonyea, Allison BrckaLorenz, Shimon Sarraf and Jennifer Brooks, NSSE and FSSE Project Staff
March 26, 2020.
Recording
Supporting CSU GradInitiative 2025: NSSE-BCSSE Follow-up
Jillian Kinzie and Jim Cole NSSE and BCSSE Project Staff
February 18, 2020.
Recording
Promoting in a Crunch: Increasing NSSE Response Rates
Dajanae Palmer & Bridgette Holmes
February 3, 2020.
Recording
Telling Your Data Story: Sharing NSSE Results on Campus
Jillian Kinzie, NSSE Institute Associate Director, Samantha Silberstein, Project Associate, & Dajanae Palmer, Project Associate
November 20, 2019.
Recording
NSSE/ACUHO-I STUDENT HOUSING STUDY REPORT WALK-THROUGH
Bob Gonyea, Kevin Fosnacht, Polly Graham, and Kyle Fassett of the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
September 27, 2019.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2019: STEP BY STEP
Presenters: Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea, Associate Directors of the Center for Postsecondary Research.
August 27, 2019.
Recording
CSU and BCSSE: Introduction to administration, reports and data use
Presenters: Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager
May 21, 2019.
Recording
Learning & Assessment in Student Affairs: The NSSE Way
Dajanae Palmer, Project Associate & Samantha Silberstein, Project Associate
April 30, 2019.
Recording
Pre-Workshop Webinar: National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Regional Workshops to Support Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Directors of the Center for Postsecondary Research
April 9, 2019.
Recording
Introduction to BCSSE 2019
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager
March 26, 2019.
Recording
An Overview of the NSSE Summary Tables
Angie Miller
February 21, 2019.
Recording
This or That? Getting to Know Your Faculty
Kyle Fassett & Allison BrckaLorenz
February 7, 2019.
Recording
Report Builder Webinar
Bob Gonyea & Kevin Fosnacht
February 7, 2019.
Recording
Overview of BCSSE 2019 Updates
Jim Cole
December 11, 2018.
Recording
Strategies for More Inclusive Data Sharing and Analysis
Allison BrckaLorenz
October 30, 2018.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2018: Step by Step
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea, Associate Directors of the Center for Postsecondary Research
August 28, 2018.
Recording
Taking Action: Using NSSE for Institutional Improvement
Alex McCormick, NSSE Director, and Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute
May 15, 2018.
Recording
Recommendations for Using Multiple Years of NSSE Data
Bob Gonyea, Associate Director, Research & Data Analysis and Rick Shoup, Research Analyst
March 27, 2018.
Recording
Tableau, Psychometrics, and Content Summaries, Oh My! FSSE Tools and Resources
Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager
February 15, 2018.
Recording
Senior Transitions Topical Module: Findings from 3 Years of Research
Angie L. Miller, NSSE Research Analyst
February 2, 2018.
Recording
Student Engagement and Information Literacy
Kevin Fosnacht
December 14, 2017.
Recording
Hearing the Students? Voice: Using NSSE Comments:
Brendan Dugan, NSSE Research Analyst, and Samantha Silberstein, NSSE Project Associate
November 30, 2017.
Recording
Introducing the Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity Topical Module
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Direct of the Center for Postsecondary Research and Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager
October 31, 2017.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2017: Step by Step
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea, Associate Directors of the Center for Postsecondary Research.
August 29, 2017.
Recording
An Overview of BCSSE 2017 Updates and Data Uses
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and Research Analyst
April 18, 2017.
Recording
Examining Engagement for Small Populations
Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager and Sarah Hurtado, NSSE Institute Project Associate
March 9, 2017.
Recording
Using FSSE Demographic Data to Look Within Your Institution
Allison BrkcaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager and Bridget Yuhas, FSSE Project Associate
February 23, 2017.
Recording
Ask Me Anything — NSSE Research Analysts
Bob Gonyea, Associate Director of the Center for Postsecondary Research, Amy Ribera, NSSE Research Analyst, and John Zilvinskis, NSSE Institute Project Associate
January 31, 2017.
Recording
Using NSSE Data in Student Affairs
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director of the Center of Postsecondary Research, and Sarah Hurtado, Project Associate NSSE Institute.
December 1, 2016.
Recording
An Overview of Survey Preparations for NSSE
Jennifer Brooks NSSE Project Services Manager
October 4, 2016.
Recording
Survey Recruitment Using Student Portals and Learning Management Systems
Shimon Sarraf, Assitant Director for Survey Operations and Project Services
September 29, 2016.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2016: Step by Step
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea, Associate Directors of the Center for Postsecondary Research
August 30, 2016.
Recording
Tips for NSSE System Participation
Angie Miller, NSSE Research Analyst
August 26, 2016.
Recording
Using NSSE Data to Assess and Enhance High-Impact Practices
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute, and John Zilvinskis, Research Project Associate
June 28, 2016.
Recording
Overview of NSSE?s Academic Advising Topical Module
Amy Ribera, NSSE Research Analyst
May 23, 2016.
Recording
New First-Year Experiences Topical Module
Sarah Hurtado, NSSE Institute Project Associate
April 13, 2016.
Recording
Adding Context to NSSE with FSSE
Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager and Research Analyst, and Bridget Yuhas, FSSE Project Associate
January 12, 2016.
Recording
New Senior Transitions Topical Module
Angie Miller and Amber Dumford, NSSE Research Analysts
October 29, 2015.
Recording
Connecting Campus Units to NSSE Results
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute and Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager, Research Analyst
October 14, 2015.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2015: Step-by-Step
Bob Gonyea and Jillian Kinzie
August 25, 2015.
Recording
FSSE Overview: Basics, Administration, Reporting, and Resources
Allison Brckalorenz and Bridget Yuhas
August 7, 2015.
Recording
Moving Beyond Statistical Significance: Using Effect Sizes in NSSE
Louis Rocconi, Research Analyst & Bob Gonyea, Associate Director
June 23, 2015.
Recording
Using BCSSE and NSSE to Help Retention Efforts
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager & NSSE Research Analyst
April 30, 2015.
Recording
NSSE webinar for Council of Independent Colleges (CIC) member institutions
Jillian Kinzie
February 24, 2015.
Recording
Last minute prep for your NSSE 2015 administration
Jennifer Brooks, NSSE Project Services Manager
February 21, 2015.
Recording
Increase dissemination and discussion of results: Introducing the NSSE Data User's Guide
Amy Ribera, Research Analyst, and Cindy Cogswell, NSSE Institute Project Associate
December 18, 2014.
Recording
Improving student participation rates : What we?ve learned about incentives and promotion
Shimon Sarraf, Assistant Director
October 2, 2014.
Recording
A conversation with the director: If it isn't broken, make it better!
Alex McCormick, Director
September 26, 2014.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2014: Step by step
Bob Gonyea and Jillian Kinzie, Associate Directors
August 27, 2014.
Recording
The NSSE update: Analysis and design of ten new Engagement Indicators
Bob Gonyea and Allison BrckaLorenz
April 29, 2014.
Recording
Using NSSE data for accreditation
Jillian Kinzie and Cindy Ahonen
March 26, 2014.
Recording
Last minute prep for your NSSE 2014 administration
Cindy Ahonen and Katherine Wheatle
February 21, 2014.
Recording
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2013: Step by step
Jillian Kinzie and Robert Gonyea, Associate Directors
September 19, 2013.
Recording
An overview of BCSSE 2013
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst
April 16, 2013.
Recording
NSSE 2013: Discussion of the new survey and reports
Heather Haeger, Rick Shoup, and Amy Ribera, NSSE Research Analysts
March 12, 2013.
Recording
Last minute prep for your NSSE 2013 administration
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute
January 28, 2013.
Recording
Need more answers about NSSE 2013?
Jillian Kinzie, NSSE Associate Director, and Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst
December 4, 2012.
Recording
Using NSSE and FSSE to explore deep approaches to learning
Amy Ribera, NSSE Research Analyst
November 14, 2012.
Recording
An explanation of NSSE weights
Amber Lambert, NSSE Research Analyst
November 1, 2012.
Recording
A brief tour of the NSSE Psychometric Portfolio
Angie Miller, NSSE Research Analyst
October 11, 2012.
Recording
Your Institutional Report 2012: Step by step
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute, and Shimon Sarraf, NSSE Assistant Director for Survey Operations and Project
September 6, 2012.
Recording
FSSE 2.0: What to expect in 2013
Tom Nelson Laird, FSSE Principal Investigator, Allison BrckaLorenz, FSSE Project Manager and Research Analyst; Leah Peck and Eddie Cole, Jr., FSSE Project Associates
July 31, 2012.
Recording
Using BCSSE and NSSE data to investigate first-year student financial stress and engagement
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst
June 18, 2012.
Recording
Using FSSE topical findings: Part 2. Live question and answer session
Mahauganee Shaw and Eddie Cole, Jr., FSSE Project Associates
April 24, 2012.
Recording
NSSE 2.0: What to expect in 2013
Jillian Kinzie and Shimon Sarraf
March 6, 2012.
Recording
Encouraging student participation in NSSE
Brian McGowan, NSSE Institute Project Associate
February 28, 2012.
Recording
Maximizing NSSE in the VSA: Approaches to transparency, accountability, and improvement
Jillian Kinzie, NSSE Institute Associate Director
February 8, 2012.
Using NSSE data in accreditation
Jillian Kinzie, NSSE Institute Associate Director
November 8, 2011.
Recording
The NSSE Pocket Guide, Student Experience in Brief, and other resources for parents, students, and admissions staff
Kathy Anderson, NSSE Institute Project Manager
September 27, 2011.
Recording
What to expect if you participate in NSSE
Jennifer Brooks, Project Services Manager
September 20, 2011.
Your NSSE Institutional Report 2011: Step by step
Jillian Kinzie and Shimon Sarraf
August 25, 2011.
Recording
Student engagement in the professions
Alex McCormick, NSSE Director, and Allison BrckaLorenz, NSSE Research Analyst
June 21, 2011.
Recording
What to Expect from FSSE Participation
Mahauganee Shaw and Eddie Cole, Jr., FSSE Project Associates
May 17, 2011.
Recording
Engagement readiness of first-year students
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst, and Wen Qi, BCSSE Project Associate
April 12, 2011.
Recording
Using NSSE data in student affairs
Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute, and Tony Ribera, NSSE Institute Project Associate
March 24, 2011.
Recording
Engagement experiences of student-veterans
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst
February 15, 2011.
Recording
Improving student response rates
Tony Ribera and Brian McGowan
January 25, 2011.
Recording
Using BCSSE-NSSE data to assess the effects of learning communities on first-year experiences
Jim Cole, BCSSE Project Manager and NSSE Research Analyst, and Jillian Kinzie, Associate Director, NSSE Institute
November 16, 2010.
Recording
Beginning to look within: NSSE reports by major field
Allison BrckaLorenz and Amber Lambert, NSSE Research Analysts
October 5, 2010.
Recording
Understanding your NSSE Institutional Report 2010
Shimon Sarraf and Julie Williams, NSSE Research Analysts
September 7, 2010.
Recording
NSSE's Psychometric Portfolio: Evidence for reliability, validity, and other quality indicators
Bob Gonyea, NSSE Associate Director, and Angie Miller, NSSE Research Analyst
August 31, 2010.
Recording
What to expect from participation in FSSE
Tom Nelson Laird
June 15, 2010.
Recording
Program and department level assessment
Jillian Kinzie
May 11, 2010.
Recording
Using BCSSE data for faculty development: Do faculty really know their students?
Jim Cole
March 16, 2010.
Recording
Ideas for encouraging student participation in NSSE
Tiffani Butler and Tony Ribera
January 26, 2010.
Recording
Linking NSSE data to other institutional data
Julie Williams and Rick Shoup
October 13, 2009.
Recording
Using results from the Consortium for the Study of Writing in College
Jillian Kinzie and Bob Gonyea
September 22, 2009.
Recording
Driving data down: Using NSSE results in department, school, and major-level assessment activities
Alex McCormick and Allison BrckaLorenz
September 15, 2009.
Recording
Using high-impact activities to maximize student gains
Todd Chamberlain
June 23, 2009.
Recording
Tips on maximizing the value of your NSSE Institutional Report: Customizing comparison groups
Jillian Kinzie and Rick Shoup
May 12, 2009.
Recording
Digging deeper: Advanced use ? Multi-year analysis
Allison BrckaLorenz and Bob Gonyea
April 28, 2009.
Recording
Digging deeper: Intermediate concepts
Shimon Sarraf and Rick Shoup
April 14, 2009.
Recording
Digging deeper: Core concepts
Amber Lambert and Julie Williams
April 7, 2009.
Recording
Beyond NSSE Benchmarks: Under-used nuggets of effective educational practice
Jillian Kinzie
March 24, 2009.
Recording
Using BCSSE data: Understanding that student expectations are important
Dr. James Cole
March 3, 2009.
Recording
The transparency-accountability puzzle: Where does NSSE fit?
Alex McCormick
November 18, 2008.
Recording
Multi-year analysis of NSSE data
Bob Gonyea and Allison BrckaLorenz
October 21, 2008.
Recording
Using your BCSSE-NSSE data
Dr. James Cole and Kevin Guidry
September 23, 2008.
Recording
Using FSSE and NSSE data: An overview of existing tools and reports
Amy Garver and Mahauganee Shaw
September 9, 2008.
Recording
Using NSSE data for student affairs
Jen Buckley and Daniel Bureau
May 13, 2008.
Introduction to BCSSE
Dr. Jim Cole
April 8, 2008.
Recording
Assessing the first-year experience
Dr. Jillian Kinzie
March 4, 2008.
Recording
Getting down to basics: Working with your NSSE data
Jillian Kinzie and Chad Ahren
December 12, 2007.