• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Main Navigation
  • Skip to Search

NSSE logo

NSSENSSENSSE

Open Search
  • NSSE
    • About NSSE
      • Conceptual Framework
      • Positions and Policies
      • Advisors
      • Partners
      • Employment
    • Survey Instruments
      • Topical Modules
      • Engagement Indicators
      • High-Impact Practices
    • Registration Details
      • Pricing
      • Campus Contacts
      • Administration Checklist
    • Administering NSSE
      • Population File
      • Customizing NSSE
      • Recruitment Method
        • Folder Name
      • Encouraging Participation
      • Terms of Participation
      • Accessibility
      • Data Security
    • Reports & Data
      • NSSE Administration Overview
      • Data Files
      • Sample Report
      • Institutional Report Guide
      • Report Builder
      • Data Summaries & Interactive Displays
    • Working with NSSE Data
      • Data Codebooks
      • Syntax
    • Psychometric Portfolio
      • Response Rates
    • NSSE Shorts (New)
      • Pricing and Registration
      • Administration Instructions
      • Item Sets
      • Reports & Data Use
      • Dashboard LogIn
  • FSSE
    • FSSE Portal Log-in
    • About FSSE
    • Survey Instruments
      • Main Survey
        • FSSE Scales
        • Disciplinary Areas
      • Topical Modules
      • Consortium Questions
    • Registration & Pricing
    • Administering FSSE
      • Administration Overview
      • Confidentiality
      • Customization
        • Preparing for Message Delivery
        • Population File Instructions
      • Data Security
      • IRB Protocol
        • Informed Consent
      • Locating Your Data & Results
      • Sample Reports
        • Administration Summary
        • FSSE Respondent Profile
        • FSSE Topical Module Report
        • FSSE Disciplinary Area Report
        • FSSE-NSSE Combined Report
        • FSSE Frequency Report
        • FSSE Snapshot Report
      • Terms of Participation
    • Findings, Data, & Reports
      • FSSE Overview
      • Content Summaries
      • Data Visualizations
      • Data Use Examples
    • Working with FSSE data
      • Using FSSE Data
      • Analysis Resources
      • Data User's Guide
    • Psychometric Portfolio
  • BCSSE
    • About BCSSE
    • BCSSE Survey
      • BCSSE Scales
    • Fall Check-In
    • Registration & Pricing
    • Administering BCSSE
      • Administration Protocol and Procedures
      • BCSSE Contacts
      • Demonstration Dashboard Portal
      • Institution Participation Agreement
      • IRB
      • Data Security and Accessibility
    • Reports & Data
      • BCSSE Overview
      • Accessing BCSSE Data
      • Summary Tables
    • Working with BCSSE data
      • Additional Resources
    • Dashboard Log-in
  • Support & Resources
    • For Participating Institutions
      • How Institutions Use Their Data
        • Lessons from the Field
          • Institution Examples
        • NSSE Data Use in Brief
        • Search for examples
        • Displaying Results
        • Data Use Teams
      • Data & Results Guides
        • Student Success Mapping
        • Navigating Your Institutional Report
        • Tips for More Inclusive Data Sharing and Analysis
        • Data User's Guide: Sense of Belonging
        • Accreditation Toolkits
        • Sharing and Disseminating NSSE Results
        • NSSE Data User’s Guide
        • Campuswide Mapping
        • Contextualizing NSSE Effect Sizes
        • Custom Analysis
      • Workshops and Webinars
    • For Partnerships
      • Special Projects
    • For Students & Parents
      • Pocket Guide
        • English
        • Spanish
    • For All Audiences
  • Research
    • Annual Results
      • Annual Results 2023
        • Special Report 1
        • Special Report 2
      • Annual Results 2022
        • 1. Rebounding Engagement
        • 2. Digging Deeper Into HIP Quality
        • 3. Hot Topics in Higher Ed
      • Past Annual Results
    • Publications & Presentations
      • Foundational Publications
      • Featured Publications
      • Recent Presentations
      • Lessons from the Field
      • DEEP Practice Briefs
      • Search
    • NSSE Essentials
    • NSSE Sightings (blog)
      • Search Posts
  • Institution Login
  • BLOG
  • Contact Us

Our Research: Projects,
Publications, and More

  • Home
  • NSSE
    • About NSSE
    • Survey Instruments
    • Registration Details
    • Administering NSSE
    • Reports & Data
    • Working with NSSE Data
    • Psychometric Portfolio
    • NSSE Shorts (New)
  • FSSE
    • FSSE Portal Log-in
    • About FSSE
    • Survey Instruments
    • Registration & Pricing
    • Administering FSSE
    • Findings, Data, & Reports
    • Working with FSSE data
    • Psychometric Portfolio
  • BCSSE
    • About BCSSE
    • BCSSE Survey
    • Fall Check-In
    • Registration & Pricing
    • Administering BCSSE
    • Reports & Data
    • Working with BCSSE data
    • Dashboard Log-in
  • Support & Resources
    • For Participating Institutions
    • For Partnerships
    • For Students & Parents
    • For All Audiences
  • Research
    • Annual Results
    • Publications & Presentations
    • NSSE Essentials
    • NSSE Sightings (blog)
  • Search
  • Institution Login
  • BLOG
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Research
  • NSSE Sightings (blog)

Intersectionality and Sense of Belonging: Unpacking the Student Veteran Experience

Thursday, November 10, 2022

 Photo courtesy of the United State Naval Academy

Over the last decade, a concerted effort has been made to transition, support, and graduate student veterans through national and campus policies and improvements. However, few studies have examined student veteran engagement, belonging, and campus integration at a national scale. Nor has there been a scaled study of the intersecting identities of student veterans and how they relate to campus engagement and success.

Regarding belongingness, veterans often report imposter syndrome, difficulty working in groups with younger students, and feelings of isolation on campus (Elliott & Gonzalez, 2011; Mendez et. al, 2018; Morris et al., 2019; & Williams-Klotz & Gansemer-Topf, 2017). A few studies found a perceived lack of respect from faculty and other students, based on ideological differences on war and the military (Elliott et al., 2011; Persky & Oliver, 2010; Rumann & Hamrick, 2010). These studies highlight the importance of creating discourse between student veterans and their non-veteran peers on campus to lessen cultural boundaries and gain mutual understanding of military service (Kent & Buechner, 2021; Elliot et al., 2011). To bridge communication and cultural gaps between student-veterans and non-veterans, Veteran Ally Training programs have been developed to increase sense of belonging and integration, and have demonstrated success (Morris et al., 2021; Osborne, 2013).

Guided by the Cultural Congruity framework which focuses on values, beliefs, and expectations as they relate to how one adapts to a new culture (Gloria & Kurpius, 1996), the Vacchi and Berger model (2014) for student veteran success, and Crenshaw's (1989) intersectionality framework, we used data from the 2020 and 2021 administrations of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to examine the experiences of student veterans. Specifically, we asked the following research questions:

  1. How do veteran and non-veteran students compare on select aspects of a supportive environment for college students?
  2. How do student veterans with varying identities and student characteristics compare on select aspects of a supportive environment for college students?

Our study outcome measures are all important aspects of a supportive environment for college students: Sense of Belonging, Collaborative Learning, Student-Faculty Interaction, and Quality of Interactions. In some analyses, we combine these measures to form a measure of Environmental Integration. We examined the experiences of 12,668 student veterans, 4% of the total sample, enrolled at 813 four-year institutions across the United States. We found that student veterans are more likely to be enrolled part time; living off campus; majoring in Business, Engineering, or Social Service Professions; first-generation students; identifying as men; identifying as People of Color, or reporting a sensory or physical disability, chronic medical condition, or more than one disability or impairment.

Using more traditional variable-centered analyses, specifically OLS regressions, we found statistically significant, but very small differences between veteran and non-veteran student supportive environment outcomes. Within the student veteran population, however, we found many significant and notable differences by other identity and student characteristics. For example, veteran students identifying with a nonbinary gender identity had lower Sense of Belonging and Quality of Interactions than the average scores of veteran students overall. Veteran students who lived on campus had far greater Collaborative Learning and Student-Faculty Interaction than the average scores of veteran students overall.

Using person-centered analyses to further examine differences across veteran students, a two-step cluster analysis grouped student veterans into three groups: 1) high Environmental Integration, 2) low Environmental Integration, and mixed Environmental Integration where students had low interactions with faculty and peers but a high quality of interactions with others and sense of belonging. A selection of results summarized in the table below show patterns of how veteran students with other identity and student characteristics experience environmental integration.

High Env Integration
(CL-SF-QI-SB)

  • Full-time
  • Living on campus
  • Bio Sci, Phys Sci, Eng
  • Non-first gen
  • Women
  • Bisexual
  • Am Ind, AK native
  • MENA
  • Multiracial
  • No disabilities

Mix Env Integration
(cl-sf-QI-SB)

  • Part-time
  • Living off campus
  • Business, Soc Srv Profs
  • First-gen
  • Men
  • Straight
  • Black or Af Am
  • White

Low Env Integration
(cl-sf-qi-sb)

  • Living off campus
  • Nonbinary gender ID
  • Non-listed race/ethnicity
  • Bisexual
  • Non-listed sexual orient
  • Multiple disabilities

See more details of this study as well as presentation slides from our session at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference in Las Vegas, NV.

References

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1(8), 139-167.

Elliott, M., Gonzalez C., & Larsen, B. (2011). U.S. military veterans transition to college: Combat, PTSD, and alienation on campus. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(3), 279-296, https://10.2202/1949-6605.6293

Gloria, A. M., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (1996). Validation of the Cultural Congruity Scale and the University Environment Scale with Chicano/a Students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863960184007

Kent, S. M., & Buechner, B. D. (2021). Beyond transition: Personal and social transformation through co-inquiry among military-connected students. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 61(3) 313-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167819841702

Mendez, S., Witkowsky, P., Morris, P., Brosseau, J., & Nicholson, H. (2018). Student Veteran Experiences in a Transition Seminar Course: Exploring the Thriving Transition Cycle. Journal of Veterans Studies, 3(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21061/jvs.v3i2.52

Morris, P., Albanesi, H. P., & Cassidy, S. (2019). Student-Veterans’ Perceptions of Barriers, Support, and Environment at a High-Density Veteran Enrollment Campus. Journal of Veterans Studies, 4(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.21061/jvs.v4i2.102

Morris, P., McNamee, M., & St. Louis, K. (2021). Assessing the Impact of Military Cultural-Competence Training: Lessons for Creating an Inclusive Campus Environment. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2021.1938804

Osborne, N. J. (2013). Veteran ally: Practical strategies for closing the military-civilian gap on campus. Innovative Higher Education, 39 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9274-z

Persky, K. R., & Oliver, D. E. (2010). Veterans Coming Home to the Community College: Linking Research to Practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 35(1–2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2011.525184

Rumann, C. B., & Hamrick, F. A. (2010). Student veterans in transition: Re-enrolling after warzone deployments. The Journal of Higher Education, 81, 431-458

Vacchi, D. T. & Berger, J. B. (2014). Student veterans in higher education. In. M. Paulson (ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 93–151). Netherlands: Springer.

Williams-Klotz, D. N., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (n.d.). Identifying the Camouflage: Uncovering and Supporting the Transition Experiences of Military and Veteran Students. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 29(1), 16.

  • Annual Results
  • Publications & Presentations
  • NSSE Essentials
  • NSSE Sightings (blog)
    • Search Posts

Evidence-Based Improvement in Higher Education resources and social media channels

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

RELATED SITES

  • Center for Postsecondary Research
  • Indiana University Bloomington School of Education

Evidence-Based Improvement in Higher Education

Center for Postsecondary Research
Indiana University School of Education
201 N. Rose Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405-1006
Phone: 812.856.5824
Contact Us


NSSE, FSSE, BCSSE, and the column logo are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Accessibility | Privacy Notice | Copyright © 2021 The Trustees of Indiana University

Center for Postsecondary Research | Indiana University Bloomington School of Education